Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 123 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338 İndeks Tarihi: 21-11-2020

The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer

Öz:
Objective: Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) can be predicted from Magee EquationsTM (MS) postoperatively. The aim of this study is to investigatecorrelation of MS with RS from pretreatment core needle biopsy (CNB) tissues, and their clinical usefulness in prediction of response to neoadjuvantchemotherapy (NCT) in estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC).Materials and Methods: Pretreatment CNB tissue samples from 60 patients with ER+/HER2- invasive BC were analyzed for MS and RS correlation. MS and RS were categorized as follows: low (<18), intermediate (18–30), and high (≥ 31). Percentage Tumor size Reduction (%TR) was used toassess tumor response to NCT, and substantial %TR was defined as at least 50% reduction (≥50%TR). Correlation between MS and RS, and predictivefactors for the ≥50%TR achievement were assessed.Results: MS and RS represented a strong correlation (Spearman's correlation; r=0.58, p<0.0001) as a continuous variable. As a categorical variable, theconcordance between MS and RS was 43.3%, and it increased to 80% (r=0.61, p=0.003) with the exclusion of the intermediate risk categories. Although,there was pathologic complete response (pCR), MS showed the highest predictive power for the ≥50% TR achievement, none of the factors were statistically significant (p≥0.07).Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that there was a strong correlation between MS and RS from pretreatment biopsy tissue samples in ER+ andHER2- invasive BC.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817-2826. (PMID: 15591335) [CrossRef]
  • 2. Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 3726-3734. (PMID: 16720680) [CrossRef]
  • 3. Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, Hortobagyi GN, Livingston RB, Yeh IT, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptorpositive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 55-65. (PMID: 20005174) [CrossRef]
  • 4. Mamounas EP, Tang G, Fisher B, Paik S, Shak S, Costantino JP, et al. Association between the 21-gene recurrence score assay and risk of locoregional recurrence in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1677-1683. (PMID: 20065188) [CrossRef]
  • 5. Tang G, Shak S, Paik S, Anderson SJ, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, et al. Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ERpositive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127: 133-142. (PMID: 21221771) [CrossRef]
  • 6. Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, et al. Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1533-1546. (PMID: 25939896)
  • 7. Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rutgers E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 26(Suppl 5): v8-30. (PMID: 26314782) [CrossRef]
  • 8. Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1134-1150. (PMID: 26858339) [CrossRef]
  • 9. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in OncologyTM: Breast Cancer (Version 2.2016; http://www.nccn.org) Accessed Dec 2016.
  • 10. Allison KH, Kandalaft PL, Sitlani CM, Dintzis SM, Gown AM. Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 131: 413-424. (PMID: 21369717) [CrossRef]
  • 11. Gage MM, Rosman M, Mylander WC, Giblin E, Kim HS, Cope L, et al. A validated model for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from the 21-gene recurrence score assay. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15: 467-472. (PMID: 26072275) [CrossRef]
  • 12. Tang P, Wang J, Hicks DG, Wang X, Schiffhauer L, McMahon L, et al. A lower Allred score for progesterone receptor is strongly associated with a higher recurrence score of 21-gene assay in breast cancer. Cancer Invest 2010; 28: 978-982. (PMID: 20690804) [CrossRef]
  • 13. Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, Wale C, Salter J, Quinn E, et al. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4273-4278. (PMID: 21990413) [CrossRef]
  • 14. Ingoldsby H, Webber M, Wall D, Scarrott C, Newell J, Callagy G. Prediction of Oncotype DX and TAILORx risk categories using histopathological and immunohistochemical markers by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Breast 2013; 22: 879-886. (PMID: 23643806) [CrossRef]
  • 15. Auerbach J, Kim M, Fineberg S. Can features evaluated in the routine 122 pathologic assessment of lymph node-negative estrogen receptor-positive stage I or II invasive breast cancer be used to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010; 134: 1697-1701. (PMID: 21043825)
  • 16. Geradts J, Bean SM, Bentley RC, Barry WT. The oncotype DX recurrence score is correlated with a composite index including routinely reported pathobiologic features. Cancer Invest 2010; 28: 969-977. (PMID: 20873988) [CrossRef]
  • 17. Flanagan MB, Dabbs DJ, Brufsky AM, Beriwal S, Bhargava R. Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 2008; 21: 1255-1261. (PMID: 18360352) [CrossRef]
  • 18. Klein ME, Dabbs DJ, Shuai Y, Brufsky AM, Jankowitz R, Puhalla SL, et al. Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathologygenerated equations derived by linear regression analysis. Mod Pathol 2013; 26: 658-664. (PMID: 23503643) [CrossRef]
  • 19. Harowicz MR, Robinson TJ, Dinan MA, Saha A, Marks JR, Marcom PK, et al. Algorithms for prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using clinicopathologic data: a review and comparison using an independent dataset. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162: 1-10. (PMID: 28064383) [CrossRef]
  • 20. Turner BM, Skinner KA, Tang P, Jackson MC, Soukiazian N, Shayne M, et al. Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score. Mod Pathol 2015; 28: 921-931. (PMID: 25932962) [CrossRef]
  • 21. Chen YY, Tseng LM, Yang CF, Lien PJ, Hsu CY. Adjust cut-off values of immunohistochemistry models to predict risk of distant recurrence in invasive breast carcinoma patients. J Chin Med Assoc 2016; 79: 649-655. (PMID: 27595437) [CrossRef]
  • 22. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 778-785. (PMID: 18258986) [CrossRef]
  • 23. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 2014; 384: 164- 172. (PMID: 24529560) [CrossRef]
  • 24. Gianni L, Baselga J, Eiermann W, Porta VG, Semiglazov V, Lluch A, et al. Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2474-2481. (PMID: 19332727) [CrossRef]
  • 25. Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, Suzanne Klimberg V, Brian Butler E, Teh BS. Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 170: 559-567. (PMID: 29693228) [CrossRef]
  • 26. Mina L, Soule SE, Badve S, Baehner FL, Baker J, Cronin M, et al. Predicting response to primary chemotherapy: gene expression profiling of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 103: 197-208. (PMID: 17039265) [CrossRef]
  • 27. Soran A, Bhargava R, Johnson R, Ahrendt G, Bonaventura M, Diego E, et al. The impact of Oncotype DX® recurrence score of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissues in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Breast Dis 2016; 36: 65-71. (PMID: 27662272) [CrossRef]
  • 28. Gianni L, Zambetti M, Clark K, Baker J, Cronin M, Wu J, et al. Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7265-7277. (PMID: 16145055) [CrossRef]
  • 29. Chang JC, Makris A, Gutierrez MC, Hilsenbeck SG, Hackett JR, Jeong J, et al. Gene expression patterns in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded core biopsies predict docetaxel chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 108: 233-240. (PMID: 17468949) [CrossRef]
  • 30. Yardley DA, Peacock NW, Shastry M, Burris HA 3rd, Bechhold RG, Hendricks CB, et al. A phase II trial of ixabepilone and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer: correlation of pathologic complete response with the 21-gene recurrence score. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 154: 299-308. (PMID: 26507191) [CrossRef]
  • 31. Pivot X, Mansi L, Chaigneau L, Montcuquet P, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Bazan F, et al. In the era of genomics, should tumor size be reconsidered as a criterion for neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Oncologist 2015; 20: 344-350. (PMID: 25795632) [CrossRef]
  • 32. Ueno T, Masuda N, Yamanaka T, Saji S, Kuroi K, Sato N, et al. Evaluating the 21-gene assay Recurrence Score® as a predictor of clinical response to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant exemestane in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2014; 19: 607-613. (PMID: 24101215) [CrossRef]
  • 33. Akashi-Tanaka S, Shimizu C, Ando M, Shibata T, Katsumata N, Kouno T, et al. 21-Gene expression profile assay on core needle biopsies predicts responses to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast 2009; 18: 171-174. (PMID: 19410462) [CrossRef]
  • 34. Bear HD, Wan W, Robidoux A, Rubin P, Limentani S, White RL Jr, et al. Using the 21-gene assay from core needle biopsies to choose neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: A multi-center trial. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115: 917-923. (PMID: 28407247) [CrossRef]
  • 35. Sparano JA, Paik S. Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 721-728. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Sparano JA. TAILORx: Trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx). Clin Breast Cancer 2006 Oct; 7: 347-350. (PMID: 17092406) [CrossRef]
  • 37. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 111-121. (PMID: 29860917)
  • 38. Farrugia DJ, Landmann A, Zhu L, Diego EJ, Johnson RR, Bonaventura M, et al. Magee Equation 3 predicts pathologic response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative/ equivocal breast tumors. Mod Pathol 2017; 30: 1078-1085. (PMID: 28548119) [CrossRef]
APA Soran A, Tane K, SEZGİN E, Bhargava R (2020). The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. , 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
Chicago Soran Atilla,Tane Kaori,SEZGİN Efe,Bhargava Rohit The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. (2020): 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
MLA Soran Atilla,Tane Kaori,SEZGİN Efe,Bhargava Rohit The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. , 2020, ss.117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
AMA Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. . 2020; 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
Vancouver Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. . 2020; 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
IEEE Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R "The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer." , ss.117 - 123, 2020. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
ISNAD Soran, Atilla vd. "The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer". (2020), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
APA Soran A, Tane K, SEZGİN E, Bhargava R (2020). The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. European Journal of Breast Health, 16(2), 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
Chicago Soran Atilla,Tane Kaori,SEZGİN Efe,Bhargava Rohit The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. European Journal of Breast Health 16, no.2 (2020): 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
MLA Soran Atilla,Tane Kaori,SEZGİN Efe,Bhargava Rohit The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. European Journal of Breast Health, vol.16, no.2, 2020, ss.117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
AMA Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. European Journal of Breast Health. 2020; 16(2): 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
Vancouver Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer. European Journal of Breast Health. 2020; 16(2): 117 - 123. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
IEEE Soran A,Tane K,SEZGİN E,Bhargava R "The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer." European Journal of Breast Health, 16, ss.117 - 123, 2020. 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338
ISNAD Soran, Atilla vd. "The Correlation of Magee EquationsTM and Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score From Core Needle Biopsy Tissues in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in ER+ and HER2- Breast Cancer". European Journal of Breast Health 16/2 (2020), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2020.5338