Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 31 - 40 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/jems.2021.32448 İndeks Tarihi: 08-06-2021

Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code

Öz:
Polar regions face increasing challenges resulting from the interactions between global climate change, human activities, and economic and political pressures. As the sea ice extent trends diminish, maritime operations have started increasing in these regions. In this respect, an international concern has arisen for the shrinking of sea ice, preserving the environment, and passengers’ and seafarers’ safety. The International Maritime Organization has enforced the Polar Code (PC) for the ships navigating in these challenging Arctic and Antarctic waters. Polar regions are similar in some aspects but exhibit significant differences in geographical conditions, maritime activities, and legal status. Therefore, the PC that applies to both regions should be reconsidered, accounting for the differences between the areas for further development. This study considers the Arctic and Antarctic geographical differences relevant to the PC’s scope. The emphasis is placed on the changes regarding the sea ice extent and sea ice condition differences in the two regions, which are essential in maritime safety. This study also addresses the aspects of the PC that need improvement.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] Z. Sun, and R. Beckman, “The Development of the Polar Code and Challenges to Its Implementation,” In Global Commons and the Law of the Sea, vol. 5, Brill Nijhoff, 2018, pp. 303-325.
  • [2] T. Zieliński, M. Darecki, and J. M. Węsławski, (n.d.). CLIMATERELATED CHANGES IN THE ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT, EduCO2cean Magazine. http://magazine.educo2cean.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/2/2018/03/9.-CLIMATE-RELATEDCHANGES-IN-THE-ARCTIC-ENVIRONMENT.pdf
  • [3] THE ANTARCTIC TREATY. (n.d.) https://www.ats.aq/e/ antarctictreaty.html.
  • [4] I. Simmonds, “Comparing and contrasting the behaviour of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice over the 35 year period 1979-2013,” Annals of Glaciology, vol. 56, pp. 18-28, 2015.
  • [5] O. A. Anisimov, et al. 2007: Polar regions (Arctic and Antarctic). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 653-685.
  • [6] T. Maksym, S. E. Stammerjohn, S. Ackley, and R. Massom, “Antarctic sea ice-a polar opposite?” Oceanography, vol. 25, pp. 140-151, September 2012.
  • [7] R. K. Pachauri et al. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 151, 2014.
  • [8] V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, et al. Global warming of 1.5°C An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, Summary for Policymakers Edited by Science Officer Science Assistant Graphics Officer, Working Group I Technical Support Unit. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/ sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_Low_Res.pdf
  • [9] Climate Change | United Nations. (n.d.). Retrieved February 6, 2020, from https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/ climate-change/
  • [10] R. Gerdes, and C. Koeberle, “Comparison of Arctic sea ice thickness variability in IPCC climate of the 20th century experiments and in ocean-sea ice hindcasts,” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 112, April 2007.
  • [11] J. E. Overland, and M. Wang, “When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free?” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 40, pp. 2097-2101, March 2013.
  • [12] J. C. Stroeve, T. Markus, L. Boisvert, J. Miller, and A. Barrett, “Changes in Arctic melt season and implications for sea ice loss,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 41, pp. 1216-1225, February 2014.
  • [13] D. Notz, and J. Stroeve, “The trajectory towards a seasonally icefree Arctic ocean.” Current Climate Change Reports, vol. 4 pp. 407-416, September 2018.
  • [14] T. S. Rogers, J. E. Walsh, T. S. Rupp, L. W. Brigham, and M. Sfraga, “Future Arctic marine access: Analysis and evaluation of observations, models, and projections of sea ice.” The Cryosphere Discussions, Publisher: European Geosciences Union vol. 7 pp. 321-332, February 2013.
  • [15] C. L. Parkinson, “A 40-y record reveals gradual Antarctic sea ice increases followed by decreases at rates far exceeding the rates seen in the Arctic,” Inaugural Article, vol. 116, pp. 14414-14423, Jul 2019.
  • [16] M. Humpert, and A. Raspotnik, “The future of Arctic shipping along the transpolar sea route,” August 2012.
  • [17] Arctic Shipping: Navigating the Risks and Opportunities, 2014. https://www.marsh.com/us/insights/research/arcticshipping-navigating-risks-opportunities.html
  • [18] L. C. Smith, and S. R. Stephenson, “New Trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, pp. 1191-1195, March 2013.
  • [19] Issue 328. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214212
  • [20] B. Şahin, Y. E. Şenol, and Ş. E. Kartal, “Swot analysis of transportation in the arctic region,” Published Abstract Title: ©XII. International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, Paper Title Papers: Supply Chains of the Future, pp. 669-683, October 2014.
  • [21] O. J. Borch, “Offshore service vessels in high arctic oil and gas field logistics operations: fleet configuration and the functional demands of cargo supply and emergency response vessels,” 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2486368.
  • [22] N. A. Marchenko, O. J. Borch, S. V. Markov, and N. Andreassen, “Maritime Safety in The High North - Risk and Preparedness,” The 26th Int. Ocean and Polar Eng. Conf. Rhodes, Greece [Online]. Available: https://onepetro.org/ISOPEIOPEC/proceedingsabstract/ISOPE16/All-ISOPE16/ISOPE-I-16-363/17796. [Accessed: 26 June 2016].
  • [23] J. C. Erazo, “The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University, Shipping in Antarctica : can safety and environmental protection be addressed considering the existing legal regimes?,” World Maritime University, 2009. https://commons.wmu.se/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1346&context=all_dissertations
  • [24] A. Council, “Arctic marine shipping assessment,” January 2009. https://pame.is/projects/arctic-marine-shipping/57-projects/ amsa/amsa-2009-report
  • [25] D. Palma et al. “Cruising the marginal ice zone: climate change and Arctic tourism,” Polar Geography, vol. 42, pp. 215-235, August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2019.1648585
  • [26] Report on IAATO Operator Use of Antarctic Peninsula Landing Sites and ATCM Visitor Site Guidelines, 2018-19 Season, Information Paper submitted by IAATO. pp. 142-143, 2019.
  • [27] C. Erbe et al. “Managing the effects of noise from ship traffic, seismic surveying and construction on marine mammals in Antarctica,” Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 6, pp. 647, November 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00647
  • [28] ASOC. Antarctic Shipping, pp. 1-13, June 2008. http://www. asoc.org/storage/documents/Meetings/ATCM/XXXI/ASOC_IP_ on_shipping_050108_final.pdf
  • [29] S. Ghosh, and C. Rubly, “The emergence of Arctic shipping: issues, threats, costs, and risk-mitigating strategies of the Polar Code,” Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, vol. 7, pp. 171-182, October 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.20 15.1093695
  • [30] S. Kum, and B. Şahin, “A survey on ice navigation research,” Transactions of navigation, vol. 1, pp. 23-28, 2016.
  • [31] Marchenko, N. “Navigation in the Russian Arctic: Sea Ice Caused Difficulties and Accidents.” Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Eng. vol. 6: Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology; Offshore Geotechnics; Petroleum Technology Symposium. Nantes, France. Jun 9-14, 2013. V006T07A011. ASME.
  • [32] B. Şahin, “Risk assessment and marine accident analysis in icecovered waters.” Institute of Science and Technology, April 2015.
  • [33] S. Kum, and B. Sahin, “A root cause analysis for Arctic Marine accidents from 1993 to 2011,” Safety Science, vol. 74, pp. 206- 220, April 2015.
  • [34] B. Sahin, S. Kum, “Route selection approach for vessels in ice covered waters,” Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, vol. 3, pp. 1-4, December 2014.
  • [35] S. Sandven, O. M. Johannessen, and K. Kloster, “Sea ice monitoring by remote sensing,” In book: Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, vol. 6, pp. 241-283, September 2006.
  • [36] P. J. Cullen, “Polarworthiness: A new standard of seaworthiness in the polar context?” Polar Shipping and Arctic Development Symposium 42nd International Conference of the CMI, New York: May 2016.
  • [37] R. Kwok, and D. A. Rothrock, “Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958-2008,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, August 2009. https://doi. org/10.1029/2009GL039035
  • [38] Sea ice ecosystems - MarineSpecies Introduced Traits Wiki. (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2020, from http://www.marinespecies. org/introduced/wiki/Sea_ice_ecosystems
  • [39] M. Spindler, “A comparison of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice and the effects of different properties on sea ice biota,” In Geological history of the polar oceans: Arctic versus Antarctic, vol. 308, pp. 173-186, 1990.
  • [40] T. Maksym, “Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice Change: Contrasts, Commonalities, and Causes,” Annual Review of Marine Science, vol. 11, pp. 187-213, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevmarine-010816-060610
  • [41] D. J. Cavalieri, and C. L. Parkinson, “Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979-2010,” The Cryosphere, vol. 6, pp. 881-889, August 2012. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-881-2012
  • [42] Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag. (n.d.). Retrieved November 5, 2019, from http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
  • [43] J. Zhang et al. “Melt pond conditions on declining Arctic Sea ıce over 1979-2016: Model development, validation, and results,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 123, pp. 7983-8003, October 2018.
  • [44] Ice shelves. Ice Shelf Collapse (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2020, from http://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/ shrinking-ice-shelves/ice-shelves/
  • [45] G. Dieckmann, G. Rohardt, H. Hellmer, and J. Kipfstuhl, “The occurrence of ice platelets at 250 m depth near the Filchner Ice Shelf and its significance for sea ice biology,” Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, vol. 33, pp. 141-148, February 1986.
  • [46] Sea ice | ice formation | Britannica. (n.d.). Retrieved May 21, 2020, from https://www.britannica.com/science/seaice#ref908438
  • [47] Ø. Jensen, “The IMO Guidelines for Ships Operating in Arctic Ice-covered Waters: From Voluntary to Mandatory Tool for Navigation Safety and Environmental Protection,” FNI-Report 2/2007.
  • [48] The Developing International Maritime Organization Polar Code - Arctic Yearbook. (n.d.). Retrieved March 25, 2020, from https://arcticyearbook.com/arctic-yearbook/2014/2014- commentaries/108-the-developing-international-maritimeorganization-polar-code
  • [49] Ø. Jensen, “The international code for ships operating in polar waters: finalization, adoption and law of the sea implications,” Arctic Review on Law and Politics, vol. 7, pp. 60- 82, May 2016.
  • [50] Polar Code. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2020, from http://www.imo. org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/polar/Pages/default.aspx
  • [51] L. Fedi, POLARIS in the Arctic, pp. 58-71, 2018.
  • [52] L. Fedi, O. Faury, and D. Gritsenko, “The impact of the Polar Code on risk mitigation in Arctic waters: a “toolbox” for underwriters?” Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 45, pp. 478-494, March 2018.
  • [53] B. Ozsoy-Cicek, S. F. Ackley, A. Worby, H. Xie, and J. Lieser, “Antarctic sea-ice extents and concentrations: comparison of satellite and ship measurements from International Polar Year cruises.” Annals of Glaciology, vol. 52, pp. 318-326, 2011.
  • [54] 25 years servicing NASA’s Earth Observing System data | National Snow and Ice Data Center. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://nsidc.org/nsidc-monthly-highlights/2018/08/25- years-servicing-nasa’s-earth-observing-system-data
  • [55] ICESat-2 | National Snow and Ice Data Center. (n.d.). Retrieved May 3, 2020, from https://nsidc.org/data/ICESat-2
  • [56] M. Karahalil, B. Ozsoy, and O. Oktar, “Polar Code application areas in the Arctic.” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, vol. 19, pp. 219-234, May 2020.
  • [57] PAME. (2020). THE INCREASE IN ARCTIC SHIPPING. Retrieved from https://storymaps.arcgis.com/ stories/592bfe70251741b48b0a9786b75ff5d0/print
  • [58] L. D. Talley, G. L. Pickard, W. J. Emery, and J. H. Swift, “Arctic Ocean and Nordic Seas,” in Descriptive Physical Oceanography, 6th ed., 2011, pp. 401-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506- 4552-2.10012-5
  • [59] Ice Drift - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Retrieved December 16, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/ topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/ice-drift
  • [60] FINAL REPORT Antarctic Search and Rescue (SAR) Workshop IV Improving SAR Coordination and Response in the Antarctic Antarctic Search and Rescue (SAR) Workshop IV Improving SAR Coordination and Response in the Antarctic, pp. 15-16, May 2019.
  • [61] B. Şahin, “Route prioritization by using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process extended dijkstra algorithm.” Journal of ETA Maritime Science, vol. 7, pp. 3-15, March 2019. https://doi.org/10.5505/ jems.2019.39306
  • [62] E. J. Stewart, and D. Draper, “The sinking of the MS Explorer: Implications for cruise tourism in Arctic Canada” Arctic, vol. 61, pp. 224-228, June 2008.
  • [63] Explorer - Final Report.PDF. (n.d.). http://www.photobits.com/ dl/Explorer%20-%20Final%20Report.PDF
  • [64] M. Karahalil, and B. Özsoy, “Arctic shipping and human risk factors,” The Journal of Ocean Technology, vol. 13, pp. 107-114, March 2018
APA Karahalil M, OZSOY B (2021). Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. , 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
Chicago Karahalil Meric,OZSOY BURCU Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. (2021): 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
MLA Karahalil Meric,OZSOY BURCU Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. , 2021, ss.31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
AMA Karahalil M,OZSOY B Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. . 2021; 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
Vancouver Karahalil M,OZSOY B Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. . 2021; 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
IEEE Karahalil M,OZSOY B "Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code." , ss.31 - 40, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
ISNAD Karahalil, Meric - OZSOY, BURCU. "Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code". (2021), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.32448
APA Karahalil M, OZSOY B (2021). Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9(1), 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
Chicago Karahalil Meric,OZSOY BURCU Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9, no.1 (2021): 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
MLA Karahalil Meric,OZSOY BURCU Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, vol.9, no.1, 2021, ss.31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
AMA Karahalil M,OZSOY B Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(1): 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
Vancouver Karahalil M,OZSOY B Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code. Journal of Eta Maritime Science. 2021; 9(1): 31 - 40. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
IEEE Karahalil M,OZSOY B "Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code." Journal of Eta Maritime Science, 9, ss.31 - 40, 2021. 10.4274/jems.2021.32448
ISNAD Karahalil, Meric - OZSOY, BURCU. "Assessment of Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice ConditionDifferences in the Scope of the Polar Code". Journal of Eta Maritime Science 9/1 (2021), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2021.32448