The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children

Kayhan BOZGÜN, (Amasya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Programı, Amasya, Türkiye)
Serpil PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK (Hitit Üniversitesi, Sağlık Yüksekokulu, Çocuk Gelişimi Bölümü, Çorum, Türkiye)
Journal of Education and Future
11 1
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 14 Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 69 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 03-11-2020

The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children

Öz:
It is important for children to have some skills and competencies in the acquisitionof effective learning skills. Metacognition awareness that allow children to becomeaware of what they know and think to learn a knowledge and build on the knowledgethey will learn in this process; they need to be self-efficacy in order to accomplish a taskand to be able to come up with new problems or situations. In this context, the researchaimed to determine whether self-efficacy in children predicts metacognition awareness,and also the results of the relationship between self-efficacy and metacognition and thevalidity and reliability of the measurement tools used are included in the study. In theresearch, the correlational survey model, which is one of the quantitative researchmethod, is used to determine the relationship between two or more variables. The studygroup of this study consists of 350 children aged between 12 and 14 years, continuing tomiddle schools which are depends on Ministry of National Education in Turkey. ThePersonal Information Form, "Self-Efficacy Scale for Children" and "Scale ofMetacognition for Children" were used together to collect the data of the study. Thereliability coefficients of the measuring instruments were determined with the Cronbachalpha coefficient, after the fitting of the measuring instruments used in the study wasconfirmed on the working sample. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the self-efficacyscale for children were calculated .88; and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for themetacognition scale for children were calculated as .92. To investigate the relationshipbetween self-efficacy and metacognition awareness, the Pearson MomentsMultiplication Correlation Coefficient is calculated and confirmatory factor analysiswas used to check the fit of the scales with the sample group. It has been determinedthat self-efficacy is a predictor of metacognition awareness according to the results ofmultiple regression to examine whether self-efficacy beliefs in children are predictive ofmetacognition awareness. The development of metacognition and self-efficacy levelstogether in children is one of the issues to be emphasized by parents and educators.
Anahtar Kelime:

Çocuklarda Üstbiliş Farkındalığının Yordayıcısı olarak Özyeterlik

Öz:
Çocuklar için etkili öğrenme becerilerinin edinilmesi konusunda bazı becerilere ve yetkinliklere sahip olmak önemlidir. Çocukların bir bilgi edinmek için bildikleri ve düşündüklerinin farkında olmalarını sağlayan ve bu süreçte öğrenecekleri bilgiyi geliştiren üstbiliş farkındalığına; bir görevi yerine getirmek ve yeni sorunlar veya durumlarla karşılaşabilmek için de öz yeterlik becerilerine sahip olmaları gerekir. Bu bağlamda, araştırmanın amacı, çocukların öz yeterliklerinin üstbiliş becerilerini yordayıp yordamadığını ve öz yeterlik ile üstbiliş arasındaki ilişkinin sonuçlarını ve kullanılan ölçüm araçlarının geçerlik ve güvenilirliğini araştırmaktır. Araştırmada yöntem olarak nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden olan, iki veya daha fazla değişken arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemeyi sağlayan ilişkisel tarama deseni kullanılmıştır. Yaşları 12- 14 arasında değişen Türkiye’de Millî Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı ortaokullara devam eden 350 ortaokul öğrencisi bu çalışmanın çalışma grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın verilerini toplamak için Kişisel bilgi formu, “Çocuklar için Özyeterlik Ölçeği” ve “Çocuklar için Bilişüstü Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan ölçme araçlarının çalışılan örneklem üzerindeki uyumu saptandıktan sonra, ölçme araçlarının güvenirlik katsayılarına Cronbach Alpha katsayısı ile bakılmıştır. Çocuklar için özyeterlik ölçeğinin Cronbach Alfa katsayısı .88; çocuklar için bilişüstü ölçeğinin güvenirlik katsayısı .92 olarak haesaplanmıştır. İki ölçek arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek için Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısı hesaplanmış; ölçeklerin örneklem grubu ile uyumunu kontrol etmek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Çocuklardaki özyeterlik becerilerinin üst biliş becerilerinin yordayıcısı olup olmadığını belirlemek için gerçekleştirilen çoklu regresyon sonuçlarına göre özyeterlik becerileri üstbilişin bir yordayıcısı olduğu bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Çocuklarda üstbiliş ve özyeterlik becerilerinin birlikte gelişimi aileler ve eğitimciler tarafından önemle üzerinde durulması gereken konular arasında yer almalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2000). Active learnig and teaching. (3. Edition). İzmir: Kanyılmaz Press.
  • Balcikanli, C. (2011). Metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1309-1332.
  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.
  • Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 212 -213). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bassi, M., Steca, P., Delle Fave, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 301-312.
  • Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139- 161.
  • Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
  • Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences. Ankara: Pegem.
  • Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between metacognition, self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 4(7), 115-141.
  • Cheng, E. C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. The International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1-16.
  • Ciardiello, A. V. (1998). Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognition staretgies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(3), 210.
  • Clause, C. S., Delbridge, K., Schmitt, N., Chan, D., & Jennings, D. (2001). Test preparation activities and employment test performance. Human Performance, 14(2), 149-167.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 165.
  • Çakıroğlu, A. (2007). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on improving the achıvement level of students having low achievement levels of reading comprehension. Do ctoral Thesis. Gazi University, Institute for Educational Science, Ankara.
  • Demir-Gülşen, M. (2000). A model to investigate probability and mathematics achievement İn terms of cognitive, metacognitive and affective variables. Master Thesis. Boğaziçi University, The Institute for Graduate Studies in Science and Engineering, İstanbul.
  • Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3-4), 407-442.
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Rensnick (Ed.), (pp. 231– 235). Hillsdale, NJ: John Wiley.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286.
  • Gall, J., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1999). Appling educational research. New York: Longman.
  • Gay L. R., 1987. Educational research compentencies for analysis and application. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85–99.
  • Gourgey, A. F. (1998). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. Instructional Science, 26(1), 81-96.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. & Mullen, M.(2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
  • Houtveen, A. A. M., Van de Grift, W. J. C. M., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2004). Effective school improvement in mathematics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(3-4), 337-376.
  • Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Shia, R., & Hong, N. S. (2000). Metacognitive self-regulation and problem-solving: Expanding the theory base through factor analysis. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, April 24- 28).
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  • Kaplan, A., & Duran, M. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik dersine çalışma s ürecinde üstbilişsel farkındalık düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 417-445.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  • Legg, A. M., & Locker Jr, L. (2009). Math performance and its relationship to math anxiety and metacognition. North American Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 471-486.
  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80-89.
  • Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J.L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
  • Moores, T. T., Chang, J. C. J., & Smith, D. K. (2006). Clarifying the role of self-efficacy and metacognition as predictors of performance: construct development and test. ACM SIGMIS Database, 37(2-3), 125-132.
  • Muris, P. (2001). “A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths”. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145–149.
  • Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborbe, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7– 28.
  • Özsoy, G. (2008). Metacognition. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(4), 713-740.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 116-125.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
  • Ridlo, S., & Lutfiya, F. (2017). The Correlation between metacognition level with self-efficacy of biology education college students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1), 012067. IOP Publishing.
  • Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242.
  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1- 2), 111-139.
  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7, 351–371.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement. A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Education, 73, 93-105.
  • Schunk, D. H. (1982). Effects of effort attributional feedback on children’s achievement: Self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 548-556.
  • Smith, M. S. (2002). Using the social cognitive model to explain vocational interest in ınformatio n technology. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20, 1–9.
  • Telef, B. B., & Karaca, R. (2012). The self efficacy scale for children; A validity and reliability study. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 32, 169-187.
  • Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 222– 259.
  • Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Oort, F. J. (2011). Can teachers motivate students to learn? Educational Studies, 37(3), 345-360.
  • Yıldız, E., Akpınar, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. (2009). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the metacognition scale for primary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1591-1604.
  • Zakeri, A., Rahmany, R., & Labone, E. (2016). Teachers’ Self-and Collective Efficacy: The Case of Novice English Language Teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 158- 167.
APA Bozgün K, PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S (2018). The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. , 57 - 69.
Chicago Bozgün Kayhan,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK Serpil The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. (2018): 57 - 69.
MLA Bozgün Kayhan,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK Serpil The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. , 2018, ss.57 - 69.
AMA Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. . 2018; 57 - 69.
Vancouver Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. . 2018; 57 - 69.
IEEE Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S "The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children." , ss.57 - 69, 2018.
ISNAD Bozgün, Kayhan - PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK, Serpil. "The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children". (2018), 57-69.
APA Bozgün K, PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S (2018). The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. Journal of Education and Future, 0(14), 57 - 69.
Chicago Bozgün Kayhan,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK Serpil The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. Journal of Education and Future 0, no.14 (2018): 57 - 69.
MLA Bozgün Kayhan,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK Serpil The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. Journal of Education and Future, vol.0, no.14, 2018, ss.57 - 69.
AMA Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. Journal of Education and Future. 2018; 0(14): 57 - 69.
Vancouver Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children. Journal of Education and Future. 2018; 0(14): 57 - 69.
IEEE Bozgün K,PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK S "The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children." Journal of Education and Future, 0, ss.57 - 69, 2018.
ISNAD Bozgün, Kayhan - PEKDOĞAN GÖZTOK, Serpil. "The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Awareness in Children". Journal of Education and Future 14 (2018), 57-69.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 14:44

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları