Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 46 Sayfa Aralığı: 11 - 23 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01 İndeks Tarihi: 19-05-2021

Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation

Öz:
An empirical investigation of the 50 US States shows that the relationship between shadow economy and corruption is negative (substitutive) when the shadow economy is relatively small; it ispositive (complementary) when the shadow economy is large. According to the robust regression results for 50 American states between 2001 and 2008, the turning point from negative to positive is when the shadow economy of a state is at 7.61 of its GDP. Shadow economy and corruption are first substitutive and then complementary. The lesson to learn is that there is no simple anti-corruption policy rule if one takes into account the varying interaction between corruption and the shadow economy.
Anahtar Kelime:

ABD’de Kayıt Dışı Ekonomi ve Yolsuzluk Birbirinin Yerine Mi Geçer Yoksa Birbirini Mi Tamamlar? Ampirik Bir Çalışma

Öz:
Bu ampirik çalışma ABD’de kayıt dışı ekonominin küçük olduğu eyaletlerde kayıt dışıekonomi ve yolsuzluk arasında negatif bir ilişkinin olduğunu (birbirinin yerine geçen); kayıt dışıekonominin büyük olduğu eyaletlerde ise pozitif (birbirini tamamlayan) olduğunu göstermektedir.2001-2008 yılları arasında, ABD’deki 50 eyalete ait verilere dayalı yapılan regresyon analizsonuçlarına göre, bu ilişkinin negatiften pozitife geçtiği dönüm noktası, eyaletteki kayıt dışıekonominin GSYİH’nın %7,61’i kadar olduğu yerdedir: Kayıt dışı ekonomi ve yolsuzluk öncebirbirinin yerine geçmekte daha sonra ise birbirlerini tamamlamaktadırlar. Yolsuzluk ve kayıt dışıekonomi arasındaki ilişkinin değişken olduğunu göz önüne aldığımızda, yolsuzluğa karşı basit birpolitika kuralı olamayacağı ortaya çıkmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alt, J.E. & D.D. Lassen (2003), “The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341-365.
  • Ardizzi, G. & C. Petraglia & M. Piacenza & G. Turati (2014), “Measuring the underground economy with the currency demand approach: A reinterpretation of the methodology, with an application to Italy”, Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 747-772.
  • Bardahan, P. (1997), “Corruption and development: A review of issues”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320-1346.
  • Bologna, J. (2017), “Corruption, Product Market Competition, and Institutional Quality: Empirical Evidence From the U.S. States”, Economic Inquiry, 55(1), 137-159.
  • Buehn, A. & F. Schneider (2012), “Shadow economies around the world: Novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates”, International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 139-171.
  • Choi, J.P. & M. Thum (2005), “Corruption and the Shadow Economy”, International Economic Review, 46(3), 817-836.
  • Dreher, A. & F. Schneider (2010), “Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis”, Public Choice, 144(1-2), 215-238.
  • Dreher, A. & C. Kotsogiannis & S. McCorriston (2009), “How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy?”, International Tax and Public Finance, 16(6), 773-796.
  • Ekici, T. & M. Besim (2016), “A Measure of the Shadow Economy in a Small Economy: Evidence from Household-Level Expenditure Patterns”, Review of Income and Wealth, 62(1), 145- 160.
  • Glaeser, E.L. & R.E. Saks (2006), “Corruption in America”, Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), 1053-1072.
  • Goel, R.K. & M.A. Nelson (1998), “Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis”, Public Choice, 97(1), 107-20.
  • Goel, R.K. & M.A. Nelson (2011), “Measures of corruption and determinants of US corruption”, Economics of Governance, 12(2), 155-176.
  • Gokcekus, O. & S. Sonan (2017), “Political contributions and corruption in the United States”, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(4), 360-372.
  • Hibbs Jr., D.A. & V. Piculescu (2005), “Tax Toleration and Tax Evasion: Why Firms Enter the Unofficial Economy”, CEFOS Working Paper 1.
  • Johnson, N.D. & C.L. LaFountain & S. Yamarik (2011), “Corruption is bad for growth (even in the United States)”, Public Choice, 147(3-4), 377-393.
  • Johnson, S. & D. Kaufmann & A. Shleifer (1997), The Unoffficial Economy in Transition (Vol. 2). Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
  • Lambsdorff, J. (2006), “Causes and Consequences of Corruption: What Do We Know from a Crosssection of Countries?”, in: S. Rose-Ackerman (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 3-51.
  • Leeson, P.T. & R.S. Sobel (2008), “Weathering Corruption”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 667-681.
  • Mauro, P. (1995), “Corruption and growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681-712.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1998), “Corruption and Development”, in: B. Pleskovic & J.E. Stiglitz (eds.), World Bank Conference on Economic Development 1997, 35-57.
  • Schneider, F. (2017), “Estimating a Shadow Economy: Results, Methods, Problems, and Open Questions”, Open Economics, 2017/1, 1-29.
  • Schneider, F. & D.K. Enste (2000), “Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences”, Journal of Economic Literature, 64(March 1994), 1332-1334.
  • Treisman, D. (2000), “The causes of corruption: a cross-national study”, Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399-457.
  • Treisman, D. (2007), “What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of crossnational empirical research?”, Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211-244.
  • Williams, C.C. & F. Schneider (2016), Measuring the Global Shadow Economy, Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
  • Wiseman, T. (2013), “US shadow economies: A state-level study”, Constitutional Political Economy, 24(4), 310-335.
  • Zellner, A. (1962), “An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348-368
APA Gokcekus O, Schneider F (2020). Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. , 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
Chicago Gokcekus Omer,Schneider Friedrich Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. (2020): 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
MLA Gokcekus Omer,Schneider Friedrich Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. , 2020, ss.11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
AMA Gokcekus O,Schneider F Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. . 2020; 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
Vancouver Gokcekus O,Schneider F Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. . 2020; 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
IEEE Gokcekus O,Schneider F "Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation." , ss.11 - 23, 2020. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
ISNAD Gokcekus, Omer - Schneider, Friedrich. "Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation". (2020), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
APA Gokcekus O, Schneider F (2020). Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. Sosyoekonomi, 28(46), 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
Chicago Gokcekus Omer,Schneider Friedrich Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. Sosyoekonomi 28, no.46 (2020): 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
MLA Gokcekus Omer,Schneider Friedrich Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. Sosyoekonomi, vol.28, no.46, 2020, ss.11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
AMA Gokcekus O,Schneider F Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. Sosyoekonomi. 2020; 28(46): 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
Vancouver Gokcekus O,Schneider F Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation. Sosyoekonomi. 2020; 28(46): 11 - 23. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
IEEE Gokcekus O,Schneider F "Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation." Sosyoekonomi, 28, ss.11 - 23, 2020. 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01
ISNAD Gokcekus, Omer - Schneider, Friedrich. "Are Shadow Economy and Corruption in US States Substitutiveor Complementary? An Empirical Investigation". Sosyoekonomi 28/46 (2020), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.04.01