Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 66 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 436 - 443 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781 İndeks Tarihi: 10-06-2021

The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia

Öz:
objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) for Turkish patients with fibromyalgia (FM).Patients and methods: Between February 2011 and September 2011, a total of 120 female patients (mean age 45±9.1 years; range, 20 to 60 years) admitted to our outpatient clinic with extensive pain and fatigue and diagnosed with FM according to 1990 and 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria were included in this study. The MFI-20 was translated according to forward-backward translation procedure. For the test-retest reliability, the patients re-filled out the scale 48 hours after the first application. Structural validity was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was assessed by internal consistency with Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). For convergent validity, Spearman rho correlation coefficient was used for relevance analysis with the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), visual analog scale (VAS)-pain, VAS-fatigue, and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires.results: The total Cronbach alpha coefficient was found to be 0.92 (range, 0.78 to 0.93). The CFA showed good structural validity and revealed five dimensions. The ICC coefficient was found to be 0.934. All correlation coefficients between the MFI and FIS were calculated as above 0.80, indicating a strong relationship.conclusion: The results of this study show that the Turkish version of the MFI-20 has a high internal consistency and reasonable construct validity. It is a valid and reliable measurement of the assessment of fatigue in patients with FM multidimensionality.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gerdle B, Björk J, Cöster L, Henriksson K, Henriksson C, Bengtsson A. Prevalence of widespread pain and associations with work status: a population study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:102.
  • 2. Rutledge DN, Jones K, Jones CJ. Predicting high physical function in people with fibromyalgia. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39:319-24.
  • 3. Nicassio PM, Moxham EG, Schuman CE, Gevirtz RN. The contribution of pain, reported sleep quality, and depressive symptoms to fatigue in fibromyalgia. Pain 2002;100:271-9.
  • 4. Wolfe F, Hawley DJ, Wilson K. The prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 1996;23:1407-17.
  • 5. White KP, Speechley M, Harth M, Ostbye T. The London Fibromyalgia Epidemiology Study: comparing the demographic and clinical characteristics in 100 random community cases of fibromyalgia versus controls. J Rheumatol 1999;26:1577-85.
  • 6. Choy EH, Arnold LM, Clauw DJ, Crofford LJ, Glass JM, Simon LS, et al. Content and criterion validity of the preliminary core dataset for clinical trials in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 2009;36:2330-4.
  • 7. Guymer EK, Clauw DJ. Treatment of fatigue in fibromyalgia. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2002;28:367-78.
  • 8. Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995;39:315-25.
  • 9. Watt T, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Noerholm V, Rasmussen NA, Bech P. Fatigue in the Danish general population. Influence of sociodemographic factors and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:827-33.
  • 10. Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991;18:728-33.
  • 11. Arnold LM, Clauw D, Wang F, Ahl J, Gaynor PJ, Wohlreich MM. Flexible dosed duloxetine in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. J Rheumatol 2010;37:2578-86.
  • 12. Mannerkorpi K1, Nordeman L, Ericsson A, Arndorw M; GAU Study Group. Pool exercise for patients with fibromyalgia or chronic widespread pain: a randomized controlled trial and subgroup analyses. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:751-60.
  • 13. d’Elia HF, Rehnberg E, Kvist G, Ericsson A, Konttinen Y, Mannerkorpi K. Fatigue and blood pressure in primary Sjogren's syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol 2008;37:284-92.
  • 14. Rupp I, Boshuizen HC, Jacobi CE, Dinant HJ, van den Bos GA. Impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:578-85.
  • 15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417-32.
  • 16. Ericsson A, Bremell T, Mannerkorpi K. Usefulness of multiple dimensions of fatigue in fibromyalgia. J Rehabil Med 2013;45:685-93.
  • 17. Schneider RA. Preliminary data on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 from female caregivers of male hemodialysis patients. Psychol Rep 2001;88:699-700.
  • 18. Williams DA, Arnold LM. Measures of fibromyalgia: Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, and Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (MASQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:S86-97.
  • 19. Fisk JD, Ritvo PG, Ross L, Haase DA, Marrie TJ, Schlech WF. Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18(Suppl 1):S79-83.
  • 20. Frith J, Newton J. Fatigue Impact Scale. Occup Med (Lond) 2010;60:159.
  • 21. Armutlu K, Keser I, Korkmaz N, Akbiyik DI, Sümbüloğlu V, Güney Z, et al. Psychometric study of Turkish version of Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci 2007;255:64-8.
  • 22. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 1988;18:1007-19.
  • 23. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
  • 24. Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Ölmez N. F-36’nın Türkçe için güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. Ege Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 1999;12:102-6.
  • 25. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S15-20.
  • 26. George, D, Mallery, P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
  • 27. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
  • 28. Barrett PT. Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging Model Fit. Personality and Individual Differences 2007;42:815-24.
  • 29. Dittner AJ, Wessely SC, Brown RG. The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res 2004;56:157-70.
  • 30. Meek PM, Nail LM, Barsevick A, Schwartz AL, Stephen S, Whitmer K, et al. Psychometric testing of fatigue instruments for use with cancer patients. Nurs Res 2000;49:181-90.
  • 31. Tian J, Hong JS. Validation of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 in Chinese patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:2379-83.
  • 32. Fillion L, Gélinas C, Simard S, Savard J, Gagnon P. Validation evidence for the French Canadian adaptation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory as a measure of cancer-related fatigue. Cancer Nurs 2003;26:143-54.
  • 33. Gentile S, Delarozière JC, Favre F, Sambuc R, San Marco JL. Validation of the French 'multidimensional fatigue inventory' (MFI 20). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2003;12:58-64.
  • 34. Schneider RA. Reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) and the Rhoten Fatigue Scale among rural cancer outpatients. Cancer Nurs 1998;21:370-3.
  • 35. Hagelin CL, Wengström Y, Runesdotter S, Fürst CJ. The psychometric properties of the Swedish Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory MFI-20 in four different populations. Acta Oncol 2007;46:97-104.
  • 36. Elbers RG, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J, Kwakkel G. Reliability and structural validity of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012;18:532-6.
  • 37. Lin JM, Brimmer DJ, Maloney EM, Nyarko E, Belue R, Reeves WC. Further validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a US adult population sample. Popul Health Metr 2009;7:18.
  • 38. Baptista RL, Biasoli I, Scheliga A, Soares A, Brabo E, Morais JC, et al. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional fatigue inventory in Brazilian Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012;44:908-15.
  • 39. Schwarz R, Krauss O, Hinz A. Fatigue in the general population. Onkologie 2003;26:140-4.
  • 40. Oncü J, Başoğlu F, Kuran B. A comparison of impact of fatigue on cognitive, physical, and psychosocial status in patients with fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:3031-7.
  • 41. Chandel P, Sultan A, Khan KA, Choudhary V, Parganiha A. Validation of the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2015;23:2957-64.
  • 42. Buss T, Kruk A, Wiśniewski P, Modlinska A, Janiszewska J, Lichodziejewska-Niemierko M. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014;48:730-7.
  • 43. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, de Haes JC. Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1996;73:241-5.
APA TALMAC M, GÖRGEL M, kuran b, dökmeci azizi f (2020). The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. , 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
Chicago TALMAC MEHMET ALİ,GÖRGEL MEHMET AKİF,kuran banu,dökmeci azizi filiz The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. (2020): 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
MLA TALMAC MEHMET ALİ,GÖRGEL MEHMET AKİF,kuran banu,dökmeci azizi filiz The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. , 2020, ss.436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
AMA TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. . 2020; 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
Vancouver TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. . 2020; 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
IEEE TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f "The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia." , ss.436 - 443, 2020. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
ISNAD TALMAC, MEHMET ALİ vd. "The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia". (2020), 436-443. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
APA TALMAC M, GÖRGEL M, kuran b, dökmeci azizi f (2020). The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66(4), 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
Chicago TALMAC MEHMET ALİ,GÖRGEL MEHMET AKİF,kuran banu,dökmeci azizi filiz The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66, no.4 (2020): 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
MLA TALMAC MEHMET ALİ,GÖRGEL MEHMET AKİF,kuran banu,dökmeci azizi filiz The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol.66, no.4, 2020, ss.436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
AMA TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 66(4): 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
Vancouver TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 66(4): 436 - 443. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
IEEE TALMAC M,GÖRGEL M,kuran b,dökmeci azizi f "The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia." Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66, ss.436 - 443, 2020. 10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781
ISNAD TALMAC, MEHMET ALİ vd. "The reliability and validity of The Turkish version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 for the evaluation of different dimensions of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia". Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66/4 (2020), 436-443. https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2020.5781