Thanks to the enlightenment, which constitutes one of the most fundamental elements of the modern era, the only valid information source in the public sphere has become scientific knowledge. This development is a very important step in the name of humanity and civilization. However, the importance given to science and the confidence felt in the later stages of the modern process reached extreme dimensions. For this reason, a number of anti-democratic and discriminatory practices in which scientificity is based has begun to emerge in the social field. In addition, advances provided by scientific knowledge have enabled mankind not only to produce, transport and communicate easily, but also to steal, kill, disrupt and destroy much more easily. At the same time, the methods of obtaining scientific knowledge have been seriously questioned. In this context, in line with the views of two important writers who come to the fore with their criticisms about modern information theories, modern theories of information will be criticized. These two authors are Popper and Kuhn. In the text, firstly, the general structure of modern theories related to science will be given. Popper's critique of historicism and his emphasis on the importance of falsification as a scientific method will be discussed. Then, Kuhn's determinations about the structure of scientific revolutions will be examined. When the theories of modern knowledge are evaluated in line with the criticism of these two authors, a number of conclusions can be drawn about each field of science. In a broad sense, criminal law is also not exceptional. The most important result of these criticisms in the field of criminal law is as follows; scientific data should always be looked at with suspicion and scientificity should never be put before human values. Such a way of action will both ensure a healthier development of science and prevent us from sacrificing our humanity for a ridiculous development goal.