Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 75 - 82 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 İndeks Tarihi: 15-11-2020
Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle
Öz: In this study, the phalanges of the forelimb and hindlimb of 18 adult Holstein breed cattle were used. Morphometric measurements weretaken from 144 digital bones. In contrast to classical references, it was concluded that the greatest lengths (GLpe) were longer in the hindlimbthan the forelimb for the phalanx proximalis and phalanx media. In the phalanx proximalis and phalanx media, the SD*100/GLpe index valuewas high in the forelimb and low in the hindlimb. It was observed that the diffrences between the Bp (Breadth of the proximal end) valuesof phalanx proximalis and Bd (Breadth of the distal end) values in phalanx media were significant for the inner bones of the forelimb andtheir hindlimb counterparts, while the other values were statistically not significant. The presence of an asymmetry between the osteometricmeasurements of the internal and external bones of the digits could only be observed between the GL values of the phalanx media offorelimb (P<0.05). We concluded that the asymmetry seen in the forelimb in Holstein breed cattle maybe a result of being kept on concreteground as dairy cows.
Anahtar Kelime: Evcil Sığırlarda Parmak Kemikleri Üzerine Morfometrik Çalışma
Öz: Bu çalışmada, 18 adet erişkin Holstein ırkı sığıra ait ön ve arka ayak parmak kemikleri (phalanx proximalis, media ve distalis) kullanıldı. Toplam 144 parmak kemiğinin her birinden morfometrik ölçümler alındı. En büyük uzunluk (GLpe) ölçümlerinin hem Ph1, hem de Ph2’lerde, klasik kaynakların aksine arka ayaklarda daha fazla olduğu sonucuna varıldı. Ph1 ve Ph2’lerde SD*100/GLpe indeksinin ön ayaklarda daha yüksek, arka ayaklarda ise düşük olduğu gözlendi. Ph1’de Bp, Ph2’de de Bd değerlerinin ön ayakların internal kemikleriyle arka karşılıkları arasındaki farklarının istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı olması dışında, diğer farklılıkların istatistiki açıdan anlam taşımadığı gözlendi. Parmakların internal ve external kemiklerinin osteometrik ölçümleri arasında bir asimetrinin varlığı sadece ön Ph2’nin GL değerleri arasında gözlenebildi (P<0.05). Ön ayak kemikleri arasındaki bu asimetrinin, Holstein ırkı sığırların süt amaçlı yetiştiriciliği ve bunların nispeten sert zeminde tutulmuş olmalarının etkin olabileceği sonucuna varıldı.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG: Textbook of veterinary Anatomy. In, Dyce K, Sack W, Wensing C (Eds): Elsevier Health Sciences. 3 rd ed., WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, 1987.
- 2. Keller A, Clauss M, Muggli E, Nuss K: Even-toed but uneven in length: The digits of artiodactyls. Zoology, 112 (4): 270-278, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j. zool.2008.11.001
- 3. Sisson S: Ruminant osteology. In, Getty R (Ed): The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 4th ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, 1975.
- 4. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, Wilkens H, Wille KH, Frewein J: The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Volume 1. The Locomotor System of the Domestic Mammals. Parey Im Mvs, Berlin, 1986.
- 5. Nourinezhad J, Mazaheri Y, Pourmahdi Borujeni M, Daneshi M: Morphometric study on digital bones in Native Khuzestan Water Buffloes (Bubalus bubalis). Bulgarian J Vet Med, 15 (4): 228-235, 2012.
- 6. Muggli E, Sauter-Louis C, Braun U, Nuss K: Length asymmetry of the bovine digits. Vet J, 188 (3): 295-300, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl. 2010.05.016
- 7. Muggli E, Weidmann E, Kircher P, Nuss K: Radiographic measurement of hindlimb digit length in standing heifers. Anat Histol Embryol, 45 (6): 463-468, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/ahe.12222
- 8. Ocal MK, Sevil F, Parin U: A quantitative study on the digital bones of cattle. Ann Anat, 186 (2): 165-168, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0940- 9602(04)80034-7
- 9. Bartosiewicz L, Van Neer W, Lentacker A: Metapodial asymmetry in draft cattle. Int J Osteoarchaeol, 3 (2): 69-75, 1993. DOI: 10.1002/ oa.1390030203
- 10. Thomas R, Johannsen N: Articular depressions in domestic cattle phalanges and their archaeological relevance. Int J Paleopathol, 1 (1): 43- 54, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpp.2011.02.007
- 11. Boosman R, Németh F, Gruys E: Bovine laminitis: Clinical aspects, pathology and pathogenesis with reference to acute equine laminitis. Vet Q, 13 (3): 163-171, 1991. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1991.9694302
- 12. Animal Diversity Web: Bovidae. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/ Bovidae/; Accessed: 02.01.2007.
- 13. Prenti.ce DE, Neal PA: Some observations on the incidence of lameness in dairy cattle in West Cheshire. Vet Rec, 91 (1): 1-7, 1972. DOI: 10.1136/vr.91.1.1
- 14. Russell AM, Shaw SR: The compton lameness survey 1977: A preliminary report. Anim Dis Rep, 2, 5-8, 1978.
- 15. Van Amstel SR, Shearer J: Manual for Treatment and Control of Lameness in Cattle. Blackwell Publishing, USA, 2006.
- 16. Andersson L, Lundström K: The influence of breed, age, body weight and season on digital disease and hoof size in dairy cows. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A, 28 (2): 141-151, 1981. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1981. tb01174.x
- 17. Koflr J: Clinical study of toe ulcer and necrosis of the apex of the distal phalanx in 53 cattle. Vet J, 157 (2): 139-147, 1999. DOI: 10.1053/ tvjl.1998.0290
- 18. Métais G, Albayrak E, Antoine PO, Erdal O, Karadenizli L, Oyal N, Saraç G, İslamoğlu Y, Sen S: Oligocene ruminants from the Kızılırmak formation, Çankırı-Çorum basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Palaeontol Electron, 19.3.37A, 2016. DOI: 10.26879/629
- 19. Sidéra I, De Maret P: An Ideal Bone for Traditional Dolls. Ruminants Metapodia Figurines: Archaeological and Ethnographical Examples from Africa and Europe. In, Selena V (Ed): Close to the Bone: Current Studies in Bone Technologies. 315-323, Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade, 2016.
- 20. Hír J, Venczel M, Codrea V, Rössner GE, Angelone C, van den Hoek Ostende LW, Rosina VV, Kirscher U, Prieto J: Badenian and Sarmatian s. str. from the Carpathian area: Taxonomical notes concerning the Hungarian and Romanian small vertebrates and report on the ruminants from the Felsőtárkány Basin. CR Palevol, 16 (3): 312-332, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.11.006
- 21. Clason AT: The animal bones of the Bandceramic and Middle Age settlements near Bylany in Bohemia. Palaeohistoria, 14, 1-17, 1970.
- 22. Zhang Q, Ding X, Xu K: Terrain adaptability mechanism of large ruminants’ feet on the kinematics view. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2015:151686, 2015. DOI: 10.1155/2015/151686
- 23. Philip LM, Venugopal SK, Devanand CB: Management of Toe Ulcer and Apical Necrosis of Distal Phalanx in a Cow. Intas Polivet, 18 (2): 242- 244, 2017.
- 24. Gyan LA, Paetsch CD, Jelinski MD, Allen AL: The lesions of toe tip necrosis in southern Alberta feedlot cattle provide insight into the pathogenesis of the disease. Can Vet J, 56 (11): 1134-1139, 2015.
- 25. Taşbaş M, Tecirlioğlu S: Researches on the maceration technique. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 4, 324-330, 1966.
- 26. Von den Driesch A: Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass, 1976.
| APA | Gündemir O, Ozkan E, MUTUŞ R (2020). Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. , 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| Chicago | Gündemir Ozan,Ozkan Ermis,MUTUŞ RIFAT Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. (2020): 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| MLA | Gündemir Ozan,Ozkan Ermis,MUTUŞ RIFAT Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. , 2020, ss.75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| AMA | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. . 2020; 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| Vancouver | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. . 2020; 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| IEEE | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R "Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle." , ss.75 - 82, 2020. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| ISNAD | Gündemir, Ozan vd. "Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle". (2020), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| APA | Gündemir O, Ozkan E, MUTUŞ R (2020). Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| Chicago | Gündemir Ozan,Ozkan Ermis,MUTUŞ RIFAT Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 26, no.1 (2020): 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| MLA | Gündemir Ozan,Ozkan Ermis,MUTUŞ RIFAT Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.26, no.1, 2020, ss.75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| AMA | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 26(1): 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| Vancouver | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 26(1): 75 - 82. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| IEEE | Gündemir O,Ozkan E,MUTUŞ R "Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle." Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, ss.75 - 82, 2020. 10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
| ISNAD | Gündemir, Ozan vd. "Morphometric Study on the Digital Bones in the Domestic Cattle". Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 26/1 (2020), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2019.22291 |
