Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 12 Sayfa Aralığı: 2148 - 2153 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909 İndeks Tarihi: 04-09-2020

Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill)

Öz:
Agricultural developments mostly depend on rapidly increasing world population. Tomato is ahighly nutritious vegetable. Post-harvest technologies are often applied to prolong the consumptionperiods of tomato. Drying is one of the oldest methods of conservation. In this study, five differentdrying methods (oven drying, vacuum oven drying, sensitive drying, shaded-open atmospheredrying and sun drying) was used. Drying processes were carried out with dryers at 55°C, 60°C, 65°Cand 70°C temperatures. All drying trials were performed in three replications. Drying performance(drying duration, final moisture content), drying kinetics, colour analysis, energy consumption,chemical analyses were performed for all drying methods. Fresh samples reached to desired moisturecontents in 20-300 hours. To define time-dependent changes in moisture contents, Page, Logarithmicand Midilli-Küçük equations were used. Page equation yielded the worst estimations. There werenot significant differences in “a” redness values of fresh samples, 65-70C of oven dryer and alltemperatures of sensitive dryer. Sensitive dryer yielded the closet pH values to fresh samples. Basedon current findings, it was concluded that oven drying, and sensitive drying were suitable for dryingSelinus tomato variety.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abushita AA, Daood HG, Biacs PA. 2000. Change In Carotenoids and Antioxidant Vitamins In Tomato As a Function of Variental and Technological Factors. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry. 48, 2075-2081.
  • Agarwal A, Shen H, Agarwal S, Rao AV. 2001. Lycopene Content of Tomato Products: Its Stability. Bioavailability and In Vivo Antioxidant Properties. Journal of Medicinal Food. 4, 915.
  • Aybak ÇH. 2004, Domates, Hasat Yayıncılık, s.278, İstanbul. Çelen S, Kahveci K. 2013. Microwave Drying Behaviour of Tomato Slices. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 31(2), 132–138
  • Cemeroğlu B. 1992. Meyve ve Sebze İşleme. Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metotları. Biltav Üniversite Kitapları Serisi No: 02(2), Ankara, 381.
  • Da Silva MA, Pinedo R, Kieckbusch TG. 2005. Ascorbicacid thermal degradation during hot air drying of camu-camu (Myrciariadubia [H.B.K.] McVaugh) slices at different air temperatures. Drying Technology 23: 2277–2287.
  • Duzyaman E, Duman D. 2003. Dried Tomato as a New Potential in Export and Domestic Market Diversification in Turkey. Proceedings of the Eighth International ISHS Symposium on the Processing Tomato, Acta Horticulturae, 613, 433-436.
  • Güngör A, Kurtuluş E, Akdemir Ö. 2001. Endüstriyel Proseslerde Enerji Geri Kazanımında Isı Pompalarının Kullanımı. V. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi ve Sergisi 3-6 Ekim, 153-182.
  • Günhan T. 2005. Farklı Kurutma Havası Şartlarının Rio Grande Çeşidi Domatesin Kuruma Karakteristiklerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarım Makinaları Anabilimdalı, Doktora Tezi, Bornova-İzmir,
  • Hollman PCH, Hertog MGL, Katan MB. 1996. Analysis anad Health Effects of Flavonoids. Food Chemistry, 57: 43-46.
  • Kocabiyik H, Demirtürk BS. 2008. Nane Yapraklarının İnfrared Radyasyonla Kurutulması. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (3) 239-246.
  • Kocabiyik H, Yilmaz N, Tuncel NB, Sumer SK, Buyukcan MB. 2015. Drying, Energy, and Some Physical and Nutritional Quality Properties of Tomatoes Dried with Short-Infrared Radiation, Food Bioprocess Technol, 8, 516 – 525
  • Konopacka D, Plocharski WJ. 2004. Effect Of Storage Conditions On he Relationship Between Apple Firmness And Texture Acceptability. Postharvest Biology And Tech. 32, 205-211.
  • Maskan M. 2001. Kinetics of colour change of kiwifruits during hot air and microwave drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 48, 169-175.
  • Mcguire RG. 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience, 27, 1254-1255.
  • Menges HO, Ertekin C. 2006. Modelling of Air Drying of Hacihalilioglu-type Apricots. J. Sci. Food Agric. 86, 279– 291.
  • Midilli A, Kucuk H, Yapar ZA. 2002. New Model for SingleLayer Drying, Drying Technology. An International Journal, 20 (7), 1503-1513.
  • Mutlu A, Ergüneş G. 2008. Tokat’ta Güneş Enerjili Raflı Kurutucu İle Domates Kurutma Koşullarının Belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 1 (1), 61-68.
  • Özcan SG, Karabacak ÖA, Tamer CE, Çopur ÖU. 2018. The effect of hot air, vacuum and microwave drying on drying characteristics, rehydration capacity, color, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Kumquat (Citrus japonica). Food Science and Technology, 2018-12-24
  • Özler S, Tarhan S, Ergüneş G. 2004. Kurutulmuş Sebzeler – 2. Cine-tarım Dergisi (62).
  • Page G. 1949. Factorsinfluencing the maximum rates of airdrying shelled corn in thin layers . M. S. Thesis (unpublished) . Purdue University, 1
  • Şahin FH, Ülger P, Aktaş T, Orak HH. 2012. Farklı Önişlemlerin ve Vakum Kurutma Yönteminin Domatesin Kuruma Karakteristikleri ve Kalite Kriterleri Üzerine Etkisi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 15-25.
  • Uzun N, Şen F, Karaçali İ. 2004. Güneşte Kurutulan Domatesin Değişik Koşullarda Saklanmasının Kalite Üzerine Etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 41 (3), 67-75.
  • Vural H, Duman İ. 2000. Güneşte Kurutulmuş Domates Üretimi ve Bu Üretimin Sanayi Domatesi Üretimindeki Yeri. TİGEM Dergisi, sayı 81.
  • Wang J, Sheng K, 2006. Far İnfrared and Microwave Drying of Peach. Lebensmittel- Wissenschaft und Technologie, 39, 247-255.
  • Xu S, Pegg RB, Kerr WL. 2016. Physical and Chemical Properties of Vacuum Belt Dried Tomato Powders, Food Bioprocess Technol 9:91 – 100
  • Yağcioglu A. 1999. Tarımsal Ürünleri Kurutma Tekniği. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No:536. İzmir,
APA Polatcı H, ERKMEN Y (2019). Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). , 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
Chicago Polatcı Hakan,ERKMEN Yücel Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). (2019): 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
MLA Polatcı Hakan,ERKMEN Yücel Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). , 2019, ss.2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
AMA Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). . 2019; 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
Vancouver Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). . 2019; 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
IEEE Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y "Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill)." , ss.2148 - 2153, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
ISNAD Polatcı, Hakan - ERKMEN, Yücel. "Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill)". (2019), 2148-2153. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
APA Polatcı H, ERKMEN Y (2019). Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7(12), 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
Chicago Polatcı Hakan,ERKMEN Yücel Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7, no.12 (2019): 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
MLA Polatcı Hakan,ERKMEN Yücel Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.7, no.12, 2019, ss.2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
AMA Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(12): 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
Vancouver Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(12): 2148 - 2153. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
IEEE Polatcı H,ERKMEN Y "Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill)." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7, ss.2148 - 2153, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909
ISNAD Polatcı, Hakan - ERKMEN, Yücel. "Effects of Different Drying Methods on Modelling, Energy Consumption and Final Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill)". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7/12 (2019), 2148-2153. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909