Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 35 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 18-10-2020

Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1

Öz:
The primary aim of this study is to determine whether there was a difference in teachers' levelsof interactive whiteboard usage, their self-efficacy, and opinions before and after the Use ofTechnology in Education Course (UTEC) in vocational high schools where FATIH project wasimplemented. Research participants constituted of teachers and school administrators, andstudents attending Telkari Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School in whichinteractive whiteboard installation was made within the framework of FATIH project in Midyatdistrict of Mardin province and who attended UTEC training in the 2015-2016 academic year.In this study, a mixed research method model was used. Data were collected through scale,survey and semi-structured interview forms. Quantitative data were analyzed by mean and ttest, and qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. In conclusion of the study, it wasobserved that there was no significant change in the self-efficacy of teachers using interactivewhiteboard and their level of using interactive whiteboard after UTEC training. Furthermore,it was observed that teachers were unable to develop materials for the interactive whiteboardbefore UTEC training, and after the UTEC training, they were able to prepare materials in part.This fact has revealed that the UTEC training content was not sufficient in materialdevelopment for the interactive whiteboard. The students, on the other hand, indicated that theypreferred the courses used on the interactive whiteboard and asked the teachers to continueusing the interactive whiteboard. Participant students indicated that interactive whiteboardfailures also adversely affected the lesson. Teachers, students, and school administratorsreported that use an interactive whiteboard in the course increased student success andpositively affected interest and participation in the course.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adıgüzel, T., Gürbulak, N., & Sarıçayır, H. (2011). Akıllı tahtalar ve öğretim uygulamalar. Mustafa Kemal University, Social Sciences Journal, 8(15), 457-471.
  • Albayrak, E. (2014). FATİH Projesi kapsamındaki okullarda bilişim teknolojilerinin kullanımının sınıf yönetimi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Akdeniz University, Educational Sciences Journal: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Altınçelik, B. (2009). İlköğretim düzeyinde öğrenmede kalıcılığı ve motivasyonu sağlaması yönünden akıllı tahtaya ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Sakarya University, Institute of Social Sciences: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Bağcı, H. (2013). FATİH Projesi çerçevesinde ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin etkileşimli tahtaya yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Okan University: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Baydaş, Ö., Esgice, M., Kalafat, Ö., & Göktaş, Y. (2011), Etkileşimli tahtaların öğretim süreçlerine katkıları. 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, 22-24 Eylül 2011, Fırat University, Elazığ, Türkiye.
  • Beauchamp, G., & Parkinson, J. (2005). Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
  • Beeland, W.D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning, and technology: can ınteractive whiteboards help? Retrieved February 08, 2016, from http://www.sharpsav.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/08/beeland_am.pdf.
  • Bell, M.A. (1998). Teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of the ınteractive electronic whiteboard in ınstruction. Retrieved February 02, 2016, from http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/research_library/k-12/ teachers_perceptions_regarding_the_use_of_the_interactive_electronic_whiteboard_in _instruction.pdf.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2006). Understanding Mixed Methods Research, (Chapter 1). Retrieved February 10, 2016, from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/10981_Chapter_1.pdf.
  • Çelik, S., & Atak, H. (2012). Etkileşimli tahta tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(2), 49-66.
  • Çiçekli, E. (2014). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin FATİH Projesi kapsamında akıllı tahta kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. İstanbul Aydın University, Institute of Social Sciences: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Ekici, S., & Yılmaz B. (2013). FATİH Projesi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 27(2), 317-339.
  • Erduran, A., & Tataroğlu, B. (2009). Eğitimde akıllı tahta kullanımına ilişkin fen ve matematik öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. 9th International Educational Technology Conference (IETC2009), Ankara, Türkiye
  • Johnson, B., & Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In
  • A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (ss. 297-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
  • Hörgüç, İ. (2014). FATİH Projesi’nin İstanbul ilinde uygulanmasına ilişkin yönetici ve öğretmenlerin görüşleri. Yıldız Teknik University, Institute of Social Sciences: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Kayaduman, H., Sırakaya, M., & Seferoğlu, S.S. (2011). Eğitimde FATİH Projesinin öğretmenlerin yeterlik durumları açısından incelenmesi. Akademik Bilişim 2011, İnönü University, Malatya, Türkiye.
  • Koçak, Ö. (2013). FATİH Projesi kapsamındaki LCD panel etkileşimli tahta uygulamalarına yönelik öğretmen tutumları (Erzincan ili örneği). Atatürk University, Institute of Educational Sciences: Postgraduate thesis.
  • Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.
  • Kurt, A.A., Günüç, S., & Ersoy, M. (2013). Dijitalleşmede son durum: dijital yerli, dijital göçmen ve dijital göçebe. Ankara University, Educational Sciences Faculty Journal, 46(1), 1-22.
  • Lai, H.J. (2010). Secondary school teachers’perceptions of interactive whiteboardtraining workshops: a case study from Taiwan. Educational Technology, 26(4), 511-522.
  • Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101.
  • Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 379-383.
  • Türel, Y.K., & Demirli, C. (2010). Instructional interactive whiteboard materials: Designers’ perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences (WCLTA 2010), 9, 1437–1442.
  • Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). ‘The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851–867.
  • Yalçınkaya, Y. (2013). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin etkileşimli tahta kullanımına yönelik öz yeterlikleri. Süleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science and Technology: Postgraduate thesis.
APA AYKAT Ş, Gunuc S (2020). Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. , 1 - 35.
Chicago AYKAT Şükrü,Gunuc Selim Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. (2020): 1 - 35.
MLA AYKAT Şükrü,Gunuc Selim Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. , 2020, ss.1 - 35.
AMA AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. . 2020; 1 - 35.
Vancouver AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. . 2020; 1 - 35.
IEEE AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S "Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1." , ss.1 - 35, 2020.
ISNAD AYKAT, Şükrü - Gunuc, Selim. "Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1". (2020), 1-35.
APA AYKAT Ş, Gunuc S (2020). Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 1 - 35.
Chicago AYKAT Şükrü,Gunuc Selim Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 11, no.1 (2020): 1 - 35.
MLA AYKAT Şükrü,Gunuc Selim Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, vol.11, no.1, 2020, ss.1 - 35.
AMA AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2020; 11(1): 1 - 35.
Vancouver AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2020; 11(1): 1 - 35.
IEEE AYKAT Ş,Gunuc S "Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1." Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11, ss.1 - 35, 2020.
ISNAD AYKAT, Şükrü - Gunuc, Selim. "Review of the Opinions of Vocational High School Teachers, Students, and Administrators on the Interactive Whiteboard1". Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 11/1 (2020), 1-35.