Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 78 - 83 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 İndeks Tarihi: 30-10-2020
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population
Öz: Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of bifidmandibular canals (BMC) in a Turkish population, using cone-beamcomputed tomography (CBCT).Methodology: The CBCT images of 350 untreated patients (178male, 172 female ranging in age between 18 and 65,) were includedin this study. The presence or absence of BMC was determined in axial,sagittal, and coronal planes by considering gender and side. Forstatistical evaluation, a chi‑square test was used to determine anydifferences in the prevalence of BMC with significance set at 5%.Results: BMCs were observed in 129 out of 700 sides (18.42%) and 97out of 350 patients (27.71%), of which, 55 were in males and 42 infemales. Regardless of gender, the right side was more frequentlyaffected (73%). Male patients showed higher prevalence (15.71%) thanthe female patients (12%).Conclusions: BMC was observed in 27.71% of examined Turkishsubjects and detected more frequently in males and on the right side.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011;33:501-7. (Crossref)
- 2. de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PH, de Azambuja Berti-Couto S, et al. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:387-93. (Crossref)
- 3. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:155-9.
- 4. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-71. (Crossref)
- 5. Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:731-4.
- 6. Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal TJ, et al. The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;16:147-51. (Crossref)
- 7. Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1493-7. (Crossref)
- 8. Cangul S, Adiguzel O. Cone-Beam Three-Dimensional Dental Volumetric Tomography in Dental Practice. Int Dent Res 2017;7:62-70. (Crossref)
- 9. Aktuna Belgin C, Adiguzel O, Bud M, Colak M, Akkus Z. Mandibular Buccal Bone Thickness In Southeastern Anatolian People: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int Dent Res 2017;7:6-12. (Crossref)
- 10. Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:53-60. (Crossref)
- 11. Das S, Suri RK. An anatomic-radiological study of an accessory mandibular foramen on the medial mandibular surface. Folia Morphol 2004;63:511-3.
- 12. Villaça-Carvalho MF, Manhães LR Jr, de Moraes ME, et al. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:289-94. (Crossref)
- 13. Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, et al. Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:235-9. (Crossref)
- 14. Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:923-6. (Crossref)
- 15. Grover PS, Lorton L. Bifid mandibular nerve as a possible cause of inadequate anesthesia in the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:177-9. (Crossref)
- 16. Falakaloglu S, Veis A. Determining the size of the mental foramen: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Int Dent Res 2017;7:20-5. (Crossref)
- 17. Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I, et al. Observation of the retromolar foramen and canal of the mandible: a CBCT and macroscopic study. Oral Radiology 2012;28:10-4. (Crossref)
- 18. Fuentes R, Farfán C, Astete N, et al. Bilateral bifid mandibular canal: a case report using cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2018. (Crossref)
- 19. Adiguzel O, Yigit Ozer S, Kaya S, Akkus Z. Patient-specific factors in the proximity of the inferior alveolar nerve to the tooth apex. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal 2012;17(6):e1103-8. (Crossref)
- 20. Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:55–8. (Crossref)
- 21. Neves FS, Nascimento MC, Oliveira ML, et al. Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;18:419-24. (Crossref)
- 22. Kim MS, Yoon SJ, Park HW, et al. A false presence of bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40:434-8. (Crossref)
- 23. Rouas P, Delbos Y, Nancy J. Pseudo multiple and enlarged mandibular canals: the evidence-based response of cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:217-8. (Crossref)
- 24. Fu E, Peng M, Chiang CY, et al. Bifid mandibular canals and the factors associated with their presence: a medical computed tomography evaluation in a Taiwanese population. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;25:64-7. (Crossref)
- 25. Motamedi MHK, Navi F, Sarabi N. Bifid mandibular canals: prevalence and implications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:387-90. (Crossref)
- 26. Orhan Al, Orhan K, Aksoy S, et al. Evaluation of perimandibular neurovascularization with accessory mental foramina using cone-beam computed tomography in children. J CraniofacSurg 2013. (Crossref)
- 27. Nortjé CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 1977;15:55-63.
- 28. Sanchis JM, Peñarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:422-4. (Crossref)
| APA | Laçin N, Aytuğar E, VELI I (2018). Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. , 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| Chicago | Laçin Nihat,Aytuğar Emre,VELI ILKNUR Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. (2018): 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| MLA | Laçin Nihat,Aytuğar Emre,VELI ILKNUR Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. , 2018, ss.78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| AMA | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. . 2018; 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| Vancouver | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. . 2018; 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| IEEE | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I "Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population." , ss.78 - 83, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| ISNAD | Laçin, Nihat vd. "Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population". (2018), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| APA | Laçin N, Aytuğar E, VELI I (2018). Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research, 8(2), 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| Chicago | Laçin Nihat,Aytuğar Emre,VELI ILKNUR Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research 8, no.2 (2018): 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| MLA | Laçin Nihat,Aytuğar Emre,VELI ILKNUR Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research, vol.8, no.2, 2018, ss.78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| AMA | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(2): 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| Vancouver | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research. 2018; 8(2): 78 - 83. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| IEEE | Laçin N,Aytuğar E,VELI I "Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population." International Dental Research, 8, ss.78 - 83, 2018. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
| ISNAD | Laçin, Nihat vd. "Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population". International Dental Research 8/2 (2018), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.5 |
