Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 70 - 77 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 İndeks Tarihi: 30-10-2020
Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques
Öz: Aim: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect ofdifferent layering techniques (bulk, oblique, centripetal, splithorizontal) on the marginal microleakage of Class II adhesiverestorations.Methodology: Forty-eight standardized Class II cavities wereprepared on both mesial and distal sides of extracted non-carioushuman molar teeth. Following preparation, all specimens wererandomly divided into four groups (n=12). Group 1: bulk technique;Group 2: oblique incremental technique; Group 3: centripetalincremental technique; Group 4: split horizontal incrementaltechnique. The teeth were restored with a total-etch adhesive systemand a microhybrid composite resin. After thermocycling andimmersion in a 0.2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, therestorations were sectioned, and dye penetration was evaluated undera stereomicroscope. The microleakage scores (0 to 4) obtained fromthe occlusal and gingival margins were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallisand Mann-Whitney U tests (p<0,05).Results: Incremental placement techniques showed lowermicroleakage compared with bulk and lower microleakage was seen atocclusal margin compared with gingival margin. However, there wereno statistically significant differences among four placementtechniques and the margins (p>0,05).Conclusions: Based on the results of the present study, none of thefour placement techniques were found to be effective in eliminatingmarginal microleakage entirely in Class II restorations. All of theplacement techniques showed similar results when the cavity marginswere located on the enamel.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Duarte S Jr, Saad JR. Marginal adaptation of Class 2 adhesive restorations. Quintessence Int 2008;39:413-9.
- 2. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 2012;28:801–9. (Crossref)
- 3. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:60-9. (Crossref)
- 4. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-9. (Crossref)
- 5. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:406-11.
- 6. Aguiar FHB, Ajudarte KF, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and filling techniques on microleakage of posterior resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:557-62.
- 7. Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behavior of high viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:977-85. (Crossref)
- 8. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:1-14.
- 9. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oidenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-84.
- 10. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J et al. Bonding to Enamel and Dentin. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, editors. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 3rd ed. London: Quintessence Pub Co; 2006. p. 202-42.
- 11. Nadig RR, Bugalia A, Usha G, Karthik J, Rao R, Vedhavathi B. Effect of four different placement techniques on marginal microleakage in class II composite restorations: an in vitro study. World J Dent 2011;2:111-6. (Crossref)
- 12. Khosravi K, Ataei E, Mousavi M et al. Phosphoric acid etching of enamel margins on the microleakage of a simplified all-in-one and a self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent 2009;34:531-6. (Crossref)
- 13. Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pecora JD. Microleakage of class v resin composites restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001;26:491-7.
- 14. 3M ESPE Dental Products. AdperTM Single Bond 2 Adhesive Technical Product Profile. http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/276868O/adpersingle-bond-2-technical-profile.pdf Accessed March 19, 2016
- 15. Cangul S, Adiguzel O. The latest developments related to composite resins. Int Dent Res 2017;7:32-41. (Crossref)
- 16. Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H, Tahvildarnejad N. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage. J Contempor Dent Pract 2007;8:1-7.
- 17. Tay FR, Moulding KM, Pashley DH. Distribution of nanofillers from a simplified-step adhesive in acid- conditioned dentin. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(2):103-17.
- 18. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhesive Dent 2001;3:237-45.
- 19. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002;33:213-24.
- 20. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998,77:1435-45. (Crossref)
- 21. Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:297-304.
- 22. Bichacho N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23.
- 23. Usha H, Kumari A, Mehta D, Kaiwar A, Jain N. Comparing microleakage and layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in class V cavities using confocal microscopy: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011 14: 164-8. (Crossref)
- 24. Hassan K, Khier S. Split-increment technique: an alternative approach for large cervical composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:121-8.
- 25. Santhosh L, Bashetty K, Nadig G. The influence of different composite placement techniques on microleakage in preparations with high C-factor: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:112-6. (Crossref)
- 26. Neiva IF, Andrada MA, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998;23:282-9.
- 27. Hassan K, Khier S. Composite restorations of large class II cavities using split-increment horizontal placement technique. Gen Dent 2006;54:172-7.
- 28. Sadeghi M. The effect of fluid composite as gingival layer on microleakage of class II composite restorations. Dent Res J 2007;4:40-7.
| APA | MİSİLLİ U, YILMAZ F (2018). Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. , 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| Chicago | MİSİLLİ Umut,YILMAZ FİKRET Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. (2018): 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| MLA | MİSİLLİ Umut,YILMAZ FİKRET Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. , 2018, ss.70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| AMA | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. . 2018; 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| Vancouver | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. . 2018; 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| IEEE | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F "Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques." , ss.70 - 77, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| ISNAD | MİSİLLİ, Umut - YILMAZ, FİKRET. "Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques". (2018), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| APA | MİSİLLİ U, YILMAZ F (2018). Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. International Dental Research, 8(2), 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| Chicago | MİSİLLİ Umut,YILMAZ FİKRET Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. International Dental Research 8, no.2 (2018): 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| MLA | MİSİLLİ Umut,YILMAZ FİKRET Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. International Dental Research, vol.8, no.2, 2018, ss.70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| AMA | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(2): 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| Vancouver | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(2): 70 - 77. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| IEEE | MİSİLLİ U,YILMAZ F "Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques." International Dental Research, 8, ss.70 - 77, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
| ISNAD | MİSİLLİ, Umut - YILMAZ, FİKRET. "Evaluation of marginal microleakage in composite restorations with different placement techniques". International Dental Research 8/2 (2018), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.4 |
