Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 102 - 107 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.494676 İndeks Tarihi: 17-12-2020

ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY

Öz:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate buccal bone thickness by conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients in both genders and in differentage groups.Materials and Methods: Our study included 186 anterior teeth and 62 patientswith CBCT images. Buccal bone thickness was measured at the crest level, and ata distance 1 and 2 mm apical to the crest level. The t-test and ANOVA test wereused in analyzing data.Results: It was found out that age and gender were not significantly associatedwith the buccal bone thickness of anterior teeth (p>0.05). The mean buccal bonethickness was the highest as 1.91 mm around the right canines and it was thelowest as 0.35 mm surrounding the right lateral incisor.Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the mean buccal bone thicknessincreased towards the apical region for all three teeth types. CBCT preciselymeasures the maxillary bone thickness and may facilitate the planning process forplacing implants and scheduling other types of surgeries correctly.
Anahtar Kelime:

Anterior Maksilladaki Bukkal Kemik Kalınlığının Değerlendirilmesi: Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Çalışması

Öz:
Amaçlar: Farklı yaş gruplarındaki ve cinsiyetteki hastaların bukkal kemik kalınlıklarının konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (KIBT) kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza anterior 186 diş ve 62 hastanın KIBT görüntüleri dahil edilmiştir. Kret seviyesindeki, kret seviyesinden 1 ve 2 mm apikaldeki bukkal kemik kalınlıkları ölçülmüştür. Elde edilen veriler T testi ve One-way ANOVA testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Anterior dişlerdeki bukkal kemik kalınlığına yaş grupları ve cinsiyetin anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı anlaşılmıştır (p>0,05). En yüksek ortalama bukkal kemik kalınlığı sağ kanin bölgesinde 1,91 mm, en düşük ortalama bukkal kemik kalınlığı ise 0,35 mm değerinde sağ lateral kesici bölgesinde ölçülmüştür. Sonuçlar: Sonuçlara göre; her üç diş tipinde de ortalama bukkal kemik kalınlığı apikal bölgeye doğru artış göstermiştir. Maksiller bukkal kemik kalınlığını KIBT ile ölçerek dental implant planlamasında ve diğer cerrahi operasyonlar hakkında öngörü sahibi olmak daha kolay olacaktır ve aynı zamanda kesin ölçüm değerleri sağlanabilecektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
6
6
6
  • 1. Coots BK. Alveolar bone grafting: past, present, and new horizons. Semin Plast Surg 2012;26:178-183.
  • 2. Garg AK. Bone: Biology, Harvesting and Grafting for Dental Implants. Chicago: Quintessence 2004:171- 211.
  • 3. Kim YJ, Park JM, Kim S, Koo KT, Seol YJ, Lee YM, Rhyu IC, Ku Y. New method of assessing the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:372-381.
  • 4. Deshpande S, Deshmukh J, Deshpande S, Khatri R, Deshpande S. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior maxilla using autograft, xenograft and titanium mesh with simultaneous placement of endosseous implants. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18:661.
  • 5. Poli PP, Beretta M, Cicciù M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh. A retrospective clinical study. Open Dent J 2014;8:148.
  • 6. Scarfe WC , Farman AG . What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707–730.
  • 7. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1-21.
  • 8. El Nahass H, N. Naiem S. Analysis of the dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:e57-e61.
  • 9. Arora H, Ivanovski S. Correlation between pre‐ operative buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes around immediately placed and restored implants in the maxillary anterior region: A 2‐year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1188-1194.
  • 10.Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1168-1171.
  • 11. La Rocca AP, Alemany AS, Levi Jr P, Juan MV, Molina JN, Weisgold AS. Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness. Implant Dent 2012;21:507-515.
  • 12. Nikiforidou M, Tsalikis L, Angelopoulos C, Menexes G, Vouros I, Konstantinides A. Classification of periodontal biotypes with the use of CBCT. A crosssectional study. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2061-2071.
  • 13. Younes F, Eghbali A, Raes M, De Bruyckere T, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non‐ invasive registration methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:523-528.
  • 14. Esfahanizadeh N, Daneshparvar N, Askarpour F, Akhoundi N, Panjnoush M. Correlation Between Bone and Soft Tissue Thickness in Maxillary Anterior Teeth. J Dent (Tehran) 2016;13:302-308.
  • 15. Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:499-508.
  • 16. Khoury J, Ghosn N, Mokbel N, Naaman N. Buccal Bone Thickness Overlying Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Clinical and Radiographic Prospective Human Study. Implant Dent 2016;25:525-531.
  • 17. Zhang CY, DeBaz C, Bhandal G, Alli F, Francisco MCB, Thacker HL, Palomo JM, Palomo L. Buccal bone thickness in the esthetic zone of postmenopausal women: A CBCT analysis. Implant Dent 2016;25:478- 484.
  • 18. Morais JF, Melsen B, de Freitas KMS, Castello Branco N, Garib DG, Cattaneo PM. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study. Angle Orthod 2018;88:748-756.
  • 19.Crespi R, Cappare P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone EF. Buccal-Lingual Bone Remodeling in Immediately Loaded Fresh Socket Implants: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;35:43-49.
  • 20. Adiguzel O, Aktuna Belgin C, Falakaloglu S, Cangul S, Akkus Z. Maxillary Cortical Bone Thickness in a South-Eastern Anatolian Population: A ConeBeam Computed Tomography Study. Med Sci Monit 2017;23:5812-5817.
  • 21. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:119-128.
  • 22. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang HL. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol 2010;81:569-574.
  • 23. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti T, D'addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol 2012;83:187-197.
  • 24. Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015;45:162-168.
APA koç a, kavut i, UĞUR M (2019). ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. , 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
Chicago koç alaettin,kavut idris,UĞUR MEHMET ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. (2019): 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
MLA koç alaettin,kavut idris,UĞUR MEHMET ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. , 2019, ss.102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
AMA koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. . 2019; 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
Vancouver koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. . 2019; 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
IEEE koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M "ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY." , ss.102 - 107, 2019. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
ISNAD koç, alaettin vd. "ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY". (2019), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.494676
APA koç a, kavut i, UĞUR M (2019). ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 22(1), 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
Chicago koç alaettin,kavut idris,UĞUR MEHMET ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22, no.1 (2019): 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
MLA koç alaettin,kavut idris,UĞUR MEHMET ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.22, no.1, 2019, ss.102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
AMA koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2019; 22(1): 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
Vancouver koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2019; 22(1): 102 - 107. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
IEEE koç a,kavut i,UĞUR M "ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 22, ss.102 - 107, 2019. 10.7126/cumudj.494676
ISNAD koç, alaettin vd. "ASSESSMENT OF BUCCAL BONE THICKNESS IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDY". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22/1 (2019), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.494676