Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 0 Sayı: Talha Özel Sayısı Sayfa Aralığı: 57 - 76 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.18092/ulikidince.557263 İndeks Tarihi: 22-11-2020

TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz:
Son yıllarda internet sitesi kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi önemli bir konu haline gelmiş ve internet sitesi kalitesideğerlendirilmesi üzerine birçok çalışma yapılmıştır. Buna rağmen, literatürde teknoloji mağazalarını ele alanbir araştırmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Çalışma ile bu eksikliğin giderilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda ISO 25010kalite modeli çerçevesinde uygulama alanına özgü çok kriterli kalite modeli geliştirilmiş ve model yardımıylaTürkiye’de faaliyet gösteren altı alternatif teknoloji mağazasının internet sitesinin değerlendirilmiştir. Budoğrultuda, hem kriterlerin önem derecelerinin belirlenmesinde hem de alternatiflerin değerlendirilmesindeçok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden biri olan Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (BAHP)kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca, kriter ağırlıklarındaki değişimlerin internet sitelerinin sıralamasına etkilerini araştırmakamacıyla duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma teorik açıdan araştırmacılara internet sitesi kalite değerlendirmeprobleminde yeni bir model sunması, pratik açıdan teknoloji mağazalarına kullanıcılarına daha kaliteli hizmetsunabilmeleri için internet sitelerini tasarlamalarında yol gösterici olması bakımından yazına katkısağlayacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS OF WEBSITE QUALITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON ISO 25010 QUALITY MODEL OF TECHNOLOGY STORES: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Öz:
In recent years, the evaluation of website quality has become an important issue and many studies have been done on the evaluation of website quality. In spite of this, there is no study which evaluates website quality of technology stores. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature. Within this context, a new model with multiple criteria specific to the application area has been developed based on the ISO 25010 quality model. The new model has been used to evaluate website quality of six alternative technology stores operating in Turkey. Accordingly, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) has been used for both determining the importance of the criteria and evaluating and ranking the alternatives. In addition, a sensitivity analysis has been conducted to investigate the impact of changes in criteria weights on websites rankings. This study will contribute to the literature theoretically by providing a new website quality evaluation model, and in practical terms, it is a guide to designing websites so that they can provide better quality service to customers of technology stores.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adali, E. A.ve Isik, A. T. (2017). Ranking Web Design Firms with the ORESTE Method/Web Tasarim Firmalarinin Oreste Yöntemi ile Siralanmasi. Ege Akademik Bakis, 17(2), 243.
  • Agrawal, A., Shah, P. ve Wadhwa, V. (2007). EGOSQ-Users’ Assessment of E-Governance OnlineServices: A Quality Measurement Instrumentation. In International Conference on Egovernance, December, Hydrabad, India.
  • Al-Safadi, L. A. ve Garcia, R. A. (2012). ISO9126 Based Quality Model for Evaluating B2C eCommerce Applications, A Saudi Market Perspective. IJCIT, 3(2).
  • Apostolou, G.ve Economides, A. A. (2008). Airlines Websites Evaluation around the World. The Open Knowlege Society. A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto, 611- 617.
  • Ataloglou, M. P. ve Economides, A. A. (2009). Evaluating European Ministries' Websites. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 5(3).
  • Aydın, A. O., Kutay, F., Gökçen, H. ve Güngör, A. (2006). ISO/IEC 9126 Standardında Anadilin Kullanımı. Journal of Yasar University, 1(3), 221-237.
  • Behkamal, B., Kahani, M. ve Akbari, M. K. (2009). Customizing ISO 9126 Quality Model for Evaluation of B2B Applications. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 599-609.
  • Biscoglio, I., Fusani, M., Lami, G. ve Trentanni, G. (2007). Establishing a Quality-Model Based Evaluation Process for Websites. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Engineering, ICWE’07, 344-351.
  • Büyüközkan, G. ve Çifçi, G. (2012). A Combined Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Based Strategic Analysis of Electronic Service Quality in Healthcare Industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341-2354.
  • Büyüközkan, G. ve Ruan, D. (2007). Evaluating Government Websites Based on a Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(03), 321-343.
  • Büyüközkan, G., Ruan, D. ve Feyzioğlu, O. (2007). Evaluating E‐Learning Web Site Quality in a Fuzzy Environment. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(5), 567-586.
  • Cao, M., Zhang, Q.ve Seydel, J. (2005). B2C E-Commerce Web Site Quality: An Empirical Examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645-661.
  • Cebi, S. (2013a). Determining Importance Degrees of Website Design Parameters Based on Interactions and Types of Websites. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 1030-1043.
  • Cebi, S. (2013b). A Quality Evaluation Model for the Design Quality of Online Shopping Websites. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 124-135.
  • Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal Of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  • Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1-9.
  • Chen, C.T., Lin, C. T. ve Huang, S. F. (2006). A Fuzzy Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection In Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102, 289– 301.
  • Chou, W. C. ve Cheng, Y. P. (2012). A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Website Quality of Professional Accounting Firms. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2783-2793.
  • Chua, B. B. ve Dyson, L. E. (2004). Applying the ISO 9126 Model to the Evaluation af an E-Learning System. In Proceedings of 21th ASCILITE conference, 5-8.
  • Cox, J. ve Dale, B. G. (2002). Key Quality Factors In Web Site Design and Use: An Examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 862-888.
  • Cristobal, E., Flavian, C. ve Guinaliu, M. (2007). Perceived e-Service Quality (PeSQ): Measurement Validation and Effects on Consumer Satisfaction and Web Site Loyalty. Managing Science Quality, 3(17), 317-340.
  • Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria Analysis with Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison. International Journal Of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215-231.
  • Devi, K. ve Sharma, A. (2016). Framework for Evaluation of Academic Website. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 3(2), 234-9.
  • Ding, D. X., Hu, P. J. H. ve Sheng, O. R. L. (2011). e-SELFQUAL: A Scale For Measuring Online SelfService Quality. Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 508-515.
  • Ecer, F. (2014). A Hybrid Banking Websites Quality Evaluation Model Using AHP And COPRAS-G: A Turkey Case. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 758-782.
  • Ertuğrul, İ. ve Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702-715.
  • Facchinetti, G. (2002). Ranking Functions Induced by Weighted Average of Fuzzy Numbers. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 1(3), 313-327.
  • Fahmy, S., Haslinda, N., Roslina, W. ve Fariha, Z. (2012). Evaluating the Quality of Software in EBook Using the ISO 9126 Model. International Journal of Control and Automation, 5(2), 115-122.
  • GonzáLez, F. M. ve Palacios, T. B. (2004). Quantitative Evaluation of Commercial Web Sites: An Empirical Study of Spanish Firms. International journal of information management, 24(4), 313-328.
  • Gonzalez, M. E., Quesada, G., Davis, J. ve Mora-Monge, C. (2015). Application of Quality Management Tools in the Evaluation of Websites: Tbe Case of Sports Organizations. The Quality Management Journal, 22(1), 30.
  • Gök, A. C., & Perçin, S. (2016). Elektronik Alışveriş (E-alışveriş) Sitelerinin E-hizmet Kalitesi Açısından Değerlendirilmesinde DEMATEL-AAS-VIKOR Yaklaşımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 131-144.
  • Hasan, L. ve Abuelrub, E. (2008). Assessing the quality of Web Sites. INFOCOMP, 7(4), 11-20.
  • Hasan, L. ve Abuelrub, E. (2011). Assessing the Quality Of Web Sites. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 11-29.
  • Huang, T. C. K. ve Huang, C. H. (2010). An Integrated Decision Model for Evaluating Educational Web Sites from the Fuzzy Subjective and Objective Perspectives. Computers & Education, 55(2), 616-629.
  • ISO/IEC 25010:2011: System and Software Engineering – Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and Software Quality Models. ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, March 2011.
  • ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001: Software Engineering – Product Quality – Part 1: Quality Model. ISO Copyright Office, Geneva, June 2001.
  • Jafarnejad, A. ve Ajalli, M. (2014). A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Ranking the Application Barriers of Electronic Government in Iran. Social and Basic Sciences Research Review, 2(2), 67-84.
  • Janošcová, R. (2012). Evaluation of Software Quality. IMEA. 24-29.
  • Jeddi, F. R., Gilasi, H. ve Khademi, S. (2017). Evaluation Models and Criteria of the Quality of Hospital Websites: A Systematic Review Study. Electronic Physician, 9(2), 3786.
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(2), 171-184.
  • Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
  • Kaya, T. (2010). Multi-Attribute Evaluation of Website Quality in E-Business Using An Integrated Fuzzy AHP TOPSIS Methodology. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3(3), 301-314.
  • Kaya, T. ve Kahraman, C. (2011). A Fuzzy Approach to E-Banking Website Quality Assessment Based on an Integrated AHP-ELECTRE Method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 313-334.
  • Kim, S. ve Stoel, L. (2004). Apparel Retailers: Website Quality Dimensions and Satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11(2), 109-117.
  • Klir, G. ve Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic (Vol. 4). New Jersey: Prentice hall.
  • Kuo, R. J., Lee, L. Y. ve Hu, T. L. (2010). Developing a Supplier Selection System through Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy DEA: A Case Study on an Auto Lighting System Company in Taiwan. Production Planning and Control, 21(5), 468-484.
  • Lee, K. W., Tsai, M. T. ve Lanting, M. C. L. (2011). From Marketplace to Marketspace: Investigating the Consumer Switch to Online Banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(1), 115-125.
  • Lee, Y. ve Kozar, K. A. (2006). Investigating the Effect of Website Quality on E-Business Success: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1383-1401.
  • Lew, P., Olsina, L. ve Zhang, L. (2010). Quality, Quality in Use, Actual Usability and User Experience as Key Drivers for Web Application Evaluation. Web Engineering, 218-232.
  • Liang, S. K. ve Lien, C. T. (2006). Selecting the Optimal ERP Software by Combining the ISO 9126 Standard and Fuzzy AHP Approach. Contemporary Management Research, 3(1), 23.
  • Mebrate, T. W. (2010). A Framework for Evaluating Academic Website’s Quality from Students’ Perspective. Master Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
  • Micali, F. ve Cimino, S. (2008). Web Q-Model: A New Approach to The Quality. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, Italy.
  • Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N. Y. ve Özceylan, E. (2013). Bulanık Küme Teorisi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Rio, A. ve Abreu, F. B. (2010). Websites Quality: Does it Depend on the Application Domain?. In Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC), Seventh International Conference, IEEE. 493-498.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning Priority Setting, Resource Allocation New York: MacGraw-Hill, International Book Company.
  • Shawgi, E. ve Noureldien, N. A. (2015). Usability Measurement Model (Umm): A New Model for Measuring Websites Usability. International Journal of Information Science, 5(1), 5-13.
  • Signore, O. (2005). A Comprehensive Model for Web Sites Quality. In Web Site Evolution, Seventh IEEE International Symposium, IEEE. 30-36.
  • Sugiyanto, Rochimah, S. ve Sarwosri, (2016). The Improvement of Software Quality Model for Academic Websites Based on Multi-Perspective Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 86(3), 464.
  • Suwawi, D. D. J., Darwiyanto, E. ve Rochmani, M. (2015). Evaluation of Academic Website Using ISO/IEC 9126. In Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 3rd International Conference, IEEE, 222-227.
  • Teo, H. H., Oh, L. B., Liu, C. ve Wei, K. K. (2003). An Empirical Study of The Effects Of Interactivity on Web User Attitude. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 281-305.
  • Thowfeek, M. H., Salam, M. N. A. (2014). Students’ Assessment on the Usability of E-leaming Websites. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 916-922.
  • Tsai, W. H., Chou, W. C. ve Lai, C. W. (2010). An Effective Evaluation Model and Improvement Analysis for National Park Websites: A Case Study of Taiwan. Tourism Management, 31(6), 936-952.
  • Vaidya, O. S. ve Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal Of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29.
  • Wang, X. ve Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking Irregularities when Evaluating Alternatives by Using Some ELECTRE Methods. Omega, 36(1), 45-63.
  • Yalçın, N. ve Şimşek, B. (2017). Applying ISO 9126 Quality Model to Evaluate the Website Quality of Turkish Mobile Telecommunication Companies. 6th AGP International Humanities and Social Sciences Conference. Barcelona, 169-178.
  • Yang, T., Chen, M. C. ve Hung, C. C. (2007). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods for the Dynamic Operator Allocation Problem. Mathematics and Computers In Simulation, 73(5), 285-299.
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information And Control, 8(3), 338-353.
  • Zafiropoulos, C. ve Vrana, V. (2006). A Framework for the Evaluation of Hotel Websites: The Case of Greece. Information Technology & Tourism, 8(3-1), 239-254.
  • http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbPrint.do?id=24862 (Erişim Tarihi: 06.06.2018)
  • http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/digital-influence-how-the-internet-affectsnew-product-purchase-decisions.html (Erişim Tarihi: 22.09.2017)
  • https://www.webbyawards.com/judging-criteria/#websites (Erişim Tarihi: 30.09.2017)
  • https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mediamarkt.com.tr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.06.2019)
APA Yalçın N, Simsek Yagli B (2020). TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. , 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
Chicago Yalçın Neşe,Simsek Yagli Burcu TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. (2020): 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
MLA Yalçın Neşe,Simsek Yagli Burcu TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. , 2020, ss.57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
AMA Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. . 2020; 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
Vancouver Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. . 2020; 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
IEEE Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B "TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ." , ss.57 - 76, 2020. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
ISNAD Yalçın, Neşe - Simsek Yagli, Burcu. "TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ". (2020), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.557263
APA Yalçın N, Simsek Yagli B (2020). TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 0(Talha Özel Sayısı), 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
Chicago Yalçın Neşe,Simsek Yagli Burcu TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 0, no.Talha Özel Sayısı (2020): 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
MLA Yalçın Neşe,Simsek Yagli Burcu TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, vol.0, no.Talha Özel Sayısı, 2020, ss.57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
AMA Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2020; 0(Talha Özel Sayısı): 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
Vancouver Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2020; 0(Talha Özel Sayısı): 57 - 76. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
IEEE Yalçın N,Simsek Yagli B "TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ." Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 0, ss.57 - 76, 2020. 10.18092/ulikidince.557263
ISNAD Yalçın, Neşe - Simsek Yagli, Burcu. "TEKNOLOJİ MAĞAZALARININ ISO 25010 KALİTE MODELİNE DAYALI WEBSİTESİ KALİTE DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi Talha Özel Sayısı (2020), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.557263