Political criticism is a film criticism method based on Marxist theory. This method uses the concepts which belong to Marxist theory like manufacturing type and relations, infrastructure-superstructure relation, ideology and false consciousness, alienation and commodification in relation to each other and consists of complemantary criterions each other like ‘the place of director in dominant production relations, ideology and social class conditions of director’, ‘production conditions and manufacturing type in which film is made’, ‘typicality and integrality in the story and characters of film’, ‘processing way of the story which film approachs and originality in the style’ and ‘the political context of film and the criticism of the context’ and also answers the question how to criticize a film by using Marxist theory and literature with the help of these criterions. The subject of this article consists of the criticism of Yavuz Turgul’s latest film Yol Ayrımı. Therefore in the article, it is aimed to criticize Yavuz Turgul’s film Yol Ayrımı who was chosen according to the purposeful sampling method and who entered to the demonstration in 2017 and searched the answer to the question of whether this criticism can be done or not with this method. Besides it is assumed that the film does not include typicality and integrality features depending on the director’s background and film production conditions, that the film is commodified and not original, that the film is politically didactic and forced, and that the film speaks of the subjective reality of the director depending on the way of to his perceive of the world and the country with both his narration and his idealized characters instead of reflecting the existing type of manufacturing and relations as it is.