Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal

ARSLAN, Gülşah G.; KIVRAK, S. Oğuzhan; YILDIZ, S.

Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal

S. Yıldız, (Kara Harp Okulu, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

S. Oğuzhan KIVRAK, (Anadolu Üniversitesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

Gülşah G. ARSLAN (Anadolu Üniversitesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online)

2 2

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 33 - 42 Metin Dili: Diğer İndeks Tarihi: 14-10-2020

Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal

Öz:

Like in many other developing countries, urban renewal projects constitute a significant part of the activitiesof architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry in Turkey, and recently Turkey has started anurban renewal movement aiming renewal of 8 million dwellings. In this study, as a critical factor on thesuccess and continuity of the urban renewal projects, the relation between built environment design andeconomic sustainability in urban renewal areas, was examined. In order to determine the importance of builtenvironment design elements in terms of economic sustainability, a survey study was done with theparticipation of 323 people, who were mainly architects, civil engineers, and urban planners and havepreviously worked in urban renewal projects. By applying factor analyses the design elements were groupedunder six different factors, which were named as: Transportation and Accessibility, Built EnvironmentQuality, Conservation of Resources, Supporting Social Life, Commercial and Economic Opportunities andHistorical and Cultural Values. The importance weights of these factors were determined by AHP analysesconducted with the participation of a group of 60 people formed by academicians and practitioners.Conservation of Resources and Commercial and Economic Opportunities factors were found as the mostimportant factors. It is evaluated that the results of the study will guide the urban renewal stakeholders increating economically sustainable urban renewal areas.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Yoke-Lian L, Hassim S., Muniandy R., Teik-Hua L. Review of Subcontracting Practice in Construction Industry. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology 4(4) (2012) 442-445.
[2] Tang B. S. From Privatization to Bureaucratization: Implementing Urban Renewal in Hong Kong. Planning in a Global Era. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002.
[3] Zheng H. W, Shen G. Q., Wang H. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41 (2014) 272-279.
[4] Wood A. P., Bruff G. E. Local sustainable development:land-use planning's contribution to modern local government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(4) (2000) 519-539.
[5] Cloutier S., Larson L., Jambeck J. Are sustainable cities “happy” cities? Associations between sustainable development and human well-being in urban areas of the United States. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(3) (2014) 633- 647.
[6] Musakwa W., Van Niekerk A. Monitoring sustainable urban development using built-up area indicators: a case study of Stellenbosch, South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(3) 547-566, 2015.
[7] Pearce D. Optimal prices for sustainable development. In Economics, Growth and Sustainable Environments London: Palgrave Macmillan Press, 1988.
[8] Gilbert R., Stevenson D., Girardet H., Stren R. Making cities work. London: Earthscan, 1996.
[9] Dizdaroglu D., Yigitcanlar T. A. Parcel-scale assessment tool to measure sustainability through urban ecosystem components: The MUSIX model, Ecological Indicators, 41 (2014) 115–130
[10] Kent Association of Local Authorities (KALA), Kent Design A Guide to Sustainable Development Available from the Internet: https://shareweb.kent.gov.uk/Documents/ community-and-living/Regeneration/kent-designguide-2000.pdf, 2000.
[11] Oktay D. Urban design for sustainability: a study on the Turkish city. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 11(1) (2004) 24–35.
[12] Kim J. J., Rigdon B. Sustainable Architecture Module: Introduction to Sustainable Design, National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, Michigan, 1998.
[13] Newman P. W. G., Kenworthy J. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.
[14] Wheeler S. Planning sustainable and livable cities, The city reader, 2 (1998) 434-445.
[15] CABE and DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) The value of urban design: A research project commissioned by CABE and DETR to examine the value added by good urban design. London: Thomas Telford, 2001.
[16] MacCallum R. C., Widaman K. F., Zhang S., Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 4 (1999) 84-99.
[17] Gorsuch R. L. Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
[18] Bryant F. B., Yarnold P. R. Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & R R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1995.
[19] Garson D. G. Factor Analysis: Statnotes. North Carolina State University Public Administration Program, Available from Internet: http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/factor.h tm., 2008
[20] Cronbach L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3) (1951) 297- 334.
[21] Murphy K. R., Davidshofer C. O. Psychological testing. 4th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice – Hall Inc, 1998.
[22] Hutcheson G. D., Sofroniou N. The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Pub, London, UK, 1999.
[23] Snedecor G. W., Cochran W. G. Failures in the assumptions. Statistical methods, (1989) 278-280.
[24] Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association, 2004.
[25] Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Principal components and factor analysis. In Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed., Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
[26] Sustainable Environment, [online], [cited 23.03.2017]. Available from Internet http://www.sustainable-environment.org.uk), 2016.
[27] Gedikli B. The Open Space Contributing to Neighborhood Sustainability Through Public Events: A Case From Ankara Turkey Available from the Internet: http://www.livablecities.org/sites/ default/files/papers/Gedikli-Bahah-(paper).pdf, 2010.
[28] Song Y., Knaap G. New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assesment, Journal of Urban Economics 54 (2003) 218-238.
[29] Cilliers E. J., Timmermans W., van den Goorbergh, F., Slijkhuis J. S. A. Designing public spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability 17(6) (2015) 1367-1380.
[30] Motawa I., Carter K. Sustainable BIM-based evaluation of buildings, 26th IPMAWorld Congress Crete Greece, Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 74 (2013) 419–428.
[31] Rahman M. M. G., Megat A., Maryanti M. R. Impacts of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Elements on Residential Property Market: A Review. Jurnal Teknologi 73(5) (2015) 42-45.
[32] Iverot S. P., Brandt N. The development of a sustainable urban district in Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm, Sweden. Environment, Development and Sustainability 13(6) (2011) 1043-1064.
[33] Lee G. K. L., Chan E. H. W. Factors affecting urban renewal in high-density city: Case study of Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Planning and Development –ASCE 134(3) (2008) 140–148.
[34] Lee J. S. Enhancing sustainability in downtown by triple-value adding to urban redevelopment efforts: A case study of Seoul, Korea. PhD Thesis Washington: University of Washington, 2003.
[35] Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill, 1980.
[36] Saaty T. L. Axiomatic foundations of the AHP, Management Science 32 (1986) 841- 855.
[37] Saaty T. L., Peniwati K. Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications, 2008.
[38] Bhushan N., Kanwal R. Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process. London: Springer-Verlag, 2004.

APA	YILDIZ S, KIVRAK S, ARSLAN G (2018). Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. , 33 - 42.
Chicago	YILDIZ S.,KIVRAK S. Oğuzhan,ARSLAN Gülşah G. Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. (2018): 33 - 42.
MLA	YILDIZ S.,KIVRAK S. Oğuzhan,ARSLAN Gülşah G. Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. , 2018, ss.33 - 42.
AMA	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. . 2018; 33 - 42.
Vancouver	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. . 2018; 33 - 42.
IEEE	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G "Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal." , ss.33 - 42, 2018.
ISNAD	YILDIZ, S. vd. "Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal". (2018), 33-42.

APA	YILDIZ S, KIVRAK S, ARSLAN G (2018). Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 1(1), 33 - 42.
Chicago	YILDIZ S.,KIVRAK S. Oğuzhan,ARSLAN Gülşah G. Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 1, no.1 (2018): 33 - 42.
MLA	YILDIZ S.,KIVRAK S. Oğuzhan,ARSLAN Gülşah G. Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.1, no.1, 2018, ss.33 - 42.
AMA	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2018; 1(1): 33 - 42.
Vancouver	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2018; 1(1): 33 - 42.
IEEE	YILDIZ S,KIVRAK S,ARSLAN G "Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 1, ss.33 - 42, 2018.
ISNAD	YILDIZ, S. vd. "Built environment design-economic sustainability relationship in urban renewal". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 1/1 (2018), 33-42.