Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 196 - 201 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2020

Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens

Öz:
Objective: For a suspected diagnosis of acute appendicitis, appendectomy is one of the most common emergency abdominal operations performed.However, the need for routine histopathological examination (HPE) of all appendectomy specimens has recently been questioned. The aim of thisstudy was to assess whether a routine HPE of appendectomy specimens is needed and whether routine HPE has an impact on further management ofpatients.Material and Methods: From January 2009 to June 2017, all histopathology reports of 4012 consecutive appendectomy specimens for a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis were retrospectively analyzed in two university hospitals.Results: Out of the 4012 cases, 3530 (88%) patients showed findings consistent with acute appendicitis on HPE. Perforation rate was 5.8% and wassignificantly higher in male patients (p< 0.001) and higher in the > 30 years age group (p= 0.024). Negative appendectomy rate was 5.6% and was significantly higher in female patients (p< 0.001). There were 256 (6.4%) patients who demonstrated unusual findings in their HPE, which included chronicappendicitis (n= 207; 5.2%) patients, Enterobius vermicularis (n= 14), Schistosoma (n= 8), Crohn’s disease (n= 1), neuroma (n= 10), carcinoid tumour (n= 5)and mucinous cystadenoma (n= 5), mucocele (n= 4) and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (n= 2).Conclusion: HPE of the appendix does not only confirm the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but also detects other unusual diagnoses that may havean impact on a patient’s management. A number of patients with unusual histopathological findings require anti-helmentic treatment, colectomy,gastroenterology follow-up or periodic surveillance. Hence, all appendectomy specimens must be submitted for routine HPE.
Anahtar Kelime:

Apendektomi örneklerinin rutin histopatolojik incelemesinin hasta yönetimine etkisi: 4012 apendektomi örneği

Öz:
Giriş ve Amaç: Akut apandisit tanısı şüphenilen durumlarda apendektomi en yaygın acil abdomen ameliyatlarından birini oluşturmaktadır. Ancak, tüm apendektomi örneklerinin rutin histopatolojik değerlendirilmesi (HPE) son yıllarda tartışılan bir konu olmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, apendektomi örneklerine HPE yapılmasının gerekli olup olmadığını ve HPE’nin detaylı hasta yönetiminde bir etkiye sahip olup olmadığını ortaya koymaktı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2009-Haziran 2017 tarihleri arasında akut apandisit klinik şüphesiyle 4012 ardışık apendektomi örneklerinin histopatolojik raporları iki üniversite hastanesinde retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Toplam 4012 olgu içerisinde, 3530 (%88)’u, HPE’de akut apandisit ile uyumlu bulgular gösterdi. Perforasyon oranı %5,8 ve anlamlı derecede erkeklerde (p< 0,001) ve > 30 yaş grubunda daha yüksekti (p= 0,024). Negatif apendektomi oranı %5,6 idi ve kadın hastalarda anlamlı şekilde daha yüksek bulundu (p< 0,001). 256 (%6,4) hastanın HPE’sinde olağandışı bulgulara rastlandı; bunlar sırasıyla kronik apandisit hastaları (n= 207; %5,2), Enterobius vermicularis (n= 14), Schistosoma (n= 8), Crohn’s hastalığı (n= 1), nöroma (n= 10), karsinoid tümör (n= 5), musinöz kistadenoma (n= 5), mukosel (n= 4) ve musinöz kistadenokarsinoma (n= 2) idi. Sonuç: Apandiste yapılan hem akut apandisit tanısını doğrular hem de hasta yönetimine etki edebilecek diğer olağandışı tanıları tespit eder. Olağandışı histopatolojik buğusu olan birkaç hasta anti-helmentik tedavi, kolektomi, gastroenteroloji takibi veya periyodik takip gerektirmektedir. Bu yüzden, tüm appendektomi örneklerine rutin HPE yapılmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Emre A, Akbulut S, Bozdag Z, Yilmaz M, Kanlioz M, Emre R, et al. Routi-ne histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: retros-pective analysis of 1255 patients. Int Surg 2013; 98: 354-62. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, Cheung MT. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 cases of appendici-tis. Hong Kong Med J 2010; 16: 12-7.
  • 3. Omiyale AO, Adjepong S. Histopathological correlations of appendec-tomies: a clinical audit of a single center. Ann Transl Med 2015; 3: 119.
  • 4. Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, Ubbink DT, Bemelman WA. Is routine histopat-hological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A syste-matic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1214-21. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Martellucci J, Fontani A, Tanzini G. Is routine pathological examinati-on necessary in appendectomy for acute appendicitis? Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1243.
  • 6. Oguntola AS, Adeoti ML, Oyemolade TA. Appendicitis: Trends in in-cidence, age, sex, and seasonal variations in South-Western Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2010; 9: 213-7.
  • 7. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 745-9.
  • 8. Chandrasegaram MD, Rothwell LA, An EI, Miller RJ. Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens. ANZ J Surg 2012; 82: 844-7.
  • 9. Shreshtha R, Ranabhat SR, Tiwari M. Histopathological analysis of ap-pendectomy specimens. J Pathol Nepal 2012; 2: 215-9.
  • 10. Charfi S, Sellami A, Affes A, Yaïch K, Mzali R, Boudawaraet TS. Histo-pathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a study of 24,697 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29: 1009-12.
  • 11. van Rossem CC, Bolmers MD, Schreinemacher MH, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA. Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2015; 103: 144-51.
  • 12. Jat MA, Al-Swailmi FK, Mehmood Y, Alrowaili M, Alanazi S. Histopat-hological examination of appendicectomy specimens at a district hospital of Saudi Arabia. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31: 891-4.
  • 13. de Burlet KJ, Crane G, Cullinane R, Larsen PD, Dennett ER. Review of appendicectomies over a decade in a tertiary hospital in New Zea-land. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88: 1253-7.
  • 14. Dincel O, Göksu M, Türk BA, Pehlivanoğlu B, İşler S. Incidental findings in routine histopathological examination of appendectomy speci-mens; retrospective analysis of 1970 patients. Indian J Surg 2018; 80: 48-53.
  • 15. Rehman S, Khan AI, Ansari HA, Alam F, Vasenwala SM, Alam K, et al. Retrospective analysis of appendicectomy specimens: A tertiary care center-based study. Saudi Surg J 2017; 5: 71-5. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Yabanoglu H, Caliskan K, Ozgur Aytac H, Turk E, Karagulle E, Kayasel-cuk F, et al. Unusual findings in appendectomy specimens of adults: retrospective analyses of 1466 patients and a review of literature. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16:e12931. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Gali BM, Nggada HA. Schistosomiasis of the appendix in Maiduguri. Trop Doctor 2006; 36: 162-3. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Machado NO, Chopra PJ, Hamdani AA. Crohn’s disease of the appen-dix with enterocutaneous fistula post-appendicectomy: An approach to management. N Am J Med Sci. 2010 Mar; 2: 158-61.
  • 19. Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu S, Arikanoglu Z, Basbug M, Ulku A, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: A retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1961-70. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Demetrashvili Z, Chkhaidze M, Khutsishvili K, Topchishvili G, Javak-hishvili T, Pipia I, et al. Mucocele of the appendix: case report and revi-ew of literature. Int Surg 2012; 97: 266-9. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Yilmaz M, Akbulut S, Kutluturk K, Sahin N, Arabaci E, Ara C, et al. Unu-sual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 4015-22. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Patel AV, Friedman M, MacDermott RP. Crohn’s disease patient with right lower quadrant abdominal pain for 20 years due to an appen-diceal neuroma (fibrous obliteration of the appendix). Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16: 1093-4. [CrossRef]
APA Elfaedy O, BENKHADOURA M, Elshaikhy A, Elgazwi K (2019). Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. , 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
Chicago Elfaedy Osama,BENKHADOURA Mohamed,Elshaikhy Akrem,Elgazwi Khaled Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. (2019): 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
MLA Elfaedy Osama,BENKHADOURA Mohamed,Elshaikhy Akrem,Elgazwi Khaled Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. , 2019, ss.196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
AMA Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. . 2019; 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
Vancouver Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. . 2019; 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
IEEE Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K "Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens." , ss.196 - 201, 2019. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
ISNAD Elfaedy, Osama vd. "Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens". (2019), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
APA Elfaedy O, BENKHADOURA M, Elshaikhy A, Elgazwi K (2019). Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Surgery, 35(3), 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
Chicago Elfaedy Osama,BENKHADOURA Mohamed,Elshaikhy Akrem,Elgazwi Khaled Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Surgery 35, no.3 (2019): 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
MLA Elfaedy Osama,BENKHADOURA Mohamed,Elshaikhy Akrem,Elgazwi Khaled Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Surgery, vol.35, no.3, 2019, ss.196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
AMA Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2019; 35(3): 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
Vancouver Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Surgery. 2019; 35(3): 196 - 201. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
IEEE Elfaedy O,BENKHADOURA M,Elshaikhy A,Elgazwi K "Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens." Turkish Journal of Surgery, 35, ss.196 - 201, 2019. 10.5578/turkjsurg.4253
ISNAD Elfaedy, Osama vd. "Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens". Turkish Journal of Surgery 35/3 (2019), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.5578/turkjsurg.4253