Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 6 Sayfa Aralığı: 1650 - 1656 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308 İndeks Tarihi: 02-12-2020

Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

Öz:
Aim: Cognitive failures are suggested to be a transdiagnostic endophenotype that increases the vulnerability for psychiatricdisorders. Broadbent’s Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), is among the most widely used scales to assess cognitive functionobserved in an ecological manner. Despite its wide use in research and correlation with biological markers, CFQ is criticized forits unstable factorial structure among studies and 5-Likert structure that may lead to bias for neutral answers. Here we aimed todevelop a 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ, search its validity, reliability and factorial structure.Material and Methods: CFQ has been translated to Turkish in two steps. CFQ, Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-D (PDQ-D), BeckDepression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied to 272 participants (187 healthy controls, 55 patientsdiagnosed with depression, 30 patients diagnosed with anxiety disorder).Results: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ was found as 0.91. Principal component analysisextracted five factors and explained 53.7 % of total variance. CFQ scores were significantly different among groups. Both depressiveand anxious groups reported higher CFQ scores compared to controls. CFQ significantly and strongly correlated with PDQ-D andshowed a moderate correlation with BDI and BAI.Conclusion: 4-Likert Turkish version of CFQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess cognitive failures in non-demented groups. Ouranalysis revealed a five factorial structure for CFQ, however previous literature with the 5-Likert version shows different factorstructures and does not indicate a dimensional stability.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Millan MJ, Agid Y, Brune M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: characteristics, causes and the quest for improved therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2012;11:141-68.
  • 2. Saleh A, Potter GG, McQuoid DR, et al. Effects of early life stress on depression, cognitive performance and brain morphology. Psychol Med 2017;47:171-81.
  • 3. Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, et al.The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol 1982;21:1-16.
  • 4. Carrigan N, Barkus E. A systematic review of cognitive failures in daily life: Healthy populations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016;63:29-42.
  • 5. Klumb PL. Cognitive failures and performance differences: validation studies of a German version of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Ergonomics 1995;38:1456-67.
  • 6. de Paula JJ, Costa DS, Miranda DM, et al. Brazilian version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ): cross-cultural adaptation and evidence of validity and reliability. Braz J Psychiatry 2018;40:312-5.
  • 7. Sandberg K, Blicher JU, Dong MY, et al.Occipital GABA correlates with cognitive failures in daily life. Neuroimage 2014;87:55-60.
  • 8. Markett S, Montag C, Diekmann C, et al. A molecular genetic approach to everyday cognitive failure. Neurosci Lett 2014;566:216-20.
  • 9. Boomsma DI. Genetic analysis of cognitive failures (CFQ): A study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Eur J Personality 1998;12:321-30.
  • 10. Maaijwee NA, Schaapsmeerders P, Rutten-Jacobs LC, et al. Subjective cognitive failures after stroke in young adults: prevalent but not related to cognitive impairment. J Neurol 2014;261:1300-8.
  • 11. Carrigan N, Barkus E. A systematic review of the relationship between psychological disorders or substance use and self-reported cognitive failures. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2016;21:539-64.
  • 12. Mecacci L, Righi S, Rocchetti G. Cognitive failures and circadian typology. Pers Indiv Differ 2004;37:107-13.
  • 13. Matthews G, Coyle K, Craig A. Multiple Factors of Cognitive Failure and Their Relationships with Stress Vulnerability. J Psychopathol Behav 1990;12:49-65.
  • 14. Larsen GE, Alderton DL, Neideffer M, Underhill E. Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Brit J Psychol 1997;88:354.
  • 15. Wallace JC. Confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive failures questionnaire: evidence for dimensionality and construct validity. Pers Indiv Differ 2004;37:307-24.
  • 16. Lam RW, Lamy FX, Danchenko N, et al.Psychometric validation of the Perceived Deficits QuestionnaireDepression (PDQ-D) instrument in US and UK respondents with major depressive disorder. Neuropsych Dis Treat 2018;14:2861-77.
  • 17. Aydemir O, Cokmus FP, Akdeniz F, et al.Psychometric properties of the Turkish Versions of Perceived Deficit Questionnaire-Depression and British Columbia Cognitive Complaints Inventory. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi 2017;18:224-30.
  • 18. Beck AT, Steer RA. Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory. J Clin Psychol 1984;40:1365-7.
  • 19. Hisli N. Beck depresyon envanterinin üniversite öğrencileri için geçerliliği, güvenilirliği (A reliability and validity study of Beck Depression Inventory in a university student sample). J Psychology 1989;7:3-13.
  • 20. Beck AT, Brown G, Epstein N, et al. An Inventory for Measuring Clinical Anxiety - Psychometric Properties. J Consult Clin Psych 1988;56:893-7.
  • 21. Ulusoy M. Beck Anxiety Inventory: Validity and reliability study (Beck Anksiyete Envanteri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması). Unpublished residency thesis. Bakırköy Mental and Neurological Diseases Hospital (Bakırköy Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Hastanesi), İstanbul. 1998.
  • 22. Wallace JC, Kass SJ, Stanny CJ. The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: dimensions and correlates. J Gen Psychol 2002;129:238-56.
  • 23. Rast P, Zimprich D, Van Boxtel M, et al.Factor structure and measurement invariance of the cognitive failures questionnaire across the adult life span. Assessment 2009;16:145-58.
  • 24. Bridger RS, Johnsen SA, Brasher K. Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Ergonomics 2013;56:1515-24.
  • 25. Snitz BE, Weissfeld LA, Cohen AD, et al. Subjective Cognitive Complaints, Personality and Brain Amyloidbeta in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Am J Geriat Psychiat 2015;23:985-93.
  • 26. Hohman TJ, Beason-Held LL, Resnick SM. Cognitive complaints, depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairment: are they related? J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59:1908-12.
  • 27. Burdick KE, Endick CJ, Goldberg JF. Assessing cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: are self-reports valid? Psychiatry Res 2005;136:43-50.
  • 28. Van der Linden D, Keijsers GPJ, Eling P, et al.Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work Stress 2005; 19:23-36.
  • 29. Lu Y, Nyunt MS, Gwee X, et al. Life event stress and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): associations with mental well-being and quality of life in a population-based study. BMJ Open 2012;2.
  • 30. Payne TW, Schnapp MA. The Relationship between Negative Affect and Reported Cognitive Failures. Depress Res Treat 2014;2014:396195.
  • 31. Hohman TJ, Beason-Held LL, Lamar M, et al. Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Longitudinal Changes in Memory and Brain Function. Neuropsychology 2011; 25:125-30
APA YAPICI ESER H, Yalçınay-inan m, Kucuker M, Kilciksiz C, Yılmaz S, Dincer N, Kilic O, Ercan C, Aydemir O (2020). Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. , 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
Chicago YAPICI ESER HALE,Yalçınay-inan merve,Kucuker Mehmet Utku,Kilciksiz Can,Yılmaz Sezen,Dincer Neris,Kilic Ozge,Ercan Cenk,Aydemir Omer Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. (2020): 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
MLA YAPICI ESER HALE,Yalçınay-inan merve,Kucuker Mehmet Utku,Kilciksiz Can,Yılmaz Sezen,Dincer Neris,Kilic Ozge,Ercan Cenk,Aydemir Omer Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. , 2020, ss.1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
AMA YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. . 2020; 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
Vancouver YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. . 2020; 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
IEEE YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O "Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire." , ss.1650 - 1656, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
ISNAD YAPICI ESER, HALE vd. "Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire". (2020), 1650-1656. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
APA YAPICI ESER H, Yalçınay-inan m, Kucuker M, Kilciksiz C, Yılmaz S, Dincer N, Kilic O, Ercan C, Aydemir O (2020). Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research, 27(6), 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
Chicago YAPICI ESER HALE,Yalçınay-inan merve,Kucuker Mehmet Utku,Kilciksiz Can,Yılmaz Sezen,Dincer Neris,Kilic Ozge,Ercan Cenk,Aydemir Omer Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research 27, no.6 (2020): 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
MLA YAPICI ESER HALE,Yalçınay-inan merve,Kucuker Mehmet Utku,Kilciksiz Can,Yılmaz Sezen,Dincer Neris,Kilic Ozge,Ercan Cenk,Aydemir Omer Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research, vol.27, no.6, 2020, ss.1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
AMA YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(6): 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
Vancouver YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(6): 1650 - 1656. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
IEEE YAPICI ESER H,Yalçınay-inan m,Kucuker M,Kilciksiz C,Yılmaz S,Dincer N,Kilic O,Ercan C,Aydemir O "Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire." Annals of Medical Research, 27, ss.1650 - 1656, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
ISNAD YAPICI ESER, HALE vd. "Development, Validity and Reliability of the 4-point Likert Turkish version of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire". Annals of Medical Research 27/6 (2020), 1650-1656. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308