GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 767 - 787 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17482/uumfd.648299 İndeks Tarihi: 29-04-2021
GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ
Öz: Günümüzde karmaşıklaşan tedarik zinciri yapılarıyla birlikte tedarikçi ilişkileri tedarik zinciri için stratejik öneme sahip bir süreç haline gelmiştir. Tedarik zincirinde rekabet avantajı kazanabilmek için tedarikçiler ile uzun süreli ve sağlam ilişkilerin kurulması önemlidir. Ayrıca tedarikçilerin firmanın tedarik zinciri stratejilerine uygun operasyonel faaliyetlerde bulunmaları ve gerekli kriterlere sahip olmaları önemlidir. Tedarik zincirinde gerçekleştirilen faaliyetlerin başarısı tedarik zincirinde yer alan bağımsız firmaların ortak amaçlar etrafında birleşerek faaliyet göstermesine bağlıdır. Tedarik zincirinde yer alan firmalarda yaşanacak problemler zincir içerisindeki faaliyetlerin aksamasına neden olacaktır. Bu nedenle tedarikçi seçiminde firmaların tedarikçi firmalardan kaynaklanabilecek risk faktörlerini göz önünde bulundurması önemlidir. Bu çalışmada tedarikçi seçimi ve risk değerlendirilmesi probleminin çözümü için bir model önerilmiştir. Problemin çözümü için belirsizlik durumunda karar problemlerinin çözülmesinde etkin sonuç veren Gri ilişkisel temelli TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Yöntemin ilgili problemin çözümündeki performansını gözlemlemek amacıyla çalışmanın uygulama bölümünde Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren bir tekstil firmasının tedarikçi seçim süreci ele alınmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Supplier Selection and Supplier Risk Assessment with Using Grey Relations Based TOPSIS Method
Öz: In todays with the increasing complexity of supply chains, supplier relationships have gainedstrategic importance for supply chains. Long-term and sustainable supplier relations are important to gaina competitive advantage in the supply chain. It is also important that suppliers are selected according toKPIs, which enable the company to perform operational activities in line with supply chain strategies. Toachieve a competitive advantage, all supply chain members must work collaboratively around commongoals. The problems that faced by the supply chain members can cause disruption in the whole supplychain. Therefore, it is important that firms take into account the risk factors that may arise from suppliers.In this study, a model has been suggested for the solution of the supplier selection and risk evaluationproblem. Grey Relational Analysis based TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to IdealSolution) method was used to solve this problem because it is an effective method to solve uncertaintyproblems with discrete data. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, a real-life casestudy is conducted in a Turkish textile company.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Abdel-Basset M., Chang V., Gamal A., Smarandache F., (2019), An integrated neutrosophic anp and vikor method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: a case study in importing field. Computers in Industry, 106, 94-110. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017
- 2. Abdel-Basset, M., Saleh M., Gamal A., Smarandache F., (2019). An approach of TOPSIS technique for developing supplier selection with group decision making under type-2 neutrosophic number. Applied Soft Computing, 77, 438-452. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.035
- 3. Amindoust, A., & Saghafinia, A. (2017). Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 108(7), 1250–1258. doi:10.1080/00405000.2016.1238130
- 4. Alikhani, R., Torabi, S. A., & Altay, N. (2019). Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 69-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.018
- 5. Azadeh, A., & Alem, S. M. (2010). A flexible deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis approach for supply chain risk and vendor selection problem: Simulation analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7438-7448. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.022
- 6. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
- 7. Bhattacharyya, R. (2015). A grey theory based multiple attribute approach for R&D project portfolio selection. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 7(2), 211-225. doi:10.1016/j.fiae.2015.05.006
- 8. Bhutta, M. K. S. (2003). Supplier selection problem: methodology literature review. Journal of International Information Management, 12(2), 5.
- 9. Cengiz, A.; Aytekin, O.; Ozdemir, I.; Kusan, H.; Cabuk, A. A Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Construction Material Supplier Selection. Procedia Eng. 2017, 196, 294–301 doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.202
- 10. Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert systems with applications, 40(10), 3872-3885. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040
- 11. Chai, J., & Ngai, E. W. (2020). Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Expert Systems with Applications, 140, 112903. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112903
- 12. Chan F.T.S., & Chan H.K. (2010). An AHP model for selection of suppliers in the fast changing fashion market. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, 1195–1207. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2683-6
- 13. Chan, F. T., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417-431. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004
- 14. Çalık, A. (2018). Otomotiv Tedarik Zincirinde Risk Değerlendirmesi için Bulanık AHP ve TOPSIS ile Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 868-886.
- 15. De Felice, F., Deldoost, M. H., & Faizollahi, M. (2015). Performance measurement model for the supplier selection based on AHP. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7(Godište 2015), 7-17. doi:10.5772/61702
- 16. Er Kara, M., & Oktay Fırat, S. (2018). Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study. Sustainability, 10(4), 1066. doi:10.3390/su10041066
- 17. Ghodsypour, S.H. and O’Brien, C. (2001), “The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 15-27.pg 16 doi:10.1016/S0925- 5273(01)00093-7
- 18. Hamdi, F.; Ghorbel, A.; Masmoudi, F.; Dupont, L. Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: Literature review. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29, 763– 788. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1128-3
- 19. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., 2010. Muticriteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 202 (1), 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
- 20. Hosseini, S., Khaled A.A., (2019). A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 207-228. doi:10.1007/s10845- 016-1241-y
- 21. Jadidi, O., Yusuff, R. M., Firouzi, F., & Hong, T. S. (2008). Improvement of a grey based method for supplier selection problem. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 31(2), 770-777.
- 22. Jia, P., Govindan, K., Choi, T. M., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Supplier selection problems in fashion business operations with sustainability considerations. Sustainability, 7(2), 1603- 1619. doi:10.3390/su7021603
- 23. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics information management, 16(6), 382-394.
- 24. Kraljic, P. 1983. Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5): 109-117.
- 25. KaiFu, Y., (2019). An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARASMCGP methodology. Journal of Air Transport Management, 75, 164-169. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.01.011
- 26. Lee, A. H. (2009). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 2879-2893. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045
- 27. Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2007). A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Mathematical and computer modelling, 46(3-4), 573-581. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.11.021
- 28. Li, Y., Diabat, A. & Lu, C., (2020). Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach. Ann Oper Res 287, 303–322 doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03453-2
- 29. Lingyu, H., Bingwu, L., & Juntao, L. (2009, August). An ERP system selection model based on fuzzy grey TOPSIS for SMEs. In 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (Vol. 3, pp. 244-248). IEEE.
- 30. Liu T., Deng Y., Chan F., (2018). Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1321-1333. doi:10.1007/s40815-017-0400-4
- 31. Mukherjee, K. (2016). Supplier selection criteria and methods: past, present and future. International Journal of Operational Research, 27 (1/2), 356-373 doi:10.1504/IJOR.2016.078470
- 32. Mishra, S., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2013). Grey-based and fuzzy TOPSIS decisionmaking approach for agility evaluation of mass customization systems. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 20(4), 440-462. doi:10.1108/BIJ-07-2011-0050
- 33. Mwikali, R., and Kavale, S. (2012). “Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management.” Int. J. Human. Social Sci., 2(14), 189–193. Pg.191
- 34. Nyaoga, R., Magutu, P., & Wang, M. (2016). Application of Grey-TOPSIS approach to evaluate value chain performance of tea processing chains. Decision Science Letters, 5(3), 431-446. doi:10.5267/j.dsl.2016.1.002
- 35. Pal, O., Gupta, A. K., & Garg, R. K. (2013). Supplier selection criteria and methods in supply chains: A review. International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, 7(10), 1403-1409.
- 36. Plebankiewicz, E., & Kubek, D. (2015). Multicriteria selection of the building material supplier using AHP and fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 04015057. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001033
- 37. Rosell, D.T., Lakemond, N. and Wasti, S.N. (2014), “Integrating knowledge with suppliers at the R&D-manufacturing interface”, Journal of Manufacturing TechnologyManagement, Vol. 25 No. 2, p. 6. doi:10.1108/JMTM-12-2013-0171
- 38. Stević, Ž. (2017). Criteria for supplier selection: A literature review. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications, 19(1), 23-27. doi:10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.016
- 39. Taherdoosta, H., Brard, A., (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, (32), 1024–1034. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317
- 40. Thiruchelvam, S., & Tookey, J. E. (2011). Evolving trends of supplier selection criteria and methods. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), 437-454. doi:10.15282/ijame.4.2011.6.0036
- 41. Ustun, O., & Demı, E. A. (2008). An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega, 36(4), 509-521. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.12.004
- 42. Wan, S.P., Xu, G.L., Dong,& J.Y., (2017). Supplier selection using ANP and ELECTRE II in interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 385, 19-38. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.032
- 43. Zare, A., Feylizadeh, M., Mahmoudi, A., Liu, S., 2018. Suitable computerized maintenance management system selection using grey group TOPSIS and fuzzy group VIKOR: A case study. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 341-358. doi:10.5267/j.dsl.201
| APA | Kabadayi N, KUCUK CIRPIN B (2020). GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. , 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| Chicago | Kabadayi Nihan,KUCUK CIRPIN Birgül GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. (2020): 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| MLA | Kabadayi Nihan,KUCUK CIRPIN Birgül GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. , 2020, ss.767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| AMA | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. . 2020; 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| Vancouver | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. . 2020; 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| IEEE | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B "GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ." , ss.767 - 787, 2020. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| ISNAD | Kabadayi, Nihan - KUCUK CIRPIN, Birgül. "GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ". (2020), 767-787. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| APA | Kabadayi N, KUCUK CIRPIN B (2020). GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| Chicago | Kabadayi Nihan,KUCUK CIRPIN Birgül GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 25, no.2 (2020): 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| MLA | Kabadayi Nihan,KUCUK CIRPIN Birgül GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.25, no.2, 2020, ss.767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| AMA | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 25(2): 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| Vancouver | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020; 25(2): 767 - 787. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| IEEE | Kabadayi N,KUCUK CIRPIN B "GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ." Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, ss.767 - 787, 2020. 10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
| ISNAD | Kabadayi, Nihan - KUCUK CIRPIN, Birgül. "GRİ İLİŞKİSEL TEMELLİ TOPSIS YÖNTEMİ İLE TEDARİKÇİSEÇİMİ VE TEDARİKÇİ RİSK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ". Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 25/2 (2020), 767-787. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.648299 |
