Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 34 - 39 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 İndeks Tarihi: 22-04-2021
Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently
Öz: Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the shear bond strength of a veneer composite resin bonded to cobalt-chromium (CoCr) dental alloys produced by different techniques.Material-Method: Ninety cylindrical specimens (10mm in diameter, 8mm in height) made of CoCr dental alloys were prepared by conventional casting technique (C), milling (M), LaserCUSING with and without annealing (CL+, CL), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) with and without annealing (EL+, EL). Veneer composite cylinders (5mm in diameter, 3mm in height) were built on metal specimens using a silicone jig. After storage in water for 24 hours, the specimens were assessed for bond strength with a shear force test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were statistically analyzed using the Kolmogorow-Smirnow test and Tukey-HSD multiple comparison test (α=.05).Results: When the SBS values of the groups were compared, significant differences were found among the groups (P<.05). While statistically significant differences were found between the CL+ group (9.36±2.62) and the M group (13.34±2.53) (P<.05), there were no significant differences among the others (P>.05). The debonded surfaces of the specimens exhibited mostly mixed type of failures.Conclusions: The CoCr alloy fabrication technique has an effect on the SBSs between the veneer composite resin and the metal used. LaserCUSING casting, a new technology, seems to have the lowest metal-resin bond strength among all the techniques tested.
Anahtar Kelime: Veneer Kompozitlerin Farklı Tekniklerle Üretilen Kobalt-Krom Alaşımlara Makaslama Bağlanma Direnci
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı tekniklerle üretilen kobalt-krom (Co-Cr) dental alaşımların veneer kompozit rezinlere olan makaslama bağlanma direncinin (MBD) değerlendirilmesi ve karşılaştırılmasıdır. Materyal-Metot: Co-Cr dental alaşımlardan konvansiyonel döküm tekniği (C), frezeleme tekniği (M), LaserCUSING yöntemi tavlama işlemi yapılmış ve yapılmamış olmak üzere (CL+, CL) ve direk metal lazer sinterleme (DMLS) yöntemi ile tavlama işlemi yapılmış ve yapılmamış (EL+, EL) olmak üzere toplam 90 adet silindir şeklinde (10 mm çapında, 8 mm yüksekliğinde) örnekler elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen metal örneklerin üzerine silindir şeklinde (5 mm çapında, 3 mm yüksekliğinde) veneer kompozit örnekler silikon bir kalıp aracılığıyla oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan örnekler suda 24 saat bekletildikten sonra, bağlantı dayanıklılıkları çapraz kafa hızı 0.5 mm/dak olmak üzere makaslama testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen MBD değerleri istatistiksel olarak Kolmogorov-Smirnov ve Tukey-HSD çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile analiz edilmiştir (α=.05). Bulgular: MBD değerleri karşılaştırıldığında, gruplar arasında önemli farklılıklar olduğu bulunmuştur (P<.05). CL+ (9.36±2.62) ve M (13.34±2.53) grubu arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli fark bulunurken (P<.05), diğer gruplar arasındaki fark önemsiz bulunmuştur (P>.05). Örneklere ait bağlantı yüzeyleri genellikle karışık tip başarısızlık göstermiştir. Sonuç: Co-Cr alaşımlarının üretim tekniğinin, çalışmada kullanılan veneer kompozit rezin ve metal arasındaki MBD değerlerini etkilediği gözlenmiştir. Yeni bir teknoloji olan LaserCUSING üretim tekniğinin, test edilen tüm teknikler arasında en düşük metal-rezin bağlantısına sahip olduğu gözlenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63.
- 2. Noort RV. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
- 3. Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS. Rapid Prototyping. In: Kai C, Fai K, Sing C, editors. Powder-based rapid prototyping systems. 3th ed., Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. 2010. p.199-300.
- 4. Azari A, Sakineh N. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2009;15:216-25.
- 5. Sinirlioğlu MC. Rapid manufacturing of dental and medical parts via LaserCUSING technology using titanium and CoCr powder materials. Workshop on Rapid Technologies; 2009 Sept 24th; Turkey.
- 6. Ayyıldız S, Soylu EH, İde S, Kılıç S, Sipahi C, Pişkin B et all. Annealing of Co-Cr dental alloy: effects on nanostructure and Rockwell hardness. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:471-8.
- 7. Guo WH, Brantley WA, Li D, Clark WAT, Monaghan P, Heshmati RH. Annealing study of palladium–silver dental alloys: Vickers hardness measurements and SEM microstructural observations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:111-8.
- 8. Chen CL, Tatlock GJ, Jones AR. Effect of annealing temperatures on the secondary re‐crystallization of extruded PM2000 steel bar. J Microsc 2009;233:474-81.
- 9. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Brückner H, Handel G. Composite veneering of metal based fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:614-9.
- 10. Drago Carl, Lynn Gurney. Maintenance of implant hybrid prostheses: clinical and laboratory procedures.J Prosthodont 2013;22: 28-35.
- 11. Jandt KD, Bernd WS. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:1001-6.
- 12. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to a cobalt-chromium alloy. J Dent 1995;23:47-54.
- 13. Grover N, Nandlal B. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to the facial surface of primary anterior stainless steel crowns. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:119-25.
- 14. Sarafianou A, Seimenis I, Papadopoulos T. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:377-87.
- 15. Egoshi T, Taıra Y, Soeno K, Sawase T. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/ HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4. Dent Mater J 2013;32:219-27.
- 16. Patil SS, Kontham UR, Kamath A, Kontham R. Shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to preformed metal crowns for primary molars using a universal adhesive and two different surface treatments: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2016;17:377-80.
- 17. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal–resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193-7.
- 18. Muratomi R, Kamada K, Taira Y, Higuchi S, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Comparative study between laser sintering and casting for retention of resin composite veneers to cobalt-chromium alloy. Dent Mater J 2013;32:939-45.
- 19. Sunitha N, Ariga P, Jain AR, Philip JM. An in vitro evaluation of flexural bond strength of indirect composites fused to metal. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:122-7.
- 20. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
- 21. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
- 22. Petridis H, Hirayama H, Kugel G, Habib C, Garefis P. Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:608-14.
- 23. Gu D, Shen Y. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 2009;30:2903-10.
- 24. Al Jabbari YS, Koutsoukis T, Barmpagadaki X, Zinelis S. Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting. Dent Mater 2014;30:79-88.
- 25. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 184-9.
| APA | Tulga A (2018). Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. , 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| Chicago | Tulga Ayça Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. (2018): 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| MLA | Tulga Ayça Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. , 2018, ss.34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| AMA | Tulga A Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. . 2018; 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| Vancouver | Tulga A Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. . 2018; 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| IEEE | Tulga A "Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently." , ss.34 - 39, 2018. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| ISNAD | Tulga, Ayça. "Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently". (2018), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| APA | Tulga A (2018). Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| Chicago | Tulga Ayça Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 9, no.1 (2018): 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| MLA | Tulga Ayça Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.9, no.1, 2018, ss.34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| AMA | Tulga A Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 9(1): 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| Vancouver | Tulga A Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 9(1): 34 - 39. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| IEEE | Tulga A "Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently." Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9, ss.34 - 39, 2018. 10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
| ISNAD | Tulga, Ayça. "Shear Bond Strength of Veneer Composite to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated Differently". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 9/1 (2018), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.22312/sdusbed.290849 |
