Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 156 - 162 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21653/tjpr.547050 İndeks Tarihi: 28-10-2020

AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS

Öz:
Purpose: The study aimed to examine hamstring-quadriceps muscle activations of the supinebridge and reverse plank exercises that are performed for both improving the overall body strengthand contributing to the treatment in the process following an injury on different grounds.Methods: Ten participants (four males and six females, age=26.70±3.02 years) without regularsports habits were included in the study. Bilateral supine bridge and bilateral reverse plankexercises were practiced randomly on stable and unstable grounds. In the study, muscle activationvalues of vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (SEM)muscles of the participants were examined. Along with the muscle activation that occurred duringthe exercise, hamstring (BF+SEM)/quadriceps (VM+VL) ratio was also determined (H:Q).Results: The lowest co-activation ratio (most balanced H:Q activation) was observed on stableground bridge exercise (5.83±4.04), and the largest co-activation ratio (hamstring dominantactivation) was observed on stable ground plank exercise (8.84±6.60). No significant differencewas found between exercises at H:Q co-activation ratio (p>0.05). A statistically significantdifference was found in the quadriceps and hamstring group in terms of exercise and differenceground in favor of plank (p<0.05).Conclusion: Reverse plank exercise has greater agonist muscle activation than the supine bridge.Therefore, it is thought that bridge exercise could be advised in the rehabilitation process thatnecessitates a high level of balance, especially in co-activation ratio. Further study with variousclinical problems may direct the process.
Anahtar Kelime:

FARKLI ZEMİNLERDE UYGULANAN BRIDGE-PLANK EGZERSİZLERİNDE UYLUK KAS AKTİVASYONUNUN İNCELENMESİ

Öz:
Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı, hem genel vücut kuvvetini geliştirmek hem de yaralanma sonrası süreçte tedaviye katkı sağlaması amacıyla farklı zeminlerde uygulanan sırtüstü köprü ve ters plank egzersizlerindeki hamstring-quadriceps kas aktivasyonlarının incelenmesiydi. Yöntem: Araştırmaya aktif spor yaşantısı olmayan 10 katılımcı (dört erkek ve altı kadın, yaş=26,70±3,02 yıl) dâhil edildi. Randomize olarak sabit ve sabit olmayan zeminlerde bilateral köprü ve bilateral ters plank egzersizleri uygulandı. Araştırmada katılımcıların vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF) ve semitendinosus (SEM) kas aktivasyon seviyeleri incelendi. Egzersiz sırasında meydana gelen kas aktivitesi ile birlikte hamstring (BF+SEM)/ quadriceps (VM+VL) oranı da tespit edildi (H:Q). Sonuçlar: En düşük ko-aktivasyon oranı (en dengeli H:Q aktivasyonu) sabit zemin köprü egzersizinde (5,83±4,04) ve en yüksek ko-aktivasyon oranı (hamstring dominant aktivasyon) sabit zemin plank egzersizinde (8,84±6,60) görüldü. H:Q ko-aktivasyon oranında egzersizler arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı (p>0,05). Egzersiz ve zemin farklılığı açısından hamstring ve quadriceps grubunda plank lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık tespit edildi (p<0,05). Tartışma: Ters plank egzersizi sırtüstü köprüye göre daha yüksek agonist kas aktivasyonuna sahiptir. Bu sebeple, özellikle yüksek ko-aktivasyon oranı gerektiren rehabilitasyon sürecindeki hastalara köprü egzersizinin tavsiye edilebileceği düşünülmektedir. Değişik klinik sorunlarda yapılacak değerlendirmeler yön gösterici olabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Govil K, Noohu MM. Effect of EMG biofeedback training of gluteus maximus muscle on gait parameters in incomplete spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):147-52.
  • 2. Muthukrishnan R, Shenoy SD, Jaspal SS, Nellikunja S, Fernandes S. The differential effects of core stabilization exercise regime and conventional physiotherapy regime on postural control parameters during perturbation in patients with movement and control impairment chronic low back pain. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2010;2(1):1-12.
  • 3. Thomas E, Bianco A, Mancuso EP, Patti A, Tabacchi G, Paoli A, et al. The effects of a calisthenics training intervention on posture, strength and body composition. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2017;25(3):215-22.
  • 4. Kotarsky CJ, Christensen BK, Miller JS, Hackney KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(3):651-9.
  • 5. Thopmson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2015: what’s driving the market. ACSM’S Health Fit J. 2014;18(6):8-17.
  • 6. Lee J, Jeong K, Lee H, Shin J, Choi J, Kang S, et al. Comparison of three different surface plank exercises on core muscle activity. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2015;5(1):29-33.
  • 7. Byrne JM, Bishop NS, Caines AM, Cranev KA, Feaver AM, Pearcey GE. Effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28(11):3049-55.
  • 8. Uçar M, Koca I, Eroglu M, Eroglu S, Sarp U, Arik HO, et al. Evaluation of open and closed kinetic chain exercises in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(12):1875-8.
  • 9. Cho SH, Bae CH, Gak HB. Effects of closed kinetic chain exercises on proprioception and functional scores of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(10):1239-41.
  • 10. Czaprowski D, Afeltowicz A, Gębicka A, Pawłowska P, Kędra A, Barrios C, et al. Abdominal muscle EMG-activity during bridge exercises on stable and unstable surfaces. Phys Ther Sport. 2014;15(3):162-8.
  • 11. Borreani S, Calatayud J, Martin J, Colado JC, Tella V, Behm D. Exercise intensity progression for exercises performed on unstable and stable platforms based on ankle muscle activation. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):404-9.
  • 12. Ferreira LAB, Pereira WM, Rossi LP, Kerpers II, de Paula Jr AR, Oliveira CS. Analysis of electromyographic activity of ankle muscles on stable and unstable surfaces with eyes open and closed. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011;15(4):496-501.
  • 13. Anderson KG, Behm DG. Maintenance of EMG activity and loss of force output with instability. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):637-40.
  • 14. Behm DG, Anderson K, Curnew RS. Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(3):416-22.
  • 15. Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. Electromyographic activity and 6RM strength in bench press on stable and unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(4):1101-7.
  • 16. Lawrence MA, Carlson LA. Effects of an unstable load on force and muscle activation during a parallel back squat. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(10):2949-53.
  • 17. Kim MJ, Oh DW, Park HJ. Integrating arm movement into bridge exercise: effect on EMG activity of selected trunk muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(5):1119-23.
  • 18. Walsh M, Boling MC, McGrath M, Blackburn JT, Padua DA. Lower extremity muscle activation and knee flexion during a jumplanding task. J Athl Train. 2012;47(4):406-13.
  • 19. Dedinsky R, Baker L, Imbus S, Bowman M, Murray L. Exercises that facilitate optimal hamstring and quadriceps co-activation to help decrease ACL injury risk in healthy females: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(1):3-15.
  • 20. Harput G, Soylu AR, Ertan H, Ergun N, Mattacola CG. Effect of gender on the quadriceps-to-hamstrings coactivation ratio during different exercises. J Sport Rehabil. 2014;23(1):36-43.
  • 21. Kim HJ, Lee JH, Ahn SE, Park MJ, Lee DH. Influence of anterior cruciate ligament tear on thigh muscle strength and hamstringto- quadriceps ratio: a meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2016;11(1):1- 11.
  • 22. Harput G, Kilinc HE, Ozer H, Baltaci G, Mattacola CG. Quadriceps and hamstring strength recovery during early neuromuscular rehabilitation after ACL hamstring-tendon autograft reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil. 2015;24(4):398-404.
  • 23. White KK, Lee SS, Cutuk A, Hargens AR, Pedowitz RA. EMG power spectra of intercollegiate athletes and anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):371-6.
  • 24. Begalle RL, DiStefano LJ, Blackburn T, Padua DA. Quadriceps and hamstrings coactivation during common therapeutic exercises. J Athl Train. 2012;47(4):396-405.
  • 25. Hakkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Malkia E, et al. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol. 1998;84(4):1341-9.
  • 26. Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved on December 2018, from http:// www.randomizer.org/
  • 27. Project SENIAM. Surface Electromyography for the non-invasive assessment of muscles; 2011. Available at: www.seniam.org. Access Date: 26.02.2019.
  • 28. Andrade R, Araújo RC, Tucci HT, Martins J, Oliveira AS. Coactivation of the shoulder and arm muscles during closed kinetic chain exercises on an unstable surface. Singapore Med J. 2011;52(1):35-41.
  • 29. Imai A, Kaneoka K, Okubo Y, Shiina I, Tatsumura M, Izumi S, et al. Trunk muscle activity during lumbar stabilization exercises on both a stable and unstable surface. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(6):369-75.
  • 30. McBride JM, Larkin TR, Dayne AM, Haines TL, Kirby TJ. Effect of absolute and relative loading on muscle activity during stable and unstable squatting. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(2):177-83.
  • 31. Calatayud J, Colado JC, Martin F, Casaña J, Jakobsen MD, Andersen LL. Core muscle activity during the clean and jerk lift with barbell versus sandbags and water bags. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(6):803-10.
  • 32. Kohler JM, Flanagan SP, Whiting WC. Muscle activation patterns while lifting stable and unstable loads on stable and unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(2):313-21.
  • 33. Anderson K, Behm DG. Trunk muscle activity increases with unstable squat movements. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30(1):33- 45.
  • 34. Anderson GS, Gaetz M, Holzmann M, Twist P. Comparison of EMG activity during stable and unstable push-up protocols. European J Sport Sci. 2013;13(1):42-8.
  • 35. Reeves NP, Everding VQ, Cholewicki J, Morrisette DC. The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance. Exp Brain Res. 2006;174(4):694-700.
  • 36. Youdas JW, Hollman JH, Hitchcock JR, Hoyme GJ, Johnsen JJ. Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps femoris electromyographic activity between men and women during a single-limb squat on both a stable and labile surface. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(1):105-11.
  • 37. Kim T, Kim M, Lee M, Yoon B. Comparison of scapular muscle activation during shoulder elevation in older and young adults: A pilot study. J Back Musculoskelet. 2019;32(3):437-43.
APA Cinarli F, Olmez S, namaldı s, Karanfil E, Güllü K, Soylu A (2020). AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. , 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
Chicago Cinarli Fahri Safa,Olmez Sevim Beyza,namaldı seda,Karanfil Ecem,Güllü Kerem Hürcan,Soylu Abdullah Ruhi AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. (2020): 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
MLA Cinarli Fahri Safa,Olmez Sevim Beyza,namaldı seda,Karanfil Ecem,Güllü Kerem Hürcan,Soylu Abdullah Ruhi AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. , 2020, ss.156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
AMA Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. . 2020; 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
Vancouver Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. . 2020; 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
IEEE Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A "AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS." , ss.156 - 162, 2020. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
ISNAD Cinarli, Fahri Safa vd. "AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS". (2020), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.547050
APA Cinarli F, Olmez S, namaldı s, Karanfil E, Güllü K, Soylu A (2020). AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 31(2), 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
Chicago Cinarli Fahri Safa,Olmez Sevim Beyza,namaldı seda,Karanfil Ecem,Güllü Kerem Hürcan,Soylu Abdullah Ruhi AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 31, no.2 (2020): 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
MLA Cinarli Fahri Safa,Olmez Sevim Beyza,namaldı seda,Karanfil Ecem,Güllü Kerem Hürcan,Soylu Abdullah Ruhi AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), vol.31, no.2, 2020, ss.156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
AMA Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2020; 31(2): 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
Vancouver Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online). 2020; 31(2): 156 - 162. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
IEEE Cinarli F,Olmez S,namaldı s,Karanfil E,Güllü K,Soylu A "AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS." Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online), 31, ss.156 - 162, 2020. 10.21653/tjpr.547050
ISNAD Cinarli, Fahri Safa vd. "AN EXAMINATION OF THIGH MUSCLE ACTIVATIONS IN BRIDGE-PLANK EXERCISES PERFORMED ON DIFFERENT GROUNDS". Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi (Online) 31/2 (2020), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.547050