How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey

Cemal ZEHİR, (Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)
İbrahim Sarper KARAKADILAR, (Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Kahramanmaraş, Türkye)
Gizem GÖĞÜS, (Bilkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Doğan BAŞAR (Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye)
İş Ahlakı Dergisi
5 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 26 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119 İndeks Tarihi: 15-11-2020

How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey

Öz:
This paper aims to investigate the mediating role of organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) betweencharismatic leadership (CL) and corporate entrepreneurship (CE), as well as to examine the moderator effect ofethical climate on the relationships between charismatic leadership (CL) and corporate entrepreneurship (CE).Structural equation modeling ıs performed to test the proposed relations using data collected from 425 white-collarworkers in Istanbul. The analysis results show charismatic leadership, organizational citizenship behaviors, andethical climate to positively and significantly correlate with corporate entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, principled localethical climate has a moderator effect between charismatic leadership and organizational citizenship as it strengthensthe positive relationship between them. This means that better ethical environmental conditions strengthenthe positive effect of charismatic leadership on corporate entrepreneurship. This study contributes to the literatureby attempting some novelties such as: (a) testing the impact and importance level of ethical climate in the workenvironment of an emerging country such as Turkey, (b) investigating the moderating role of ethical climate onthe relationship between charismatic leadership and corporate entrepreneurship, and (c) analyzing the mediatingrelationship among charismatic leadership, organizational citizenship behavior and corporate entrepreneurship andchecking the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior over them.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akçakaya, M. (2010). 21.Yüzyılda yeni liderlik anlayışı [Novel leadership approach in the twenty first century]. Ankara, Turkey: Adalet Yayınevi.
  • Aronson, E. (2001). Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18, 244–256.
  • Aykanat, Z., & Yildiz, T. (2016). Karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel yenilikçilik ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma [A research on relationship between charismatic leadership and organizational innovation]. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Development/Girisimcilik ve Kalkinma Dergisi, 11(2), 198–228.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
  • Barringer, B. R., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 421–444.
  • Basar, D. (2009). Çalışanların şirket politikası, liderlik davranışları ve etik iklimi algılamaları ile iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationship among corporation policy, charismatic leadership, ethical climate, job satisfaction and organizational commitment]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Gebze Institute of Technology. Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Bateman, T. S., & Crant, M. J. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.
  • Bortolotti, T., Danese, P., & Romano, P. (2013). Assessing the impact of just-in-time on operational performance at varying degrees of repetitiveness, International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1117–1130.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 439–452.
  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N., Menon, S. T., & Mathur, P. (1997). Measuring charisma: dimensionality and validity of the Conger-Kanungo Scale of Charismatic Leadership, Revue Canadiennedes Sciences de l’ Administration, 14, 3.
  • Covin, J. G., Slevin, D. P., & Schultz, R. L. (1994). Implementing strategic missions: Effective strategic, structural and tactical choices. Journal of Management Studies, 31(4), 481–506.
  • Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, K. P., & Victor, B. (2003). The effects of ethical climates on organizational commitment: A two-study analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 127–141.
  • Cullen, J. B., Victor, B., & Stephens, C. (1989). An ethical weather report: Assessing the organization’s ethical climate. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 50–62.
  • Çınar, B., Akgül, G., & Korkmaz, E. (2018). Karizmatik liderin işgören motivasyonuna etkisi: Madencilik sektöründe bir araştırma. Turkish Journal of Marketing, 3(2), 143–165.
  • Deluga, R. J. (1998). American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership, and rated performance. Leadership Quarterly, 9(3), 265–291.
  • Dickson, M. W., Smith, D. B., Grojean, M. W., & Ehrhart, M. (2001). An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 197–217.
  • Eyal, O., & Kark, R. (2004). How do transformational leaders transform organizations? A study of the relationship between leadership and entrepreneurship. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 211–235.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  • Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115–134.
  • Galvin, B. M., Waldman, D. A., & Balthazard, P. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63, 509–537.
  • Hair, F. W., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis -the 7th Edition. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
  • Hemmen, S. V., Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2013). Charismatic leadership and entrepreneurial activity: An empirical analysis. Innovar, 23(50).
  • House, R. J. (1977). Theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189–207). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902.
  • Imran, R., & Anis-ul-Hak, M. (2011). Mediating effect of organizational climate between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 6(2), 183–199.
  • Kadirov, I. (2003). Karizmatik liderlik ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma [A Study on the relationship between charismatic leadership and organizational commitment]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Gebze Institute of Technology. Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Karagozoglu, N., & Brown, W. B. (1988). Adaptive responses by conservative and entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(4), 269–281.
  • Keklik, B. (2012). Sağlık hizmetlerinde benimsenen liderlik tiplerinin belirlenmesi: Özel bir hastane örneği [Determination of leadership style preferred in health institutions: Example of a private hospital]. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 14(1), 73–93.
  • Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 213–225.
  • Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit level longitudinal study. Personal Psychology, 54(1), 101–114.
  • Köseoglu, M. A., Yildiz, M., & Ciftci. T. (2018). Authorship trends and collaboration patterns in business ethics literature. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27, 164–177.
  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1997). Proactiveness versus competitive aggressiveness: Teasing apart key dimensions of an entrepreneurial orientation. In P. D. Raynolds, W. D. Bygrave, N. M. Carter, P. Davidsson, W. B. Gartner, C. M. Mason, and P. P. McDougall (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Babson College - Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Wellesley, MA.
  • Malisetty, S., Archana, R. V., & Kumari, V. (2017). Evaluating the impact of organisation ethical culture and ethical climate on deviant behavior using ECQ. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8, 217–231.
  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates for entrepreneurship in three types of firm. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
  • Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 115–126.
  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, J. F., & Locander, W. B. (2008). Effect of ethical climate on turnover intention: Linking attitudinal and stress theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 559–574.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Otken, A. B., & Cenkci, T. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 525–536.
  • Pearce, J. A., Kramer, T. R., & Robbins, D. K. (1997). Effects of managers’ entrepreneurial behavior on subordinates. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(2), 147–160.
  • Pittaway, L., (2001). Corporate enterprise: A new reality for hospitality organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(4), 379–393.
  • Pittaway, L., Carmouche, R., & Chell, E. (1998). The way forward: Leadership research in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 17(4), 407–426.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.
  • Schwepker, C. H., Jr. (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54, 39–52.
  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.
  • Toor, S. R., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 533–547.
  • Valentine, S., Godkin, L., & Lucero, M. (2002). Ethical context, organizational commitment, and person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 349–360.
  • Veríssimo, J., & Lacerda, T. (2015). Does integrity matter for CSR practice in organizations? The mediating role of transformational leadership. Business Ethics: a European Review, 24(1), 34–51.
  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.
  • Vranceanu, R. (2014). Corporate profit, entrepreneurship theory and business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), 50–68.
  • Whetstone, T. J. (2005). A framework for organizational virtue: the interrelationship of mission, culture and leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4), 367–378.
  • Wyld, D. C., & Jones, C. A. (1997). The importance of context: The ethical work climate construct and models of ethical decision making: An agenda for research. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 465–472.
  • Yasir, M., & Rasli, A. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of ethical leadership on workplace deviance in public healthcare sector of Pakistan. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15(4), 558–574.
  • Yıldız, T., Aykanat, Z., & Tüzemen, S. (2016). Etik liderlik ve sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 229–250.
  • Yukl, G. (1998). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33–48.
  • Zahra, S. A. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5(21), 5–21.
  • Zbierowski, P. (2016). Positive leadership and corporate entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and research propositions. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3).
  • Zehir, C., Altındağ, E., Müceldili, B., & Zehir, S. (2014). Charismatic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of ethical climate. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 42(8).
APA ZEHİR C, KARAKADILAR I, GÖĞÜS G, BAŞAR D (2019). How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. , 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
Chicago ZEHİR Cemal,KARAKADILAR IBRAHIM SARPER,GÖĞÜS Gizem,BAŞAR Doğan How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. (2019): 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
MLA ZEHİR Cemal,KARAKADILAR IBRAHIM SARPER,GÖĞÜS Gizem,BAŞAR Doğan How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. , 2019, ss.1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
AMA ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. . 2019; 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
Vancouver ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. . 2019; 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
IEEE ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D "How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey." , ss.1 - 26, 2019. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
ISNAD ZEHİR, Cemal vd. "How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey". (2019), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
APA ZEHİR C, KARAKADILAR I, GÖĞÜS G, BAŞAR D (2019). How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 12(1), 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
Chicago ZEHİR Cemal,KARAKADILAR IBRAHIM SARPER,GÖĞÜS Gizem,BAŞAR Doğan How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi 12, no.1 (2019): 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
MLA ZEHİR Cemal,KARAKADILAR IBRAHIM SARPER,GÖĞÜS Gizem,BAŞAR Doğan How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, vol.12, no.1, 2019, ss.1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
AMA ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 2019; 12(1): 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
Vancouver ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 2019; 12(1): 1 - 26. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
IEEE ZEHİR C,KARAKADILAR I,GÖĞÜS G,BAŞAR D "How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey." İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 12, ss.1 - 26, 2019. 10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
ISNAD ZEHİR, Cemal vd. "How the Managerial Environment Effects on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Turkey". İş Ahlakı Dergisi 12/1 (2019), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.12711/tjbe.2019.12.1.0119
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 15:7

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları