Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education

Serhat ERCAN, (Sinop Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Sinop, Türkiye)
Esra BOZKURT ALTAN, (Sinop Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Sinop, Türkiye)
Bekir TAŞTAN, (Sinop Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Sinop)
İbrahim DAĞ (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Sinop, Türkiye)
Journal of Turkish Science Education
3 0
Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 13 Sayı: Sayfa Aralığı: 30 - 43 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 01-07-2020

Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education

Öz:
STEM stands for science, technology, engineering and mathematics and is an approach to educationthat aims to integrate these four separate disciplines. In theory, the idea of integration is clear, but inpractice in a school setting it proves to be problematic due to the current structure of the educationalcurricula. In the current structure of educational curricula, usually only mathematics and science coursesfrom STEM disciplines are included in school programmes and these courses are conducted in an isolatedmanner separate from other disciplines. This problem may be overcome by using interrelated applicationssuch as the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to integrate mathematics and science courses withinSTEM disciplines. As an interdisciplinary technology, GIS serves as a pedagogical tool for use in STEMeducation. Using a qualitative research paradigm, the current study evaluated a sample of junior (thirdyear) science teacher candidates (N=34) in a STEM educational setting using GIS. The data was collectedfrom the written science texts of teacher candidates (e.g. the role of GIS in STEM teaching and scienceteaching; the implementation of STEM education in science classes) before and after the teachingintervention. At the end of the study, it was discovered that a four-week long teaching intervention had apositive effect on the science teacher candidates’ views of implementing STEM as well as improvingtheir views on and awareness of GIS.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adamuti-Trache, M. & Sweet, R. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and math readiness: ethno-linguistic and gender differences in high-school course selection patterns, International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 610-634.
  • Aladag, E. (2014). An evaluation of geographic information systems in social studies lessons: teachers’ views. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1533-1539.
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J. & Dillon, J. (2014). ‘It didn’t really change my opinion’: exploring what works, what doesn’t and why in a school science, technology, engineering and mathematics careers intervention. Research in Science & Technological Education, 32(1), 35-55.
  • Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 84-125.
  • Audet, R. H. and Abegg, G. L. (1996 ). Geographic information systems: implications for problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching ,33( 1), 21-45.
  • Audet, H., & Paris, J. (1997). GIS implementation model for schools: assessing the critical concerns. Journal of Geography, 96(6), 293-300.
  • Baker, T. R. & White, S. H. (2003) The effects of G.I.S. on students' attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 243-254.
  • Baker, T. (2012). Advancing STEM Education with GIS. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/library/ebooks/advancingstem-education-with-gis.pdf.
  • Beane, J. A. (1991). The middle school: the natural home of the integrated curriculum. Educational Leaders, 49, 9-13.
  • Bowers, S. W. (2015). Supporting Elementary Education In-Service Teachers’ Proficiency In Planning Stem-Centric Lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
  • Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  • Chiu, A., Price, C. A. & Ovrahim, E. (2015). supporting elementary and middle school STEM education at the whole school level: a review of the literature. NARST 2015 Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
  • Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-12.
  • Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39 (171), 74-85.
  • Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In 6th Biennial international conference on technology education research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
  • Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B. & Orady, E. A. (2014). urban high school students’ IT/stem learning: findings from a collaborative inquiry- and design-based afterschool program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23,116–137.
  • Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N. & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011), Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (1), 94-116.
  • English, L. D. (2015). STEM: Challenges and opportunities for mathematics education. Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME, Hobart, Tas, pp. 4-18.
  • Glancy, A. W. & Moore, T. J., (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM Learning Environments. Engineering Education Working Papers. Paper 1. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76.
  • Harrel, P. E. (2010). Teaching an integrated science curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and teaching assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, 19(1), 145-165.
  • Henry, P. & Semple, H. (2012) Integrating online GIS into the K–12 curricula: Lessons from the development of a collaborative GIS in Michigan. Journal of Geography, 111(1), 3- 14.
  • Kerski, J. J. (2003) The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102(3), 128- 137.
  • Kerski, J. J. (2008). The role of GIS in digital earth education. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1(4), 326-346.
  • Kerski J. J., (2011). “Sleepwalking into the Future – The Case for Spatial Analysis Throughout Education” in Jekel T., Koller A., Donert K. & Vogler R. (Eds.), Learning with GI 2011 – Implementing Digital Earth in Education, Berlin, Wichmann Verlag, 2- 11.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2013). Is it STEM or “S & M” that we truly love?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(8), 1237-1240.
  • MEB (2013). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/guncellenen-ogretimprogramlari-ve-kurul-kararlari/icerik/150
  • Meng, C. C., Idris, N., & Eu, L. K. (2014). Secondary students' perceptions of assessments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 219-227.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Meyer, J. W., Butterick, J., Olkin, M. & Zack, G. (1999) GIS in the K-12 curriculum: A cautionary note. The Professional Geographer, 51(4), 571-578.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education?. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
  • Nugent, N., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088.
  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. (2009). The use of digital manipulatives in K-12: robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio.
  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. (2010). Impact of Robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391-408.
  • Patterson, M. W., Reeve, K., & Page, D. (2003). Integrating geographic information systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 275-281
  • Pitt, J. (2009) Blurring the boundaries – STEM education and education for sustainable development. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 37- 48.
  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Oliver, S., & Johnson, D. (2006). A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 13-24.
  • Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş/nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Roberts, A., & Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM instructional strategies to design and technology curriculum. Proceedings of the Technology Education in the 21st Century, Stockholm; Sweden. 111-118.
  • Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-4.
  • Sampurno, P. J., Sari, Y. A. & Wijaya, A. D. (2015). Integrating STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) and disaster (STEM-D) education for building students’ disaster literacy. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 73-76.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
  • Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Fostering pre-service STEM teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge: A lesson learned from case-based learning approach. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(8), 1356-1366.
  • Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J. & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 27-34.
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu [TÜBİTAK]. (2004). Ulusal bilim ve teknoloji politikaları, 2003-2023 strateji belgesi. Retrieved from, www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak content.../Vizyon2023 Strateji Belgesi.pdf
  • TUSIAD (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik alanında eğitim almış iş gücüne yönelik talep ve beklentiler araştırması. Retrieved from, http://www.tusiad.org.tr/__rsc/shared/file/STEM-ipsos-rapor.pdf.
  • Wang, H. (2012). A new era of science education: science teachers‘ perceptions and classroom practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  • Whitaker, D. (2011). Using geographic information systems in science classrooms. Educar em Revista, Curitiba, Brasil, 40, 1-68.
  • Williams, P.J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal. 16(1), 27-35.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
APA ERCAN S, BOZKURT ALTAN E, TAŞTAN B, DAĞ İ (2016). Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. , 30 - 43.
Chicago ERCAN Serhat,BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,TAŞTAN Bekir,DAĞ İbrahim Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. (2016): 30 - 43.
MLA ERCAN Serhat,BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,TAŞTAN Bekir,DAĞ İbrahim Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. , 2016, ss.30 - 43.
AMA ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. . 2016; 30 - 43.
Vancouver ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. . 2016; 30 - 43.
IEEE ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ "Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education." , ss.30 - 43, 2016.
ISNAD ERCAN, Serhat vd. "Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education". (2016), 30-43.
APA ERCAN S, BOZKURT ALTAN E, TAŞTAN B, DAĞ İ (2016). Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(), 30 - 43.
Chicago ERCAN Serhat,BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,TAŞTAN Bekir,DAĞ İbrahim Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education 13, no. (2016): 30 - 43.
MLA ERCAN Serhat,BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,TAŞTAN Bekir,DAĞ İbrahim Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol.13, no., 2016, ss.30 - 43.
AMA ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2016; 13(): 30 - 43.
Vancouver ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2016; 13(): 30 - 43.
IEEE ERCAN S,BOZKURT ALTAN E,TAŞTAN B,DAĞ İ "Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education." Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, ss.30 - 43, 2016.
ISNAD ERCAN, Serhat vd. "Integrating GIS into Science Classes to Handle STEM Education". Journal of Turkish Science Education 13/ (2016), 30-43.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 12:29

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları