Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 13 Sayfa Aralığı: 311 - 343 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2021

BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI

Öz:
Kolluk kuvvetleri, iç güvenliğin sağlanmasında ve hukukun üstünlüğünün korunmasında önemli bir görev üstlenmektedir. Bu görevin icrasını sağlamak üzere kolluk mensupları diğer kamu görevlilerinden farklı olarak arama, el koyma, yakalama, zor kullanma, silah kullanma gibi birtakım özel yetkiler ile donatılmıştır. Söz konusu yetkilerin kullanımının insanların temel hak ve özgürlüklerinin ihlaline sebep olabilme potansiyelinden dolayı kolluk personeli de kurum içi ve kurum dışı birtakım mekanizmalar tarafından denetlenmekte ve gözetilmektedir. Kolluk personelinin denetiminde hiyerarşik denetim ve disiplin kurulları marifetiyle yapılan denetime ek olarak yasama, yürütme ve yargı organları, mülki amirler, bağımsız kurullar, halk, medya ve sivil toplum örgütleri tarafından icra edilen sivil gözetim de son derece önemlidir. Araştırma kapsamında sivil gözetimin bileşenlerinden bağımsız kolluk şikâyet sistemleri ele alınmış, yalnızca kolluk kuvvetleri aleyhindeki şikâyetleri araştırmakla görevli uzmanlaşmış kuruma sahip ülkeler temel alınarak; Avrupa Konseyi üyesi ülkelerden Belçika, Danimarka, İngiltere ve Galler, İrlanda, İskoçya, Kuzey İrlanda, Lüksemburg, Macaristan, Malta ve Norveç; ayrıca Güney Afrika, Kanada, Kenya ve Yeni Zelanda’da bulunan kurumlar yetki, kaynak, bağımsızlık, şeffaflık, raporlama ve sivil toplum katılımı gibi birtakım kriterler kapsamında kuruluş kanunları, kurumsal web siteleri, performans programları ve faaliyet raporlarından yararlanmak suretiyle karşılaştırmalı bir şekilde incelenmiş ve söz konusu sistemlerin etkililiğini artıracak bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur. ‘Bağımsız, tarafsız ve sivil yapı’ ilkelerine uygun uygulama örnekleri olmakla birlikte, sistemin etkililiğini artıracak birtakım reformlara ihtiyaç bulunduğu görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime:

The Main Characteristics of The Independent Law Enforcement Complaint Systems and The Examples Regarding State-Level Applications

Öz:
Law enforcement agencies play an important rolein ensuring internal security and protecting thesuperiority of law. In order to ensure the executionof this duty, law enforcement officers are equippedwith a number of special authorizations such assearch, seizure, use of force and use of weapons,unlike other public officials. Due to the potential ofthe use of such powers to violate the fundamentalrights and freedoms of people, law enforcementpersonnel are also supervised by some internaland external mechanisms. In addition to the supervision by hierarchical control and disciplinaryboards, civilian oversight by legislative, executiveand judicial bodies, administrative authorities,independent boards, the public, the media andnon-governmental organizations is also very important. Within the scope of the research, one of the components of civilian oversight ‘independent lawenforcement complaint systems’ have been examined. Countries with specialized institutionstasked with investigating complaints against law enforcement officers; Belgium, Denmark, Englandand Wales, Ireland, Scotland, Northern Ireland,Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta and Norway from themember states of the Council of Europe and alsoinstitutions in South Africa, Canada, Kenya and NewZealand have been examined in a comparativemanner by benefiting from establishment laws,corporate websites, performance programs and annual reports within some criterias such as authority,resource, independence, transparency, reportingand civil society participation. Some suggestionshave been made to increase the effectiveness ofthese systems. Although there are some examplesin accordance with the principles of “independent,impartial and civil structure”, it has been seen thatthere is a need for some reforms that will increasethe effectiveness of the system.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ACT XXXIV OF 1994 ON THE POLICE. (1994). https://net.jogtar. hu/jogszabaly?dbnum=1&docid=99400034.TV&mahu=1 (Erişim Tarihi: 02.04.2020)
  • AJILORE, Olugbenga (2018). “Are Civilian Oversight Agencies Actually Holding Police Accountable?”, https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/are-civilian-oversight-agencies-actually-holding-police-accountable (Erişim Tarihi: 03.03.2020)
  • ALTUNTOP, Serkan (2015b). “Kamu Güvenliğini Sağlamada Kolluğun Aşırı Güç Kullanma Sorunsalı”, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:14, Sayı:4, ss. 873-904.
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL (2015). “Police Oversight Short Paper Series No. 2”, Amnesty International Dutch section Police and Human Rights Programme, Holland.
  • ATTARD, Barbara & Olson, Kathryn (2013). “Overview of Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement in the United States”, Accountability Associates, http://accountabilityassociates.org/wp-content/uploads/Oversight-in-the-US-%E2%80%A6FINAL.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.03.2020)
  • BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER İŞKENCEYE KARŞI SÖZLEŞME (1984). “Birleşmiş Milletler İşkence ve Diğer Zalimane, Gayri İnsani veya Küçültücü Muamele veya Cezaya Karşı Sözleşme”, Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurulu, 39/46.
  • BOER, Monica den (2008). “Police Oversight Mechanisms in Europe: Towards a Comparative Overview of Ombudsmen and Their Competencies”, Asia-Europe Democratisation and Justice Series, 23-63. COMMITTEE P (2019a). “About Complaint Handling”, https://comitep.be/faq.html#complaint (Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2020)
  • COMMITTEE P (2019b). “Our Missions”, https://comitep.be/missions. html (Erişim Tarihi: 25.02.2020)
  • COMMITTEE P (2019c). “Who Is Monitored?”, https://comitep.be/ who-is-monitored.html (Erişim Tarihi: 21.02.2020)
  • CPT REPORT, (2014), “Report to the Danish Government on the visit to Denmark carried out by the CPT”, https://rm.coe.int/168069570e (Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2020)
  • CRCC (2019). “Complaint and Review Process”, https://www.crcc-ccetp. gc.ca/en/complaint-and-review-process (Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2020)
  • EPAC (2011). “Police Oversight Principles”, European Partners Against Corruption.
  • GARDA OMBUDSMAN (2019). “How Is Informal Resolution Done?”, https://www.gardaombudsman.ie/about-gsoc/faqs/engage-informal-resolution/ (Erişim Tarihi: 24.02.2020)
  • GARDA SIOCHÁNA ACT (2005). http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ eli/2005/act/20/enacted/en/html (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2020)
  • GENERAL INSPECTORATE OF THE POLICE ACT (2018). http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/07/18/a623/jo (Erişim Tarihi: 29.03.2020)
  • GİRİTLİ, İsmet, Pertev Bilgen, Tayfun Akgüner ve Kahraman Berk (2015). İdare Hukuku, Der Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • GOLDSTEIN, Herman (1977). “Policing a Free Society”, Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Pub. Co. Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1349’den aktaran Altuntop, Serkan (2015a). “Hesapverebilirlik Bağlamında Kolluğun Sivil Denetimi: Sivil Gözetim Kurulları”, İnsan Hakları Yıllığı, Cilt 33, 35-65.
  • GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (2018). “Opportunities-Selection Processes”, https://appointments.gc.ca/slctnPrcs.asp?menu=1&lang=eng&- SelectionProcessId=E283BFAC-0072-4655-A779-749CD51A597A (Erişim Tarihi: 06.04.2020)
  • GSOC (2019). “GSOC’s Functions”, https://www.gardaombudsman.ie/ about-gsoc/gsocs-functions/ (Erişim Tarihi: 08.04.2020)
  • HOME OFFICE - IOPC FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT (2019). https://policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/Who-we-are/ Our-Policies/IOPC_HomeOffice_Framework_Agreement.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2020)
  • HOUSE OF COMMONS NORTHERN IRELAND AFFAIRS COMMITTEE (2005). “The Functions of the Office of the PONI”, https:// publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmniaf/344/344.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2020)
  • IGP (2018). “General Organisation Chart”, https://igp.gouvernement. lu/en/service/organigramme/organigramme-general.html (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2020)
  • IGP LEGALITY CONTROL (2018). https://igp.gouvernement.lu/en/ service/attributions/controle-legalite.html (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2020)
  • INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY (2012). “Organisational Structure”, http://www.politiklagemyndigheden.dk/english/ organisational-structure (Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2020)
  • INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS BOARD (2019). https://ipcan.org/members/independent-police-complaints-board (Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2020)
  • IOPC (2018). “A Guide to IOPC Independent Investigations”, https:// www.policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/Investigations/our-investigations-a-guide-to-IOPC-independent-investigations.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2020)
  • IOPC (2019a). “Investigation Summaries And Learning Recommendations”, https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/investigations/investigation-summaries-and-learning-recommendations (Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2020)
  • IOPC (2019b). “Who We Are”, https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/whowe-are (Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2020)
  • IOPC (2019c). “Make a Complaint”, https://policeconduct.gov.uk/complaints-and-appeals/make-complaint (Erişim Tarihi: 19.04.2020)
  • IOPC (2019d). “Our Investigations“, https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/ investigations/our-investigations (Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2020)
  • IPCA (2019). “Do You Want to Complain About the Police?”, http:// www.politiklagemyndigheden.dk/media/6447/booklet_-_do_you_want_ to_complain_about_the_police.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 28.04.2020)
  • IPCA ACT (1988). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1988/0002/latest/DLM126222.html (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2020)
  • IPCA LEGISLATION. (2017). ”Legislation and Accountability” https:// www.ipca.govt.nz/Site/about-us/Legislation-and-Accountability.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2020)
  • IPID ACT (2011). https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a12011.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 28.03.2020)
  • IPOA ACT (2012). https://www.policinglaw.info/assets/downloads/2012_Independent_Policing_Oversight_Authority_Act.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 28.03.2020)
  • IPOA PROFILE (2019). https://www.ipoa.go.ke/ipoa-profile/ (Erişim Tarihi: 29.03.2020)
  • KERSTETTER, Wayne (1985). “Who Disciplines the Police? Who Should?”, William A Geller, ed. Police Leadership in America:Crisis and Opportunity, American Bar Association, ss.149-182.
  • KOYUNCU, Erhan (2010). “İç Güvenlik Sektörünün Sivil Gözetiminin Geliştirilmesi Projesi”, İdarecinin Sesi Dergisi, 142.
  • MALTA POLICE ACT (2017). http://www.justiceservices.gov. mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8686 (Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2020)
  • MURPHY, Christopher & Mckenna, Paul. F. (2014). “Police Investigating Police: A Critical Analysis of the Literature”, https://www.crcc-ccetp. gc.ca/en/police-investigating-police-critical-analysis-literature#toc4 (Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2020)
  • NEW ZEALAND IPCA (2017). “What We Do”, https://www.ipca. govt.nz/Site/about-us/What-we-do.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2020)
  • NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY (2016). “Issues Relating to Public Services Ombudsmen and the PONI”, http://www.niassembly.gov. uk/globalassets/documents/raise/publications/2016-2021/2016/executive_ office/8716.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 24.03.2020)
  • PARC (Police Assessment Resource Center) (2005). “Review of National Police Oversight Models For The Eugene Police Commission”, https:// www.eugene-or.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3802/Review-of-National-Police-Oversight-Models (Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2020)
  • PEREZ, Wayne (1994). Common Sense About Police Review, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
  • PIRC (2014). “A Guide for the Public on the Role of PIRC”, https://www. scotland.police.uk/assets/pdf/138327/147514/pirc-guide-for-the-public?- view=Standard (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04.2020)
  • PIRC (2019), “Who We Are: The Executive Team”, https://pirc.scot/ about-us/who-we-are/ (Erişim Tarihi: 28.04.2020)
  • PIRC GUIDE FOR POLICE AND STAFF (2019). “A Guide for Police and Staff on the Role of the PIRC”, https://pirc.scot/media/4907/pirc_ guide_for_police_and_staff_web.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2020)
  • POLICE COMPLAINTS SYSTEMS IN THE UK (2018). Briefıng Paper, Number 02056, House of Commons Library.
  • POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND (2019). “Informal Resolution”, https://www.policeombudsman.org/Information-for-Police-Officers/Informal-Resolution (Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2020)
  • POLICE OVERSIGHT MECHANISMS NOTE (2018). The Danish Institute for Human Rights, Denmark’s National Human Rights Institution, Denmark.
  • POLICE WATCHDOG, (2018), “Information Brochure, the Standing Police Monitoring Committee”, https://comitep.be/document/doc-download/brochure%20English.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2020)
  • PONI (2017). “Annual Report & Accounts”, https://www.policeombudsman.org/PONI/files/59/59a07a61-6d31-4190-b639-6d4333ca7dd0.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.04.2020)
  • PRENZLER, Tim & Ronken, Carol (2001). “Models of Police Oversight: A Critique”, Policing and Society, 11(2), 151-180.
  • RCMP ACT (1985). https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/R-10/ (Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2020)
  • REPORTING OFFENCES (2019). “Reporting Offences to the Bureau”, http://www.spesialenheten.no/English/Information/Reportingoffences.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 28.03.2020)
  • ROACH, Kent (2014). “Models of Civilian Police Review: The Objectives and Mechanisms of Legal and Political Regulation of the Police”, Criminal Law Quarterly, 61, 29-73.
  • SMITH, Graham (2010). “Every Complaint Matters: Human Rights Commissioner’s Opinion Concerning Independent and Effective Determination of Complaints Against the Police”, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 38(2), 59-74.
  • SMITH, Graham (2014). “International Police Complaints Reform”, 2014, 1-9.
  • THE COMPETENCE OF THE BOARD (2014). “The Competence and the Procedure of the Board”, https://www.repate.hu/index.php?option=- com_content&view=article&id=84&Itemid=173&lang=en (Erişim Tarihi: 21.02.2020)
  • THE NORWEGIAN BUREAU FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF POLICE AFFAIRS. (2019a). “Case Processing at Two Levels”, http://www. spesialenheten.no/English/Caseprocessing.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 14.04.2020)
  • THE NORWEGIAN BUREAU FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF POLICE AFFAIRS (2019b). “Information”, http://www.spesialenheten.no/ English/Information/Aboutus.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 14.04.2020)
  • THE POLICE COMPLAINTS SYSTEM, (2018), “Information for Police Officers”, https://policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/ info-for-police/the-police-complaints-system-information-for-police-offcers_ IOPC.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13.04.2020)
  • THE POLICE OMBUDSMAN (2019). “Corporate Governance”, https://www.policeombudsman.org/About-Us/Corporate-Governance (Erişim Tarihi: 16.04.2020)
  • UNHRC (2010). “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions”.
  • UNODC (2011). “Handbook on Police Accountability, Oversight and Integrity”, Criminal Justice Handbook Series UN Publications, ABD.
APA GÜNGÖR M, KARAKILÇIK Y (2020). BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. , 311 - 343.
Chicago GÜNGÖR Mustafa,KARAKILÇIK Yusuf BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. (2020): 311 - 343.
MLA GÜNGÖR Mustafa,KARAKILÇIK Yusuf BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. , 2020, ss.311 - 343.
AMA GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. . 2020; 311 - 343.
Vancouver GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. . 2020; 311 - 343.
IEEE GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y "BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI." , ss.311 - 343, 2020.
ISNAD GÜNGÖR, Mustafa - KARAKILÇIK, Yusuf. "BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI". (2020), 311-343.
APA GÜNGÖR M, KARAKILÇIK Y (2020). BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. Ombudsman Akademik, 7(13), 311 - 343.
Chicago GÜNGÖR Mustafa,KARAKILÇIK Yusuf BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. Ombudsman Akademik 7, no.13 (2020): 311 - 343.
MLA GÜNGÖR Mustafa,KARAKILÇIK Yusuf BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. Ombudsman Akademik, vol.7, no.13, 2020, ss.311 - 343.
AMA GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. Ombudsman Akademik. 2020; 7(13): 311 - 343.
Vancouver GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI. Ombudsman Akademik. 2020; 7(13): 311 - 343.
IEEE GÜNGÖR M,KARAKILÇIK Y "BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI." Ombudsman Akademik, 7, ss.311 - 343, 2020.
ISNAD GÜNGÖR, Mustafa - KARAKILÇIK, Yusuf. "BAĞIMSIZ KOLLUK ŞİKÂYET SİSTEMİNİN TEMELÖZELLİKLERİ VE ÖRNEK ÜLKE UYGULAMALARI". Ombudsman Akademik 7/13 (2020), 311-343.