Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 1216 - 1238 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361 İndeks Tarihi: 23-03-2021

Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators

Öz:
This study investigates the opinions of people who have administrative experiences in distanceeducation application and research centers in universities in Turkey about graduate distance education programs(master’s and doctoral degree). It was examined that why the number of master’s degree distance educationprograms are so few and why universities don’t open doctoral degree distance education programs. In thisqualitative study, data were collected by an online questionnaire with open ended questions. Participants of thestudy were 11 academic members who have administrative experiences in distance education. Qualitative date wasanalyzed with content analysis method. According to the findings of the study, participants indicate that regulationsare insufficient and this is one of the reasons for limited number of online distance education programs. In addition,they stated that there is a negative perception towards distance education among academics. Most of them thinkthat distance education graduate programs should be offered.
Anahtar Kelime:

Yöneticilerin Gözünden Türkiye’de Çevrimiçi Uzaktan Lisansüstü Eğitim

Öz:
Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki çevrimiçi uzaktan lisansüstü eğitim (yüksek lisans ve doktora) hakkında yöneticilik deneyimi olan uzmanların görüşleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada Türkiye’de uzaktan tezli yüksek lisansın (YL) neden yaygın olmadığı ve doktora (DR) programlarının neden bulunmadığı sorgulanmıştır. Nitel olarak desenlenen araştırmada veriler, açık uçlu soru formu ile çevrimiçi olarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını uzaktan öğretimde yöneticilik deneyimi olan 12 öğretim elemanı oluşturmuştur. Araştırmadan elde edilen nitel veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, uzaktan öğretim yöneticileri, Türkiye’de uzaktan tezli YL’nin yaygın olmaması ve DR’nin olmamasının nedenleri arasında gerekli mevzuatın olmaması, uzaktan öğretime karşı negatif algı gibi çeşitli sorunları ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırmaya katılan yöneticilerin büyük bir çoğunluğu Türkiye’de tezli YL ve DR’nin uzaktan verilebileceğini ifade etmişlerdir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi (2018). İnternet ve Bilişim Teknolojileri Yönetimi (Tezli). http://ibty.aku.edu.tr/ adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • Akojie, P., Entrekin, F., Bacon, D., & Kanai, T. (2019). Qualitative meta-data analysis: Perceptions and experiences of online doctoral students. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(1), 117-135.
  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States, 2009. Babson Survey Research Group.
  • Amaro, J., & Mason, C. (2019). Reflections on best practices for a successful online doctoral program. In J. Keengwe (Ed.), Handbook of research on virtual training and mentoring of online instructors (pp. 311-324). PA: IGI Global.
  • Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (2018). Anabilim dalları. https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/akademik/enstituler/580/egitim-bilimleri-enstitusu/bolumler adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (2018). Uzaktan öğretim programları. http://www.sosbilens.anadolu.edu.tr/tr/uzaktan-egitim adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2012). Use of Learner-Centered Instructional Strategies in Higher Education: Doctoral Student Assessments. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2).
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Columbaro, N. L. (2009). e-Mentoring Possibilities for Online Doctoral Students: A Literature Review. Adult Learning, 20(3–4), 9–15.
  • de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213–226.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: on developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 163–179.
  • Fariza, N., Nor, M., Hamat, A., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Patterns of discourse in online interaction : seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process, 8221.
  • Fedynich, L., Bradley, K. S., & Bradley, J. (2015). Graduate students ’ perceptions of online learning, 27, 1–13.
  • Gülbahar, Y., & Karataş, E. (2016). Uzaktan öğretimi uzaktan eğitim yöntemi ile öğrenmek: “e-eğitmen sertifika programı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(4), 1867-1880.
  • Iriberri, A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2).
  • İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi (2018). İşletme Yüksek Lisans Programı (Uzaktan Eğitim). https://sbe.iku.edu.tr/tr/programlar/isletme-yuksek-lisans-programi-uzaktan-egitim adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • İzmirli, S. & Kırmacı, O. (2017). Developing online teaching competencies of educators in Turkey. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(22), 38-52.
  • Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2012). Theory to Practice: Implementation and Initial Impact of an Online Doctoral Program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(1), 1–13. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring151/kumar_dawson.html
  • Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the Community of Inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 126–142.
  • Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: the role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59-71.
  • Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a Distance: Students’ Perceptions of Online Mentoring in a Doctoral Program. Journal of Distance Education, 27(1).
  • Mayne, L. A., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and Measuring Social Presence in Online Graduate Nursing Courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110–114.
  • McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74.
  • Merriam, S. B., ve Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Purdue Online Learning (2018). Master’s and PhD programs. https://digitaleducation.purdue.edu/graduate-programs/masters-phd.html adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • Rodwell, J., & Neumann, R. (2008). Predictors of timely doctoral student completions by type of attendance: The utility of a pragmatic approach. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(1), 65–76.
  • Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of Faculty With Doctoral Student Supervision in Programs Delivered via Distance. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93.
  • Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2012). Socialization in online doctorates: Academic socialization in an online residency program. Journal of Distance Education, 26(1).
  • Sheingold, B. H., Hahn, J. A., & Hofmeyer, A. (2013). Hiding In Plain Sight: Building Community Social Capital In Distance Education Graduate Programs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 6(2), 265.
  • St. George, E. (2006). Positioning higher education for the knowledge based economy. Higher Education, 52(4), 589–610.
  • Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Higher Education Research & Development (Vol. 38). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2015). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında uzaktan öğretime ilişkin usul ve esaslar. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/17374/Uzaktan_ogretime_%C4%B0liskin_Us ul_ve_Esaslar_19.06.2014+_GK_15.04.2015_YK_%28Maliye_+Goruslu%29.pdf/5b6d ae07-ff5c-4c40-8cf3-3fc7e62cac7f adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
  • Walker, M., & Thomson, P. (2010). The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor’s Companion. The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor’s Companion. London: Routledge.
APA Izmirli S, ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö, Cankaya S (2019). Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. , 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
Chicago Izmirli Serkan,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Özden,Cankaya Serkan Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. (2019): 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
MLA Izmirli Serkan,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Özden,Cankaya Serkan Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. , 2019, ss.1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
AMA Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. . 2019; 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
Vancouver Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. . 2019; 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
IEEE Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S "Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators." , ss.1216 - 1238, 2019. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
ISNAD Izmirli, Serkan vd. "Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators". (2019), 1216-1238. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
APA Izmirli S, ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö, Cankaya S (2019). Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(2), 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
Chicago Izmirli Serkan,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Özden,Cankaya Serkan Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi 13, no.2 (2019): 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
MLA Izmirli Serkan,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Özden,Cankaya Serkan Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, vol.13, no.2, 2019, ss.1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
AMA Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi. 2019; 13(2): 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
Vancouver Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi. 2019; 13(2): 1216 - 1238. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
IEEE Izmirli S,ŞAHİN İZMİRLİ Ö,Cankaya S "Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators." Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 13, ss.1216 - 1238, 2019. 10.17522/balikesirnef.643361
ISNAD Izmirli, Serkan vd. "Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators". Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi 13/2 (2019), 1216-1238. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.643361