Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study

aydin, unal; iyigün, taner; timur, bariş; iyigun, muzeyyen; kyaruzi, mugisha

doi:10.9739/tjvs.2019.237

Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study

Taner İYİGÜN, (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Mugisha KYARUZİ, (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Barış TİMUR, (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Müzeyyen İYİGÜN, (Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Ünal AYDIN (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Turkish journal of vascular surgery

1 1

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 23 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237 İndeks Tarihi: 06-10-2020

Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study

Öz:

Objectives: This study aims to compare midterm results of patch angioplasty with primary closure techniques in patients undergoing carotidendarterectomy (CEA) in terms of restenosis.Patients and methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized study included a total of 137 patients (42 females, 95 males; mean age64.4±8.8 years; range 36 to 86 years) who underwent CEA between January 2010 and October 2015. The patients were divided into twogroups: the patch angioplasty group (n=70) and the primary closure group (n=67). The mean follow-up was 2-7 years. Carotid computedtomography angiography was performed to evaluate restenosis. Restenosis was defined as a lesion of >70% in diameter.Results: During midterm follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the restenosis rate between the two surgical closuretechniques (p=0.729).Conclusion: Our study results show that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8.
2. AbuRahma AF. Processes of care for carotid endarterectomy: surgical and anesthesia considerations. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:921-33.
3. de Borst GJ, Zanen P, de Vries JP, van de Pavoordt ED, Ackerstaff RG, Moll FL. Durability of surgery for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:363-71.
4. Bond R, Rerkasem K, AbuRahma AF, Naylor AR, Rothwell PM. Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD000160.
5. Bond R, Rerkasem K, Naylor AR, Aburahma AF, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1126-35.
6. Cheng I, Vyas KS, Velaga S, Davenport DL, Saha SP. Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy with Primary Closure. Int J Angiol 2017;26:83-8.
7. Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA, Naddaf A, El-Shazly OM, Marone L, Makaroun MS. Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques. J Vasc Surg 2016;64:678-83.
8. Archie JP Jr. Prevention of early restenosis and thrombosisocclusion after carotid endarterectomy by saphenous vein patch angioplasty. Stroke 1986;17:901-5.
9. Eikelboom BC, Ackerstaff RG, Hoeneveld H, Ludwig JW, Teeuwen C, Vermeulen FE, et al. Benefits of carotid patching: a randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:240-7.
10. Huizing E, Vos CG, Hulsebos RG, van den Akker PJ, Borst GJ, Ünlü Ç. Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. Surg J (N Y) 2018;4:e96-e101.
11. Murie JA, John TG, Morris PJ. Carotid endarterectomy in Great Britain and Ireland: practice between 1984 and 1992. Br J Surg 1994;81:827-31.
12. Bernstein EF, Torem S, Dilley RB. Does carotid restenosis predict an increased risk of late symptoms, stroke, or death? Ann Surg 1990;212:629-36.
13. Sarp Beyazpınar D, Harman A, Akovalı N, Ersoy Ö, Kayıpmaz Ç, Gültekin B, et al. Our treatment strategies of carotid artery restenoses. Damar Cer Derg 2018;27:71-7.
14. Clagett GP, Rich NM, McDonald PT, Salander JM, Youkey JR, Olson DW, et al. Etiologic factors for recurrent carotid artery stenosis. Surgery 1983;93:313-8.
15. Rossi PJ, Valentine RJ, Myers SI, Brillant PT, Chervu A, Clagett GP. The durability of bilateral carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 1995;9:16-20.
16. AbuRahma AF, Khan JH, Robinson PA, Saiedy S, Short YS, Boland JP, et al. Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: perioperative (30-day) results. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:998-1006.
17. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Saiedy S, Kahn JH, Boland JP. Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:222-34.
18. AbuRahma AF, Choueiri MA. Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after repeat carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:649-54.
19. Uncu H, de Santis F, Fiorani P. Patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy. Damar Cer Derg 1994;3:13-8.
20. Yüksel V, Ozdemir AC, Huseyin S, Guclu O, Turan FN, Canbaz S. Impact of Surgeon Experience During Carotid Endarterectomy Operation and Effects on Perioperative Outcomes. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016;31:444-8.

APA	iyigün t, kyaruzi m, timur b, iyigun m, aydin u (2019). Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. , 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
Chicago	iyigün taner,kyaruzi mugisha,timur bariş,iyigun muzeyyen,aydin unal Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. (2019): 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
MLA	iyigün taner,kyaruzi mugisha,timur bariş,iyigun muzeyyen,aydin unal Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. , 2019, ss.19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
AMA	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. . 2019; 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
Vancouver	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. . 2019; 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
IEEE	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u "Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study." , ss.19 - 23, 2019. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
ISNAD	iyigün, taner vd. "Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study". (2019), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2019.237

APA	iyigün t, kyaruzi m, timur b, iyigun m, aydin u (2019). Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, 28(1), 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
Chicago	iyigün taner,kyaruzi mugisha,timur bariş,iyigun muzeyyen,aydin unal Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery 28, no.1 (2019): 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
MLA	iyigün taner,kyaruzi mugisha,timur bariş,iyigun muzeyyen,aydin unal Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery, vol.28, no.1, 2019, ss.19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
AMA	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery. 2019; 28(1): 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
Vancouver	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish journal of vascular surgery. 2019; 28(1): 19 - 23. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
IEEE	iyigün t,kyaruzi m,timur b,iyigun m,aydin u "Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study." Turkish journal of vascular surgery, 28, ss.19 - 23, 2019. 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237
ISNAD	iyigün, taner vd. "Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study". Turkish journal of vascular surgery 28/1 (2019), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2019.237