Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 67 - 73 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 13-10-2020

DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY

Öz:
Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentin tubule penetration depth and sealer percentage along the root canal wall in root canals obturated with AH26, MTA Fillapex, and Well-Root ST using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 extracted human permanent canine teeth with root canal length fixed at 14 mm were shaped up to file F5 with a ProTaper rotary system. The teeth were divided into three groups (n=12) according to the sealer used: AH 26, MTA Fillapex, and Well-Root ST. All root canals were filled with their respective Rhodamine B-labeled sealers with F5 gutta-percha using the single-cone technique. Each root was sectioned horizontally 8-mm, 5-mm, and 2-mm above the apex. Confocal laser microscopy evaluation was performed at 10X magnification. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: The only significant difference between the sealers in terms of penetration depth was observed in the 8-mm cross section (p < 0.000). Well-Root ST group exhibited the lowest penetration depth values followed by MTA Fillapex and AH26 (p=0.000 and p=0.000, respectively) whereas the difference between the latter two was insignificant (p>0.237). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of sealer percentage in the 2-mm, 5-mm, and 8-mm cross sections (p=0.482, p=0.888, and p=0.054, respectively). Conclusion: Well-Root ST exhibited significantly lower penetration depths than MTA Fillapex and AH26.
Anahtar Kelime: Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers Confocal Laser Microscopy Penetration Depth Resin-Based Sealers Sealer Percentage

AH 26, MTA FİLLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST KÖK KANAL PATLARININ DENTİN TÜBÜLÜ PENETRASYON DERİNLİĞİ VE PAT ORANI: BİR KONFOKAL LAZER TARAMA MİKROSKOBİ ÇALIŞMASI

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, konfokal lazer tarama mikroskobu kullanarak AH26, MTA Fillapex ve Well-Root ST ile doldurulmuş kök kanallarında kök kanal duvarındaki dentin tübül penetrasyon derinliğini ve pat oranını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 14 mm’ye sabitlenmiş kök kanal uzunluğuna sahip toplam 36 adet çekilmiş insan kalıcı köpek dişi, bir ProTaper döner sistemiyle F5’e kadar şekillendirildi. Kullanılan kök kanal patına göre dişler üç gruba (n=12). Grup 1: AH 26, Grup 2: MTA Fillapex, Grup 3: Well-Root ST. Tüm kök kanalları, F5 gutta-perka ile tek kon tekniği kullanılarak Rhodamine B ile etiketlenmiş kök kanal patı ile dolduruldu. Her kökün apeksinin 2 mm, 3 mm ve 5 mm üstünden horizontal kesitler alındı. Konfokal lazer mikroskopi değerlendirmesi, 10X büyütmede yapıldı. İstatistiksel analiz için iki yönlü ANOVA analizi ve post hoc Tukey testi anlamlılık düzeyi 0,05 olarak kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Kanal patları arasındaki tek önemli fark 8 mm kesitte gözlendi (p<0,000). Well-Root ST grubu, MTA Fillapex ve AH26’nın (p1=0,000, p2=0,000) ardından anlamlı derecede düşük penetrasyon derinliği sonuçları gösterirken, son iki grup arasındaki fark önemsizdi (p>0.237). Gruplar arasında, 2 mm, 5 mm ve 8 mm kesitlerde, ortalama kanal patı yüzdesi değerleri anlamında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlemlenmemiştir (p1=0,482, p2=0,888, p3=0,054). Sonuç: Well-Root ST, hem MTA Fillapex hem de AH26 ile karşılaştırıldığında daha düşük penetrasyon derinliği sonuçları sergilemiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Kalsiyum Silikat Esaslı Dolgu Maddeleri Konfokal Lazer Mikroskopisi Penetrasyon Derinliği Rezin Esaslı Dolgu Maddeleri Pat Oranı

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part 1. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 37–43.
  • 2. Gharib SR, Tordik PA, Imamura GM, Baginski TA, Goodell GG. A confocal laser scanning microscope investigation of the epiphany obturation system. J Endod 2007; 33: 957-961.
  • 3. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Graeff MS, del Carpio Perochena A, Vivan RR, Camargo EJ et al. Depth and percentage of penetration of endodontic sealers into dentinal tubules after root canal obturation using a lateral compaction technique: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 450-457.
  • 4. Pommel L, Jacquot B, Camps J. Lack of correlation among three methods for evaluation of apical leakage. J Endod 2001; 27: 347–350.
  • 5. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endod 1987; 13, 369–374.
  • 6. Oksan T, Aktener BO, Sen BH, Tezel H. The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinal tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study. Int Endod J 1993; 26, 301–305.
  • 7. De Deus GA, Gurgel-Filho ED, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Coutinho-Filho T. The influence of filling technique on depth of tubule penetration by root canal sealer: A study using light microscopy and digital image processing. Aust Endod J 2004; 30, 23–28.
  • 8. Reszka P, Nowicka A, Lipski M, Dura W, Droździk A, Woźniak K. A Comparative Chemical Study of Calcium Silicate-Containing and Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 9808432.
  • 9. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod 2013; 39: 1281-1286.
  • 10. Marciano MA, Guimaraes BM, Ordinola-Zapata R, Bra-mante CM, Cavenago BC, Garcia RB et al. Physical properties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-based sealers. J Endod 2011; 37: 1417-1421.
  • 11. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P et al. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 3–18.
  • 12. De Deus GA, Gurgel-Filho ED, Maniglia-Ferreira C, Coutinho-Filho T. The influence of filling technique on depth of tubule penetration by root canal sealer: A study using light microscopy and digital image processing. Aust Endod J 2004; 30: 23–28.
  • 13. Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: Technical, biological and clinical testing. Endod Topics 2005; 12: 25–38.
  • 14. Kokkas AB, Boutsioukis ACh, Vassiliadis LP, Stavrianos CK. The influence of the smear layer on dentinal tubule penetration depth by three different root canal sealers: an in vitro study. J Endod 2004; 30: 100–102.
  • 15. Kara Tuncer A, Tuncer S. Effect of different final irrigation solutions on dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of root canal sealer. J Endod 2012; 38: 860–863.
  • 16. Violich DR, Chandler NP. The smear layer in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 2–15.
  • 17. Kuçi A, Alaçam T, Yavaş O, Ergul-Ulger Z, Kayaoglu G. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study. J Endod 2014; 40: 1627-1631.
  • 18. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cadigiaco MC, Mjor IA. Bonding to root canal: Structuralcharacterstics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 255–260.
  • 19. Nikhil V, Bansal P, Sawani S. Effect of technique of sealer agitation on percentage and depth of MTA Fillapex sealer penetration: A comparative in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18: 119-123.
  • 20. Aktemur Türker S, Uzunoğlu E, Purali N. Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018; 12: 294-298.
  • 21. Piai GG, Duarte MAH, Nascimento ALD, Rosa RAD, Só MVR, Vivan RR. Penetrability of a new endodontic sealer: A confocal laser scanning microscopy evaluation. Microsc Res Tech 2018; 81: 1246-1249.
  • 22. Silva EJ, Rosa TP, Herrera DR, Jacinto RC, Gomes Brenda PFA, Zaia AA. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer MTA Fillapex. J Endod 2013; 39: 274–277.
  • 23. Amoroso-Silva PA, Guimarães BM, Marciano MA, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R et al. Microscopic analysis of the quality of obturation and physical properties of MTA Fillapex. Microsc Res Tech 2014; 77: 1031-1036.
  • 24. Cetinkaya I, Bodrumlu E. Evaluation of the flow properties of two different root canal sealers with three different temperatures. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2019; 29: 7-11
APA eyuboglu t, Olcay K, Ekiz D, Terlemez A (2020). DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. , 67 - 73.
Chicago eyuboglu tan fırat,Olcay Keziban,Ekiz Didem,Terlemez Arslan DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. (2020): 67 - 73.
MLA eyuboglu tan fırat,Olcay Keziban,Ekiz Didem,Terlemez Arslan DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. , 2020, ss.67 - 73.
AMA eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. . 2020; 67 - 73.
Vancouver eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. . 2020; 67 - 73.
IEEE eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A "DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY." , ss.67 - 73, 2020.
ISNAD eyuboglu, tan fırat vd. "DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY". (2020), 67-73.
APA eyuboglu t, Olcay K, Ekiz D, Terlemez A (2020). DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. Clinical Dentistry and Research, 44(2), 67 - 73.
Chicago eyuboglu tan fırat,Olcay Keziban,Ekiz Didem,Terlemez Arslan DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. Clinical Dentistry and Research 44, no.2 (2020): 67 - 73.
MLA eyuboglu tan fırat,Olcay Keziban,Ekiz Didem,Terlemez Arslan DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. Clinical Dentistry and Research, vol.44, no.2, 2020, ss.67 - 73.
AMA eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2020; 44(2): 67 - 73.
Vancouver eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2020; 44(2): 67 - 73.
IEEE eyuboglu t,Olcay K,Ekiz D,Terlemez A "DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY." Clinical Dentistry and Research, 44, ss.67 - 73, 2020.
ISNAD eyuboglu, tan fırat vd. "DENTIN TUBULE PENETRATION DEPTH AND SEALER PERCENTAGE OF AH 26, MTA FILLAPEX AND WELL-ROOT ST ROOT CANAL SEALERS: A CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY STUDY". Clinical Dentistry and Research 44/2 (2020), 67-73.