Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 43 - 54 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 14-10-2020

Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings

Öz:
A considerable amount of energy is consumed in buildings because of the economic developments and theincreased population. By taking in consideration that 40% of total energy use is consumed in the building,the proper design of building’s envelope is crucial for reducing the adverse effects of high energyconsumption in the economy and environment of a country. This study aims to investigate the proper designalternatives on the reduction of energy consumption and life-cycle cost (LCC) of residential buildings forheating and cooling purposes. The study is carried out in two cities, Ankara and Antalya, which representsthe cold and hot climate region. For this study, the same flat of 1+1 floor plan designed for a family of twoin a reference residential building project is simulated with different location, in Ankara and Antalya. Forthese flats, the annual zone heating and total cooling energy consumptions and life cycle costs are calculatedusing DesignBuilder simulation program according to different window-wall ratios, glazing types andinsulation thickness. Window assembly alternatives are composed of double glazing units with clear glass,low-e glass, blue tinted glass and reflective glass, and PVC frame and the investigated insulation thicknessoptions are EPS 100 mm and EPS 50 mm. At the end of the study, energy, and cost-efficient designalternatives for cold and hot climate regions are proposed.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] NIRAS. Energy Systems and Measurement Methods in Buildings, 2016.
  • [2] Sağlam G. N., Yılmaz A. Z., Becchio C., Corgnati S. P. A comprehensive cost-optimal approach for energy retrofit of existing multi-family buildings: application to apartment blocks in Turkey. Energy Build. 150 (2017) 224–238.
  • [3] Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.enerji.gov.tr/trTR/Sayfalar/Elektrik. [Accessed: 10-Sep-2017].
  • [4] Yousefi-Sahzabi A., Unlu-Yucesoy E., Sasaki K., Yuosefi H., Widiatmojo A., Sugai Y. Turkish challenges for low-carbon society: current status, government policies and social acceptance. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68 (2017) 596–608.
  • [5] National Fenestration Rating Council, “Energy Performance Label,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.nfrc.org/energy-performance-label. Accessed: 12-Sep-2017].
  • [6] Sadineni S. B., Madala S., Boehm R. F. Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15(8) (2011) 3617–3631.
  • [7] Sozer H. Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope. Build. Environ. 45(12) (2010) 2581–2593.
  • [8] Cuce E., Riffat S. B. A state-of-the-art review on innovative glazing technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41 (2015) 695–714.
  • [9] Raji B., Tenpierik M. J., Van Den Dobbelsteen A. An assessment of energy-saving solutions for the envelope design of high-rise buildings in temperate climates: A case study in the Netherlands. Energy Build. 124 (2016) 210–221.
  • [10] Rezaei S. D., Shannigrahi S., Ramakrishna S. A review of conventional, advanced, and smart glazing technologies and materials for improving indoor environment. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 159 (2017) 26–51.
  • [11] Chwieduk D. A. Some aspects of energy efficient building envelope in high latitude countries. Energy Procedia 57 (2014) 1898–1907.
  • [12] Sang X., Pan W., Kumaraswamy M. M. Informing energy-efficient building envelope design decisions for Hong Kong. Energy Procedia 62 (2014) 123–131.
  • [13] Shariah A., Tashtoush B., Rousan A. Cooling and heating loads in residential buildings in Jordan. Energy Build. 26(2) (1997) 137–143.
  • [14] Hee W. J. The role of window glazing on daylighting and energy saving in buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 323–343.
  • [15] Deng S., Dalibard A., Martin M., Dai Y. J., Eicker U., Wang R. Z. Energy supply concepts for zero energy residential buildings in humid and dry climate. Energy Convers. Manag. 52(6) (2011) 2455–2460.
  • [16] Mirrahimi S., Mohamed M. F., Haw L., Ibrahim N. L. N., Yusoff W. F. M., Aflaki A. The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in a hot-humid climate. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016) 1508–1519.
  • [17] Okumuş M. Research of windows impact on building energy and daylight performance for elderly houses summary. Istanbul Technical University, 2014.
  • [18] Taleb H. M. Using passive cooling strategies to improve thermal performance and reduce the energy consumption of residential buildings in U.A.E. buildings. Front. Archit. Res. 3(2) (2014) 154–165.
  • [19] Yasar Y., Macka S. K. The effects of window alternatives on energy efficiency and building economy in high-rise residential buildings in moderate to humid climates. Energy Convers. Manag. 64(4) (2012) 170– 181.
  • [20] Macka S. K. The method using in the determination of heating and cooling loads for residential buildings in Turkish climate regions. Karadeniz Technical University, 2014.
  • [21] Ucar A., Balo F. Determination of the energy savings and the optimum insulation thickness in the four different insulated exterior walls. Renew. Energy 35(1) (2010) 88–94.
  • [22] Bolattürk A. Optimum insulation thicknesses for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degreehours in the warmest zone of Turkey. Build. Environ. 43(6) (2008) 1055–1064.
  • [23] Yilmaz Z. Evaluation of energy efficient design strategies for different climatic zones: Comparison of thermal performance of buildings in temperate-humid and hot-dry climate. Energy Build. 39(3) (2007) 306– 316.
  • [24] Yildiz Y., Özbalta G. T., Arsan D. Z. Impact of Window-to-wall surface area for different window glass types and wall orientations on building energy performance: a case study for a school building located in Izmir, Turkey. Megaron 6 (2011) 30–38.
  • [25] Unalan H. Analysis of the heating and cooling energy performance at building envelope in terms of orientation, window wall ratio and glass type for an office building in Eskisehir climate condition. Anadolu University, 2016.
  • [26] Kumar G. K, Babu T. P. A. Study of various glass materials to provide adequate daylighting in office buildings of warm and humid climatic zone in India. Energy Procedia 109 (2017) 181–189.
  • [27] DesignBuilder Ltd UK. DesignBuilder Software Ltd - Home, 2017.
  • [28] Turkish State Meteorological Service, “Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx. [Accessed: 15-Mar-2018].
  • [29] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) _ WBDG Whole Building Design Guide,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.wbdg.org/resources/life-cyclecost-analysis-lcca. [Accessed: 03-Jun-2017].
  • [30] Turkish Statistical Institute, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24 788. [Accessed: 10-Sep-2017].
  • [31] Başkent Doğalgaz, “Başkent Doğalgaz Dağıtım Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklığı A,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://online.baskentdogalgaz.com.tr/MusteriOnline/fac es/genel/dogalgazsatisfiyatlari.jsf. [Accessed: 16-Mar2018].
  • [32] Enerya Doğalgaz, “Doğal gaz birim fiyatları 2016,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://portal.enerya.com.tr/DogalGazBirimFiyatlari/ind ex.xhtml?city=07. [Accessed: 16-Mar-2018].
  • [33] Akıllı Tarife, “Elektrik Birim Fiyatları Ne Kadar,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://akillitarife.com/rehber/elektrik-fiyatlari-2018. [Accessed: 16-Mar-2018].
APA BAHADIR Ü, THOMOLLARİ X, TOĞAN V (2018). Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. , 43 - 54.
Chicago BAHADIR Ü.,THOMOLLARİ X.,TOĞAN V. Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. (2018): 43 - 54.
MLA BAHADIR Ü.,THOMOLLARİ X.,TOĞAN V. Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. , 2018, ss.43 - 54.
AMA BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. . 2018; 43 - 54.
Vancouver BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. . 2018; 43 - 54.
IEEE BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V "Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings." , ss.43 - 54, 2018.
ISNAD BAHADIR, Ü. vd. "Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings". (2018), 43-54.
APA BAHADIR Ü, THOMOLLARİ X, TOĞAN V (2018). Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 1(1), 43 - 54.
Chicago BAHADIR Ü.,THOMOLLARİ X.,TOĞAN V. Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 1, no.1 (2018): 43 - 54.
MLA BAHADIR Ü.,THOMOLLARİ X.,TOĞAN V. Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), vol.1, no.1, 2018, ss.43 - 54.
AMA BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2018; 1(1): 43 - 54.
Vancouver BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online). 2018; 1(1): 43 - 54.
IEEE BAHADIR Ü,THOMOLLARİ X,TOĞAN V "Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings." Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), 1, ss.43 - 54, 2018.
ISNAD BAHADIR, Ü. vd. "Evaluation of energy-cost efficient design alternatives for residential buildings". Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) 1/1 (2018), 43-54.