Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 68 - 75 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068 İndeks Tarihi: 15-05-2021

Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure

Öz:
Objective: This study aims to determine the capacity to tolerate discomfort by women who undergo mammography.Materials and Methods: The data were obtained using the face-to-face interview method immediately after the procedure with women who undergomammography (n=132). Demographic data collection form and the Discomfort Intolerance Scale was used for data collection.Results: Among the women, 78.8% experienced pain during mammography and the pain intensity was determined as 3.55 (standard deviation=3.00)on the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale. Women who were not on pain relievers and nonsmokers have high discomfort tolerance. Women who were consumingsubstances containing methylxanthine (eg. chocolate) tend to avoid discomfort. Women with a history of breast mass and abnormal test results did not avoiddiscomfort as much as women who undergo regular checkup mammograms. Most of the women experience pain during mammography, and avoidancefrom discomfort increases as the perceived pain during the procedure increases.Conclusion: Conducting different studies using the same scale can be useful in evaluating the discomfort experienced during mammography and itscontribution to reducing pain.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Kabataş Yıldız M, Ekinci M. The relation between anger expression styles and caretaking burden of family members of cancer patients and affecting factors. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Derg 2017; 14: 176-184. [Crossref ]
  • 2. Gemalmaz A, Avşar G. Cancer diagnosis and after experiences: A qualitative study. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Derg 2015; 12: 93- 98. [Crossref ]
  • 3. American Cancer Society, Cancer Statistics Center available at: https:// cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/#!/
  • 4. Fuller MS, Lee CI, Elmore JG. Breast cancer screening: An Evidence- Based Update Med Clin North Am 2015; 99: 451–468. (PMID: 25841594) [Crossref ]
  • 5. Freitas-Junior R, Martins E, Metran-Nascente C, Assis Carvalho A, da Silva MF, Soares LR, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial on the use of paracetamol for performing mammography. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e0261. (PMID: 29595685) [Crossref ]
  • 6. Narod SA, Giannakeas V, Miller AB. RE: Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107: djv094. (PMID: 25855706) [Crossref ]
  • 7. Chan HH, Lo G, Cheung P. Is the pain from mammography reduced by the use of a radiolucent MammoPad? Local experience in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2016; 22: 210–215. (PMID: 27101790) [Crossref ]
  • 8. den Boer D, Dam-Vervloet LAJ, Boomsma MF, de Boer E, van Dalen JA, Poot L. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography System. Eur J Radiol 2018; 105: 251–254. [Crossref ]
  • 9. Mendat CC, Mislan D, Hession-Kunz L. Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9: 359–364. (PMID: 28572739) [Crossref ]
  • 10. Ndikum-Moffor FM, Braiuca S, Daley CM, Gajewski BJ, Engelman KK. Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native Women. Womens Health Issues 2013; 23: e395-402. (PMID: 24183414) [Crossref ]
  • 11. Whelehan P, Evans A, Wells M, MacGillivray S. The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: a systematic review. Breast 2013; 22: 389–394. [Crossref ]
  • 12. Katarzyna F, Jens-Holger G. Is ındividualizing breast compression during mammography useful? Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast is Individualizing breast. Rofo 2017; 189: 39–48. [Crossref ]
  • 13. Paap E, Witje M, Van Landsveld-Verhoeven C, Pijnappel RM, Maas AHEM, Broeders MJM. Mammography in females with an implantedmedical device: impact on image quality, pain, and anxiety. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20160142. (PMID: 27452263) [Crossref ]
  • 14. Miller D, Livingstone V, Herbison GP. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD002942. (PMID: 18254010) [Crossref ]
  • 15. Lambertz CK, Johnson CJ, Montgomery PG, Maxwell JR, Fry SJ. Toxicity of topical lidocaine applied to the breasts to reduce discomfort during screening mammography. Journal Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012; 28: 200–204. [Crossref ]
  • 16. Tabar L, Lebovic GS, Hermann GD, Kaufman CS, Alexander C, Sayre J. Clinical assessment of a radiolucent cushion for mammography. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 154-158. (PMID: 15191098) [Crossref ]
  • 17. Markle L, Roux S, Sayre JW. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad. Breast J 2004; 10: 345-349. (PMID: 15239794) [Crossref ]
  • 18. Feder K, Grunert JH. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? – Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast. Rofo 2017; 189: 39–48. (PMID: 28002858) [Crossref ]
  • 19. de Groot, JE, Hopman IGM, van Lier MGJTB, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure and forcestandardization. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 384–391. (PMID: 25554008) [Crossref ]
  • 20. Broeders MJM, ten Voorde M, Veldkamp WJH, van Engen RE, van Landsveld – Verhoeven C, Gunneman MNL, et al. Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose, and technical image quality. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 821-829. [Crossref ]
  • 21. de Groot JE, Hopman IGM, van Lier MGJTB, Branderhorst W, Grimbergen CA, den Heeten GJ. Pressure-standardized mammography does not affect visibility, contrast, and sharpness of stable lesions. Eur J Radiol 2017; 86: 289-295. (PMID: 28027762) [Crossref ]
  • 22. Özdel K, Yalçınkaya Alkar Ö, Taymur İ, Türkçapar MH, Zamkı E, Sargın AE. "Rahatsızlığa Dayanma Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması". Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Derg 2012; 1: 52-58. [Crossref ]
  • 23. Schmidt NB, Richey JA, Fitzpatrick KK. Discomfort Intolerance: Development of a construct and measure relevant to panic disorder. J Anxiety Disord 2006; 20: 263-280. (PMID: 16564432) [Crossref ]
  • 24. Alimoğlu E, Alimoğlu MK, Kabaalioğlu A, Çeken K, Apaydın A, Lüleci E. Mamografi çekimine bağlı ağrı ve kaygı. Tanısal Girişimsel Radyoloji 2004; 10: 213-217. [Crossref ]
  • 25. Yılmaz M, Kıymaz Ö. Anxiety, and pain associated with process mammography: influence of process, information before. J Breast Health 2010; 6: 262-268. [Crossref ]
  • 26. Gabel P, Larsen MB, Nielsen PB, Svendstrup DB, Berit Andersen B. Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in a Danish population. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17: 489. [Crossref ]
  • 27. Moshina N, Sagstad S, Sebuødegård GG, Waade E, Gran J, Music S, et al. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Radiography 2020; 26: 133-139. [Crossref ]
  • 28. Sütçigil L, Yurdakul AN, Türkçapar H. Üniversite öğrencilerinde ertelemeciliğin rahatsızlığa dayanıksızlıkla ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Boylam Psikiyatri Enstitüsü, JCBPR 2017; 6: 123-132. [Crossref ]
  • 29. Orcullo DJC, San Teo H. Understanding cognitive dissonance in smoking behavior: A qualitative study. Int J Soc Sci Humanity Stud 2016; 6: 481- 484. [Crossref ]
  • 30. Hormes JM, Rozin P. Premenstrual chocolate craving. What happens after menopause? Appetite 2009; 53: 256–259. (PMID: 19595725) [Crossref ]
APA Akansel N, gülşen m, gültaş m (2021). Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. , 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
Chicago Akansel Neriman,gülşen muaz,gültaş muhammed Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. (2021): 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
MLA Akansel Neriman,gülşen muaz,gültaş muhammed Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. , 2021, ss.68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
AMA Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. . 2021; 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
Vancouver Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. . 2021; 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
IEEE Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m "Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure." , ss.68 - 75, 2021. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
ISNAD Akansel, Neriman vd. "Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure". (2021), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
APA Akansel N, gülşen m, gültaş m (2021). Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. European Journal of Breast Health, 17(1), 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
Chicago Akansel Neriman,gülşen muaz,gültaş muhammed Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. European Journal of Breast Health 17, no.1 (2021): 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
MLA Akansel Neriman,gülşen muaz,gültaş muhammed Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. European Journal of Breast Health, vol.17, no.1, 2021, ss.68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
AMA Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. European Journal of Breast Health. 2021; 17(1): 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
Vancouver Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure. European Journal of Breast Health. 2021; 17(1): 68 - 75. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
IEEE Akansel N,gülşen m,gültaş m "Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure." European Journal of Breast Health, 17, ss.68 - 75, 2021. 10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068
ISNAD Akansel, Neriman vd. "Influence of Discomfort Tolerance of Women who Undergo Mammography on the Perceived Pain Intensity Due to the Procedure". European Journal of Breast Health 17/1 (2021), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.2020.6068