Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 760 - 769 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.28948/ngumuh.685509 İndeks Tarihi: 04-06-2021

ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER

Öz:
Teknolojinin hızlı gelişimi ile birlikte kentsel, tarımsal, endüstriyel ve rekreasyonel su ihtiyacının artış gösterdiği son dönemde arıtılmış kentsel atıksuların sulama amaçlı kullanımı büyük bir potansiyel su kaynağı olarak görülmektedir. Ancak özellikle ikincil arıtılmış atıksularda yeterli düzeyde giderilemeyen mikrokirleticilerin varlığı yeni bir endişe kaynağıdır. Bu tür atıksuların ileri arıtım teknikleri ile üçüncül arıtım yapıldıktan sonra sulamada kullanımı halk ve çevre sağlığı tehditlerini gidermek için zaruri bir ihtiyaçtır. Bu konuda arıtılmış atıksulardaki mikrokirleticilerden kaynaklanan çevresel riskler göz önüne alınmamaktadır. Ayrıca bu kirleticilerle ilgili deşarj standartlarının kabulündeki karmaşalar, atıksuların yeniden kullanımı/geri kazanımı önündeki engeller arasında yer almaktadır. Bu çalışma, kentsel arıtılmış atıksuların sulamada kullanımında endişe yaratan mikrokirleticiler, bu kirleticilerle ilgili yasal yönergeler, mikrokirleticilerin çevrede yaratacağı riskler ile bunların su ortamından uzaklaştırılması için uygulanan arıtma seçenekleri üzerine odaklanmıştır. Bu kapsamdakiliteratür çalışmaları, mikrokirleticilerin ileri arıtma proseslerinin yanı sıra yenilikçi hibrit uygulamalar ile yüksek verimlerde giderildikten sonra arıtılmış kentsel atıksuların sulamaya uygun hale getirilebileceğini vurgulamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE RISK OF MICROPOLLUTANTS WHEN THE USE OF TREATED URBAN WASTEWATER IN IRRIGATION

Öz:
The use of treated urban wastewater for irrigation has been seen as a major potential water source in the recent years, when theneed for urban, agricultural, industrial and recreational water has increased with the rapid development of technology.However, the presence of micropollutants is a new concern, which cannot be adequately removed, especially in secondarytreated wastewater. The use of this type of wastewater for irrigation after applying advanced tertiary treatment techniques is anessential requirement to eliminate public and environmental health threats. The environmental risks due to presence ofmicropollutants in the treated wastewater have not taken into consideration. Furthermore the confusion in accepting thedischarge standards related to these pollutants pose an obstacle for reuse/recovery of wastewater. The current study focused onmicro-pollutants that cause concern in the use of urban treated wastewater in irrigation, legal guidelines regarding thesepollutants, the risks that micro-pollutants will create in the environment and the treatment options applied to remove ofmicropollutants from the water environment. The studies investigated for this purposes indicate that treated urban wastewater can be made suitable to irrigation after removal at high efficiencies with innovative hybrid applications as well as advancedtreatment processes of micropollutants.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, “Kentsel Atıksu Arıtımı Yönetmeliği,” Ankara, Türkiye, R.G. Tarih-No: 08.01.2006- 26047, 2006.
  • [2] J. L. Acero, F. J. Benitez, A. I. Leal, F. J. Real, F. Teva, “Membrane filtration technologies applied to municipal secondary effluents for potential reuse,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 177, no. 1-3, May., pp. 390-398, 2010.
  • [3] F. Zanetti, G. De Luca, R. Sacchetti, “Performance of a full-scale membrane bioreactor system in treating municipal wastewater for reuse purposes,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 10, May., pp. 3768-3771, 2010.
  • [4] E. Can Doğan, A. Yaşar, Ü. Şen, C. Aydıner, “Water recovery from treated urban waswater by ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis for landscape irrigation,” Urban Water Journal, vol. 13, no. 6, Jan., pp. 553-568, 2016.
  • [5] P. Jin, X. Jin, X. C. Wang, X. Shi, “An analysis of the chemical safety of secondary effluent for reuse purposes and the requirement for advanced treatment,” Chemosphere, vol. 91, no. 4, Apr., pp. 558-562, 2013.
  • [6] N. R. Mizyed, “Challenges to treated wastewater reuse in arid and semi-arid areas,” Environmental Science Policy, vol. 25, Jan., pp. 186-195, 2013.
  • [7] J. Wang, Z. Tian, Y. Huo, M. Yang, X. Zheng, Y. Zhang, “Monitoring of 943 organic micropollutants in wastewater from municipal wastewater treatment plants with secondary and advanced treatment processes,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 67, May., pp. 309-317, 2018.
  • [8] B. Maryam ve H. Büyükgüngör, “Wastewater reclamation and reuse trends in Turkey: Opportunities and challenges,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 30, Aug., 100501, 2019.
  • [9] P. Verlicchi, A. Galletti, M. Petrovic, D. Barcelo, “Hospital effluents as a source of emerging pollutants: An overview of micropollutants and sustainable treatment options,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 389, no. 3-4, Aug., pp. 416-428, 2010.
  • [10]N. Rosman, W. N. W. Salleh, M. A. Mohamed, J. Jaafar, A. F. Ismail, Z. Harun, “Hybrid membrane filtration advanced oxidation processes for removal of pharmaceutical residue,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 532, Dec., pp. 236-260, 2018.
  • [11]C. Grandclément, I. Seyssiecq, A. Piram, P. Wong-Wah-Chung, G. Vanot, N. Tiliacos, N. Roche, P. Doumenq, “From the conventional biological wastewater treatment to hybrid processes, the evaluation of organic micropollutant removal: A Review,” Water Research, vol. 111, Mar., pp. 297-317, 2017.
  • [12]A. Yaşar, E. Can Doğan, A. Arslan, “Hastane atıksularında makro ve mikro kirleticiler ve arıtma seçenekleri,” Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, Apr., pp. 144-158, 2013.
  • [13]X. Y. Ma, X. C. Wang, X. C. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Wang, H. H. Ngo, “Micropollutants removal and health risk reduction in a water reclamation and ecological reuse system,” Water Research, vol. 138, July, pp. 272-281, 2018.
  • [14]P. Burkhardt-Holm, “Linking water quality to human health and environment: The fate of micropollutants, institute of water policy,” Institute of Water Policy, National University of Singapur, pp. 1-62, 2011.
  • [15]J. C. Prata, “Microplastics in wastewater: State of the knowledge on sources, fate and solutions,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 129, no. 1, Apr., pp. 262-265, 2018.
  • [16]M. Yurtsever, “Küresel plastik kirliliği nano-mikroplastik tehlikesi ve sürdürülebilirlik,” Çevre Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, no. 1, ISBN:978-605-7594-06-8, pp. 171-197, 2018.
  • [17]Z. Long, Z. Phan, W. Wang, J. Ren, X. Yu, L. Lin, H. Lin, H. Chen, X. Jin, “Microplastic abundance, characteristics and removal in wastewater treatment plants in a Coastal City of China,” Water Research, vol. 155, Feb., pp. 255-265, 2019.
  • [18]J. Sun, X. Dai, Q. Wang, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, B-J. Ni, “Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Detection, occurrence and removal,” Water Research, vol. 152, Jan., pp. 21-37, 2019.
  • [19]The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Annex-X, 2000.
  • [20] “Yerüstü Su Kalitesi Yönetmeliği ve Ekleri,” Ankara, Türkiye, R.G. Tarih ve Sayı: 30.11.2012-28483, 2012.
  • [21] “Yüzeysel Su Kalitesi Yönetimi Yönetmeliğinde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik ve Ekleri,” Ankara, Türkiye, R.G. Tarih ve Sayı: 10.08.2016-29797, 2016.
  • [22]M. O. Barbosa, N. F. F. Moreira, A. R. Ribeiro, M. F. R. Pereira, A. M. T. Silva, “Occurrence and removal of organic micropollutants: An overview of the watch list of EU Decision 2015/495,” Water Research, vol. 94, May, pp. 257- 279, 2016.
  • [23]J, Radjenovic, M. Petrovic, F. Ventura, D. Barcelo, “Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment,” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 14, Aug., pp. 3601-3610, 2008.
  • [24]K. Chon, S. J. Kim, J. Moon, J. Cho, “Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: An autopsy study of a pilot plant,” Water Research, vol. vol. 46, no. 6, Apr., pp. 1803-1816, 2012.
  • [25]P. Bhattacharya, S. Ghosh, A. Mukhopadhyay, “Efficiency of combined ceramic microfiltration and biosorbent based treatment of high organic composite wastewater: An approach for agricultural reuse,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1-2, June, pp. 38-49, 2013.
  • [26]C. Furlong, S. De Silva, K. Gan, L. Guthrie, R. Considine, “Risk management, financial evaluation and funding for wastewater and stormwater reuse projects,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 191, Apr., pp. 83-95, 2017.
  • [27]G. Murtaza, A. Ghafoor, M. Qadir, “Irrigation and soil management strategies for using saline-sodic water in a cotton wheat rotation,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 81, no. 1-2, Mar., pp. 98-114, 2006.
  • [28]C. Park, S-W. Hong, T. Hak Chung, Y-S. Choi, “Performance evaluation of pretreatment processes in integrated membrane system for wastewater reuse,” Desalination, vol. 250, no. 2, Jan., pp. 673-676, 2010.
  • [29]F. Pedrero, I. Kalavrouziotis, J. J. Alarcon, P. Koukoulakis, T. Asano, “Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture-review of some practices in Spain and Greece,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 97, no. 9, Sep., pp. 1233-1241, 2010.
  • [30]A. Kajenthira, A. Siddiqi, L. D. Anadon, “A new case for promoting wastewater reuse in Saudi Arabia: Bringing energy into the water equation,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 102, July, pp. 184-192, 2012.
  • [31]S. Bunani, E. Yörükoğlu, G. Sert, Ü. Yüksel, M. Yüksel, N. Kabay, “Application of nanofiltration for reuse of municipal wastewater and quality analysis,” Desalination, vol. 315, Apr., pp. 33-36, 2013.
  • [32]N. B. Goodman, R. J. Taylor, Z. Xie, Y. Gozukara, A. Clements, “A feasibility study of municipal wastewater desalination using electrodialysis reversal to provide recycled water for horticultural irrigation,” Desalination, vol. 317, May, pp. 77-83, 2013.
  • [33]D. Norton-Brandao, S. M. Scherrenberg, J. B. van Lier, “Reclamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes - A review of treatment technologies,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 122, June, pp. 85-98, 2013.
  • [34]S. Shanmuganathan, S. Vignesvaran, T. V. Nguyen, P. Loganathan, J. Kandasamy, “Use of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis in reclaiming micro-filtered biologically treated sewage effluent for irrigation,” Desalination, vol. 364, May, pp. 119-125, 2015.
  • [35]D. M. Revitt, E. Eriksson, E. Donner, “The implications of household greywater treatment and reuse for municipal wastewater flows and micropollutant loads,” Water Research, vol. 45, no. 4, Feb., pp. 1549-1560, 2011.
  • [36]L. Semerjian, A. Shanableh, M. H. Semreen, M. Smarai, “Human health risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in treated wastewater reused for non-potable applications in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates,” Environment International, vol. 121, no. 1, Dec., pp. 325-331, 2018.
  • [37]L. Fan, T. Nguyen, F. A. Roddick, J. L. Harris, “Low pressure membrane filtration of secondary effluent in water reuse: pre-treatment for fouling reduction,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 320, no. 1-2, July, pp. 135-142, 2008.
  • [38]P. Xu, C. Bellona, J. E. Drewes, “Fouling of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes during municipal wastewater reclamation: Membrane autopsy results from pilot scale investigations,” Journals of Membrane Science, vol. 353, no. 1-2, May, pp. 111-121, 2010.
  • [39]S. Bakopoulou, C. Emmanouil, A. Kungolos, “Assessment of wastewater effluent quality in Thessaly Region, Greece, for determining its irrigation reuse potential,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 74, no. 2, Feb., pp. 188- 194, 2011.
  • [40]M. Rygaard, P. J. Binning, H. J. Albrectsen, “Increasing urbanwater self-sufficiency: New era, new challenges,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, no. 1, Jan., pp. 185-194, 2011.
  • [41]E. Agrafioti ve E. Diamadopoulos, “A strategic plan for reuse of treated municipal wastewater for crop irrigation on the island of Crete,” Agricultural Water Management, vol. 105, Mar., pp. 57-64, 2012.
  • [42]L. D. Nghiem ve S. Hawkes, “Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): mechanisms and role of membrane pore size,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 57, no. 1, Oct., pp. 176-184, 2007.
  • [43]Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, “Su Kirliliği Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, Atıksu Arıtma Tesisleri Teknik Usuller Tebliği Ek:7,” Ankara, Türkiye, R.G. Tarih-No: 20.03.2010-27527, 2010.
  • [44]M. El Tokhy, H. F. Shaalan, A. M. Sharaky, N. M. Abd El-Monem, G. A. Al Bazedi, “Performance analysis of upgrading of secondary treated wastewater by nanofiltration,” World Applied Sciences Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, Oct., pp. 384-390, 2013.
  • [45]I. Michael, L. Rizzo, C. S. McArdell, C. M. Manaia, C. Merlin, T. Schwartz, C. Dagot, D. Fatta-Kassinos, “Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for the release of antibiotics in the environment: A review,” Water Research, vol. 47, no. 3, Mar., pp. 957-995, 2013.
  • [46]A. Blstakova, I. Bodik, L. Dancova, Z. Jacubcova, “Domestic wastewater treatment with membrane filtration – two years experience,” Desalination, vol. 240, no. 1-3, May, pp. 160-169, 2009.
  • [47]Y. Li, S. Zhang, W. Zhang, W. Xiong, Q. Ye, X. Hou, C. Wang, “Life cycle assessment of advanced wastewater treatment processes: involving 126 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in life cycle inventory,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 238, May, pp. 442-450, 2019.
  • [48]T. Zhou, T-T. Lima, S-S. Chind, A. G. Fane, “Treatment of organics in reverse osmosis concentrate from a municipal wastewater reclamation plant: feasibility test of advanced oxidation processes with/without pretreatment,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 166, no. 3, Feb., pp. 932–939, 2011.
  • [49]S. O. Ganiyu, E. D. van Hullebusch, M. Cretin, G. Esposito, M. A. Oturan, “Coupling of membrane filtration and advanced oxidation processes for removal of pharmaceutical residues: A critical review,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 156, no. 3, Dec., pp. 891-914, 2015.
  • [50]J. Talvitie, A. Mikola, A. Koistinen, O. Setala, “Solutions to Microplastic Pollution – Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies,” Water Research, vol. 123, Oct., pp. 401-407, 2017.
  • [51]H. Vatankhah, S. M. Riley, C. Murray, O. Quinones, K. X. Steirer, E. R. V. Dickenson, C. Bellona, “Simultaneous ozone and granular activated carbon for advanced treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater effluent,” Chemosphere, vol. 234, Nov., pp. 845-854, 2019.
  • [52]M. H. Semreen, A. Shanableh, L. Semerjian, H. Alniss, M. Mousa, X. Bai, K. Acharya, “Simultaneous determination of pharmaceuticals by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandemmass spectrometry: a case study from Sharjah Sewage Treatment Plant,” Molecules, vol. 24, Feb., pp. 633, 2019.
  • [53]F. Martinez, M. J. Lopez-Munoz, J. Aguado, J. A. Melero, J. Arsuaga, A. Sotto, R. Molina, Y. Segura, M. I. Pariente, A. Revilla, L. Cerro, G. Carenas, “Coupling membrane separation and photocatalytic oxidation processes for the degradation of pharmaceutical pollutants,” Water Research, vol. 47, no. 15, Oct., pp. 5647-5658, 2013.
  • [54]R. L. Fernandez, J. A. McDonald, S. J. Khan, P. Le-Clech, “Removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting chemicals by a submerged membrane photocatalysis reactor (MPR),” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 127, Apr., pp. 131-139, 2014.
  • [55]D, Papaioannou, P. H. Koukoulakis, M. Papageorgiou, D. A. Lambropoulou, I. K. Kalavrouziotis, “Investigation of pharmaceutical and personal care product interactions of soil and beets (beta vulgaris l.) under the effect of wastewater reuse,” Chemosphere, vol. 238, Jan., 124553, 2020.
APA Yaşar A, CAN DOGAN E (2020). ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. , 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
Chicago Yaşar Aynur,CAN DOGAN ESRA ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. (2020): 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
MLA Yaşar Aynur,CAN DOGAN ESRA ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. , 2020, ss.760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
AMA Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. . 2020; 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
Vancouver Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. . 2020; 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
IEEE Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E "ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER." , ss.760 - 769, 2020. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
ISNAD Yaşar, Aynur - CAN DOGAN, ESRA. "ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER". (2020), 760-769. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.685509
APA Yaşar A, CAN DOGAN E (2020). ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
Chicago Yaşar Aynur,CAN DOGAN ESRA ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 9, no.2 (2020): 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
MLA Yaşar Aynur,CAN DOGAN ESRA ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.9, no.2, 2020, ss.760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
AMA Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 9(2): 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
Vancouver Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020; 9(2): 760 - 769. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
IEEE Yaşar A,CAN DOGAN E "ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER." Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 9, ss.760 - 769, 2020. 10.28948/ngumuh.685509
ISNAD Yaşar, Aynur - CAN DOGAN, ESRA. "ARITILMIŞ KENTSEL ATIKSULARIN SULAMADA KULLANIMINDAMİKROKİRLETİCİLERİN OLUŞTURABİLECEĞİ RİSKLER". Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 9/2 (2020), 760-769. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.685509