Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 199 - 214 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2020
Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety
Öz: Global regulations about shipboard emissions become stricter day by day. There are various ways toreduce shipboard emissions, and using alternative fuels on main engine and auxiliary engines is one ofthese ways. The alternative fuels can have different physicochemical properties than conventional fuels,which needs special procedures and safety precautions while using onboard. Safety is important termfor sustainable shipping. This study aimed to determine the safety ranking of the trend alternative fuelsand possible ones in the future. A safety evaluation method was formed to assess fourteen alternativefuels by considering handling, storage and crew health. Flashpoint, auto-ignition, explosion limits, flamespeed, density, and exposure limit are criteria for the safety evaluation. Analytic Hierarchy Process wasused while finding the weighing of the alternative fuels at these criteria. Scale of relative importancewas used to find the pair-wise comparison of the fuels. The criteria weighing were determined by takingexpert opinions. Seven experts gave points to the criteria at the asked questionnaire. The questionairrewas about; which fuel property is more important at the storage, handling, and operation with thefuels. According to the final safety assessment results, liquefied petroleum gas had the highest weighingof 0,130. Ethanol and ammonia followed it with 0,120 and 0,116, respectively. Liquefied natural gasand methanol, as trend alternative fuels with liquefied natural gas for shipping industry, got 0,084 and0,053, respectively.
Anahtar Kelime: Alternatif Yakıtların Gemi Emniyeti Açısından Değerlendirilmesi
Öz: Gemi kaynaklı emisyonları ilgilendiren uluslar arası denizcilik sözleşmeleri gün geçtikçe katılaşmaktadır. Gemi kaynaklı emisyonları azaltmaya yönelik çeşitli yöntemler bulunmaktadır ve alternatif yakıt kullanımı da bunlardan biridir. Alternatif yakıtların, gemilerde kullanılan konvansiyonel yakıtlardan farklı fiziko-kimyasal özellikleri olabilir. Bu farklı özellikler, gemi üzerinde özel prosedürler ve emniyet tedbirleri alınmasını gerektirebilir. Emniyet, sürdürülebilir deniz ticareti için önemli bir kavramdır. Bu çalışma günümüzde revaçta olan alternatif yakıtların ve ileride kullanılabilecek olanların emniyet puanını belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Emniyet değerlendirme yöntemi oluşturularak, seçilen 14 alternatif yakıt, depolama, elleçleme ve mürettebat sağlığı temel alınarak değerlendirilmiştir. Emniyet değerlendirmesinde kullanılan değerlendirme kriterleri, parlama noktası, kendiliğinden tutuşma sıcaklığı, patlama limitleri, alev hızı, yoğunluk ve etkileme derecesidir. Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi kullanılarak bu değerlendirme yapılmıştır. Nispi önem derecesi puanları kullanılarak yakıtların çiftsel karşılaştırması yapılmıştır. Kriterlerin ağırlıkları da yedi ekspere sorulan anket sonucunda görüşleri alınarak belirlenmiştir. Anket, hangi yakıt özelliğinin, yakıtların depolanması, elleçlenmesi ve operasyonunda daha önemli olduğunu sormaktadır. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre sıvılaştırılmış petrol gazı 0,130 ile en yüksek emniyet puanını almıştır. Etanol ve amonyak, 0,120 ve 0,116 ile takip etmiştir. Günümüzün revaçta alternatif yakılarından sıvılaştırılmış doğalgaz ve metanol, 0,084 ve 0,053 emniyet puanı almıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- [1] DNV GL: The Future of Shipping, Høvik, 04.2014.
- [2] International Maritime Organization, International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea. Access Date: 18 September 2017. http://www. imo.org/en/About/conventions/ l i s t o f c o n v e n t i o n s / p a g e s / international-convention-for-thesafety- of-life-at-sea-(solas),-1974. aspx.
- [3] International Maritime Organization, Gas and low-flashpoint fuels code adopted by IMO. Access Date: 18 September 2017. http:// www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/ pressbriefings/pages/26-msc-95- ends.aspx.
- [4] Deniz, C., Zincir, B. (2016). Environmental and economical assessment of alternative marine fuels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113(2016)438-449.
- [5] Gu, Y., Zhang, C. (2014). Alternative energies or fuels for future deep sea container shipping. Master degree thesis, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law.
- [6] Mansson, S. (2017). Prospects for renewable marine fuels, a multicriteria decision analysis of a alternative fuels for the maritime sector. Master thesis, Industrial Ecology, Chalmers University of Technology.
- [7] Hossain, A. K., Davies, P. A. (2010). Plant oils as fuels for compression ignition engines: a technical review and life-cycle analysis. Renewable Energy, 35(2010)1-13.
- [8] Google Scholar, Alternative fuel research number, 17 March 2017.
- [9] University of Nebraska Lincoln. Safe Operating Procedure. Hazards of Flammable Gases, Liquids & Aerosols & Risk Minimization. Access Date: 8 November 2017. https://ehs.unl. edu/sop/s-hazards_flam_gases_liq_ aeros_risk_min.pdf.
- [10] Reiter, A. J., Kong, S. (2011). Combustion and emission characteristics of compressionignition engine using dual ammoniadiesel fuel. Fuel 90(2011)87-97.
- [11] Praxair. Ammonia Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 11 November 2017. http://www.praxair.com/-/ media/documents/sds/ammonianh3- safety-data-sheet-sds-p4562. pdf?la=en.
- [12] Nozari, H., Karabeyoglu, A. (2014). Chemical kinetics study of combustion characteristics of ammonia-air mixtures under high pressure lean conditions. https://nh3fuel.files. wordpress.com/2014/10/nh3fa- 2014-hadi-nozari-arif-karabeyoglu. pdf.
- [13] Hossain, A. K., Davies, P. A. (2010). Plant oils as fuels for compression ignition engines: a technical review and lifecycle analysis. Renewable Energy, 35(2010)1-13.
- [14] Sidibe, S. S., Blin, J., Vaitilingam, G., Azoumah, Y. (2010). Use of crude filtered vegetable oils as a fuel in diesel engines state of the art: literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2010)2748-2759.
- [15] Hankinson Renewable Energy. Material Safety Data Sheet Corn Oil. Access Date: 1 November 2017. http://corporate. murphyusa.com/content/documents/ MSDS_PDFs/CORN_OIL_Murphy_Oil_ HRE_-_CAN_US_V4.1English_US.pdf.
- [16] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipments. Corn Oil Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 20 November 2017. http://www.sciencelab.com/ msds.php?msdsId=9927139.
- [17] Parthasarathi, R., Gawri, S., Saravanan, C. G. (2014). Effects of ethanol-diesel emulsions on the performance, combustion and emission characteristics of DI diesel engine. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(4):592-600,2014.
- [18] Labeckas, G., Slavinskas, S., Mazeika, M. (2014). The effect of ethanol-dieselbiodiesel blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct injection diesel engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 79(2014)698-720.
- [19] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment. Material Safety Data Sheets Ethyl Alcohol 200 Proof. Access Date: 10 November 2017. https://www.sciencelab.com/msds. php?msdsId=9923955.
- [20] Jhang, S. R., Chen, K. S., Lin, S. L., Lin, Y. C., Cheng, W. L. (2016). Reducing pollutant emissions from a heavyduty diesel engine by using hydrogen additions. Fuel 172(2016)89-95.
- [21] National Research Council. (2008). 7 Hydrogen. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants: Vol. 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 1017226/12032, pp.154.
- [22] Nasim, M. N., Yarasu, R. B., Sarda, R. H. (2013). Experimental investigation on compression ignition engine powered by preheated neat jatropha oil. Journal of Petroleum Technology and Alternative Fuels, Vol 4(7), pp.119- 124, doi:10.5897/JPTAF 10.004.
- [23] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment. Material Safety Data Sheet Kerosene. Access Date: 14 November 2017. http://www.sciencelab.com/ msds.php?msdsId=9924436.
- [24] Aydin, H., Bayindir, H., Ilkiliç, C. (2010). Emissions from an engine fueled with biodiesel-kerosene blends. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 33:2,130- 137.
- [25] Tesoro. (2014). Kerosene Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 23 November 2017. https://tsocorpsite. f i l e s . wo rd p re s s . c o m / 2 0 1 4 / 0 8 / kerosene.pdf.
- [26] Wu, Y. (2016). Experimental investigation of laminar flame speeds of kerosene fuel and second generation biofuels in elevated conditions of pressure and preheat temperature. Chemical Physics, INSA de Rouen.
- [27] PGW. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 20 November 2017. https:// www.pgworks.com/uploads/pdfs/ LNGSafetyData.pdf.
- [28] Lukoil. LNG Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 20 November 2017. http://en.lukoil.com.tr/Upload/ Docs/LNG%20(MSDS)-EN.pdf.
- [29] OnGas. LPG Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 18 November 2017. https://www.ongas.co.nz/Assets/ OnGas%20Material%20Safety%20 Data%20Sheet%20OCT%202014.pdf.
- [30] Contact Energy. LPG Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 18 November 2017. https://contact.co.nz/-/media/contact/ pdfs/residential/reference-guides/ safety- data-sheet.ashx?la=en&hash=5A C0B371B71A873D64668E4BFE DA04246590501C.
- [31] Shell. LPG Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 18 November 2017. http://www.shell.com/content/dam/ shell-new/local/corporate/tradingshipping/ downloads/msds/in-country/ singapore-sietco/lpg-lpg---sietco---en. pdf.
- [32] Liao, S. Y., Jiang, D. M., Cheng, Q., Gao, J., Huang, Z. H., Hu, Y. (2005). Correlations for laminar burning velocities of liquefied petroleum gas-air mixtures. Energy Conversion and Management, 46(2005)3175-3184.
- [33] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment. Material Safety Data Sheet Methyl Alcohol. Access Date: 11 November 2017. http://www.sciencelab. com/msds.php?msdsId=9927227.
- [34] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipment. Material Safety Data Sheet Palm Oil. Access Date: 5 November 2017. http://www.sciencelab.com/msds. php?msdsId=9926383.
- [35] Chong, C. T., Hochgreb, S. (2011). Measurements of laminar flame speeds of liquid fuels: Jet-A1, diesel, palm methyl esters and blends using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV). Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 33(2011)979- 986.
- [36] Chevron Phillips Chemical Company. Heavy Pyrolysis Oil Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 15 November 2017. http://www.cpchem.com/ msds/100000014923_SDS_US_EN.PDF.
- [37] CIRAD. Bio-oil Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 15 November 2017. http://www.pyne.co.uk/ Resources/user/docs/CIRAD_MSDSFinal. pdf.
- [38] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipments. Naphthalene Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 15 November 2017. http:// www. s c i e n c e l a b . c o m / m s d s . php?msdsId=9927671.
- [39] Spectrum Chemical. Rapeseed Material Safety Data Sheet. Access date: 21 November 2017. https:// www.spectrumchemical.com/MSDS/ R2221.PDF.
- [40] Buda-Ortins, K. (2010). Auto-ignition of cooking oils. University of Maryland, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, 19.05.2010.
- [41] Science Lab Chemicals & Laboratory Equipments. Soybean Oil Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 21 November 2017. http:// www. s c i e n c e l a b . c o m / m s d s . php?msdsId=9925064.
- [42] Gomez-Meyer, J. S., Gollahalli, S. R., Parthasarthy, R. N., Quiroga, J. E. (2012). Laminar flame speed of soy and canola biofuels. C.T.F Cienc. Technol. Futuro vol.4 no.5 Bucaramanga, January/June 2012.
- [43] Natural Sourcing Specialists in Cosmeceutical Ingredients. Material Safety Data Sheet Soybean Oil. Access Date: 6 November 2017. https://www. naturalsourcing.com/downloads/ msds/MSDS_Soybean_Oil.pdf.
- [44] ConAgra Foods. Soybean Material Safety Data Sheet. Access Date: 21 November 2017. http:// sds . chemtel . n et/webcl ien t s/ cheneybrothers/116009SDS.pdf.
- [45] Bioils S.A. Material Safety Data Sheet Used Cooking Oil. Access Date: 6 November 2017. http://www.bioils. com.co/descargas/MSDS.pdf.
- 46] Kathirvel, S., Layek, A., Muthuraman, S. (2016). Exploration of waste cooking oil methyl esters (WCOME) as fuel in compression ignition engines: a critical review. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 19(2016)1018-1026.
- [47] Wikipedia, Flashpoint, Access Date: 17.03.2018. https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Flash_point.
- [48] Wikipedia, Auto-ignition Temperature, Access Date: 17.03.2018, https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoignition_ temperature.
- [49] Wikipedia, Flammability Limits, Access Date: 17.03.2018, https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flammability_ limit.
- [50] Wikipedia, Flame Speed, Access Date: 17.03.2018, https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Flame_speed.
- [51] American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Access Date: 25 September 2017. http://www. acgih.org/tlv-bei-guidelines/policiesprocedures- presentations.
- [52] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, and Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- [53] Winebrake, J. J., Creswick, B. P. (2003). The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective-based scenario analysis using the analytic hierarchy process. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70(2003)359-384.
- [54] Ren, J., Sovacool, B.K. (2015). Prioritizing Low-carbon Energy Sources to Enhance China's Energy Security. Energy Conversion and Management, 92(2015)129-136.
- [55] Render, B., Stair, R. M. (1999). Quantitative Analysis for Management, 7th Edition. Pearson. Pp. 522-529.
- [56] Saathy, T. L., Tran, L. T. (2007). On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. ISAHP 2007, Vina del Mar, Chile, August 3- 6, 2007.
APA | Zincir B, Deniz C (2018). Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. , 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
Chicago | Zincir Burak,Deniz Cengiz Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. (2018): 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
MLA | Zincir Burak,Deniz Cengiz Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. , 2018, ss.199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
AMA | Zincir B,Deniz C Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. . 2018; 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
Vancouver | Zincir B,Deniz C Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. . 2018; 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
IEEE | Zincir B,Deniz C "Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety." , ss.199 - 214, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
ISNAD | Zincir, Burak - Deniz, Cengiz. "Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety". (2018), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
APA | Zincir B, Deniz C (2018). Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6(3), 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
Chicago | Zincir Burak,Deniz Cengiz Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6, no.3 (2018): 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
MLA | Zincir Burak,Deniz Cengiz Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.6, no.3, 2018, ss.199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
AMA | Zincir B,Deniz C Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(3): 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
Vancouver | Zincir B,Deniz C Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(3): 199 - 214. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
IEEE | Zincir B,Deniz C "Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6, ss.199 - 214, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |
ISNAD | Zincir, Burak - Deniz, Cengiz. "Assessment of Alternative Fuels from the Aspect of Shipboard Safety". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6/3 (2018), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.71676 |