Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar

Mehmet HABERLİ (Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi, İslami İlimler Fakültesi Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri Bölümü, Bilecik, Türkiye)
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
31 3
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 879 - 902 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 24-10-2020

Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar

Öz:
İnternet ve mobil iletişim teknolojilerinin sosyal yaşama ayrılmaz bir şekildeentegre olması, dinin dijital uzama daha çok boyutlu olarak genişlemesinisağlamıştır. Bu noktada, dinin/dinlerin dijital medya ile etkileşimini ve buetkileşim bağlamında değişen din algısı ile pratikleri konu edinen ve “dijitaldin araştırmaları” olarak nitelendirilen yeni bir disiplinlerarası araştırmasahası ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu makale de dijital din araştırmalarının gelişimsürecinde ele alınan paradigma değişimleri, başlıca konular, kullanılanmetodolojik yaklaşım ve teknikler incelenmiştir. Analizler neticesinde,dünyada olgunlaşma, Türkiye’de ise filizlenme aşamasında olan dijital dinaraştırmalarındaki sınırlılıklar ve eksiklikler tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bunoktada gelecekte yapılacak ardıl araştırmalara yönelik önerilerdebulunulmaya çalışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Issues and Approaches in Digital Religion Studies

Öz:
The fact that internet and mobile communication technologies are inextricably intertwined with social life has enabled religion to expand more in digital space. At this point, a new field of interdisciplinary research has emerged, which deals with the interaction of religion/religions with digital media, and the changing perception of religion and practices in the context of this interaction called “digital religion researches”. In this article, paradigm changes, main topics, methodological approaches and techniques used in the development process of digital religion researches are examined. As a result of the analysis, limitations and deficiencies in the research field of digital religion which is a mature issue in the world, but a red-hot issue in Turkey has tried to be determined.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdulla, R. (2007). Islam, Jihad, and Terrorism in Post 9/11 Arabic discussion boards. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,12, 1063-1081.
  • Al-Rawi, A. (2016). Facebook As a Virtual Mosque: The Online Protest Against Innocence of Muslims, Culture and Religion, 1-16.
  • Antweiler, K. R. (2006). Rituals Online: Transferring and Designing Rituals. Online Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, C.2(1), 54-72.
  • Brasher, Brenda E. (2001). Give Me That Online Religion, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Brauchler, B. (2003). Cyberidentities at War Religion, Identity, and the Internet in the Moluccan Conflict. Indonesia, (75), 123-151.
  • Bunt, G. (2000). Virtually Islamic: Computer-Mediated Gommunicatian and Cyber Islamic Environments. Lampeter: University or Wales Press.
  • Bunt, G. (2003). Islam in the Digital Age: E-Jihad, Online Fatwas and Cyber Islamic Environments, London: Pluto Press.
  • Bunt, G. (2012). Din ve İnternet. Din Sosyolojisi: Çağdaş Gelişmeler (Çev Edt. İhsan Çapcıoğlu), Ankara: İmge Yayınevi, 175- 200.
  • Bunt, G. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Campbell, H. (2003a). Approaches to Religious Research in ComputerMediated Communication. Mediating Religion: Conversations in Media, Culture and Religion. New York: T & T Clark/Continuum, 213-228.
  • Campbell, H. (2003b). Online Communities, Religious. Encyclopedia of Community: From Village to Virtual World. (Edt. K. Christensen ve D. Levinson), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1027-1029.
  • Campbell, H. (2005). Exploring Religious Community Online: We are one in the Network. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Campbell, H. (2007). “What hath god wrought?” Considering how religious communities culture (or Kosher) the cell phone. Continuum, 21(2), 191-203.
  • Campbell, H. (2011). Internet and Religion. The Handbook of Internet Studies. (Edt. M. Consalvo ve C. Ess), Singapore: Blackwell Publishing, 232-250.
  • Campbell, H. (2012). The Relationship between Religion Online and Offline in a Networked Society, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 80, No. 1, 64-93.
  • Campbell, H. (2013). The Rise of the Study of Digital Religion. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds (Edt. H.
  • Campbell), London: Routledge, 1-22.
  • Campbell, H. (2017). Surveying Theoretical Approaches within Digital Religion Studies. New Media & Society 19(1), 15-24.
  • Campbell, H. & Altenhofen, B. (2016). Methodological Challenges, Innovations and Growing Pains in Digital Religion Research. Digital Methodologies in the Sociology of Religion, (Edt S. Cheruvallil-Contractor- S. Shakkour), London: Bloomsbury, 1-13.
  • Campbell, H. & Evolvi, G. (2019). Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research On Emerging Technologies. Hum Behav & Emerg Tech, 1-13.
  • Campbell, H. A. & Lövheim, M. (2011). Introduction: Rethinking the OnlineOffline Connection in the Study of Religion Online. Information, Communication &Society, 1083-1096.
  • Cantoni, L. & Zyga, S.(2007). The Use of Internet Communication by Catholic Congregations: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Media and Religion, 6:4, 291-309.
  • Cheong P. H & Poon JPH. (2009). Weaving webs of faith: examining Internet use and religious communication among Chinese protestant transmigrants. JIIC, 2(3): 189–207.
  • Cheong, P. H. (2014). Tweet the message? Religious authority and social media innovation. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 3(3), 1–19.
  • Cheong, P. H., Poon, Jessie P. H. ve dğr. (2009). The Internet Highway and Religious Communities: Mapping and Contesting Spaces in Religion Online. The Information Society, C. 25, 291-302.
  • Cho, K. (2011). New Media and Religion: Observations on Research. Communıcatıon Research Trends, Vol. 30, No.1, 4-22.
  • Cobb, Jennifer J. (1998). Cybergrace: The Search For God in the Digital World. New York: Crown.
  • Çamdereli, M. & Önay, B. D. & Şener, Nihal K. (2015). Medya ve Din 2: Dijital Din, İstanbul: Köprü Kitaplar.
  • Dawson, L. & Cowan, D., Edt. (2004) Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet, New York: Routledge.
  • Dawson, Lorne L. (2000). Researching Religion in Cyberspace. Issues and Strategies. Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises (Edt. J. K.
  • Hadden ve D. E. Cowan), London: JAI Press/Elsevier Science, 25-54.
  • Dawson, Lorne L. (2004). Religion and the Quest for Virtual Community. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet, (Edt. D. E. Cowan & L. Dawson), London: Routledge, 75-89.
  • Dereli, M. D. (2020). Sanala Veda: Sosyal Medya ve Dönüşen Dindarlık. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Eken, M. (2019). Modern görsel kültürde online din: M nesli’nin online inanç pratikleri üzerine bir inceleme. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
  • Fernback, J. (2002). Internet Ritual: A Case for the Construction of Computer-Mediated Neopagan Religious Meaning. Practicing Religion in the Age of Media. New York: Columbia
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Goethals, G. (2003). Myth and Ritual in Cyberspace. Mediating Religion: Conversations in Media, Religion and Culture (Edt. J. Mitchell & S. Marriage), Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
  • Graf, B. (2014). Media Fatwas and Fatwa Editors: Challenging and Preserving Yusuf al-Qaradawi's Religious Authority. Media Evolution on the Eve of the Arab Spring, (Edt. Hudson, L., Iskandar, A.,Kirk, M.) New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 139-157.
  • Grieve, G. (2010). Virtually Embodying the Field: Silent Online Buddhist Meditation, Immersion, and the Cardean Ethnographic Method Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 4(1): 35–62.
  • Helland, C.(2000). Online-Religion/Religion-Online and Virtual Communitas. Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises, (Edt. J.K. Hadden –D.E. Cowan), New York:JAI Pressss, 205-223
  • Haberli, M. (2014). Sanal Din: Tarihsel, Kuramsal ve Pratik Boyutlarıyla İnternet ve Din. İstanbul: Açılımkitap.
  • Haberli, M. (2019). Dijital Çağda Din ve Dindarlığın Dönüşümü. Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi (MEDİAD), 2(2), 307-315.
  • Hadden, J.K. and Cowan, D.E. (Edt) (2000). Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises. London and New York: JAI Press.
  • Hill-Smith, C. (2009). Cyberpilgrimage: A Study of Authenticity, Presence and Meaning in Online Pilgrimage Experiences. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 21(2). www.utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/jrpc.21.2.006
  • Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatization and The Changing Authority o f Religion. Media, Culture & Society, 38(1), 8-17.
  • Hoover, S. M. & Clark, L. S. (2004). Faith Online. Pew Internet and Public Life Project. Erişim Adresi: www.pewtrusts.org/ /media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/society_and_the_int ernet/pewinternetfaith0404pdf
  • Hoover, Stewart M. (Edt).(2016). The Media and Religious Authority, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Hutchings, T. (2017a). Creating Church Online: Ritual, Community and New Media. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hutchings, T. (2017b). Design and The Digital Bible: Persuasive Technology and Religious Reading. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 32(2), 205-219.
  • Jacobs, S. (2007). Virtually Sacred: The Performance of Asynchronous CyberRituals in Online Spaces. JCMC, C.12, 1103-1021.
  • Kendall, L. (2003). Virtual Communities. Encyclopedia of Community: From Village to Virtual World (Edt. K. Christensen & D. Levinson), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1054-1063.
  • Knowles, S. (2013). Rapture Ready and the World Wide Web: Religious Authority on the Internet. Journal of Media and Religion, 12/3, 128-143.
  • Larsen, E. (2000). Wired Churches, Wired Temples: Taking Congregations and Missions into Cyberspace. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Erişim Adresi: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2000/12/20/wired-churches-wiredtemples
  • Larsen, E. (2001). CyberFaith: How Americans Pursue Religion Online. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Erişim Adresi: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2001/12/23/cyberfaith-how-americanspursue-religion-online/
  • Lawrence, B. (2002). Allah on Line: The Practice of Islam in the Information Age. Practicing Religion in the Age of the Media: Explorations in Media, Religion, and Culture, (Edt S. M. Hoover & L. S. Clark) New York: Columbia University Press, 237-253.
  • Linjakumpu, A. (2011). Alternative Islamic voices on the internet. Mediating Faiths: Religion and Socio-Cultural Change in the Twenty-First Century. (Edt. M. Bailey & G. Redden). 37-48.
  • Lövheim, M. (2004). Young People, Religious Identity and the Internet. Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet, London: Routledge, 59-70.
  • Lövheim, M. & Campbell, H. (2017). Considering Critical Methods And Theoretical Lenses in Digital Religion Studies. New Media &Society, 19(1), 5-14.
  • Lövheim, M. & Linderman, Alf G. (2005). Constructing Religious Identity on the Internet. Religion and Cyberspace. (Edt. M. T. Hojsgaard ve M. Warburg), London: Routledge, 121-137.
  • Maguire, M. (2007). The Islamic Internet: Authority, Authenticity and Reform. Media on the Move Global Flow and Contra-Flow, (Edt. Daya Kishan Thussu), New York: Routledge, 209-221.
  • Mandaville, P. (2001). Transnational Muslim Politics: Reimagining the Umma. London: Routeldge.
  • Mandaville, P. (2003). Communication and Diasporic Islam: A Virtual Ummah?. The Media of Diaspora, (Edt. K. H. Karim), London: Routledge, 135-147.
  • Miczek, N. (2007). Rituals Online: Dynamic Processes Reflecting Individual Perspectives. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, C. 1(2), 197-204.
  • Morgan, D. (2013). Religion and media: A critical review of recent developments. Critical Research on Religion, 1(3), 347-356.
  • Narbona, J. (2016). Digital Leadership, Twitter And Pope Francis. Church, Communication and Culture, 1(1), 90-109.
  • Okun, S. & Nimrod, G. (2017). Online ultra-orthodox religious communities as third spaces: A netnographic study. International Journal of Communication. 11. 2825-2841.
  • O’Leary, S. D. (1996). Cyberspace as Sacred Space: Communicating Religion On Computer Networks. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, C. 4, 781-808.
  • O’Leary, S. D. & Brasher, B. (1996). The Unknown God of the Internet. Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. (Edt. C. Ess), New York: SUNY Press, 233-271.
  • Önay Doğan, B. (2015).Dini Kimlik ve Sanal Uzam. (M. Çamdereli & B. Önay Doğan & N.Kocabay Şener), Dijitalleşen Din. İstanbul: Köprü Kitapları, 223-246.
  • Pew Internet and American Life Project (2014), Religion and Electronic Media. Erişim Adresi: www.pewforum.org/2014/11/06/religion-and-electronicmedia/
  • Possamai, A. & Turner, B. S. (2012). Authority and liquid religion in cyberspace: the new territories of religious communication. International Social Science Journal, 63 (209), 197-206.
  • Quinn, D. (2019). The Digital Pulpit: A Nationwide Analysis of Online Sermons.Pew Internet and American Life Project. www.pewforum.org/2019/12/16/the-digital-pulpit-a-nationwide-analysis-ofonline-sermons/
  • Radde-Antweiler, K. (2013). Authenticity. Digital Religion Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds (Edt. H. Campbell), London Routledge, 88-103.
  • Ritzer, G. (2015). Prosumer Capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413-445.
  • Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: the Search for a new Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press
  • Sands, K. Z. (2010). Muslims Identity and Multimodal Communication on The Internet. Cont Islam, 4, 139-155.
  • Schroeder, Ralph & Heather, N & Raymond, M. L. (1998). The Sacred and the Virtual: Religion in Multi- User Virtual Reality. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication 4(2). www. jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue2/schroeder.html.
  • Seggie F. N & Bayburt, Y. ( 2015). Nitel araştırma, yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımları. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Snee H. & Hine C. & Morey Y. & Roberts S. & Watson H. (2016) Digital Methods as Mainstream Methodology: An Introduction. Digital Methods for Social Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sturgill, A. (2004). Scope and Purposes of Church Web Sites. Journal of Media and Religion, 3/3, 165-176.
  • Summeren, C. (2007). Religion online: The shaping of multidimensional interpretations of muslimhood on Maroc.nl. Communications. 32, 273-295.
  • Turner, B. S. (2007). Religious Authority and the New Media. Theory, Culture&Society, C.24 (2), 117-134.
  • Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. JCMC, Volume 10, Number 3 (2005), 100-110.
  • Yiğitoğlu, M. (2015). Dinlerde Dua, Sunu ve Sunaklar: Fiziki Alemden Sanal Aleme, İstanbul: Kitabi Yayınevi.
  • Zaleski, J. P. (1997). The Soul of Cyberspace: How New Technology is Changing our Spiritual Lives. New York: HarperEdge.
  • Zijderveld, T. (2017). Pope Francis in Cairo: Authority and branding on Instagram. Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet, 12, 125-140.
APA Haberli M (2020). Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. , 879 - 902.
Chicago Haberli Mehmet Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. (2020): 879 - 902.
MLA Haberli Mehmet Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. , 2020, ss.879 - 902.
AMA Haberli M Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. . 2020; 879 - 902.
Vancouver Haberli M Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. . 2020; 879 - 902.
IEEE Haberli M "Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar." , ss.879 - 902, 2020.
ISNAD Haberli, Mehmet. "Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar". (2020), 879-902.
APA Haberli M (2020). Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 879 - 902.
Chicago Haberli Mehmet Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 9, no.2 (2020): 879 - 902.
MLA Haberli Mehmet Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2020, ss.879 - 902.
AMA Haberli M Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020; 9(2): 879 - 902.
Vancouver Haberli M Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020; 9(2): 879 - 902.
IEEE Haberli M "Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar." İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9, ss.879 - 902, 2020.
ISNAD Haberli, Mehmet. "Dijital Din Araştırmalarında Konu ve Yaklaşımlar". İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 9/2 (2020), 879-902.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
14-05-2024 12:59

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları