Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 233 - 240 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429 İndeks Tarihi: 20-11-2020

The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the long-termclinical outcomes, complications and survival rates of cementedOxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) andto compare the findings with the reported outcomes of UKA andtotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the literature.Patients and methods: In the study, 133 knees of 115patients (16 males, 99 females; mean age 65.5±8.3 years; range,50 to 88 years) who underwent Oxford medial UKA betweenMay 2007 and August 2013 were followed-up for an averageof 126 months. Prosthetic complications and revisions wereevaluated. While Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluateimplant survival, Knee Society, Functional Knee Society andvisual analog scale scores were used for determining finalfunctional outcomes.Results: Totally 29 prosthetic complications (21.6% of totalpatients) were observed and the most common one was insertdislocation observed in 17 knees (12.6%). Revision surgeries wereperformed for all of these patients. Among the 17 patients whounderwent insert replacement surgeries, the inserts were stable ineight during the follow-up while insert dislocation reoccurred innine. Revision surgeries were performed in a total of 21 patients(15.6%). There were statistically significant improvements in finalfollow-up functional knee scores of patients without complicationscompared to preoperative scores.Conclusion: According to our findings, while reoperationand early aseptic revision rates of Oxford medial UKA arehigh compared to the TKA results reported in the literature,functional results are satisfactory for patients with norevision.
Anahtar Kelime:

Çimentolu Oxford unikompartmental diz artroplastisinin uzun dönem sonuçları: Tek merkez deneyimi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada çimentolu Oxford medial unikompartmental diz artroplastisi (UDA)’nin uzun dönem klinik sonuçları, komplikasyonları ve sağkalım oranları araştırıldı ve bulgular UDA ve total diz artroplastisi (TDA)’nin literatürde bildirilen sonuçları ile karşılaştırıldı. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Çalışmada Mayıs 2007-Ağustos 2013 tarihleri arasında Oxford medial UDA uygulanan 115 hastanın (16 erkek, 99 kadın; ort. yaş 65.5±8.3 yıl; dağılım, 50-88 yıl) 133 dizi ortalama 126 ay takip edildi. Protez komplikasyonları ve revizyonları değerlendirildi. İmplant sağkalımını değerlendirmek için Kaplan-Meier yöntemi kullanılırken son fonksiyonel sonuçları belirlemek için Diz Derneği, Fonksiyonel Diz Derneği ve görsel analog ölçeği skorları kullanıldı. Bulgular: Toplam 29 protez komplikasyonu (toplam hastaların %21.6'sı) gözlendi ve en yaygın olanı 17 dizde (%12.6) görülen insert çıkığıydı. Tüm bu hastalara revizyon cerrahisi yapıldı. Insert replasman cerrahisi uygulanan 17 hastadan sekizinde t akipte i nsert stabil i ken, dokuzunda tekrar insert çıkığı gelişti. Toplamda 21 hastaya (%15.6) revizyon cerrahisi yapıldı. Komplikasyon olmayan hastaların son takip fonksiyonel diz skorlarında ameliyat öncesi skorlara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı iyileşme vardı. Sonuç: Bulgularımıza göre, Oxford medial UDA'nın literatürde bildirilen TDA sonuçlarına göre yeniden ameliyat ve erken aseptik revizyon oranları yüksek olmakla beraber fonksiyonel sonuçlar revizyonu olmayan hastalar için tatmin edici idi.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004;86:43-7.
  • 2. Repicci JA1, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty J South Orthop Assoc 1999;8:20-7
  • 3. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80:983-9.
  • 4. Müller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:296-301.
  • 5. Saxler G, Temmen D, Bontemps G. Medium-term results of the AMC-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 2004;11:349-55.
  • 6. Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:722-31.
  • 7. Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014;384:1437-45.
  • 8. Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P, Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2008;79:499-507.
  • 9. Hansen EN, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Lonner JH. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty has fewer complications but higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty in a study of large united states databases. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:1617-25.
  • 10. Aslan H, Ersan O, Baz AB, Duman E, Aydin E, Ateş Y. Midterm results of Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007;41:367-72.
  • 11. Parmaksizoğlu AS, Kabukçuoğlu Y, Ozkaya U, Bilgili F, Aslan A. Short-term results of the Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44:135-42.
  • 12. Cepni SK, Arslan A, Polat H, Yalçin A, Parmaksizoğlu AS. Mid-term results of Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in obese patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48:122-6.
  • 13. Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit HG, Gray H, Price AJ, Dodd CA, et al. The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91:896-902.
  • 14. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88:54-60.
  • 15. Price AJ, Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:174-9.
  • 16. Chou DT, Swamy GN, Lewis JR, Badhe NP. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012;19:356-9.
  • 17. Schroer WC, Barnes CL, Diesfeld P, LeMarr A, Ingrassia R, Morton DJ, et al. The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3533-9.
  • 18. Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:84-90.
  • 19. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91:52-7.
  • 20. Hamilton WG, Ammeen D, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA. Learning curve with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:735-40.
  • 21. Barrett WP, Scott RD. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69:1328-35.
  • 22. Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2013;95:702-9.
  • 23. Atik OS. Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2011;22:118-9.
APA Sever G, Cankuş M (2019). The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. , 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
Chicago Sever Gökhan Bülent,Cankuş Mehmet Cenk The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. (2019): 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
MLA Sever Gökhan Bülent,Cankuş Mehmet Cenk The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. , 2019, ss.233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
AMA Sever G,Cankuş M The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. . 2019; 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
Vancouver Sever G,Cankuş M The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. . 2019; 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
IEEE Sever G,Cankuş M "The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience." , ss.233 - 240, 2019. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
ISNAD Sever, Gökhan Bülent - Cankuş, Mehmet Cenk. "The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience". (2019), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
APA Sever G, Cankuş M (2019). The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), 30(3), 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
Chicago Sever Gökhan Bülent,Cankuş Mehmet Cenk The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) 30, no.3 (2019): 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
MLA Sever Gökhan Bülent,Cankuş Mehmet Cenk The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), vol.30, no.3, 2019, ss.233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
AMA Sever G,Cankuş M The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.). 2019; 30(3): 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
Vancouver Sever G,Cankuş M The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.). 2019; 30(3): 233 - 240. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
IEEE Sever G,Cankuş M "The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience." Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.), 30, ss.233 - 240, 2019. 10.5606/ehc.2019.66429
ISNAD Sever, Gökhan Bülent - Cankuş, Mehmet Cenk. "The long-term results of cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A single-center experience". Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Dergisi (Eski Adı: Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi Derg.) 30/3 (2019), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2019.66429