Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 72 - 75 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931 İndeks Tarihi: 12-10-2020

Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training

Öz:
Detailed knowledge of anatomy is an essential part of surgical practice. However, there are many drawbacks in anatomy education that make many residentsfeel inadequate when they start performing surgeries. Cadaveric dissection courses aim to close the gap between the anatomic knowledge and surgical practice. This review focuses on the role of cadaveric dissection on surgical education, and additionally states the panel decision of the Surgical Anatomy and Technologies Association on the proper use of cadavers.
Anahtar Kelime:

Cerrahi eğitimde kadavrada anatomi ve disseksiyon

Öz:
Cerrahi pratiğin en önemli parçası detaylı bir anatomi bilgisidir. Ancak anatomi eğitiminde birçok engel ve eksiklik bulunmaktadır, ve birçok cerrahi asistanı cerrahi prosedürleri uygularken yetersizlik hissetmektedir. Diğer bir açıdan, kadavra kursları anatomik bilgi ve cerrahi pratik arasında oluşmuş olan bu boşluğu kapatmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu derleme, kadavra disseksiyonunun cerrahi eğitimdeki rolüne odaklanmakla beraber; Cerrahi Anatomi ve Teknolojileri Derneği’nin kadavraların uygun kullanımı ile ilgili panel kararını da içermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol 2015;48:153-69.
  • 2. Ahmed K, Rowland S, Patel V, Khan RS, Ashrafian H, Davies DC, et al. Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice? Surgeon 2010;8:318-24.
  • 3. Nwachukwu C, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 2015;8:45-52.
  • 4. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007;41:15-22.
  • 5. Hu M, Wattchow D, de Fontgalland D. From ancient to avant-garde: a review of traditional and modern multimodal approaches to surgical anatomy education. ANZ J Surg 2018;88:146-51.
  • 6. Kim SC, Fisher JG, Delman KA, Hinman JM, Srinivasan JK. CadaverBased Simulation Increases Resident Confidence, Initial Exposure to Fundamental Techniques, and May Augment Operative Autonomy. J Surg Educ 2016;73:e33-e41.
  • 7. Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:286-99.
  • 8. Lim CP, Roberts M, Chalhoub T, Waugh J, Delegate L. Cadaveric surgery in core gynaecology training: a feasibility study. Gynecol Surg 2018;15:4.
  • 9. Heisler CA. Importance of adequate gross anatomy education: the impact of a structured pelvic anatomy course during gynecology fellowship. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:302-4.
  • 10. Sharma G, Aycart MA, Najjar PA, van Houten T, Smink DS, Askari R, et al. A cadaveric procedural anatomy course enhances operative competence. J Surg Res 2016;201:22-8.
  • 11. Ahmed K, Aydin A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, McCabe JE. A novel cadaveric simulation program in urology. J Surg Educ 2015;72:556-65.
  • 12. Jansen S, Cowie M, Linehan J, Hamdorf JM. Fresh frozen cadaver workshops for advanced vascular surgical training. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:877-80.
  • 13. Bonnet P, Waltregny D, Reul O, de Leval J. Transobturator vaginal tape inside out for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: anatomical considerations. J Urol 2005;173:1223-8.
  • 14. Zahn CM, Siddique S, Hernandez S, Lockrow EG. Anatomic comparison of two transobturator tape procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:701-6.
  • 15. Neuman M, Masata J, Hubka P, Bornstein J, Martan A. Sacrospinous ligaments anterior apical anchoring for needle-guided mesh is a safe option: a cadaveric study. Urology 2012;79:1020-2.
  • 16. Masata J, Hubka P, Martan A. Pudendal neuralgia following transobturator inside-out tape procedure (TVT-O)--case report and anatomical study. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:505-7.
  • 17. Nakamura M, Fujii T, Imanishi N, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Kuribayashi S, et al. Surgical anatomy imaging associated with cervical cancer treatment: A cadaveric study. Clin Anat 2014;27:503-10.
  • 18. Barksdale PA, Brody SP, Garely AD, Elkins TE, Nolan TE, Gasser RF. Surgical landmarks of the ureter in the cadaveric female pelvis. Clin Anat 1997;10:324-7.
  • 19. Kraima AC, Derks M, Smit NN, van de Velde CJ, Kenter GG, DeRuiter MC. Careful Dissection of the Distal Ureter Is Highly Important in Nerve-sparing Radical Pelvic Surgery: A 3D Reconstruction and Immunohistochemical Characterization of the Vesical Plexus. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26:959-66.
  • 20. Barton DP, Davies DC, Mahadevan V, Dennis L, Adib T, Mudan S, et al. Dissection of soft-preserved cadavers in the training of gynaecological oncologists: report of the first UK workshop. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:352-6.
  • 21. Hammond I, Taylor J, Obermair A, McMenamin P. The anatomy of complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve the training and performance of fellows in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:769-73.
  • 22. Kerbage Y, Debarge V, Lucot JP, Clouqueur E, Rubod C. Simulation training to teach postpartum hemorrhage surgery to residents. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;201:27-30.
  • 23. Selcuk I, Yassa M, Tatar I, Huri E. Anatomic structure of the internal iliac artery and its educative dissection for peripartum and pelvic hemorrhage. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2018;15:126-9.
  • 24. Emmanuelli V, Lucot JP, Closset E, Cosson M, Deruelle P. [Development and assessment of a workshop on repair of third and fourth degree obstetric tears]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2013;42:184-90.
  • 25. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG. Effectiveness of laparoscopic cadaveric dissection in enhancing resident comprehension of pelvic anatomy. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:492-7.
  • 26. Martin KD, Patterson DP, Cameron KL. Arthroscopic Training Courses Improve Trainee Arthroscopy Skills: A Simulation-Based Prospective Trial. Arthroscopy 2016;32:2228-32.
  • 27. Matsuo S, Baydin S, Gungor A, Middlebrooks EH, Komune N, Iihara K, et al. Prevention of postoperative visual field defect after the occipital transtentorial approach: anatomical study. J Neurosurg 2018;129:188-97.
  • 28. Ali S, Ibrahim A. Course Review: Birmingham and Coventry Hand and Forearm Cadaveric Dissection Course. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:596-7.
  • 29. Acar HI, Kuzu MA. Perineal and pelvic anatomy of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: cadaveric dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:1179-83.
  • 30. Ozcan S, Huri E, Tatar I, Sargon M, Karakan T, Yagli OF, et al. Impact of cadaveric surgical anatomy training on urology residents knowledge: a preliminary study. Turk J Urol 2015;41:83-7.
  • 31. Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK, Cusimano M, Murnaghan J, Brown M, et al. Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 1999;177:167-70
APA Selcuk i, TATAR I, HURİ E (2019). Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. , 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
Chicago Selcuk ilker,TATAR Ilkan,HURİ Emre Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. (2019): 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
MLA Selcuk ilker,TATAR Ilkan,HURİ Emre Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. , 2019, ss.72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
AMA Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. . 2019; 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
Vancouver Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. . 2019; 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
IEEE Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E "Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training." , ss.72 - 75, 2019. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
ISNAD Selcuk, ilker vd. "Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training". (2019), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
APA Selcuk i, TATAR I, HURİ E (2019). Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16(1), 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
Chicago Selcuk ilker,TATAR Ilkan,HURİ Emre Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 16, no.1 (2019): 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
MLA Selcuk ilker,TATAR Ilkan,HURİ Emre Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.16, no.1, 2019, ss.72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
AMA Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 16(1): 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
Vancouver Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 16(1): 72 - 75. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
IEEE Selcuk i,TATAR I,HURİ E "Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training." Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16, ss.72 - 75, 2019. 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931
ISNAD Selcuk, ilker vd. "Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training". Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 16/1 (2019), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2018.15931