Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 12 Sayfa Aralığı: 2657 - 2663 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 İndeks Tarihi: 21-05-2021
Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example
Öz: Biocomfort conditions, which are related to climate parameters, are a factor that affect almost everyaspect of people’s lives. Compatibility in terms of biocomfort also brings many advantages anddisadvantages in areas where tourism activities are carried out. For this reason, it is of greatimportance to identify areas that are suitable and not suitable for biocomfort during the tourismseason, especially in areas where tourism activities are carried out. In this study, with the help of GIS,it was aimed to determine the areas that are suitable and not suitable for biocomfort in the city ofSamsun in June, July, August and September by using the summer temperature index (SummerSimmer Index = SSI). As a result of the study, it was determined that 1.41% of the province in Juneand 16.65% in September remained in the cold zone. Apart from this, it was determined that 11.58%of the province in June, 33.27% in July, 21.77% in August and 14.3% in September remained in thesecond generation, which is considered the most comfortable belt.
Anahtar Kelime: CBS Yardımıyla Yaz Sıcaklık İndeksi Kullanılarak Biyokonfor Açısından Uygun Alanların Belirlenmesi; Samsun Örneği
Öz: İklim parametreleri ile bağlantılı olan biyokonfor şartları, insanların yaşamlarının hemen her alanında etkili olan bir faktördür. Biyokonfor açısından uygunluk, aynı zamanda turizm faaliyetlerinin gerçekleştirildiği alanlarda birçok avantaj ve dezavantajı da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu sebepten dolayı özellikle turizm faaliyetlerinin yürütüldüğü alanlarda, turizm sezonunda biyokonfor açısından uygun olan ve olmayan alanların belirlenmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışmada da CBS yardımıyla Samsun il genelinde yaz sıcaklık indeksi (New Summer Index = SSI) kullanılarak Haziran, Temmuz, Ağustos ve Eylül aylarında biyokonfor açısından uygun olan ve olmayan alanların belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda il genelinin haziran ayında %1,41’inin, Eylül ayında ise %16,65’inin soğuk kuşakta kaldığı belirlenmiştir. Bunun dışında ilin Haziran ayında %11,58’inin, Temmuz ayında %33,27’sinin, Ağustos ayında %21,77’sinin ve Eylül ayında ise %14,3’ünün en konforlu kuşak kabul edilen 2. kuşakta kaldığı belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Adiguzel F, Cetin M, Kaya E, Simsek, M, Gungor S, Sert, EB. 2019. Defining suitable areas for bioclimatic comfort for landscape planning and landscape management in Hatay, Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 139(3-4): 1493-1503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-03065-7
- Alaud FMM. 2019. The research of urban planning in bioclimatic comfort: A case study of Çankırı. MSc. Thesis, Institute of Science, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey.
- Aricak B, Cetin M, Erdem R, Sevik H, Cometen H. 2020. The Usability of Scotch Pine (Pinus sylvestris) as a Biomonitor for Traffic-Originated Heavy Metal Concentrations in Turkey. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(2): doi: 10.15244/pjoes/109244
- Boz AÖ. 2017. Tekirdağ Kent Merkezinin Biyoklimatik Konfor Değerleri Bakımından İncelenmesi. MSc. Thesis, Institute of Science, Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
- Bulgan E, Yılmaz S. 2017. Farklı Kent Dokularının Yaz Aylarında Biyoklimatik Konfora Etkisi: Erzurum Örneği. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(4): 235- 242. doi: 10.21597/jist.2017.216
- Cetin M. 2015. Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(10): 640. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3
- Cetin M. 2019. The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area’s effect using satellitia imagines on air quality: a case study of Bursa city. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(10): 1237-1249.
- Cetin M. 2020. Climate comfort depending on different altitudes and land use in the urban areas in Kahramanmaras City. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 1-9. doi:10.1007/s11869- 020-00858-y
- Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Gungor S, Kaya E, Sancar MC. 2019. Evaluation of thermal climatic region areas in terms of building density in urban management and planning for Burdur, Turkey. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(9): pp. 1103-1112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019- 00727-3
- Cetin M, Zeren I, Sevik H, Cakir C, Akpinar H. 2018. A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(3): 167. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6534-5
- Denı̇ z A, Güngör Ş. 2020. Mapping with unmanned aerial vehicles systems: A Case Study of Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University Campus. MSc. Thesis, Institute of Science, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey., 6 (1): 27-32.
- Elhadar YO. 2020. Specific Climate Parameters and Seasonal Changes of Biocomfort Zones Van Province. MSc. Thesis, Institute of Science, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey. 60 p.
- Ertugrul M, Ozel HB, Varol T, Cetin M, Sevik H. 2019. Investigation of the relationship between burned areas and climate factors in large forest fires in the Çanakkale region. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191(12): 737. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7946-6
- Güçlü Y. 2010a. The examination of climate comfortable conditions in terms of coastal tourism on the aegean region coastal belt. Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1): 794-823.
- Güçlü Y. 2010b. The examination of climate comfortable conditions in terms of coastal tourism on the eastern black sea subregion coastal belt. Turkish Geographical Review, 8(2): 111-136.
- Güngör Ş, Bozyiğit R. 2011. The Natural and Human Factor Effects of Land Use in Gazipaşa County. Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty (AKEF) Journal, 32.
- Kaya E, Agca M, Adiguzel F, Cetin M. 2019. Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Human and ecological risk assessment: An International Journal, 25(6): 1521-1530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896
- Kilicoglu C, Cetin M, Aricak B, Sevik H. 2020 Site selection by using the multi-criteria technique-a case study of Bafra, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08562-1
- Kong Q, Zheng J, Fowler HJ, Ge Q, Xi J. 2019. Climate change and summer thermal comfort in China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 137(1-2): 1077-1088. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2648-5
- MGM. 2020. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. Available from: https://mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceleristatistik. aspx?m=SAMSUN [Accessed 28 September 2020].
- Ozel HB, Donduran B, Cakmakli E, Sevik H. 2020. Factors affecting success in natural regeneration works of cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) In Kas region of Antalya. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 6(2): 054-059. doi: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.6.2.0127
- Pepi JW. 1987. The Summer Simmer Index, Weatherwise, 40: 3, 143-145. doi: 10.1080/00431672.1987.9933356
- Salata F, Golasi I, Proietti R, Lieto Vollaro A. 2017. Implications of climate and outdoor thermal comfort on tourism: the case of Italy. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61(12): 2229-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1430-1
- Sancar MC, Güngör Ş. 2020. A Review of Bioclimatic Comfort Areas Determined by the New Summer Index in Terms of Tourism in Antalya. Acta Biologica Turcica, 33(1): 53-63.
- Sevik H, Cetin M, Ozel HB, Akarsu H, Cetin IZ. 2020b. Analyzing of usability of tree-rings as biomonitors for monitoring heavy metal accumulation in the atmosphere in urban area: a case study of cedar tree (Cedrus sp.). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1): 23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8010-2
- Sevik H, Cetin M, Ozel HB, Erbek A, Cetin IZ. 2020a. The effect of climate on leaf micromorphological characteristics in some broad-leaved species. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-13.
- Sevik H, Cetin M, Ozturk A, Yigit N, Karakus O. 2019. Changes in micromorphological characters of Platanus orientalis L. leaves in Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3): 5909-5921. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/ aeer/1703_59095921
- Taylan ED, Damçayırı D. 2016, Isparta bölgesi yağış değerlerinin IDW ve Kriging enterpolasyon yöntemleri ile tahmini, Teknik Dergi, Vol. 27(3): 7551-7559.
- Toy S. 2010. Biyoklimatik konfor değerleri bakımından Doğu Anadolu bölgesi rekreasyonel alanlarının incelenmesi. MSc. Thesis, Institute of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
- Turkyilmaz A, Sevik H, Cetin M. 2018a. The use of perennial needles as biomonitors for recently accumulated heavy metals. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 14(1): 115- 120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-017-0335-9
- Turkyilmaz A, Sevik H, Isinkaralar K, Cetin M. 2018b. Using Acer platanoides annual rings to monitor the amount of heavy metals accumulated in air. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(10): 578. doi: Environ Monit Assess (2018) 190: 578 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6956-0
- Ucun Ozel H, Gemici BT, Gemici E, Ozel HB, Cetin M, Sevik H. 2020. Application of artificial neural networks to predict the heavy metal contamination in the Bartin River. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-18.
- URL1. 2020: Available from: https://www.lafsozluk.com/ 2012/01/samsun-ilinin-turkiye-haritasndaki-yeri.html [Accessed 28 September 2020]
- Yiğit N, Çetin M, Şevik H. 2018. The change in some leaf micromorphological characters of Prunus laurocerasus L. species by their habitat. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(11): 1517-1521. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v6i11.1517-1521.1704
- Yucedag C, Kaya LG, Cetin M. 2018. Identifying and assessing environmental awareness of hotel and restaurant employees attitudes in the Amasra District of Bartin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(2): 60. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10661-017-6456-7
- Zeren Cetin I, Sevik H. 2020. Investigation of the relationship between bioclimatic comfort and land use by using GIS and RS techniques in Trabzon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(2): 71.
- Zhao Q, Lian Z, Lai D. 2020. Thermal Comfort models and their developments: A review. Energy and Built Environment.
- Zhu J, Wang S, Huang G. 2019. Assessing climate change impacts on human‐perceived temperature extremes and underlying uncertainties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124(7): 3800-3821. doi: https:// doi.org/ 10.1029/2018JD029444
- Zhu L, Wang B, Sun Y. 2020. Multi-objective optimization for energy consumption, daylighting and thermal comfort performance of rural tourism buildings in north China. Building and Environment, 106841. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106841
| APA | ARICAK B (2020). Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. , 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| Chicago | ARICAK BURAK Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. (2020): 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| MLA | ARICAK BURAK Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. , 2020, ss.2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| AMA | ARICAK B Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. . 2020; 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| Vancouver | ARICAK B Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. . 2020; 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| IEEE | ARICAK B "Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example." , ss.2657 - 2663, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| ISNAD | ARICAK, BURAK. "Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example". (2020), 2657-2663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| APA | ARICAK B (2020). Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 8(12), 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| Chicago | ARICAK BURAK Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 8, no.12 (2020): 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| MLA | ARICAK BURAK Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.8, no.12, 2020, ss.2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| AMA | ARICAK B Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2020; 8(12): 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| Vancouver | ARICAK B Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2020; 8(12): 2657 - 2663. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| IEEE | ARICAK B "Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 8, ss.2657 - 2663, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
| ISNAD | ARICAK, BURAK. "Determination of Suitable Areas for Biocomfort Using the Summer Simmer Index with the Help of GIS; Samsun Example". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 8/12 (2020), 2657-2663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i12.2657-2663.3854 |
