Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 65 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 59 - 66 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 İndeks Tarihi: 09-11-2020
Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
Öz: Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire into Turkish and to test the reliability and validityof the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (BQc-t).Patients and methods: Between June 2014 and July 2015, a total of 97 patients with neck pain (27 males, 70 females; mean age 46.6±10.6 years;range, 18 to 65 years) were included in the study. The patients underwent a physical therapy and rehabilitation program. For translation, theAmerican Association of Orthopedic Surgeons guideline was used. The reliability was measured with internal consistency and test-retestby calculation of the Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) respectively. Internal construct validity of the BQc-t wasanalyzed with confirmatory factor analysis. For external construct validity, the correlations between the BQc-t results and the Neck Painand Disability Scale (NPAD), Modified Neck Disability Index (MNDI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were analyzed before and after treatment.Responsiveness was calculated as the effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). Minimal detectable change (MDC) score wascalculated to evaluate interpretability.Results: The ICC value for test-retest of total score was 0.945. Pre- and post-treatment Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.877 and 0.907,respectively, showing that the reliability of the BQc-t was considerably high. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that questions were foundto cluster in a single dimension. In terms of the external construct validity, there was a positive statistically significant correlation betweenthe BQc-t questions, except for Question 7, and relevant subscales of the NPAD and MNDI. There was also a negative statistically significantcorrelation between the BQc-t questions and SF-36 subgroups. The ES and SRM were 1.23 and 1.48, respectively. The MDC was 20.31.Conclusion: Our study results show that the BQc-t is reliable, valid, and sensitive to clinical changes.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:1307-9.
- 2. Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, et al. A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:14-23.
- 3. Bolton JE, Breen AC. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:503-10.
- 4. Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:141-8.
- 5. Martel J, Dugas C, Lafond D, Descarreaux M. Validation of the French version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2009;53:102-20.
- 6. Soklic M, Peterson C, Humphreys BK. Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain. Chiropr Man Therap 2012;20:2.
- 7. Schmitt MA, de Wijer A, van Genderen FR, van der Graaf Y, Helders PJ, van Meeteren NL. The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire cross-cultural adaptation into Dutch and evaluation of its psychometric properties in a population with subacute and chronic whiplash associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2551-61.
- 8. Geri T, Signori A, Gianola S, Rossettini G, Grenat G, Checchia G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in the Italian population. Qual Life Res 2015;24:735-45.
- 9. Gunaydin G, Citaker S, Meray J, Cobanoglu G, Gunaydin OE, Hazar Kanik Z. Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:1292-7.
- 10. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-32.
- 11. Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health 2008;11:509-21.
- 12. Kesiktas N, Ozcan E, Vernon H. Clinimetric properties of the Turkish translation of a modified neck disability index. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012;13:25.
- 13. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:959-62.
- 14. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N, Memiş A. Kısa Form-36 (KF-36)’nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi 1999;12:102-6.
- 15. Swenson RS. Therapeutic modalities in the management of nonspecific neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003;14:605-27.
- 16. Alpar R. Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. 4. Baskı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2012.
- 17. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med 1987;6:441-8.
- 18. Mcdowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
- 19. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. NewYork: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
- 20. Schwenk M, Gogulla S, Englert S, Czempik A, Hauer K. Testretest reliability and minimal detectable change of repeated sit-to-stand analysis using one body fixed sensor in geriatric patients. Physiol Meas 2012;33:1931-46.
- 21. Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:376-82.
- 22. González T, Balsa A, Sáinz de Murieta J, Zamorano E, González I, Martin-Mola E. Spanish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire: reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;19:41-6.
- 23. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Needham Heights: Allyn&Bacon Inc; 2006.
- 24. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39:155-64.
- 25. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Kültürlerarası Ölçek Uyarlaması için Rehber 2: Psikometrik Özellikler ve Kültürlerarası Karşılaştırma. Hacettepe Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;1:3-14.
- 26. DeVellis RF. A consumer’s guide to finding, evaluating, and reporting on measurement instruments. Arthritis Care Res 1996;9:239-45.
- 27. Bolton JE. Sensitivity and specificity of outcome measures in patients with neck pain: detecting clinically significant improvement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2410-7.
APA | yılmaz o, GAFUROGLU T, Yüksel S (2019). Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. , 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
Chicago | yılmaz onur,GAFUROGLU TUBA ÜMIT,Yüksel Selcen Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. (2019): 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
MLA | yılmaz onur,GAFUROGLU TUBA ÜMIT,Yüksel Selcen Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. , 2019, ss.59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
AMA | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. . 2019; 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
Vancouver | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. . 2019; 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
IEEE | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S "Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire." , ss.59 - 66, 2019. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
ISNAD | yılmaz, onur vd. "Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire". (2019), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
APA | yılmaz o, GAFUROGLU T, Yüksel S (2019). Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65(1), 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
Chicago | yılmaz onur,GAFUROGLU TUBA ÜMIT,Yüksel Selcen Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 65, no.1 (2019): 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
MLA | yılmaz onur,GAFUROGLU TUBA ÜMIT,Yüksel Selcen Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.65, no.1, 2019, ss.59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
AMA | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019; 65(1): 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
Vancouver | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019; 65(1): 59 - 66. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
IEEE | yılmaz o,GAFUROGLU T,Yüksel S "Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65, ss.59 - 66, 2019. 10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |
ISNAD | yılmaz, onur vd. "Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 65/1 (2019), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2019.2693 |