Yıl: 2016 Cilt: 13 Sayı: Sayfa Aralığı: 103 - 117 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 01-07-2020

STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies

Öz:
This study focused on the professional development activities carried out at Sinop University during thesummer of 2015. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of the professional developmentprogram on the participating science teachers’ perceptions and competencies as they relate to STEMeducation. 24 science teachers were participated the program which was organized to promote theiracquisition of the competencies necessary for the development and implementation of original activitiessuitable for STEM education. The study was carried out through qualitative paradigm. One of the datasources used was to “Teachers’ Perceptions on STEM Education Questionnaire”. STEM educationteaching plans which were developed by teachers during the program were the other data sources used bythe study. Findings from the TPSEQ suggest that the professional development program positivelyaffected teachers’ views of STEM education. Additionally, after the professional development program,participating teachers made suggestions for the (engineering) design based science instruction for theadaption of STEM education. It can be suggested that in-service training programs should be developedfor teachers to raise their awareness of the necessity of STEM education and to enhance theircompetencies in planning, implementation and evaluation of an instructional process suitable for thisapproach.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R. and Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.
  • Arafah, M. M. (2011). But what does this have to do with science? Building the case for engineering in K-12. Master Thesis, Cleveland State University.
  • Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., and Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 84-125.
  • Bogden, R. C. and Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Brophy,S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
  • Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A. and Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301-309.
  • Capobianco, B. M. (2011). Exploring a science teacher’s uncertainty with integrating engineering design: an action research study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 645-660.
  • Capobianco, B. M. (2013). Learning and teaching science through engineering design: insights and implications for professional development. Association for Science Teacher Education, Charleston, SC.
  • Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
  • Cuijck, L. V., Keulen, H. V., & Jochems, W. (2009). Are primary school teachers ready for inquiry and design based technology education?. Retrieved from http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT22/Cuijck.pdf
  • Dugger, E. W. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research. Australia. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf
  • Felix, A. L. (2010). Design-based science for STEM Student recruitment and teacher professional development. Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Villanova University.
  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. and Airasian, R. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Householder, D. L. and Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating engineering design challenges into STEM courses. NCETE Publications. (Paper 166).
  • Hsu, M-C., Purzer S. & Cardella M.E., (2011). Elementary teachers’ views about teaching design, engineering and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research,1(2),31–39.
  • ITEA. (2007). Standards for technological literacy: content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from www.iteaconnect.ora/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf
  • Miaoulis, I. (2009). Engineering the K-12 curriculum for technological innovation. IEEEUSA Today’s Engineer Online.
  • Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE]. (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education?. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Academy of Engineering [NAE] & National Research Council [NRC] (2009). Engineering in K-12 education understanding the status and improving the prospects. Edt. Katehi, L., Pearson, G. & Feder, M. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
  • Next Generations Science Standards [NGGS]. (2013). The next generation science standardsexecutive summary. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Final%20Release%20NGSS%20Front% 20Matter%20-%206.17.13%20Update_0.pdf
  • Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-4.
  • Roehrig, G.H., Moore, T.J., Wang, H.-H., & Park, M.S. (2012). Is adding the E enough?: Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44.
  • Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  • Sungur Gül, K. & Marulcu, İ. (2014). Investigation of in service and pre-service science teachers’ perspectives about engineering-design as an instructional method and legos as an instructional material. International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 761-786.
  • Wang, H. (2012). A New Era of Science Education: Science Teachers‘ Perceptions and Classroom Practices of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
  • Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
  • Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM education: proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 16(1), 26-35.
  • Yasar, S., Baker, D., Robinson-Kurpius, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers’ perceptions of engineers and familiarity with teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Engineering Education, 205-216.
APA BOZKURT ALTAN E, ERCAN S (2016). STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. , 103 - 117.
Chicago BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,ERCAN Serhat STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. (2016): 103 - 117.
MLA BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,ERCAN Serhat STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. , 2016, ss.103 - 117.
AMA BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. . 2016; 103 - 117.
Vancouver BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. . 2016; 103 - 117.
IEEE BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S "STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies." , ss.103 - 117, 2016.
ISNAD BOZKURT ALTAN, Esra - ERCAN, Serhat. "STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies". (2016), 103-117.
APA BOZKURT ALTAN E, ERCAN S (2016). STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(), 103 - 117.
Chicago BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,ERCAN Serhat STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education 13, no. (2016): 103 - 117.
MLA BOZKURT ALTAN Esra,ERCAN Serhat STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol.13, no., 2016, ss.103 - 117.
AMA BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2016; 13(): 103 - 117.
Vancouver BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 2016; 13(): 103 - 117.
IEEE BOZKURT ALTAN E,ERCAN S "STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies." Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, ss.103 - 117, 2016.
ISNAD BOZKURT ALTAN, Esra - ERCAN, Serhat. "STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies". Journal of Turkish Science Education 13/ (2016), 103-117.