Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 84 - 87 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/less.2020.46873 İndeks Tarihi: 05-12-2020
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience
Öz: Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a method used for long–term enteral feedingin patients with normal gastrointestinal function and who cannot be fed orally. In this study, we aimed topresent the demographic and clinical features of our patients who underwent PEG.Materials and Methods: The records of patients who had PEG tube inserted in the endoscopy unit or intensive care units in our hospital between August 2017 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively inthis study.Results: A total of 108 patients underwent a PEG catheter between August 2017 and December 2019. 58(53.7%) of the cases were male, and 50 (46.2%) were female. It was observed that the PEG procedure wasperformed most frequently in patients with cerebrovascular disease. No major complications were observedin any case after the procedure. Early complications were observed in 15 (13.8%) patients and late complications in seven (6.4%) patients.Conclusion: PEG is a safe and effective enteral feeding method. It is the type of nutrition that should be applied for long–term enteral nutrition in appropriate patients.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Brar R, Doddi S, Ramasamy A, Sinha P. A forgotten migrated intrauterine contraceptive device is not always innocent: A case report. Case Rep Med 2010;2010:740642.
- 2. Bitterman A, Lefel O, Segev Y, Lavie O. Laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device following colon perforation. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2010; 14:456–8.
- 3. Broso PR, Buffetti G. The IUD and uterine perforation. Minerva Ginecol 1994;46:505–9.
- 4. Speroff L, Fritz MA, Glass RH. KNC gynaecology endocrinology & infertility. 7th ed. W& W; 2005. p. 983.
- 5. Caliskan E, Öztürk N, Dilbaz BÖ, Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2003;8:150–5.
- 6. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998;57:251–5.
- 7. Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:31–6.
- 8. Chi I cheng. What we have learned from recent IUD studies: A researcher’s perspective. Contraception 1993;48:81–108.
- 9. Mosley FR, Shahi N, Kurer MA. Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: A comparison between open and laparoscopic removal. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2012;16:236–41.
- 10. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: Is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002;66105–8.
- 11. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1987;753:1–91.
- 12. Silva PD, Larson KM. Laparoscopic removal of a perforated intrauterine device from the perirectal fat. JSLS 2000; 4:159– 62.
- 13. Mülayim B, Mülayim S, Celik NY. A lost intrauterine device. Guess where we found it and how it happened? Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care 2006;11:47–9.
- 14. Aydogdu O, Pulat H. Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity. J Can Urol Assoc 2012;6E134–6
| APA | Çetin D, patmano m (2020). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. , 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| Chicago | Çetin Durmuş Ali,patmano mehmet Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. (2020): 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| MLA | Çetin Durmuş Ali,patmano mehmet Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. , 2020, ss.84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| AMA | Çetin D,patmano m Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. . 2020; 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| Vancouver | Çetin D,patmano m Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. . 2020; 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| IEEE | Çetin D,patmano m "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience." , ss.84 - 87, 2020. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| ISNAD | Çetin, Durmuş Ali - patmano, mehmet. "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience". (2020), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| APA | Çetin D, patmano m (2020). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, 27(2), 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| Chicago | Çetin Durmuş Ali,patmano mehmet Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science 27, no.2 (2020): 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| MLA | Çetin Durmuş Ali,patmano mehmet Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, vol.27, no.2, 2020, ss.84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| AMA | Çetin D,patmano m Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science. 2020; 27(2): 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| Vancouver | Çetin D,patmano m Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science. 2020; 27(2): 84 - 87. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| IEEE | Çetin D,patmano m "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience." Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, 27, ss.84 - 87, 2020. 10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
| ISNAD | Çetin, Durmuş Ali - patmano, mehmet. "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Single–center experience". Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science 27/2 (2020), 84-87. https://doi.org/10.14744/less.2020.46873 |
