Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 129 - 136 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201 İndeks Tarihi: 05-06-2021

Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) suture tape augmentation (STA) and ACL reconstruction after a minimum follow-up of two years.Patientsandmethods:This retrospective study included 63 patients (36 males, 27 females; mean age 27.8±4.0; range, 19 to 35 years) who had unilateral ACL injury and participated in pivoting sports and were randomly assigned to undergo either isolated ACL reconstruction (Group 1, n=33) or combined ACL reconstruction and ALL STA (Group 2, n=30) between January 2015 and February 2018. The presence of an associated meniscal injury, chondral pathology, contralateral ACL rupture, and residual pivot shift; subjective and objective International Knee Documentation Committee scores; Cincinnati and Lysholm functional scores; KT-1000 measurements; and graft rupture rate were evaluated.Results: Patients were followed for a minimum of two years. The groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, side, time from injury to surgery, postoperative follow-up time, ACL graft size, contralateral ACL rupture, graft size, partial meniscectomy, chondral pathology or preoperative physical examination results. A total of 9.1% of the patients in Group 1 and 0% of those in Group 2 presented postoperative positive pivot shift (p=0.357). The graft failure rate was 6.06% (n=2) in Group 1 and 0% in Group 2 (p=0.270). In the final evaluation, compared with Group 1, Group 2 showed better anteroposterior clinical stability, as evaluated by KT-1000 arthrometry (p=0.006). Although better results were observed in Group 2, the clinical evaluation results for postoperative function did not differ significantly between groups.Conclusion: Combined ALL STA and ACL reconstruction was found to be effective in improving subjective and objective outcomes. Nevertheless, these findings were not significantly superior to those of isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring grafts, except for the side-to-side differential anterior laxity testing results.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Atik OŞ. Surgical versus conservative treatment for torn anterior cruciate ligament. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:159-60.
  • 2. Prodromos CC, Han Y, Rogowski J, Joyce B, Shi K. A metaanalysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy 2007;23:1320-5.e6.
  • 3. Ajuied A, Wong F, Smith C, Norris M, Earnshaw P, Back D, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2242-52.
  • 4. Nebelung W, Wuschech H. Thirty-five years of follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees in high-level athletes. Arthroscopy 2005;21:696-702.
  • 5. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 2009;25:1139-74.
  • 6. Ibrahim SA, Shohdy EM, Marwan Y, Ramadan SA, Almisfer AK, Mohammad MW, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee with or without reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1558-66.
  • 7. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:975-83.
  • 8. Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003;11:360-5.
  • 9. Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V, Moraiti C, Stergiou N. Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;454:89-94.
  • 10. Alp NB, Akdağ G, Kaleli T, Macunluoğlu AC, Uzunlulu N. Evaluation of patellar tendon with shear wave elastography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:137-42.
  • 11. Sofu H, Sahin V, Gürsu S, Yıldırım T, Issın A, Ordueri M. Use of quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative analysis of clinical results. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2013;24:139-43.
  • 12. Monaco E, Mazza D, Redler A, Drogo P, Wolf MR, Ferretti A. Anterolateral ligament repair augmented with suture tape in acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 2019;8:e369-73.
  • 13. Heusdens CHW, Hopper GP, Dossche L, Mackay GM. Anterolateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 2018;7:e1311-e4.
  • 14. Inderhaug E, Stephen JM, Williams A, Amis AA. Anterolateral tenodesis or anterolateral ligament complex reconstruction: effect of flexion angle at graft fixation when combined with ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:3089-97.
  • 15. Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:1598-605.
  • 16. Getgood A, Brown C, Lording T, Amis A, Claes S, Geeslin A, et al. The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019;27:166-76.
  • 17. Dabis J, Wilson A. Repair and augmentation with internal brace in the multiligament injured knee. Clin Sports Med 2019;38:275-83.
  • 18. Sonnery-Cottet B, Barbosa NC, Tuteja S, Daggett M, Kajetanek C, Thaunat M. Minimally invasive anterolateral ligament reconstruction in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:e211-5.
  • 19. Helito CP, Sobrado MF, Giglio PN, Bonadio MB, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, et al. Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury and ligamentous hyperlaxity leads to better clinical stability and a lower failure rate than isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2019;35:2648-54.
  • 20. Atik OŞ. Is there something new and interesting in my article? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:69.
  • 21. Chouliaras V, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Stergiou N, Georgoulis AD. Effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotation. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:189-96.
  • 22. Roessler PP, Schüttler KF, Heyse TJ, Wirtz DC, Efe T. The anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its role in rotational extra-articular stability of the knee joint: a review of anatomy and surgical concepts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016;136:305-13.
  • 23. Smith JO, Yasen SK, Lord B, Wilson AJ. Combined anterolateral ligament and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23:3151-6.
  • 24. Pomajzl R, Maerz T, Shams C, Guettler J, Bicos J. A review of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: current knowledge regarding its incidence, anatomy, biomechanics, and surgical dissection. Arthroscopy 2015;31:583-91.
  • 25. Parsons EM, Gee AO, Spiekerman C, Cavanagh PR. The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:669-74.
  • 26. Kennedy MI, Claes S, Fuso FA, Williams BT, Goldsmith MT, Turnbull TL, et al. The anterolateral ligament: An anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:1606-15.
  • 27. Delaloye JR, Murar J, Gonzalez M, Amaral T, Kakatkar V, Sonnery-Cottet B. Clinical outcomes after combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Tech Orthop 2018;33:225-31.
  • 28. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Giordano G, Iacono F, Presti ML. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction associated with extra-articular tenodesis: A prospective clinical and radiographic evaluation with 10- to 13-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:707-14.
  • 29. Ferretti A, Monaco E, Ponzo A, Basiglini L, Iorio R, Caperna L, et al. Combined Intra-articular and Extra-articular Reconstruction in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee: 25 Years Later. Arthroscopy 2016;32:2039-47.
  • 30. Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Cavalier M, Kajetanek C, Temponi EF, Daggett M, et al. Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Significantly Reduced ACL Graft Rupture Rates at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study of 502 Patients From the SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1547-57.
APA Erden T, toker m, TOPRAK A, Taşer Ö (2021). Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
Chicago Erden Tunay,toker mehmet berkin,TOPRAK Ali,Taşer Ömer Faruk Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. (2021): 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
MLA Erden Tunay,toker mehmet berkin,TOPRAK Ali,Taşer Ömer Faruk Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2021, ss.129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
AMA Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. . 2021; 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
Vancouver Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. . 2021; 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
IEEE Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö "Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction." , ss.129 - 136, 2021. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
ISNAD Erden, Tunay vd. "Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction". (2021), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
APA Erden T, toker m, TOPRAK A, Taşer Ö (2021). Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joint diseases and related surgery, 32(1), 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
Chicago Erden Tunay,toker mehmet berkin,TOPRAK Ali,Taşer Ömer Faruk Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joint diseases and related surgery 32, no.1 (2021): 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
MLA Erden Tunay,toker mehmet berkin,TOPRAK Ali,Taşer Ömer Faruk Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joint diseases and related surgery, vol.32, no.1, 2021, ss.129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
AMA Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2021; 32(1): 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
Vancouver Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2021; 32(1): 129 - 136. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
IEEE Erden T,toker m,TOPRAK A,Taşer Ö "Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction." Joint diseases and related surgery, 32, ss.129 - 136, 2021. 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201
ISNAD Erden, Tunay vd. "Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction". Joint diseases and related surgery 32/1 (2021), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.78201