The Mead (Eschatology) issue, which is the third issue of the three issues used by al-Ghazzali to show philosophers as heretic, is an important issue with the theological and philosophical context in which Islamic tradition began to investigate the discussion (tehafut) tradition that began with al-Ghazzali. Mead (return, resurrection of people on the Day of Resurrection) and faith in the Hereafter is a common issue between Jews, Christians and Muslims and between theologians, philosophers and religious scholars. Both in these three religions and in the ways of thinking, the Day of Apocalypse and Resurrection is one of the main subjects and indispensable principles of religious faith. Such an important issue‟s area and type of discussion undoubtedly related to many theological and philosophical issues. In this study, we have discussed the issue of al-mead with a philosopher Fârâbî and XV. century Ottoman scholar Hojazadeh by comparing their views. Thus, based on the visions of two Islamic philosophers who lived in different periods and who had different perspectives, it is aimed to make evaluations about the place of this issue in the history of Islamic thought, the manner in which it is discussed, its continuity and whether it has gained different meanings in the transition between the periods.