Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 207 - 212 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480 İndeks Tarihi: 01-11-2020

A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction

Öz:
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the mammography experience of patients using a manually controlled self- compression tool compared to theirprevious experience based on technician performed breast compression by a questionnaire survey study.Materials and Methods: Th survey studies of 365 patients who underwent screening or diagnostic mammography between April 2017 andJuly 2017 at our center were reviewed retrospectively. Each patient had completed a 12-item questionnaire following mammography examinations.Women who never had a mammography before or who had a previous mammography examination more than 2 years ago or who did not want touse the self-compression device were excluded from the study. 106 women were included in the study.Results: Patient satisfaction was high. Regarding the comparison of the experience of the exam to previous ones, 70.8% said it was a better experience. Th examination was found comfortable by 85.4% of the participants and 75.5% found the examination more comfortable compared to previous ones. Only 11.3% were anxious and 52.8% declared they were less anxious compared to previous examinations. Regarding the attractiveness ofthe new design, 66.9% declared they found the new design attractive, 39.7% found it more attractive than previous examinations, and 27.3% saidthe new design decreased anxiety. In the evaluation of impact of patient-assisted compression (PAC) on comfort, 80.2% said that they found it morecomfortable and 64.2% said that PAC decreased anxiety. Furthermore, 72.6% said the exam was shorter.Conclusion: Self-compression technique decreases pain and anxiety of women during mammography examinations and promises to enhancecompliance of clients and patients with follow-up mammography recommendations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Smith RA, Duff SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. Th randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 793- 806. (PMID: 15337416) [CrossRef]
  • 2. Tabár L, Yen AM, Wu WY, Chen SL, Chiu SY, Fann JC, Ku MM, Smith RA, Duff SW, Chen TH. Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affcts the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs. Breast J 2015; 21: 13-20. (PMID: 25413699) [CrossRef]
  • 3. Perry N, BroedersM, deWolf C, Tornberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 614-622. (PMID: 18024988) [CrossRef]
  • 4. Helvie MA, Chan HP, Adler DD, Boyd PG. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effct on image quality and radiation dose. American journal of roentgenology 1994; 163:1371-1374. (PMID: 7992731) [CrossRef]
  • 5. Heine JJ, Cao K, Thmas JA. Effctive radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness inflences and correction. Biomed Eng Online 2010; 9: 73. (PMID: 21080916) [CrossRef]
  • 6. Keemers-Gels ME, Groenendijk RP, van den Heuvel JH, Boetes C, Peer PG, Wobbes TH. Pain experienced by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 60: 235-240. (PMID: 10930111) [CrossRef]
  • 7. Shrestha S, Poulos A. Th effct of verbal information on the experience of discomfort in mammography. Radiography 2001; 7: 271-277. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Yılmaz M, Kıymaz Ö. Anxiety and pain associated with process mammography: inflence of process information before. J Breast Health 2010; 6: 62-68.
  • 9. Lambertz CK, Johnson CJ, Montgomery PG, Maxwell JR. Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography. Radiology 2008; 248: 765-772. (PMID: 18647845) [CrossRef]
  • 10. Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Sullivan DC, Catoe KE, Stout AL, Brackett JS. Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 1993; 186: 99-102. (PMID: 8416595) [CrossRef]
  • 11. Balleyguier C, Cousin M, Dunant A, Attard M, Delaloge S, ArfiRouche J. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography. Eur J Cancer 2018; 103: 137-142. (PMID: 30223227) [CrossRef]
  • 12. Tabar L, Lebovic GS, Hermann GD, Kaufman CS, Alexander C, Sayre J. Clinical assessment of a radiolucent cushion for mammography. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 154-158. (PMID: 15191098) [CrossRef]
  • 13. Markle L, Roux S, Sayre JW. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad. Breast J 2004; 10: 345-349. (PMID: 15239794) [CrossRef]
  • 14. Kornguth PJ, Keefe FJ, Conaway MR. Pain during mammography: characteristics and relationship to demographic and medical variables. Pain 1996; 66: 187-194. (PMID: 8880840) [CrossRef]
  • 15. Padoan M, Ferrante D, Pretti G, Magnani C. Study of socio-economic characteristics, diagnosis and outcome of women participating or not participating in mammogram screening. Ann Ig 2014; 26: 518-526. (PMID: 25524076)
  • 16. Hafslund B. Mammography and the experience of pain and anxiety. Radiography 2000; 6: 269-272. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Clements NC, Bird CE. Mammography-related anxiety: effct of preprocedural patient education. Women's Health Issues 2001; 11: 110-115. (PMID: 11275514) [CrossRef]
  • 18. Mendat CC, Mislan D, Hession-Kunz L. Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 359-364. (PMID: 28572739) [CrossRef]
  • 19. Bandura A, O'Leary A, Taylor CB, Gauthier J, Gossard D. Perceived selfefficy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 53: 563-571. (PMID: 2821217) [CrossRef]
  • 20. Staub E, Tursky B, Schwartz GE. Self-control and predictability: their effcts on reactions to aversive stimulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1971; 18: 157-162. (PMID: 5578258) [CrossRef]
APA Ulus S, Kovan O, Arslan A, Elpen Karyemez F, ARIBAL E (2019). A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. , 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
Chicago Ulus Sila,Kovan Ozge,Arslan Aydan,Elpen Karyemez Fatma Pinar,ARIBAL Erkin A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. (2019): 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
MLA Ulus Sila,Kovan Ozge,Arslan Aydan,Elpen Karyemez Fatma Pinar,ARIBAL Erkin A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. , 2019, ss.207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
AMA Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. . 2019; 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
Vancouver Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. . 2019; 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
IEEE Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E "A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction." , ss.207 - 212, 2019. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
ISNAD Ulus, Sila vd. "A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction". (2019), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
APA Ulus S, Kovan O, Arslan A, Elpen Karyemez F, ARIBAL E (2019). A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health, 15(4), 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
Chicago Ulus Sila,Kovan Ozge,Arslan Aydan,Elpen Karyemez Fatma Pinar,ARIBAL Erkin A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health 15, no.4 (2019): 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
MLA Ulus Sila,Kovan Ozge,Arslan Aydan,Elpen Karyemez Fatma Pinar,ARIBAL Erkin A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health, vol.15, no.4, 2019, ss.207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
AMA Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health. 2019; 15(4): 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
Vancouver Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction. European Journal of Breast Health. 2019; 15(4): 207 - 212. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
IEEE Ulus S,Kovan O,Arslan A,Elpen Karyemez F,ARIBAL E "A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction." European Journal of Breast Health, 15, ss.207 - 212, 2019. 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480
ISNAD Ulus, Sila vd. "A New Technical Mode in Mammography: SelfCompression Improves Satisfaction". European Journal of Breast Health 15/4 (2019), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2019.4480