The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis

BEYCAN, Kadir; MOHI, ammar Riyad; YALÇINKAYA, Şebnem

The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis

Ammar Mohi, (Specialist Dentist, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq)

Kadir Beycan, (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Şebnem Yalçınkaya (Marmara Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences

0 0

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 284 - 290 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 11-11-2020

The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis

Öz:

Objectives: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the spatial anddimensional morphometric changes of the vomer bone in relation to the mid facedeficiency.Methods: The CBCT images of 96 patients in Marmara University / Faculty ofDentistry/ Orthodontic department patients cases archive were there imagesevaluated within age between 16 to 30 years old, with normal occlusion and AngleClass III malocclusion. Patients CBCT images analyzed with Steiner analysisusing linear and angular reference planes of 13 skeletal points selected. The 3Dreconstructive models of vomer bone dimension were built and measured usingMIMICS 19.0V software and all data analyzed statisticallyResults: There was a statistically significant relationship in both linear and angularmeasurements of the vomer bone where the anterior values (p <0.01) and theposterior value of (P <0.05). Also the correlation was highly significant (p <0.01) inmales and severe (type C) group of mid-face insufficiency. The 3D reconstructivemodels of vomer bone appeared wider and longer in dimensions when theymeasured in the severe (type C) group to be statistically different from other groups(p <0.01).Conclusion: The results of this study found the active role of vomer bone in mid-faceregion in all planes and its effect on Mid-face malocclusion

Anahtar Kelime:

Üç Boyutlu Analizler Kullanılarak Dentofasiyal Yetersizliğinde Vomer Kemik Örneğindeki Varyasyonlar

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, 1) Orta-yüz yetersizliği olan bireylerde vomer kemiğinin konumsal ve boyutsal morfometrik değişimlerini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Marmara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodontik A. D. arşivinden seçilmiş, normal okluzyonu ve Angle Sınıf III malokluzyonu olan 16-30 yaş arasındaki 96 hastanın CBCT görüntüleri değerlendirildi. Steiner analiziyle hastalar üç gruba ayrıldı, 13 iskeletsel nokta seçilerek doğrusal ve açısal referans düzlemleri çizildi. Vomer kemiğinin 3B rekonstrüktif boyutları, MIMICS 19.0V yazılımıyla ölçüldü ve veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Lineer ve açısal ilişkide vomer kemiğinin anterior (p <0.01) ve posterior (P <0.05) düzeysel parametreleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki olduğu saptandı ve bu korelasyonun erkeklerde ve şiddetli (tip C) orta-yüz yetersizliği grubunda daha belirgin olduğu görüldü (p<0.01). Vomer kemiğinin 3B rekonstriktif modelinin şiddetli (tip C) grupta daha geniş ve daha uzun şekilde ölçüldüğü ve istatistiksel olarak diğer gruplardan farklı olduğu saptandı (p<0.001). Sonuç: çalışmanın bulguları tüm düzlemlerde orta-yüz bölgesinde, vomer kemiğinin aktif rolünün önemini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Open technique rhinoplasty. In: Warren RJ, Neligan PC, editors. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Saunders Elsevier 2012; p.387-412.
[2] Masucci C, Franchi L, Defraia E, Mucedero M, Cozza P, Baccetti T. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: A longterm controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:493– 500.[PubMed]
[3] Ferro A, Nucci LP, Ferro F, Gallo C. Long-term stability of skeletal class III patients treated with splints, class III elastics, and chincup. AmJOrthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:423–34. [PubMed]
[4] Rey D, Angel D, Oberti G, Baccetti T. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:371– 8. [PubMed]
[5] 5 .Marcus AF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. Advances in morphometrics. New York: Plenum. NATO ASI Series A: Life Sciences 1996.Vol. 284, 587 p.
[6] Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:40e-9e.
[7] Rohrich RJ, Hollier LHJ, Landecker A. Harvesting cartilage grafts for primary rhinoplasty. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WPJ, editors. Dallas rhinoplasty: nasal surgery by the masters. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Pub 2007;p.177-86.
[8] Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: an atlas of surgical techniques. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
[9] Miles BA, Petrisor D, Kao H, et al. Anatomical variation of the nasal septum: analysis of 57 cadaver specimens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:362-8.
[10] Kim JS, Khan NA, Song HM, et al. Intraoperative measurements of harvestable septal cartilage in rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:519- 23.
[11] Kim IS, Lee MY, Lee KI, et al. Analysis of the development of the nasal septum according to age and gender using MRI. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2008;1:29-34.
[12] Kim JS, Jang PY, Choi TH, et al. The dimension of the septal cartilage using the cadaver study. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006;12:29-32.
[13] Kim J, Cho JH, Kim SW, et al. Anatomical variation of the nasal septum: Correlation among septal components. Clin Anat 2010;23:945-9.
[14] Basili C, Otsuka, T, Kubota M, Slavicek R, Sato S. Three-dimensional CT analysis of vomer bone in the architecture of craniofacial structures in caucasic human skulls. International journal of stomatology & occlusion medicine 2009; 2(4), 191-204.
[15] Adam GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, Harrel WE Jr, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(4):397–409.
[16] Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Minoshima Y, Graber TM. Craniofacial features of patients with Class III abnormalities: growth-related changes and effects of short-term and long-term chincup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:84-92.
[17] McCance AM., Moss JP, Fright WR, James DR., Linney AD. A three dimensional analysis of soft and hard tissue changes following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in skeletal III patients. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1992;30(5), 305-312.
[18] Turvey T. Sequencing of two-jaw surgery: the case for operating on the maxilla first. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2011;69 doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.050. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[19] Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-64. [Crossref
[20] Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004; 126: 308-19. [Crossref ]
[21] Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 371-7. [Crossref ]
[22] Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2006; 35: 219-26. [Crossref ]
[23] Ritto FG, Ritto TG, Ribeiro DP, Medeiros PJ, de Moraes M. Accuracy of maxillary positioning after standard and inverted orthognathic sequencing. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2014;117:567–574. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.016. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[24] Baan F, et al. A New 3D Tool for Assessing the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Surgery: The OrthoGnathicAnalyser. PloS one. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0149625. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[25] Turvey TA. Simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible: surgical technique and results. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 1982;40:96–99. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(82)80033-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[26] Schneider M, Tzscharnke O, Pilling E, Lauer G, Eckelt U. Comparison of the predicted surgical results following virtual planning with those actually achieved following bimaxillary operation of dysgnathia. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2005;33:8– 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.05.010. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
[27] Barteczko K, Jacob M. A re-evaluation of the premaxillary bone in humans. Anat Embryol 2004;207(6):417–37.Hansen L, Nolting D, Holm G, Hansen B, Kjaer I. Abnormal vomer development in human fetuses with isolated cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41(5):470–3.
[28] Mooney MP, Siegel MI. Premaxillary-maxillary suture fusion and anterior nasal tubercle morphology in the chimpanzee. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991.85:451–456.
[29] Singh GD, McNamara Jr JA, Lozanoff S. Morphometry of the midfacial complex in subjects with Class III malocclusions: Procrustes, Euclidean and cephalometric analyses 1998. Clin Anat 11:162–170.

APA	MOHI a, BEYCAN K, YALÇINKAYA Ş (2018). The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. , 284 - 290.
Chicago	MOHI ammar Riyad,BEYCAN Kadir,YALÇINKAYA Şebnem The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. (2018): 284 - 290.
MLA	MOHI ammar Riyad,BEYCAN Kadir,YALÇINKAYA Şebnem The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. , 2018, ss.284 - 290.
AMA	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. . 2018; 284 - 290.
Vancouver	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. . 2018; 284 - 290.
IEEE	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş "The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis." , ss.284 - 290, 2018.
ISNAD	MOHI, ammar Riyad vd. "The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis". (2018), 284-290.

APA	MOHI a, BEYCAN K, YALÇINKAYA Ş (2018). The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8(4), 284 - 290.
Chicago	MOHI ammar Riyad,BEYCAN Kadir,YALÇINKAYA Şebnem The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8, no.4 (2018): 284 - 290.
MLA	MOHI ammar Riyad,BEYCAN Kadir,YALÇINKAYA Şebnem The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, vol.8, no.4, 2018, ss.284 - 290.
AMA	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018; 8(4): 284 - 290.
Vancouver	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2018; 8(4): 284 - 290.
IEEE	MOHI a,BEYCAN K,YALÇINKAYA Ş "The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis." Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 8, ss.284 - 290, 2018.
ISNAD	MOHI, ammar Riyad vd. "The Vomer Bone Pattern Variations in Dentofacial Discrepancy using three-dimensional Analysis". Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 8/4 (2018), 284-290.