Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 348 - 359 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 05-11-2020

STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS

Öz:
This research aimed to determine pre-service science teachers’ STEM awareness in termsof different variables. Data were collected from 148 pre-service science teachers studying at astate university in Turkey who were chosen through the convenience sampling method."STEM Awareness Scale (SAS)" was employed as data collection tool, and the data wereanalyzed using IBM SPSS-21 statistical program. For data analysis, Independent t test,variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey significance test were used. No statisticallysignificant difference in pre-service science teachers’ STEM awareness in terms of gender,academic achievement score, technology usage frequency, and family income level. Whilethey significantly differ in their STEM awareness with regard to grade level.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aydin, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM= FeTeMM) tutumlarının incelenmesi. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 787-802.
  • Baran, E., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., & Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) spotu geliştirme etkinliği. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 5(2), 60-69.
  • Bakırcı, H., & Karışan, D. (2018). Investigating the Preservice Primary School, Mathematics and Science Teachers’ STEM Awareness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1), 32-42.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education?. Science, 329(5995), 996-996.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010b). What is STEM education? Science, 329, 996. Doi: 10.1126/science.1194998.
  • Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ): geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(2), 61-76.
  • Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., Milner-Bolotin, M., & Lissitsa, S. (2016). Examination of factors predicting secondary students’ interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 366-390.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. (5 th) ed. London New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Corlu, M.A., & Aydin, E. (2016). Evaluation of learning gains through integrated STEM projects. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 20-29. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.35021
  • Corlu, M. S. (2014). FeTeMM eğitimi makale çağrı mektubu. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(1), 4-10.
  • Corlu, M. S. (2013).Insights into STEM education praxis: An assessment scheme for course syllabi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2477-2485. Doi: 10.12738/estp.2013.4.1903
  • Corlu, M. S. (2012). A pathway to STEM education: Investigating pre-service mathematics and science teachers at Turkish universities in terms of their understanding of mathematics used in science, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(1),1-13.doi:10.21891/jeseh.45721
  • Çavaş, B., Bulut, Ç., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Fen eğitimine mühendislik odaklı bir yaklaşım: ENGINEER projesi ve uygulamaları. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(1), 12-22.
  • Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014).Introducing STEM education: implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 74-85.
  • Çorlu, M. A., Adıgüzel, T., Ayar, M. C., Çorlu, M. S., & Özel, S. (2012, Haziran). Bilim, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (BTMM) eğitimi: disiplinler arası çalışmalar ve etkileşimler. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, Niğde.
  • Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.
  • Dugger, W. E. (2010, December). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Presented at the (6 th) Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. http://www.iteaconnect.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf.
  • Ekici, G., & Hevedanlı, M., 2010.Lise öğrencilerinin biyoloji dersine yönelik tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi. 7(4), 97-109.
  • Elliot, E., Strenta, A. C., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1996).The role of ethnicity in choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37(6), 681-709
  • Ercan, S., & Şahin, F.(2013). Mühendisliğin fen eğitimine entegrasyonu: mü(fen) dislik integration of engineering into scıence education: mü(fen) dislik/scıen(ce)gineering. International Symposium on Changes and New Trends in Education, Konya.
  • Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110
  • George-Jackson, C. E., & Lichtenberger, E. J. (2012). College confidence: How sure high school students are of their future majors. Illinois Education Research Council. Policy Research: IERC 2012–2. Retrieved from: http://ierc.education/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/EJL_2012_ACT_College-Confidence_final.pdf.
  • Gencer, A. (2015). Fen eğitiminde bilim ve mühendislik uygulaması: Fırıldak Etkinliği, Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi (ATED), 5(1), 1-19.
  • Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2016).Fen-teknoloji-mühendislik-matematik entegrasyonunun (STEM) 5.Sınıf öğrencilerinin bu alanlarla ilgili algı ve tutumlarına etkisi. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 602-620.
  • Hacıömeroğlu, G., & Bulut, A. S. (2016). Entegre FETEMM* öğretimi yönelim ölçeği türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması/Integrative Stem teaching intention questionnaire: a validity and relaibility study of the Turkish Form. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(3), 654-669.
  • Karakaya, F., & Avgın, S. S. (2016). Effect of demographic features to middle school students’ attitude towards FeTeMM (STEM). Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 4188- 4198. doi:10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4104
  • Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel yayın Dağıtım. Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, 82-109.
  • Lamb, R., Akmal, T., & Petrie, K. (2015). Development of a cognition‐priming model describing learning in a STEM classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52 (3), 410-437. doi: 10.1002/tea.21200.
  • Lichtenberger, E., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2013).Predicting high school students’ interest in majoring in a STEM field: Insight into high school students’ postsecondary plans. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 28(1), 19–38.
  • Mahoney, M. P. (2009). Student attitude toward STEM: Development of an instrument for high school STEM-based programs. (Unpublished PhD thesis). The Ohio State University.
  • Marulcu, İ., & Sungur, K. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının mühendis ve mühendislik algılarının ve yöntem olarak mühendislik-dizayna bakış açılarının incelenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2012), 13-23.
  • Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M.S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K.M., & Roehrig, G.H. (2013). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Edt.), Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Naizer G., Hawthorne M. J., & Henley T. B. (2014). Narrowing the gender gap: enduring changes in middle school students’ attitude toward math, science and technology. Journal of STEM Education: İnnovations and Research, 15(3), 29-34.
  • Rehmat, A. P. (2015). Engineering the Path to Higher-Order Thinking in Elementary Education: A Problem-Based Learning Approach for STEM Integration. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2497/ on 24.10.2016.
  • Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and engineering teacher, 71(8), 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/File.aspx?id=86478&v=5409fe8e on 24.10.2016.
  • Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 17-28.
  • Roth, W. (2001).Learning Science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790.
  • Saad, M. E. (2014). Progressing science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education in North Dakota with near-space ballooning. Master Thesis. Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota.
  • Sevindik, T. (2006). Akıllı sınıfların yüksek öğretim öğrencilerinin akademik başarı ve tutumlarına etkisi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Elazığ.
  • Smith, J., & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: a literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. Retrieved from ERIC database https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED443172 on 24.10.2016.
  • Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adıgüzel, T. (2014). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik içerikli okul sonrası etkinlikler ve öğrenciler üzerindeki etkileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(1), 297-322.
  • Tekerek, M., Karakaya, F., & Tekerek, B. (2016). Ethical reasoning in STEM disciplines. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(32), 182-188.
  • Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C, Lou, Ş. J. & Chen W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal Technology Design Education, 23(1), 87–102.
  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622- 639. doi: 0734282915571160.
  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., & Wiebe, E. (2014). Gender and Student Attitudes toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Retrieved from http://miso.ncsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2014/08/AERA-2014-paper-Student-Attitudes-Toward-STEM.pdf .
  • Wells, B., Sanchez, A., & Attridge, J., (2007). Modeling student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. IEEE Summit. “Meeting the Growing Demand for Engineers and their Educators,” Munich, Germany. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4760362
  • Wendell, K., Connolly, K., Wright, C., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010, October). Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society for Engineering Education. Singapore.
  • Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile fene karşı tutumlarına FeTeMM etkinliklerinin etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 249- 265.
  • Yenilmez, K., & Balbağ, M. Z. (2016). Fen bilgisi ve ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının STEM’e yönelik tutumları. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(4), 301-307.
  • Yıldırım, B., & Selvi,M. (2016). Examination of the effects of STEM education integrated as a part of science, technology, society and environment courses. Journal of Human Science, 13(2), 3684-3695.
  • Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). STEM eğitim ve mühendislik uygulamalarının fen bilgisi laboratuar dersindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40.
  • Yıldırım, B,. & Selvi, M. (2015b).Adaptation of STEM attitude scale to Turkish. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 1107-1120.
  • Yılmaz, M. (2005). İlköğretim 7.sınıflarda simetri konusunun öğretimde eğitim teknolojilerinin başarı ve tutuma etkisi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (Unpublished master thesis), İstanbul.
APA Tekerek B, Karakaya F (2018). STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. , 348 - 359.
Chicago Tekerek Betül,Karakaya Ferhat STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. (2018): 348 - 359.
MLA Tekerek Betül,Karakaya Ferhat STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. , 2018, ss.348 - 359.
AMA Tekerek B,Karakaya F STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. . 2018; 348 - 359.
Vancouver Tekerek B,Karakaya F STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. . 2018; 348 - 359.
IEEE Tekerek B,Karakaya F "STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS." , ss.348 - 359, 2018.
ISNAD Tekerek, Betül - Karakaya, Ferhat. "STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS". (2018), 348-359.
APA Tekerek B, Karakaya F (2018). STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. IOJET, 5(2), 348 - 359.
Chicago Tekerek Betül,Karakaya Ferhat STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. IOJET 5, no.2 (2018): 348 - 359.
MLA Tekerek Betül,Karakaya Ferhat STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. IOJET, vol.5, no.2, 2018, ss.348 - 359.
AMA Tekerek B,Karakaya F STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. IOJET. 2018; 5(2): 348 - 359.
Vancouver Tekerek B,Karakaya F STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS. IOJET. 2018; 5(2): 348 - 359.
IEEE Tekerek B,Karakaya F "STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS." IOJET, 5, ss.348 - 359, 2018.
ISNAD Tekerek, Betül - Karakaya, Ferhat. "STEM EDUCATION AWARENESS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS". IOJET 5/2 (2018), 348-359.