Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 34 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 561 - 578 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202 İndeks Tarihi: 30-11-2020

Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?

Öz:
Since the turn of this century, constructivism has dramatically influenced science education and, particularly in Muslim countries, the teaching of evolution. This influence came about gradually. After the 1980’s, Muslim graduate students studying Education in Western universities have been taught constructivism both as a theory of learning and a philosophy, more specifically, as an epistemological theory. This has impacted these students’ views of the nature of science, scientific argumentation, multiculturalism, and the function of democratic values and practices in education. The scope of this influence raises a number of serious questions: Has constructivism introduced a mode of reasoning into science and science education that is foreign to, and even anathema to, scientific discourse? Why does almost every science education research paper suggest or imply negotiation with clergy and religious NGOs? Such questions are discussed in the present paper. To answer these questions, this paper examines in the context of Enlightenment and secularism theoretical frameworks, the methodologies, and suggestions regarding the teaching of evolution in Muslim countries.
Anahtar Kelime:

Müslüman Ülkelerde Evrim Öğretimi: Yapılandırmacılık Çözüm mü Tehdit mi?

Öz:
Yeni yüzyıla girişle birlikte, yapılandırmacılık bilim eğitimini ve özellikle de Müslüman ülkelerde evrim eğitimini etkisi altına almıştır. Bu etki adım adım gelmiştir. Özellikle 1980 sonrası Batıda eğitim alanında öğrenim gören Müslüman lisansüstü öğrencilerine yapılandırmacılık hem bir öğrenme kuramı, hem de felsefi bir yaklaşım olarak, daha net bir anlatımla ise bir epistemolojik kuram olarak öğretilmiştir. Bu olay öğrenim gören öğrencilerin eğitimdeki bilimin doğası, bilimsel argümantasyon, çok kültürlülük, demokratik değerlerin işlevselliği ve uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşlerini etkilemiştir. Bu çalışma bazı sorulara odaklanmıştır: Yapılandırmacılık, bilim ve bilim eğitimine bilimsel söyleme yabancı, hatta son derece ters bir akıl yürütme mi getirdi? Neden, nerede ise tüm bilim eğitimi araştırma yazıları din adamları ya da dini sivil toplum kuruluşları ile uzlaşmayı öneriyor ya da ima ediyor? Bu ve benzeri sorular bu araştırmada tartışılmıştır. Bu soruları yanıtlamak için, araştırma Müslüman ülkelerdeki evrim eğitimi ile ilgili önerileri ve yöntemleri Aydınlama ve sekülarist kuramsal çerçeveleri içinde değerlendirmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abramson, P. R., & Inglehart, R. (1995). Value change in global perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Cultural assimilation in science classrooms: Border crossings and other solutions. Studies in Science Education, 27(1),1-52.
  • Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 2(3), 539 – 620. doi: 10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8
  • Alexander, A. C., & Welzel, C. (2017). The myth of deconsolidation: Rising liberalism and the populist reaction (No. 10). ILE Working Paper Series.
  • Al-Hayani, F. A. (2005). Islam and science: Contradiction or concordance. Journal of Religion & Science, 40(3), 565-576. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00688.x
  • Alters, B J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 39-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Anonymous. (2009). Turkey censors evolution. Nature, 458 (7236), 259. doi: 10.1038/458259a
  • Aroua, S., Coquide, M., & Abbes, S. (2010). Overcoming the effect of the socio-cultural context: Impact of teaching evolution in Tunisia. Evolution Education & Outreach, 2(3), 474-478. doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0129-0
  • Asghar, A. (2013). Canadian and Pakistani science teachers’ perceptions of evolutionary science and evolution education. Evolution Education & Outreach, 6(10), 1-12. doi:10.1186/1936-6434-6-10
  • Asghar, A., Hameed, S., & Farahani, N. (2014). Evolution in biology textbooks: A comparative analysis of 5 Muslim countries. Religion & Education, 41(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/15507394.2014.855081
  • Borgerding, L. A., Deniz, H., & Anderson, E. S. (2017). Evolution acceptance and epistemological beliefs of college biology students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 493-519. doi:10.1002/tea.21374
  • BouJaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2011). Biology professors’ and teachers’ positions regarding Biological Evolution and Evolution Education in Middle Eastern Society. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 979-1000. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.489124
  • BouJaoude, S., Wiles, J. R., Asghar, A., & Alters, B. (2011). Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese students’ conceptions of Biological Evolution. Science & Education, 20(9) 895-915. doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9345-4
  • Bowering, G. (2013). Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2014). Teachers' conceptions about the genetic determinism of human behaviour: A survey in 23 countries. Science & Education, 23(2), 417-443.
  • Clément, P. (2015). Muslim teachers' conceptions of evolution in several countries. Public Understanding of Science. 24(4), 400-421. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9494-0
  • Cobern, W., & Aikenhead, G. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part 2 (pp. 39–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Çakmak, D. (2009). Pro-Islamic public education in Turkey: The Imam-Hatip schools. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5), 826-846. doi:10.1080/00263200903135596
  • Dangor, S. (2005). Islamization of disciplines: Towards an indigenous educational system. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 37, 519-531. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00138.x
  • Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yılmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish pre-service biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443. doi:10.1002/tea.20223
  • Deniz, H., Çetin, F., & Yılmaz, I. (2011). Examining the relationships among acceptance of evolution, religiosity, and teaching preference for evolution in Turkish preservice biology teachers. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 31(4).
  • Develay, M. (1989). A propos de la transposition didactique en sciences biologiques. In G. Arsac, M. Develay, & A. Tiberghien, (Eds.), La Transposition didactique: En mathematiques, en physique, en biologie (pp. 59-86). Lyon: LIRDIS.
  • Donnelly, L. A., Kazempour, M., & Amirshokoohi, A. (2009). High school students’ perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 643-660. doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9097-6
  • Dowd, R. A. (2003, August). Christianity, Islam, and political culture: Lessons from Sub-Saharan African in comparative perspective. In paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Edis, T., & BouJaoude, S. (2014). Rejecting Materialism: Responses to Modern Science in the Muslim Middle East. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1663-1690). Springer: Netherlands.
  • Faraday Institute Newsletter (2009, May). Retrieved edmunds.cam.ac.uk/News.php?Mode=Single_Newsletter&ID=50 from https://www.faraday.st
  • Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The signs of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 5-15.
  • Fouad, K, E. (2016). American Muslim undergraduates’ views on evolution (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Bloomington: IN.
  • Gilbert J. K., & Watts D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions & alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1) 61-98. doi:10.1080/03057268308559905
  • Good, R. & Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in benchmarks and standards: Post modern/relativist or modern/realist? In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto, & M. R. Matthews, (Eds.), Science and culture: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (pp. 53-65). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Good R. (2003). Evolution and creationism: One long argument. The American Biology Teacher, 65(7), 512–516. doi:10.2307/4451550
  • Gregory T. R. (2008). Evolution as fact, theory, and path. Evolution Education & Outreach, 1(1), 46-52. doi:10.1007/s12052-007-0001-z
  • Guessoum, N. (2008). The Qur’an, science, and the (related) contemporary Muslim discourse. Zygon, 43(2), 411-432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00925.x
  • Günal, I. (2016, September, 18). Diyalektiksiz materyalizm (Materialism without Dialectic). Retrieved from http://haber.sol.org.tr/blog/bilimin-izleri/izge-gunal/diyalektiksiz-materyalizm-169378.
  • Haidar, H. A. (1999). Emirates pre-service and in-service teachers’ views about the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 807-822. doi:10.1080/095006999290309
  • Hallaq, W. B. (1986). On the origins of controversy about the existences of mujtahids and the gate of ijtihad. Studia Islamica, 63(1), 129-141.
  • Halliday, F. (2002). Two hours that shook the World: September 11, 2001. Causes and consequences. London: Saqi Books.
  • Hameed, S. (2015). Making sense of Islamic creationism in Europe. Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), 388399. doi:10.1177/0963662514555055
  • Herron, D. (2008). Advice to my intellectual grandchildren. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(1), 24-32. doi:10.1021/ed085p24
  • Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395-419. doi:10.1002/tea.20233
  • Houser, W. V. (1968). Biology education in Turkey. The American Biology Teacher, 30(1), 31-35. doi:10.2307/4441930
  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 75(3), 22-49.
  • Irzık, G. (2001). Back to basics: A philosophical critique of constructivism. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(2), 157-175. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_6
  • Jenkins, E. W. (2001). Constructivism in school science education: Powerful model or the most dangerous intellectual tendency? In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto, & M. R. Matthews (Eds.), Science education and culture: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (pp. 153-164). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Jubas, K. (2012). On being a new academic in the new academy: Impacts of neoliberalism on work and life of a junior faculty member. Workplace, 21(1), 5-35.
  • Kahvecioglu, A. (2012, May 2). Yaratilis ve evrim kapışması (Creationism and evolution fight). Retrieved from http://www.milliyet.com.tr/yaratilis-ve-evrim-kapismasi-gundem-1535072/
  • Kampourakis, K., & Nehm, R, H. (2014). History of philosophy of science and the teaching evolution: Students’ conceptions and explanations. In Matthews M. R. (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 377-399). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Kottasova, I. (2016, February 9). Saudi Arabia cuts funding for students abroad. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/saudi-arabia-students-overseas/
  • Kritsky, G. (1984). Teaching evolution in Islamic country. The American Biology Teacher, 46(5), 266-271. doi:10.2307/4447838
  • Lederman, N. G. (1995). Suchting on the nature of scientific thought: Are we anchoring curricula in quicksand? Science & Education, 4(4) 371-377. doi:10.1007/BF00487758
  • Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science & Education, 5 (2), 102-123. doi:10.1007/BF00428612 Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and personal religious beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about science-technologysociety (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1605-1634. doi:10.1080/09500690701463303
  • Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ interpretations of Islamic culture related to science education versus the Islamic epistemology and ontology of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 127-140. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9214-5
  • Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible. Science Education, 95(2), 281-309. doi:10.1002/sce.20418
  • Matthews, M. R. (2000). Time for science education: how teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to science literacy. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Matthews, M. R. (2015). Reflections of 25 years of journal editorship. Science & Education, 24(5-6), 749-805. doi:/10.1007/s11191-015-9764-8
  • Matthews, M. R. (2018). History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: New perspectives. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Matthews, M. R. (2021). Philosophical problems with constructivism: Some considerations for studentcentered learning and ınstruction. In Sabine Hoidn & Manja Klemenčič (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 47-64). New York: Routledge. (Upcoming)
  • McCarthy, C.L. (2018). Cultural studies of science education: An appraisal. In Matthews M. R. (Ed.), History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: New perspectives (pp. 99-138). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018a). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (Science education curriculum). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Ankara, Turkey.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018b). Ortaöğretim biyoloji dersi programı (High school biology education curriculum). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Ankara, Turkey.
  • Moudouros, N. (2014). The harmonization of Islam with the neoliberal transformation: The case of Turkey. Globalization, 11(6), 843-857. doi:10.1080/14747731.2014.904157
  • Muğaloğlu, E. Z. (2014). The problem of pseudoscience in science education and implications of constructivist pedagogy. Science & Education, 23(4), 829-842. doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9670-x
  • Muğaloğlu, E. Z. (2017). Bilim eğitiminde yapılandırmacılık yaklaşıma eleştirel bakış (Critical view of constructivist approach in science education). In Ö. Taşkın (Ed.), Fen eğitiminde güncel konular (Current issues in science education) (pp. 8-22). Ankara: Pegam Akademi.
  • Muğaloğlu E. Z. (2018). An Insight into Evolution Education in Turkey. In Deniz H., & Borgerding L. (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 263-279). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Muğaloğlu, E. Z. & Erduran, S. (2012). Prospective science teachers' appreciation of science: The case of evolution vs. intelligent design. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clément (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science learning and Citizenship. Part 5 (L. Maurines & A. Redfors), (pp. 100-105). Lyon, France: European Science Education Research Association. ISBN: 978-9963-700-44-8
  • Nanda, M. (2003). Prophets Facing Backward. Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nehm, R, H., & Kampourakis, K. (2014). History and philosophy of science and the teaching of macroevolution. In Matthews M. R. (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 401-421). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Nielsen, R. (2016, February 25). Teaching evolution in the Middle East. Retrieved from http://www.nielsenlab.org/2016/02/teaching-evolution-in-the-middle-east/
  • Padian, K. (2010). How to win the evolution war: Teach macroevolution! Evolution Education & Outreach, 3(3), 206-214. doi:10.1007/s12052-010-0213-5
  • Peker, D. (2018). Creationism in Turkish school curricula: The shadow of anti-scientism. Revue Internationale d’education de Sevres, 77 (April), 93-101. doi:10.4000/ries.6144
  • Peker, D., Cömert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of Anti-Evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the Biological Evolution Theory. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 739-755. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9199-1
  • Peker, D., & Taşkın, Ö. (2018). The Enlightenment tradition and science education in Turkey. In Matthews M. R. (Ed.), History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: New perspectives (pp. 67-97). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
  • Sak, A. (2010, October 9). Iciniz rahat olsun (Consider it Retrieved from http://www.turkishnews.com/tr/content/2010/10/09/iciniz-rahat-olsun/ is done).
  • Shapiro, A. M. (1999). Fundamentalist bedfellows: Political creationism in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19 (6),15-17.
  • Taşkın, Ö. (2011). Can willingness and hands-on work together? Teaching biological evolution and dealing with barriers. Evolution Education & Outreach, 4(3), 467-77. doi:10.1007/s12052-011-0341-6
  • Taşkın, Ö. (2013). Pre-service science teachers’ acceptance of biological evolution in Turkey. Journal of Biological Education 47(4), 200-207. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.788540
  • Taşkın, Ö. (2014). An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education 9(4), 855-875. doi:10.1007/s11422-013-9553-0
  • White, R. D. (1980). Education in bourgeoisie society: A matter of common sense. Interchange, 11(1) 47-60.
  • Williams, D. J. (2008). Creationist teaching in school science: A UK perspective. Evolution Education & Outreach, 1(1), 87-95. doi:10.1007/s12052-007-0006-7
  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer.
  • Yılmaz, İ., & Uzunoğlu, S. (1995). Alternatif biyolojiye doğru. İzmir, Turkey: Nil Yayınevi. ISBN: 9757744360.
  • Yılmaz, İ. (2008). Evolution: Science or ideology. New Jersey: Tughra Books. ISBN: 978-1-59784-118-4
  • Hoodbhoy, P. (1985). Ideological problems for science in Pakistan. In A. Khan (Ed.), Islam, politics and the state (pp. 178-191). London: Zed Books.
  • Hoodbhoy, P. (1991). Islam and Science. London: Zed Books.
APA Taskin O (2020). Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. , 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
Chicago Taskin Ozgur Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. (2020): 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
MLA Taskin Ozgur Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. , 2020, ss.561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
AMA Taskin O Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. . 2020; 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
Vancouver Taskin O Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. . 2020; 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
IEEE Taskin O "Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?." , ss.561 - 578, 2020. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
ISNAD Taskin, Ozgur. "Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?". (2020), 561-578. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
APA Taskin O (2020). Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, 34(2), 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
Chicago Taskin Ozgur Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi 34, no.2 (2020): 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
MLA Taskin Ozgur Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, vol.34, no.2, 2020, ss.561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
AMA Taskin O Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi. 2020; 34(2): 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
Vancouver Taskin O Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi. 2020; 34(2): 561 - 578. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
IEEE Taskin O "Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?." Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, 34, ss.561 - 578, 2020. DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202
ISNAD Taskin, Ozgur. "Teaching Evolution in Muslim Countries: Is Constructivism a Solution or a Threat?". Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi 34/2 (2020), 561-578. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.33308/26674874.2020342202