Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

YILDIRIM, Ayse Nur; keleş, osman nuri

doi:10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055

Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

Ayşe Nur YILDIRIM, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Histoloji ve Embriyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Osman Nuri KELEŞ (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Histoloji ve Embriyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Medicine Science

0 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 619 - 624 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2020

Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes

Öz:

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of some hematological parameters on fertilization success, embryo quality and pregnancy rates in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. 50 infertile couples aged 22-46 years who were admitted to Ataturk University Research Hospital for IVF treatment were included in the study.The number of fertilized oocytes, embryo quality, clinic pregnancy rate were determineted and compared with hematological parameters. In the male petients, the plateletdistribution width (PDW) value was negatively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = -0.341*; p=0.015). An negative relationship between the transplantable embryorate and the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) value was observed (rp = -0.320*; p = 0.024) in the male. While the hemoglobin (HGB) value was negatively correlatedwith the fertilization rate (rp=-0.332*; p=0.019), the red cell distribution width (RDW) value was positively correlated with the fertilization rate (rp = 0.359*; p=0.010) infemale petients. In addition, significant correlations were found between PDW value both good quality embryo rate (regression coefficient : -19.808, p = 0.007) ( correctedas -19.808) and transplantable embryo rate (regression coefficient : -16.855, p = 0.033) (corrected as -16.855) in female petients. In conclusion, changes in PDW valuesof female patients significantly affect embryo quality, may result pregnancy failure and abnormal embryo and fetus development during pregnancy

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Cyna AM, Middleton P. Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8:CD003005.
2. Prabhakaran S, Ljuhar D, Coleman R, et al. Circumcision in the paediatric patient: Areview of indications, technique and complications. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018;54:1299-307.
3. Sir E, Eksert S, Zor M, et al. The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane block in the pain management of shock wave lithotripsy. Arch Esp Urol. 2019;72:933-8.
4. Demiraran Y, Kocaman B, Akman RY. A Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in Children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:510-3.
5. Brenner L, Marhofer P, Kettner SC, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: The effect of different volumes of local anesthetics. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:229-35.
6. Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK. Handbook of Clinical Anesthesia. 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2009.
7. Uguralp S, Mutus M, Koroglu A, et al. Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:610-3.
8. Şener M, Çalışkan E, Bozdoğan N, et al. Our experiences of paediatric caudal anaesthesia. JARSS. 2006;14:259-63.
9. Gezer E, Uğur B, Şen S, et al. Retrospective evaluation of caudal anaesthesia in pediatric surgery. Meandros Med Dent J. 2006;7:27-30.
10. Erdoğan NM, Kaymak S, Uğuz M, et al. Evaluation of analgesic effect of caudal anesthesia: A retrospective study. J Contemp Med. 2015;5:41-5.
11. Beyaz SG. Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile nerve block with levobupivacaine for circumcision in children. Korean J Pain. 2011;24:31-5.
12. Irwin MG. Cheng W. Comparison of subcutaneous ring block of the penis with caudal epidural block for post-circumcision analgesia in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:365-7.
13. Weksler N, Atias I, Klein M, et al. Is penile block better than caudal epidural block for postcircumcision analgesia? J Anesth. 2005;19:36-9.
14. Bramwell RG, Bullen C, Radford P. Caudal block for postoperative analgesia in children. Anaesthesia. 1982;37:1024-8.
15. Walco GA, Cassidy RC, Schechter NL. Pain, hurt and harm. The ethics of pain control in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:541-4.
16. Stang HJ, Snellman LW, Condon LM, et al. Beyond dorsal penile nerve block: a more humane circumcision. Pediatrics. 1997;100:E3.
17. Yeoman PM, Cooke R, Hain WR. Penile block for circumcision? A comparison with caudal blockade. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:862-6.
18. Kazak Bengisun Z, Ekmekci P, Haliloglu AH. Levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management in circumcision: caudal blocks or dorsal penile nerve block. Agri. 2012;24:180-6.
19. Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, et al. Randomized, double-blind, phase ııı, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:366-71.
20. Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, et al. Evidence-based clinical update: which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:1102-10.
21. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, et al. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: An update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72:453-9.
22. Jöhr M, Berger TM. Caudal blocks. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22:44-50.
23. Brown DL. Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2nd edition. WB Saunders Company, Pennsylvania, 1996.
24. Akın M, Saydam S, Keskin G, et al. Caudal epidural anesthesia in pediatric urological surgery; a single institutional experience with 5536 cases. Bozok Med J. 2015;5:41-5.
25. Begeç Z, Durmuş M, Toprak Hİ, et al. Caudal block in children: A retrospective study of 2262 cases. JTAICS. 2005;33:288-94.
26. Ango PD, Kohou KL, Koné N, et al. Caudal anesthesia: experience in the post-operative analgesia in pediatric ambulatory surgery at the University Hospital of Treichville. Open Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;7:400-6.
27. Ivani G, De Negri P, Lonngvist PA, et al. A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:368-71.
28. Ramboatiana R, Gassner C, Schoch JP, et al. [Postoperative analgesia for circumcision in children]. Agressologie. 1990;31:39-42.
29. Polat R, Akın M, Keskin G, et al. Comparison of dorsal penile block and caudal block with bupivacaine and oral ibuprofen in children undergoing circumcision. J Anesth. 2015;23:238-43.
30. Irsi C, Ar Yıldırım A, Ozdemir F. Caudal block with general anesthesia for outpatient pediatric surgery procedures. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access. 2017;7:00248.

APA	YILDIRIM A, keleş o (2020). Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. , 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
Chicago	YILDIRIM Ayse Nur,keleş osman nuri Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. (2020): 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
MLA	YILDIRIM Ayse Nur,keleş osman nuri Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. , 2020, ss.619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
AMA	YILDIRIM A,keleş o Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. . 2020; 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
Vancouver	YILDIRIM A,keleş o Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. . 2020; 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
IEEE	YILDIRIM A,keleş o "Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes." , ss.619 - 624, 2020. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
ISNAD	YILDIRIM, Ayse Nur - keleş, osman nuri. "Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes". (2020), 619-624. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055

APA	YILDIRIM A, keleş o (2020). Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Medicine Science, 9(3), 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
Chicago	YILDIRIM Ayse Nur,keleş osman nuri Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Medicine Science 9, no.3 (2020): 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
MLA	YILDIRIM Ayse Nur,keleş osman nuri Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Medicine Science, vol.9, no.3, 2020, ss.619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
AMA	YILDIRIM A,keleş o Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Medicine Science. 2020; 9(3): 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
Vancouver	YILDIRIM A,keleş o Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes. Medicine Science. 2020; 9(3): 619 - 624. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
IEEE	YILDIRIM A,keleş o "Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes." Medicine Science, 9, ss.619 - 624, 2020. 10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055
ISNAD	YILDIRIM, Ayse Nur - keleş, osman nuri. "Association between some hematological parameters and in vitro fertilization outcomes". Medicine Science 9/3 (2020), 619-624. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2020.04.055