A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports

Bucak, Umur; Demirel, Hakan; Mollaoglu, Mahmut

doi:10.5505/jems.2019.15238

A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports

Mahmut MOLLAOĞLU, (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Umur BUCAK, (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, Zonguldak, Türkiye)

Hakan DEMİREL (Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, Zonguldak, Türkiye)

Journal of Eta Maritime Science

10 1

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 294 - 303 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2019.15238 İndeks Tarihi: 01-06-2020

A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports

Öz:

In recent years, the concept of sustainability has come to the forefront as a requirement of strategicmanagement in ports. The safety component which has an important place in the social dimensionof sustainability, is very valuable in terms of minimizing occupational accidents at the port area. Inorder to take precautions against the threat of occupational accidents, understanding the risks causeingoccupational accidents are as important as knowing how these accidents occur. The aim of this studyis to identify risks in port area that cause Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) violations and toreveal prominent risks as a result of expert reviews. Fuzzy AHP method is employed to analyze priorityperception of the experts. Accordingly, risks; ‘Overconfidence and Disengagement’, ‘Inter-Departmentand In-Department Communication Gap’, ‘Lack of Attention’, ‘Failure to Take Required Precautionsduring Repair and Maintenance’ have come into prominence in comparison to other factors. It can beconcluded that human factor and communication level have vital role to provide OHS in port area.Keywords: Occupational Health and Safety, Port Area, Fuzzy AHP, Human Factor.

Anahtar Kelime:

Limanlarda İş Kazalarına Neden Olabilecek Faktörlere İlişkin Nicel Bir Analiz

Öz:

Son yıllarda limanlarda, stratejik yönetimin bir gereği olarak sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ön plana çıkmaktadır. Sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal boyutu içerisinde önemli bir yer tutan emniyet unsuru, liman sahasında iş kazalarının minimize edilmesi kapsamında oldukça değerlidir. İş kazası tehdidine karşı önlem alabilmek adına iş kazalarına neden olan riskleri kavramak, bu kazaların nasıl gerçekleştiğini bilmek kadar önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı liman sahasında iş sağlığı ve güvenliği ihlallerine sebep olabilecek riskleri tanımlamak ve uzman değerlendirmeleri sonucu öne çıkan riskleri ortaya koymaktır. Uzmanların öncelik algısının analiz edilmesinde Bulanık AHP yöntemine başvurulmuştur. Buna göre, ‘Aşırı Güven ve İşi Boş Verme’, ‘Birimler Arası ve Birim İçi İletişim Kopukluğu’, ‘Dikkat Eksikliği’ ve ‘Bakım ve Onarım Sırasında Gerekli Önlemlerin Alınmaması’ gibi riskler diğer kriterlere nazaran çok daha fazla ön plana çıkmıştır. Böylece insan faktörü ve iletişim düzeyinin liman sahasında İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliğinin sağlanmasında çok önemli bir role sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Çiçek, Ö., & Öçal, M. (2016). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de İş Sağliği ve İş Güvenliğinin Tarihsel Gelişimi. Hak İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 5(11), 106-129.
[2] UNCTAD (2009). Review of Maritime Transport, New York and Geneva: UNCTAD Publishing.
[3] Ozbas, B. (2013). Safety risk analysis of maritime transportation: review of the literature. Transportation Research Record, 2326(1), 32-38.
[4] Nielsen, D., & Panayides, P. M. (2005). Causes of casualties and the regulation of occupational health and safety in the shipping industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 4(2), 147-167.
[5] Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53-68.
[6] Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53-61.
[7] Sarathy, R. (2006). Security and the global supply chain. Transportation Journal, 28-51.
[8] Antão, P., Calderón, M., Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C., & Darbra, R. M. (2016). Identification of occupational health, safety, security (OHSS) and environmental performance indicators in port areas. Safety Science, 85, 266-275.
[9] Yang, C. C., & Wei, H. H. (2013). The effect of supply chain security management on security performance in container shipping operations. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 74-85.
[10] Walters, D., James, P., Sampson, H., Bhattacharya, S., Xue, C., & Wadsworth, E. (2016). Supply chain leverage and regulating health and safety management in shipping. Industrial Relations, 71(1), 33-56.
[11] Gutierrez, X., & Hintsa, J. (2006, May). Voluntary supply chain security programs: a systematic comparison. In The International Conference on Information Systems, Logistics and Supply Chain, Lyon, France.
[12] Uğurlu, Ö., Köse, E., Yıldırım, U., & Yüksekyıldız, E. (2015). Marine accident analysis for collision and grounding in oil tanker using FTA method. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(2), 163-185.
[13] Özdemir, Ü., Altinpinar, İ., & Demirel, F. B. (2018). A MCDM approach with fuzzy AHP method for occupational accidents on board. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 12.
[14] Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety science, 103, 124-136.
[15] Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2017). Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(2), 187- 202.
[16] Yilmaz, N., & Senol, M. B. (2017). İş sağlığı ve güvenliği risk değerlendirme süreci için bulanık çok kriterli bir model ve uygulaması. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32(1), 77-87.
[17] Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
[18] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338- 353.
[19] Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241.
[20] Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247.
[21] Chang D, Y. (1996). Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
[22] Chan, F. T., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHPbased approach. Omega, 35(4), 417- 431.
[23] Turklim (2018). Türk Limancılık Sektörü 2018 Raporu. İstanbul: Türklim Yayınları.

APA	Mollaoglu M, Bucak U, Demirel H (2019). A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. , 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
Chicago	Mollaoglu Mahmut,Bucak Umur,Demirel Hakan A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. (2019): 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
MLA	Mollaoglu Mahmut,Bucak Umur,Demirel Hakan A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. , 2019, ss.294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
AMA	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. . 2019; 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
Vancouver	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. . 2019; 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
IEEE	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H "A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports." , ss.294 - 303, 2019. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
ISNAD	Mollaoglu, Mahmut vd. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports". (2019), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2019.15238

APA	Mollaoglu M, Bucak U, Demirel H (2019). A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 7(4), 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
Chicago	Mollaoglu Mahmut,Bucak Umur,Demirel Hakan A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 7, no.4 (2019): 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
MLA	Mollaoglu Mahmut,Bucak Umur,Demirel Hakan A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.7, no.4, 2019, ss.294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
AMA	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2019; 7(4): 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
Vancouver	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2019; 7(4): 294 - 303. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
IEEE	Mollaoglu M,Bucak U,Demirel H "A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 7, ss.294 - 303, 2019. 10.5505/jems.2019.15238
ISNAD	Mollaoglu, Mahmut vd. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Factors That May Cause Occupational Accidents at Ports". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 7/4 (2019), 294-303. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2019.15238