Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar

MUMCUOĞLU, Tarkan; Ozulken, Kemal

Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Kemal ÖZÜLKEN, (TOBB ETÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları ABD, Ankara, Türkiye)

Tarkan MUMCUOĞLU (TOBB ETÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları ABD, Ankara, Türkiye)

Glokom Katarakt

14 0

Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 161 - 170 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 24-10-2020

Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Öz:

Refraktif cerrahi, gözün refraksiyon kusurunu iyileştirmek veya hastanın gözlük ya da kontakt lenslere olan bağımlılığını ortadan kaldırmak içinuygulanan göz ameliyatıdır ve dünya çapında uygulanan en yaygın "kozmetik" prosedürlerden biridir. Birçok klinisyen için, refraktif cerrahigenellikle en sık yapılan refraktif işlem olan laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASİK) anlamına gelir. Fakat refraktif cerrahi ayrıca yüzey ablasyonu,refraktif lens değişimi (RLD) ve fakik göz içi lens implantasyonu gibi daha birçok cerrahi işlemi de kapsamaktadır. Lazer refraktif cerrahiprosedürleri (LASİK, fotorefraktif keratektomi gibi) düşük-orta dereceli refraksiyon kusurları olan hastalar için mükemmel görsel sonuçlarveren oldukça güvenli ameliyatlar olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Son zamanlarda geliştirilen küçük insizyonlu lentikül ekstraksiyonu (SMILE)yönteminde, femtosaniye lazer ile şekillendirilen refraktif stromal lentikül küçük bir korneal kesiden çıkarılarak istenilen refraktif düzeltmeelde edilebilmektedir. Lazer refraktif cerrahi prosedürlerinde topografi , wavefront kılavuzlu tedaviler gibi özelleştirilmiş tedaviler ile dahamükemmel sonuçlar elde etmenin mümkün olduğu gösterilmiştir. Daha geniş aralıklardaki refraksiyon kusurlarının tedavisini gerçekleştirmeküzere fakik göziçi lens implantları ve refraktif lens değişimi gibi cerrahi prosedürler de günümüz teknolojisi ile sağlanmaktadır. Refraktifcerrahi gelişmeye devam etmekle birlikte bulunan yeniliklerin uzun vadeli sonuçları da bilimsel çalışmalarla kanıtlanması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Current Approaches in Refractive Surgery

Öz:

At the most basic level, refractive surgery is any eye surgery performed to improve the refractive error of the eye or to eliminate the patient's dependence on glasses or contact lenses and is one of the most common "cosmetic" procedures applied worldwide. For many clinicians, refractive surgery usually refers to laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), the most common refractive procedure. However, refractive surgery also includes surface ablation, refractive lens exchange (RLE) and phakic intraocular lens implantation. Laser refractive surgical procedures (such as LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy) are defi ned as highly safe surgeries that provide excellent visual results for patients with low to moderate refractive errors. With the recently developed small incision lenticle extraction (SMILE), the refractive stromal lenticle formed by femtosecond laser can be removed from a small corneal incision to obtain the desired refractive correction. In laser refractive surgical procedures, it has been shown that it is possible to obtain more perfect results with customized treatments such as topography, wavefront guided ablations. Surgical procedures such as phakic intraocular lens implants and refractive lens exchange are also provided by today's technology to treat the wider range of refraction defects. While refractive surgery continues to evolve, the long-term results of innovations need to be proven.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Diğer Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050.Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1036–42.
2. Sakimoto T, Rosenblatt MI, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors. Lancet 2006; 367: 1432–47.
3. Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, et al. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 1224–34.
4. Sakimoto T, Rosenblatt MI, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors. Lancet 2006; 367: 1432–47.
5. Barsam A, Allan BD. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6: CD007679.
6. Sugar A, Hood CT, Mian SI. Patient-reported outcomes following LASIK: quality of life in the PROWL studies. JAMA 2017; 317: 204–5.
7. Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, et al. Postoperative effi cacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery: a network meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmology 2017; 178: 65–78.
8. Pettit GH. The ideal excimer laser beam for refractivem surgery. J Refract Surg 2006;22:S969-72.
9. Çakır H, Çelik U. Refraktif Cerrahi Yaklaşımları: En Uygun Tedavi Hangisidir? Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmology-Special Topics. 2014;7(1):1-6
10. Taşındı E. Excimer Laser - LASIK Cerrahisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmology. 2002;11(1):25-9.
11. Masters J, Kocak M, Waite A. Risk for microbial keratitis: comparative metaanalysis of contact lens wearers and post-laser in situ keratomileusis patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 67–73.
12. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14: 46–52.
13. Eraslan M., Toker E. Kornea yara iyileşmesinin mekanizmaları ve refraktif cerrahi operasyon sonrası modülasyonu. Marmara Medical Journal 2015;22: 169-78.
14. Kanellopoulos AJ, Pallikaris IG, Donnenfeld ED, Detorakis S, Koufala K, Perry HD. Comparison of corneal sensation following photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 34–8.
15. Amm M, Wetzel W, Winter M, Uthoff D, Duncker GI. Histopathological comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Refract Surg 1996; 12: 758–66.
16. Kösekahya P, Çağlayan M, Uysal Bs, et al. Yüksek miyop hastalarda fotorefraktif keratektomi cerrahi sonuçları. Firat Med J 2019; 24 (1): 26-30.
17. Li SM, Zhan S, Li SY, et al. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2:CD009799.
18. Antonios R, Abdul Fattah M, Arba Mosquera S, et al. Single-step transepithelial versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of high myopia: a comparative evaluation over 12 months. Br J Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;101:1106-12.
19. Celik U, Bozkurt E, Celik B, et al. Pain, wound healing and refractive comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: results of 1-year follow-up. Cont Lens and Anterior Eye. 2014;37: 420–6.
20. Hersh PS, Brint SF, Maloney RK, et al. Photorefractive keratectomyversus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1512–22.
21. Alio JL, Artola A, Claramonte PJ, et al. Complications of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: two year follow-up of 3000 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:619-26.
22. Kim TI, Pak JH, Lee SY, et al. Mitomycin C-induced reduction of keratocytes and fi broblasts after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmology Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2978–84.
23. Morales A.J., Zadok D., Mora-Retana R.,et al. Intraoperative mitomycin and corneal endothelium after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmology. 2006;142:400–4.
24. Faktorovich EG, Melwani K. Effi cacy and safety of pain relief medications after photorefractive keratectomy: review of prospective randomized trials. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 1716–30.
25. Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmologyogy 2003;110:267-75.
26. Buhren J, Pesudovs K, Martin T, et al. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 846–55.
27. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and effi cacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmologyogy. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 175–87.
28. Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M. Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser fl ap creation in relation to safety, effi cacy, predictability, and biomechanical stability. Curr Opin Ophthalmology 2006; 17: 368–72.
29. Kim P, Sutton GL, Rootman DS. Applications of the femtosecond laser in corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmology 2011; 22: 238-44.
30. Hashmani S, Hashmani N, Rajani H, et al. Comparison of visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and satisfaction between LASIK performed with a microkeratome and a femto laser. Clin Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 1009–14.
31. Zhang C, Che J, Yu J, et al. Using Femtosecond Laser to Create Customized Corneal Flaps for Patients with Low and Moderate Refractive Error Differing in Corneal Thickness. PloS ONE 2015;10: e0121291.
32. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Long-term bladeless LASIK outcomes with the FS200 Femtosecond and EX500 Excimer Laser workstation: the Refractive Suite. Clin Ophthalmology 2013; 7: 261-9.
33. Stonecipher K, Dishler J, Ignacio T, et al. Transient light sensitivity after femtosecond laser fl ap creation: Clinical fi ndings and management. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 91-4.
34. Paula FH, Khairallah CG, Niziol LM, et al. Diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser fl ap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;38:1014-9.
35. Courtin R, Saad A, Guilbert E, et al. Opaque Bubble Layer Risk Factors in Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 2015; 31: 608-61.
36. Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials 2012; 13: 75.
37. Ji YW, Kim M, Kang DSY, et al. Lower laser energy levels lead to better visual recovery after small-incision lenticule extraction: prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmology 2017; 179: 159–70.
38. Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, et al. Clinical Outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 256–65.
39. Ang M, Ho H, Fenwick E, et al. Vision-related quality of life and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2136–44.
40. Krueger RR, Meister CS. A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications. Curr opin Ophthalmology 2018; 29: 292–8.
41. Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Rathi A, et al. Learning curve of small incision lenticule extraction: challenges and complications. Cornea 2017; 36: 1377–82.
42. Özülken K, Kaderli A. The effect of different optical zone diameters on the results of high-order aberrations in femto-laserassisted in situ keratomileusis. Eur J Ophthalmology. 2019 Jul 29:1120672119865688.
43. Myrowitz EH, Chuck RS. A comparison of wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided ablations. Curr Opin Ophthalmology 2009;20: 247–50.
44. Ozulken K, Yuksel E, Tekin K, et al. Comparison of WavefrontOptimized Ablation and Topography-Guided Contoura Ablation With LYRA Protocol in LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(4):222-9.
45. Ozulken K, Ilhan C. Effects of Cyclotorsion Orientation and Magnitude in Eyes with Compound Myopic Astigmatism on the Compensation Capacity of WaveLight EX500 Photorefractive Keratectomy. Korean J Ophthalmology. 2019;33(5):458-66.
46. Yesilirmak N, Davis Z, Yoo SH. Refractive Surgery (SMILE vs. LASIK vs. Phakic IOL). Int Ophthalmology Clin. 2016;56(3):137- 47.
47. Bozkurt E., Çelik U. Fakik Göz İçi Lensleri. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmology-Special Topics. 2014;7(1):53-9.
48. Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmologyogy. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2244–58.
49. Pop M, Payette Y. Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 20–4.
50. Nanavaty MA, Daya SM. Refractive lens exchange versus phakic intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmology 2012; 23: 54–61.
51. Yasa D, Urdem U, Agca A, et al. Early results with a new posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens in patients with high myopia. J Ophthalmology. 2018 Jun 19;2018:1329874.
52. Kohnen T, Kook D, Morral M, et al. Phakic intraocular lenses: part 2: results and complications. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 2168–94.
53. Guell JL, Morral M, Kook D, et al. Phakic intraocular lenses part 1: historical overview, current models, selection criteria, and surgical techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1976–93.
54. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, et al. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br J Ophthalmology 2018; 102: 177–81.
55. Jonker SMR, Berendschot T, Ronden AE, et al. Long-term endothelial cell loss in patients with artisan myopia and artisan toric phakic intraocular lenses: 5- and 10-year results. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 486–94.
56. Morral M, Guell JL, El Husseiny MA, et al. Paired-eye comparison of corneal endothelial cell counts after unilateral iris-claw phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016; 42: 117–26.
57. Küçüksümer Y., Altan Ç. Refraktif Lens Değişimi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmology-Special Topics. 2014;7(1):60-4.
58. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, et al. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmology 2014; 59: 579–98.
59. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? Eye Vis (Lond) 2014; 1: 10.
60. De Vries NE, Nuijts RMMA. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Literature review of benefi ts and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(2):268-78.
61. Üstüner A. Refraktif Lens Cerrahisi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Surg Med Sci. 2007;3(43):18-20.
62. Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview. Surv Ophthalmology. 2017; 62(5):611-34.
63. Alió JL, Kaymak H, Breyer D, et al. Quality of life related variables measured for three multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmology. 2018; 46(4):380-8.
64. Liao X, Lin J, Tian J, et al. Evaluation of Optical Quality: Ocular Scattering and Aberrations in Eyes Implanted with Diffractive Multifocal or Monofocal Intraocular Lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2018; 43(6):696-701.
65. Gillmann K, Mermoud A. Visual Performance, Subjective Satisfaction and Quality of Life Effect of a New Refractive Intraocular Lens with Central Extended Depth of Focus. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019;236(4):384-90.
66. Hashemian H, Mirshahi R, Khodaparast M, et al. Postcataract surgery endophthalmitis: brief literature review. J Curr Ophthalmology 2016; 28: 101–5.
67. Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 66: 132– 56.
68. Jacob S, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, et al. Preliminary evidence of successful near vision enhancement with a new technique: presbyopic allogenic refractive lenticule (PEARL) corneal inlay using a SMILE lenticule. J Refract Surg 2017; 33: 224–9.
69. Hammer CM, Petsch C, Klenke J, et al. Corneal tissue interactions of a new 345 nm ultraviolet femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:1279–88.
70. Seven I, Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr. Patterned corneal collagen crosslinking for astigmatism: computational modeling study. J CataractRefract Surg. 2014; 40:943–53.
71. Han T, Li D, Hersh PS, et al. New intrastromal corneal reshaping procedure using high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:1137–44.

APA	Ozulken K, MUMCUOĞLU T (2019). Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. , 161 - 170.
Chicago	Ozulken Kemal,MUMCUOĞLU Tarkan Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. (2019): 161 - 170.
MLA	Ozulken Kemal,MUMCUOĞLU Tarkan Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. , 2019, ss.161 - 170.
AMA	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. . 2019; 161 - 170.
Vancouver	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. . 2019; 161 - 170.
IEEE	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T "Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar." , ss.161 - 170, 2019.
ISNAD	Ozulken, Kemal - MUMCUOĞLU, Tarkan. "Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar". (2019), 161-170.

APA	Ozulken K, MUMCUOĞLU T (2019). Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Glokom Katarakt, 14(4), 161 - 170.
Chicago	Ozulken Kemal,MUMCUOĞLU Tarkan Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Glokom Katarakt 14, no.4 (2019): 161 - 170.
MLA	Ozulken Kemal,MUMCUOĞLU Tarkan Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Glokom Katarakt, vol.14, no.4, 2019, ss.161 - 170.
AMA	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Glokom Katarakt. 2019; 14(4): 161 - 170.
Vancouver	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar. Glokom Katarakt. 2019; 14(4): 161 - 170.
IEEE	Ozulken K,MUMCUOĞLU T "Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar." Glokom Katarakt, 14, ss.161 - 170, 2019.
ISNAD	Ozulken, Kemal - MUMCUOĞLU, Tarkan. "Refraktif Cerrahide Güncel Yaklaşımlar". Glokom Katarakt 14/4 (2019), 161-170.