Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study

Gül DENKTAŞ ŞAKAR, (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, İzmir Türkiye)
Esra YILDIRIM, (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, İzmir Türkiye)
Ezgi MANSUROĞLU (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Denizcilik Fakültesi, İzmir Türkiye)
Journal of Eta Maritime Science
22 3
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 255 - 274 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/jems.2018.48343 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2020

Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study

Öz:
Project cargo logistics, with its idiosyncratic logistics processes and transportation of large, heavy andhigh-value cargoes, is a developing industry in Turkey. Value creation for project cargo transportationplays a critical role in gaining competitiveness in such a unique industry. Hence, the duties of relatedparties, the main value creation enablers, value creation outcomes and the barriers restricting suchvalue creation should be explored. This paper sets out to provide an understanding on value creationconcept of project cargo logistics. Its purpose is to identify the critical enablers of value creation aswell as the main outcomes of value creation. An exploratory Delphi study with two rounds is employed.Key enablers include the partner-related and project cargo logistics operations-related dimensions.Critical outcomes have been classified as operational efficiency, service effectiveness and technologyadoption/innovation. Findings can assist both operators and governmental bodies in aligning theirservices and procedures within the value creation perspective.
Anahtar Kelime:

Proje Yük Lojistiğinde Değer Yaratımı: Bir Delfi Çalışması

Öz:
Proje yük lojistiği, geniş, ağır ve yüksek değerli yüklerin taşınması ve kendine özgü lojistik süreçleri ile Türkiye'de gelişmekte olan bir sektördür. Proje yük lojistiğinde değer yaratma, rekabet gücü elde etmede önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle, ilgili tarafların görevleri, temel değer yaratıcı öğeler, değer oluşum çıktıları ve değer oluşumunu engelleyen bariyerlerin incelenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, proje yük lojistiğinde değeri yaratma kavramına yönelik bir bakış açısı sağlamaktadır. Çalışma, değer yaratıcı öğeler ile ve değer yaratmanın ana sonuçlarını tanımlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada yöntem olarak Delphi kullanılmaktadır. Değer yaratmanın ana sonuçları operasyonel etkinlik, hizmet etkililiği ve teknolojiye uyum/yenilik olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Bulgular, hem uygulayıcılara hem de devlet kurumlarına, hizmetlerini ve prosedürlerini değer yaratma perspektifine uyumlu hale getirmede yardımcı olabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Gourdin, K.N. (2001). Global logistics management: a competitive advantage for the new millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • [2] Yazdanparast, A., Manuj, I. and Swartz, S. M. (2010).Co‐Creating Logistics Value: A Service‐ Dominant Logic Perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management,21(3): 375-403
  • [3] Mentzer, J.T., Flint, D.J. and Hult, T. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segmentation-customized process. Journal of Marketing, 35(4): 82-100.
  • [4] Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. and Stank, T.P. (2000). Ten mega trends that will revolutionalize supply chain and logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2): 1-15.
  • [5] Mentzer, J.T., Rutner, S.T. and Matsuno, K. (1997). Application of the means-end value hierarchy model to understanding logistics service value. International Journal of PhysicalDistribution & Logistics Management, 27(9/10): 630-43.
  • [6] Fagerholt, K., Hvattum, L.M., Johnsen, T.A.V., and Korsvik, J.E. (2013). Routing and scheduling in project shipping. Ann Oper Res, 207:67–81
  • [7] Investment Support and Promotion Agency. (2018). Investing in infrastructure and public-private partnership in Turkey. Accessed on 30 May 2018, http://www.invest.gov. tr/en-US/infocenter/publications/ Documents/INFRASTRUCTURE. INDUSTRY.pdf
  • [8] UK P&I Club. (2014). How to safely load, stow heavy lifts and project cargo. Online available at http:// www.agcs.allianz.com/assets/PDFs/ ARC/Risk%20Bulletins/Load-stowsecure- and-discharge-heavy-liftsand- project-cargo.pdf Accessed Date: 22 November 2017.
  • [9] Sarı, A. (2016). Proje yük taşımacılığında yol izin belgeleri ve kuralları. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 30(3): 545-551.
  • [10] Aamuvuori, A. (2014). Project deliveries: Barriers & opportunities of transport logistics in the Barent region, Master’s Thesis, University of Oulu, Finland.
  • [11] Çınar, H. (2014). Proje taşımacılığı. Dünya Gazetesi. Online available at https://www.dunya.com/koseyazisi/ proje-tasimaciligi/20232. Accessed Date: 23 November 2017
  • [12] Yeni enerji.com (2013). Proje Taşımacılığında Sorunlara Rağmen Kapasiteler Artıyor. Online available at http://www.yenienerji.info/ dosya/pro j e - tasimac i ligindasorunlara- ragmen-kapasitelerartiyor. Accessed Date: 23 November 2017
  • [13] Kuleyin, B. and Cerit A.G. (2017). Turkish seaborne trade and the effects of the strategic developments in the international energy and transport corridors: A qualitative research. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 5(2): 120-138
  • [14] TOBB (2016). Proje taşımacılığının umudu mega projeler ve enerji yatırımları. Online available at https://haber.tobb.org.tr/ ekonomikforum/2017/270/068_073. pdf Accessed Date: 22 November 2017 .
  • [15] Anderson, E. (1995). Value in ethics and economics. Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
  • [16] Parasuraman, A. (1997). Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2): 154-61.
  • [17] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3): 2-22.
  • [18] Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer integration and value creation: paradigmatic traps and perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2): 211-215.
  • [19] Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
  • [20] Linn, S. (2015). Relationship structures, their integration and value in maritime logistics networks, Unpublished Post- Doctoral Dissertation, UK: Cardiff University.
  • [21] Baudin, M. (2004). Lean Logistics: The Nuts and Bolts of Delivering Materials and Goods. New York: Productivity Press.
  • [22] Lai, K. H., Ngai, E. W. T. and Cheng T. C. E. (2002). Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics. Transport Research, 38(E): 439-456.
  • [23] Wang, Y., Lo, H. P., Chi, R. and Yang, Y. (2004). An integrated framework for customer value and customer-relationship-management performance: A customer-based perspective from China. Managing Service Quality, 14(2/3): 169–182.
  • [24] Mentzer, J. T. and Flint D. J. (1997). Validity in logistics research.Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 18(2) : 199-216.
  • [25] Saatçioğlu, S. and Saygılı M. (2013). Intermodal taşımacılıkta denizyolu – demiryolu entegrasyonunun ekonomik ve çevresel açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 1(2): 19-26.
  • [26] Panayides, P. M. and Song, D. W. (2013). Maritime logistics as an emerging discipline. Maritime Policy & Management,40(3): 295-308.
  • [27] Andersson, H., Duesund, JM. and Fagerholt, K. (2011) Ship routing and scheduling with cargo coupling and synchronization constraints. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(4): 1107–1116.
  • [28] Song, D. W. and Lee, P. (2009). Maritime logistics in the global supply chain. International Journal of Logistics: Research And Applications, 12(2): 83– 84.
  • [29] Song, D. W. and Panayides P. M. (2012). Maritime logistics: A complete guide to effective shipping and port management. UK: Kogan Page.
  • [30] Bazaras, D., Batarlienė, N., Ramūnas, P. R. and Petraška, A. (2013). Optimal road rote selection criteria system for oversize goods transportation. The Baltic journal of road and bridge engineering, 8 (1): 19-24.
  • [31] Petraška, A. and Palšaitis, R. (2012). Evaluation criteria and a route selection system for transportating oversize and heavyweight cargoes. Transport Journal, 27(3): 327-334.
  • [32] Heidemann, A. and Gehbauer, F. (2011). The way towards cooperative project delivery. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(1): 19-30.
  • [33] Turoff, M. (1970). The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2: 149-171.
  • [34] McKenna, H.P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile approach for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(6): 1221-1225.
  • [35] Loo, R. (2002) The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: AnInternational Journal of Police Strategies and Management. 25(4): 762-769.
  • [36] Mitchell, V. W. and McGoldrick P. J. (1994). The role of geodemographics in segmenting and targeting consumer markets: a Delphi study. European Journal of Marketing, 28 (5): 54-72.
  • [37] Strauss, H.J. and Zeigler, H.L. (1975). The Delphi technique and its uses in social science research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9(4): 253–259
  • [38] Rauch, W. (1979). The decision Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 15 (3): 159-169
  • [39] Woudenberg, F. (1991). An evaluation of Delphi. Technological Forecasting And Social Change. 40: 131-150
  • [40] Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • [41] Dalkey, N. and Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi Method to the use of experts. Management Science. 9(3): 458-467.
  • [42] Greatorex, J. and Dexter, T. (2000). An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi Study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 32: 1016–1024.
  • [43] Branch, A. E. (2009). Global supply chain management and international logistics. New York: Routledge.
  • [44] Guzman, F. and Norgaar, J. (2000). Project cargo comes of age. World Trade, 13(10): 72-74.
  • [45] Lee, E. S., Nam, H. S. and Song, D.W. (2012). Maritime logistics: a new definition. Defining maritime logistics and its value (pp. 53-64). London: Kogan Page
  • [46] Zhao, M., Droge, C. and Stank, T.P. (2011). The effects of logistics capabilities on firm performance: Customer-focused versus information-focus capabilities. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2): 91- 107.
  • [47] Panayides, P. M. and So, M. (2005), Logistics service provider-client relationships. Transportation Research: Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 41( 3): 179-200.
  • [48] Saldanha, J. and Gray, R. (2002) The potential for British coastal shipping in a multimodal chain. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(1): 77-92
  • [49] Islam, D. M. Z., Dinwoodie, J. and Roe M.(2006) Promoting development through multimodal freight transport in Bangladesh, Transport Reviews, 26(5): 571-591.
  • [50] Deveci, D. and Cerit, A. (2007) Competition and conflict in distribution channels of combined transport services. In: Proceedings of 12. National Marketing Conference. Sakarya, Turkey.
  • [51] Brett, V. and Roe, M. (2010). The potential for the clustering of the maritime transport sector in the Greater Dublin Region. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(1): 1-16.
  • [52] Von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi Studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 79 : 1525-1536.
  • [53] Kapoor, P. (1987). Systems approach to documentary maritime fraud, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Plymouth Polytechnic, Plymouth.
  • [54] Hasson F., Keeney S. & McKenna H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing: 32, 1008–1015.
  • [55] Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M. R. and Brook, R. H. (1991). Consensus methods characteristics and guidelines for use. California: Rand.
  • [56] Murphy M. K., Black, N.A., Lamping D. L., McKee C. M., Sanderson, C. F. B and Askham J. (1998). Consensus development methods and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assessment, 2(3).
  • [57] Thangaratinam, S. (2005). We Redman Charles The Delphi technique. The Obstetrician& Gynaecologist, 7:(120- 125).
  • [58] Lynch, D. F., Keller, S. B. and Ozment, J. (2000). The effects of logistics capabilities and strategy on firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(2): 47-67.
  • [59] Langley, C. J. Jr and Holcomb, M. C. (1992). Creating logistics customer value. Journal of Business Logistics, 13 (2): 1-27.
APA Denktas Sakar G, Canbaz Yildirim E, Mansuroğlu E (2018). Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. , 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
Chicago Denktas Sakar Gul,Canbaz Yildirim Esra,Mansuroğlu Ezgi Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. (2018): 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
MLA Denktas Sakar Gul,Canbaz Yildirim Esra,Mansuroğlu Ezgi Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. , 2018, ss.255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
AMA Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. . 2018; 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
Vancouver Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. . 2018; 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
IEEE Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E "Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study." , ss.255 - 274, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
ISNAD Denktas Sakar, Gul vd. "Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study". (2018), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.48343
APA Denktas Sakar G, Canbaz Yildirim E, Mansuroğlu E (2018). Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6(3), 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
Chicago Denktas Sakar Gul,Canbaz Yildirim Esra,Mansuroğlu Ezgi Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6, no.3 (2018): 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
MLA Denktas Sakar Gul,Canbaz Yildirim Esra,Mansuroğlu Ezgi Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.6, no.3, 2018, ss.255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
AMA Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(3): 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
Vancouver Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2018; 6(3): 255 - 274. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
IEEE Denktas Sakar G,Canbaz Yildirim E,Mansuroğlu E "Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 6, ss.255 - 274, 2018. 10.5505/jems.2018.48343
ISNAD Denktas Sakar, Gul vd. "Value Creation in Project Cargo Logistics: A Delphi Study". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 6/3 (2018), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.48343
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 14:46

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları