Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 185 - 191 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465 İndeks Tarihi: 05-06-2021

Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union

Öz:
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the reliability of the radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures and modified RUST (mRUST) fractures in pediatric forearm fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) and to investigate the effect of the experience of surgeon, thresholds for union, and delayed union decisions.Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, radiographic images of 20 patients (10 males, 10 females; mean age 8.6±4.3; range, 4 to 11 years) with forearm fractures treated using ESIN between January 2013 and December 2018 were scored by 20 observers based on the RUST and mRUST scores. The observers scored the radiographs at immediate postoperative period, and at 4-, 8-, and 12-week follow-up. Intra- and interobserver agreement for each cortex, RUST, and mRUST were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Fleiss’ kappa (k) coefficient was used in the agreement between evaluators regarding union decision. Receiver operating curves were created to determine the thresholds for radiographic union and delayed union.Results: Intra- and interobserver reliability of the mRUST score (ICC: 0.84 and 0.79) were slightly higher than that of the RUST score (ICC: 0.80 and 0.72). Pediatric orthopedic and trauma surgeons had slightly higher agreement than the residents and general orthopedists for the total mRUST and RUST scores of the eight-week radiographs. Mean RUST and mRUST scores at the union for all fractures were 10.2±3.4 and 13.0±2.1, respectively. Kappa value for union was moderate (0.74). The total mRUST score had a higher predictive value for union than the total RUST score (area under the curve: 0.986 vs. 0.889). A mRUST score of ≥12 and RUST score of ≥9 were considered as the predictors of union. In addition, a mRUST score of ≤7 and RUST score of <9 were considered as the predictors of delayed union.Conclusion: A moderate agreement for both RUST and mRUST scores was found. However, the agreement for mRUST was found to be slightly higher. Healing and union of forearm fractures treated with ESIN can be reliably assessed using RUST and mRUST.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Litrenta J, Tornetta P 3rd, Mehta S, Jones C, OʼToole RV, Bhandari M, et al. Determination of radiographic healing: an assessment of consistency using RUST and Modified RUST in metadiaphyseal fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:516-20.
  • 2. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:562-6.
  • 3. Kooistra BW, Sprague S, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Outcomes assessment in fracture healing trials: a primer. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24 Suppl 1:S71-5.
  • 4. Dijkman BG, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. When is a fracture healed? Radiographic and clinical criteria revisited. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24 Suppl 1:S76-80.
  • 5. Fisher JS, Kazam JJ, Fufa D, Bartolotta RJ. Radiologic evaluation of fracture healing. Skeletal Radiol 2019;48:349-61.
  • 6. Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24 Suppl 1:S81-6.
  • 7. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 2010;68:629-32.
  • 8. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD, Guyatt GH, Kreder HJ, Stephen D, et al.. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84:15-8.
  • 9. DiSilvio F Jr, Foyil S, Schiffman B, Bernstein M, Summers H, Lack WD. Long bone union accurately predicted by cortical bridging within 4 Months. JB JS Open Access 2018;3:e0012.
  • 10. Prosser I, Lawson Z, Evans A, Harrison S, Morris S, Maguire S, et al. A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198:1014-20.
  • 11. Morgan EF, Mason ZD, Chien KB, Pfeiffer AJ, Barnes GL, Einhorn TA, et al. Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. Bone 2009;44:335-44.
  • 12. Schell H, Duda GN, Peters A, Tsitsilonis S, Johnson KA, Schmidt-Bleek K. The haematoma and its role in bone healing. J Exp Orthop 2017;4:5.
  • 13. Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S, Davidson LK, Ashworth MA, Babyn P. Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:75-8.
  • 14. Richards BS, Wilkes D, Dempsey M, Nurenberg P. A radiographic scoring system to assess healing in congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J Pediatr Orthop B 2015;24:118-22.
  • 15. Franzone JM, Finkelstein MS, Rogers KJ, Kruse RW. Evaluation of fracture and osteotomy union in the setting of osteogenesis imperfecta: reliability of the modified radiographic union score for tibial fractures (RUST). J Pediatr Orthop 2020;40:48-52.
  • 16. Leow JM, Clement ND, Tawonsawatruk T, Simpson CJ, Simpson AH. The radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures: Reliability of the outcome measure at an independent centre. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:116-21.
  • 17. Patel SP, Anthony SG, Zurakowski D, Didolkar MM, Kim PS, Wu JS, et al. Radiographic scoring system to evaluate union of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:1471-9.
  • 18. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155-63.
  • 19. Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1315-6.
  • 20. Atik OŞ. What are the expectations of an editor from a scientific article? Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:597-8.
  • 21. Lobo-Escolar A, Roche A, Bregante J, Gil-Alvaroba J, Sola A, Herrera A. Delayed union in pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32:54-7.
  • 22. Shrader MW, Stans AA, Shaughnessy WJ, Haidukewych GJ. Nonunion of fractures in pediatric patients: 15-year experience at a level I trauma center. Orthopedics 2009;32:410.
  • 23. Kapoor V, Theruvil B, Edwards SE, Taylor GR, Clarke NM, Uglow MG. Flexible intramedullary nailing of displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Injury 2005;36:1221-5.
  • 24. Garg NK, Ballal MS, Malek IA, Webster RA, Bruce CE. Use of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for treating unstable forearm fractures in children. J Trauma 2008;65:109-15.
  • 25. Berger P, De Graaf JS, Leemans R. The use of elastic intramedullary nailing in the stabilisation of paediatric fractures. Injury 2005;36:1217-20.
  • 26. Schmittenbecher PP, Fitze G, Gödeke J, Kraus R, Schneidmüller D. Delayed healing of forearm shaft fractures in children after intramedullary nailing. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:303-6.
  • 27. Baitner AC, Perry A, Lalonde FD, Bastrom TP, Pawelek J, Newton PO. The healing forearm fracture: a matched comparison of forearm refractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27:743-7.
APA Kızkapan T, Misir A, oguzkaya s, Özçamdallı M, uzun e, Sayer G (2021). Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. , 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
Chicago Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal,Sayer Gokhan Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. (2021): 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
MLA Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal,Sayer Gokhan Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. , 2021, ss.185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
AMA Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. . 2021; 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
Vancouver Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. . 2021; 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
IEEE Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G "Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union." , ss.185 - 191, 2021. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
ISNAD Kızkapan, Turan bilge vd. "Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union". (2021), 185-191. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
APA Kızkapan T, Misir A, oguzkaya s, Özçamdallı M, uzun e, Sayer G (2021). Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. Joint diseases and related surgery, 32(1), 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
Chicago Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal,Sayer Gokhan Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. Joint diseases and related surgery 32, no.1 (2021): 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
MLA Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal,Sayer Gokhan Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. Joint diseases and related surgery, vol.32, no.1, 2021, ss.185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
AMA Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2021; 32(1): 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
Vancouver Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union. Joint diseases and related surgery. 2021; 32(1): 185 - 191. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
IEEE Kızkapan T,Misir A,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e,Sayer G "Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union." Joint diseases and related surgery, 32, ss.185 - 191, 2021. 10.5606/ehc.2021.78465
ISNAD Kızkapan, Turan bilge vd. "Reliability of radiographic union scale in tibial fractures and modified radiographic union scale in tibial fractures scores in the evaluation of pediatric forearm fracture union". Joint diseases and related surgery 32/1 (2021), 185-191. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.78465