Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 130 - 142 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.30613/curesosc.556600 İndeks Tarihi: 27-08-2020
Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış
Öz: Wittgenstein 20. yüzyılın ilk yarısında Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus adlı yapıtında felsefeninöldüğünü ve felsefede bugüne kadar sorulmuş tüm soruların çözümünü bulduğunu iddia etmiştir.Daha sonraları dünyayı dolaşmış ve özellikle zamanını Kierkegaard ve Nietzsche okuyarakgeçirdikten sonra erken dönemlerinde savunduğu düşüncelerini değiştirmiş ve hem dilfelsefesinde hem de bilim felsefesinde paradigmatik bir değişikliğin ilk zeminini ortayakoymuştur. Sosyal bilimlerin genelinde olduğu gibi psikoloji de bu değişimlerden veWittgenstein’ın felsefesinden paradigmatik düzeyde etkilenmiştir. Bu yazıda genel olarakWittgenstein’ın felsefesinin psikolojiyle ve bugünün sosyal psikolojisiyle olan ilişkisi eleştirelolarak incelenmiştir. Özel olarak ise, Wittgenstein’ın felsefesinin, eleştirel psikoloji akımınınortaya çıkmasına ve ana akım psikolojideki bağlamdan kopuk, birey odaklı yaklaşımlarınirdelenmesine katkı sunduğunu savunuyoruz. Bu argümanı savunmak için ilk olarak psikolojininve özel olarak sosyal psikolojinin kısa bir tarihi verilecektir. Daha sonrasında erken dönem ve geçdönem olarak ayırdığımız iki farklı Wittgenstein portresi anlatılacak ve son olarakWittgenstein’ın çalışmalarının psikolojik çalışmalara olan etkisi tartışılacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime: A Critical Look at Wittgenstein's Opinions on Psychology
Öz: In the first half of the twentieth century, Wittgenstein claimed that philosophy is ended in his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and that he found the solution to all questions previously asked in philosophy. He later traveled the world and changed his mind in the early stages of his work, especially after reading Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Psychology was also influenced by these changes as in the other social sciences and was influenced by the philosophy of Wittgenstein at the paradigmatic level. In this paper, the relationship of Wittgenstein's philosophy with the science of psychology and with contemporary social psychology in general is critically examined. Specifically, we argue that Wittgenstein's philosophy contributed to the emergence of the critical psychology movement and led mainstream psychology to scrutinize their decontextualized and individual-focused approach. In order to support this argument, a brief history of psychology in general and social psychology in particular will be given first. Then, two different portraits of Wittgenstein, which we call as the early and late periods of him, will be explained and finally, the impact of Wittgenstein's work on psychological studies will be discussed.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Baker, G. P. (1984). On the very idea of a form of life. Inquiry, 27, 277-289.
- Burge, T. (1986). Intellectual norms and foundations of mind. Journal of Philosophy, LXXXIII(12), 649-663.
- Budd, M. (1989). Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. London: Routledge.
- Farr, R. M. (1991). The long past and the short history of social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(5), 371-380.
- Feyerabend, P. (1978). Science in a free society. London: NLB.
- Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego (Standard edition, 18). London: Hogarth
- Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
- Gibson, J. J. (1986/1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Harré, R. (Ed.) (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Harré, R. & Gillet, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
- Heidegger, M. (2008/1927). Varlık ve zaman (K. H. Ökten, çev.). İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı.
- Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107-112.
- Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 107-117.
- Hortaçsu, N. (2012). En güzel psikoloji sosyal psikoloji. Ankara: İmge Kitapevi
- Husserl, E. (2010/1907). Fenomenoloji üzerine beş ders (H. Tepe, çev.). Bilgesu Yayıncılık, Ankara.
- Hyman, J. (Ed.). (1991). Investigating psychology. London: Routledge.
- Jost, J. T. (1995). Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development, Theory & Psychology, 5(1), 5-25.
- Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Le Bon, G. (1896/1960) The crowd: A study of the popular mind [La psychologie des foules]. Viking Press. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 1896)
- Lundgren, D. C. (2011). Social feedback and self-appraisals: Current status of the Mead-Cooley hypothesis, Symbolic Interaction, 27(2), 267-286.
- Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (2011). The making of social psychology. In A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.). Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 3-17). New York: Francis & Taylor.
- Kuhn, S. T. (2000/1962). Bilimsel devrimlerin yapısı (N. Kuyaş, çev.), İstanbul: Alan Yayınevi.
- McDougall, W. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.
- McDougall, W. (1921). The group mind: A sketch oJ the principles oj collective psychology with some attempt to apply them to the interpretation oJ national life and character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Mead, G. H. (1956). On social psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Osgood, C. E. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42-55.
- Parker, I. (Ed.) (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: Sage.
- Pepitone, A. (1981). Lessons from the history of social psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 972-985.
- Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123-205.
- Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Rorty, R. (1977). Wittgensteinian philosophy and empirical psychology. Philosophical Studies, 31, 151-172.
- Rosenberg, M. J. & Abelson, R. P. (1960). An analysis of cognitive balancing. In M.J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland. W. J. McGuire, R.P. Abelson & J. W. Brehm (Eds.) Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 112-163). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Ross, E. A. (1908). Social psychology. New York: Macmillan.
- Sherif, M. (1937). An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. Sociometry, 1(1/2), 90-98.
- Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. (1961). Inter-group conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oaklahoma Press.
- Shotter, J. (1992). Social constructionism and realism: Adequacy or accuracy? Theory and Psychology, 2, 175-182.
- Shotter, J. (1996). Wittgenstein in practice: from the way of theory to a social poetics. In C. W. Tolman, F. Cherry, R., van Hezewijk & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of theoretical psychology (pp. 181-193). North York, Ontario: Captus Press.
- Shotter, J. & Katz, A. M. (1996). Articulating practices: Methods and experiences. Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: Establishing formative dialogues by the use of a “Social Poetics.” Concepts and Transformations, 2, 213- 237.
- Sullivan, G. B. (2000). Wittgenstein and social constructionism: “Methods of social poetics” or “Knots in our thinking”?. In Morss, J., Stephenson, N. & Van Rappard, H. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in psychology. Proceedings of the International Society for Theoretical Psychology 1999 Conference (pp. 181-193). Kluwer: Dordrecht.
- Sullivan, G. B. (2015). Wittgenstein’s later philosophy and “pictures” of mixed-method research in psychology: A critical investigation of theories and accounts of methodological plurality. Theory & Psychology, 25(4), 473- 493.
- Suter, R. (1989). Interpreting Wittgenstein: A cloud of philosophy, a drop of grammar. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Swanson, G. E. (1961). Mead and Freud: Their relevance for social psychology. Sociometry, 24(4), 319-339.
- Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Taylor, D. M. & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger.
- Van Dijk, L. & Withagen, R. (2014). The horizontal worldview: A Wittgensteinian attitude towards scientific psychology. Theory & Psychology, 24(1), 3-18.
- Williams, M. (1985). Wittgenstein’s rejection of scientific psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15(2), 203-223.
- Wittgenstein, L. (2006/1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (O. Aruoba, çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayıncılık.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Notes for lectures on “private experience” and “sense data”. The Philosophical Review, 77, 271-320.
- Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology (Vol. I). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
| APA | Yılmaz O, Bayrak F, ALPER S (2019). Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. , 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| Chicago | Yılmaz Onurcan,Bayrak Fatih,ALPER Sinan Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. (2019): 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| MLA | Yılmaz Onurcan,Bayrak Fatih,ALPER Sinan Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. , 2019, ss.130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| AMA | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. . 2019; 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| Vancouver | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. . 2019; 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| IEEE | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S "Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış." , ss.130 - 142, 2019. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| ISNAD | Yılmaz, Onurcan vd. "Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış". (2019), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| APA | Yılmaz O, Bayrak F, ALPER S (2019). Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Current Research in Social Sciences, 5(2), 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| Chicago | Yılmaz Onurcan,Bayrak Fatih,ALPER Sinan Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Current Research in Social Sciences 5, no.2 (2019): 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| MLA | Yılmaz Onurcan,Bayrak Fatih,ALPER Sinan Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Current Research in Social Sciences, vol.5, no.2, 2019, ss.130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| AMA | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Current Research in Social Sciences. 2019; 5(2): 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| Vancouver | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış. Current Research in Social Sciences. 2019; 5(2): 130 - 142. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| IEEE | Yılmaz O,Bayrak F,ALPER S "Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış." Current Research in Social Sciences, 5, ss.130 - 142, 2019. 10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
| ISNAD | Yılmaz, Onurcan vd. "Wittgenstein’ın Psikoloji Bilimine Dair Görüşlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış". Current Research in Social Sciences 5/2 (2019), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.556600 |
