Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: Özel Sayı Sayfa Aralığı: 212 - 239 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 İndeks Tarihi: 13-11-2020
Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities
Öz: In this study, morphological structures of the traditional fabrics of citiesin Turkey, which have been shaped under the influence of variousdifferent cultures and geographical and climatic conditions in thehistorical process are presented via a mathematical interpretation. Inthis scope, spatial configuration and morphological structures of thehistorical cores of a total of fourteen cities selected from the sevengeographical regions of Turkey, two cities from each (from the MarmaraRegion, Edirne and Bursa; from the Black Sea Region, Kastamonu andTrabzon; from the Central Anatolia Region, Sivas and Kayseri; from theEastern Anatolia Region, Kars and Erzurum; from the Aegean Region,Muğla and Kütahya; from the South Eastern Anatolia Region, Urfa,Mardin and lastly from the Mediterranean Region, Tarsus and Antakya)region were analyzed comparatively using the Space Syntax method. Inthis method, the cities were analyzed in three main categories usingeleven different parameters. These categories are convex space, axialspace and syntactic space. Convex space analyzes were made using theparamters of convex articulation, convex deformation of the grid, gridconvexity and convex ringness; axial space analyses were made using theparamters of axial articulation, axial integration of convex space, gridaxiality and axial ringness; finally, syntactic space analyses were madeusing the parameters of integration, intelligibility and synergy. In conclusion, it could be said that historical fabrics of the cities in Turkeyhave synchronous structures, manifest regular reflections, have organicsystems compared with the grid systems, and constitute higherintellibility and synergy.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Aru, K. A. (1998). Türk Kenti [Turkish city].
- Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(5), 777-795.
- Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 17-29.
- Batty, M., & Rana, S. (2002). Reformulating space syntax: the automatic definition and generation of axial lines and axial maps. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Working Paper, 58.
- Bölük, E. (2016). Köppen İklim Sınıflandırmasına Göre Türkiye İklimi. Retrieved from Ankara:
- Choudhary, P., & Adane, V. (2012). Spatial configurations of the urban cores in central India. Paper presented at the Proc. 8 Int. Sp. syntax Symp. Santiago de Chile.
- Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers)(27), iii-122.
- Cutini, V. (2001). Configuration and Centrality-Some evidence from two Italian case studies. Paper presented at the Space Syntax 3rd International Symposium Proceedings, 2001.
- Demir, A. (1996). Through the Ages Antakya. İstanbul: İstanbul Akbank Culture and Art Publication.
- Dursun, P. (2002). Trabzon kentsel dokusunda morfolojik analiz. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
- Eskidemir, K. (2016). Kent Morfolojisi ve Kültür: Anadolu ve İtalya Kentleri Karşılaştırmalı Analizleri. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi,
- Fierro, M. I. (2011). The Western Islamic World, Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hillier, B. (1989). The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics, 5- 21.
- Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of Architecture: Cambridge University Press.
- Hillier, B. (1999). The hidden geometry of deformed grids: or, why space syntax works, when it looks as though it shouldn't. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2), 169-191.
- Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space, 1984. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
- Kaya, M. A. (2003). Anadolu’daki Roma Garnizonları. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi, 18(2), 83-94.
- Kejanlı, T. (2005). Anadolu’da İlk Yerleşmeler ve Kentleşme Eğilimleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 89-97.
- Kuban, D. (1968). Anadolu-Türk Şehri: Tarihî Gelişmesi, Sosyal ve Fizikî Özellikleri Üzerinde Bazı Gelişmeler. Vakıflar(3), 53- 73.
- Kubat, A. S. (1997). The morphological characteristics of Anatolian fortified towns. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(1), 95-123.
- Kubat, A. S. (1999). The morphological history of Istanbul. Urban Morphology, 3, 28-40.
- Kubat, A. S. (2010). The study of urban form in Turkey. Urban Morphology, 14(1), 31-48.
- Larkham, P. J. (2002). Misusing'morphology'?(Urban form). Urban Morphology, 6(2), 95-98.
- Mohareb, N. I. (2009). Street morphology and its effect on pedestrian movement in historical Cairo. Cognitive processing, 10(2), 253-256.
- Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1 (1), 3-10.
- Osmond, P. (2011). The convex space as the'atom'of urban analysis. The Journal of Space Syntax, 2(1), 97-114.
- Özcan, K. (2006). Anadolu-Türk Kent Tarihinden Bir Kesit: Selçuklu Döneminde Anadolu-Türk Kent Modelleri. Bilig(38), 161-184.
- Penn, A., Hillier, B., Banister, D., & Xu, J. (1998). Configurational modelling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(1), 59-84.
- Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989). The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics, 43-55.
- Tanyeli, U. (1987). Anadolu-Türk kentinde fiziksel yapının evrim süreci (11 -15. yy). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Thilagam, N. L., & Banerjee, U. K. (2016). The morphological characteristics of medieval temple towns of Tamilnadu. Environment and Planning B: planning and Design, 43(1), 7-33.
- Tüter, R., & Ökesli, D. S. (2015). Geleneksel Kent Merkezi Çeperinde Dönüşüm Tarsus Örneği. Paper presented at the Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Temel Yaklaşımlar ve Teknikler, Mersin.
- Varoudis, T. (2012). DepthmapX multi-platform spatial network analysis software. Version 0.30 OpenSource, http://varoudis.github.io/depthmapX.
- Whitehand, J. (1986). Taking stock of urban geography. Area, 147- 151.
- Yekbun, A. E., & Çırak, A. A. (2018). Mardin Tarihi Kent Dokusunda Form Değişiminin İncelenmesi. Paper presented at the Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Araştırma Ağı II. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu “DeğişKent” Değişen Kent, Mekân ve Biçim", İstanbul.
| APA | Topcu M (2019). Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. , 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| Chicago | Topcu Mehmet Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. (2019): 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| MLA | Topcu Mehmet Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. , 2019, ss.212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| AMA | Topcu M Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. . 2019; 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| Vancouver | Topcu M Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. . 2019; 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| IEEE | Topcu M "Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities." , ss.212 - 239, 2019. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| ISNAD | Topcu, Mehmet. "Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities". (2019), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| APA | Topcu M (2019). Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 7(Özel Sayı), 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| Chicago | Topcu Mehmet Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 7, no.Özel Sayı (2019): 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| MLA | Topcu Mehmet Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, vol.7, no.Özel Sayı, 2019, ss.212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| AMA | Topcu M Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2019; 7(Özel Sayı): 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| Vancouver | Topcu M Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2019; 7(Özel Sayı): 212 - 239. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| IEEE | Topcu M "Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities." ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 7, ss.212 - 239, 2019. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
| ISNAD | Topcu, Mehmet. "Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities". ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 7/Özel Sayı (2019), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.86 |
